Contribution of mobile sources to secondary formation of carbonyl compounds

References

• Appel, K. W., S. Napelenok, C. Hogrefe, G. Pouliot, K. M. Foley, S. J. Roselle, J. E. Pleim, J. Bash, H. O. T. Pye, N. Heath, et al. 2018. Overview and evaluation of the community multiscale air quality model (CMAQ) modeling system version 5.2. In Air Pollution Modeling and its Application XXV. ITM 2016. Springer Proceedings in Complexity, eds. C. Mensink and G. Kallos, Cham, Switzerland: Springer. Accessed May 23, 2019. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-57645-9_11.
   Google Scholar
• Appel, K. W., R. C. Gilliam, N. Davis, A. Zubrow, and S. C. Howard. 2011. Overview of the atmospheric model evaluation tool (AMET) v1.1 for evaluating meteorological and air quality models. Environ. Model. Software 26 (4):434–43. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bey, I., D. J. Jacob, R. M. Yantosca, J. A. Logan, B. D. Field, A. M. Fiore, Q. Li, H. Y. Liu, L. J. Mickley, and M. G. Schultz. 2001. Global modeling of tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology: Model description and evaluation. J. Geophys. Res. 106:23073. doi:10.1029/2001JD000807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• California Air Resources Board. 2014. EMFAC2014. Accessed May 23, 2019. https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/msei/categories.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Clements, A. L., Y. Jia, A. Denbleyker, E. McDonald-Buller, M. P. Fraser, D. T. Allen, D. R. Collins, E. Michel, J. Pudota, D. Sullivan, et al. 2009. Air pollutant concentrations near three Texas roadways, part II: Chemical characterization and transformation of pollutants. Atmos. Environ. 43:4523–34. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.06.044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, R., S. Phillips, M. Houyoux, P. Dolwick, R. Mason, C. Yanca, M. Zawacki, K. Davidson, H. Michaels, C. Harvey, et al. 2011. Air quality impacts of increased use of ethanol under the United States’ energy independence and security act. Atmos. Environ. 45:7714–24. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.08.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Smedt, I., T. Stavrakou, F. Hendrick, T. Danckaert, T. Vlemmix, G. Pinardi, N. Theys, C. Lerot, C. Gielen, C. Vigouroux, et al. 2015. Diurnal, seasonal and long-term variations of global formaldehyde columns inferred from combined OMI and GOME-2 observations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. 15:12241–300. doi:10.5194/acpd-15-12241-2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunker, A. M., B. Koo, and G. Yarwood. 2015. Source apportionment of the anthropogenic increment to ozone, formaldehyde, and nitrogen dioxide by the path-integral method in a 3D model. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49:6751–59. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b00467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedfeld, S., M. Fraser, K. Ensor, S. Tribble, D. Rehle, D. Leleux., and F. Tittel. 2002. Statistical analysis of primary and secondary atmospheric formaldehyde. Atmos. Environ 36 (30):4767–75. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00558-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health Effects Institute. 2010. Special report 17: Traffic-related air pollution: a critical review of the literature on emissions, exposure, and health effects. January. Accessed July 11, 2019. https://www.healtheffects.org/system/files/SR17Traffic%20Review.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Institute for the Environment - UNC Chapel Hill. 2015. SMOKE v3.6.5 user’s manual. Accessed May 23, 2019. https://www.cmascenter.org/smoke/documentation/3.6.5/html/
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N. B., K. Riedel, W. Allan, S. Wood, P. I. Palmer, K. Chance, and J. Notholt. 2009. Long-term tropospheric formaldehyde concentrations deduced from ground-based fourier transform solar infrared measurements. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9:7131–42. doi:10.5194/acp-9-7131-2009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knote, C., P. Tuccella, G. Curci, L. Emmons, J. Orlando, S. Madronich, R. Baro, P. Jimeenez-Guerrero, D. Luecken, C. Hogrefe, et al. 2015. Influence of the choice of gas-phase mechanism on predictions of key gaseous pollutants during AQMEII phase-2 intercomparison. Atmos. Environ. 115:553–68. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., H. E. Jeffries, and K. G. Sexton. 1999. Hydroxyl radical and ozone initiated photochemical reactions of 1,3-butadiene. Atmos. Environ. 33 (18):3005–22. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00078-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luecken, D. J., S. L. Napelenok, M. Strum, R. Scheffe, and S. Phillips. 2018. Sensitivity of ambient atmospheric formaldehyde and ozone to precursor species and source types across the United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52:4668–75. doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b05509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luecken, D. J., W. T. Hutzell, M. L. Strum, and D. J. Pouliot. 2012. Regional sources of atmospheric formaldehyde and acetaldehyde, and implications for atmospheric modeling. Atmos. Environ. 47 (2012):477–90. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millet, D. B., A. Guenther, D. Siegel, N. Nelson, H. Singh, J. De Gouw, C. Warneke, J. Williams, G. Eerdekens, V. Sinha, et al. 2010. Global atmospheric budget of acetaldehyde: 3-D model analysis and constraints from in-situ and satellite observations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10:3405–25. doi:10.5194/acp-10-3405-2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millet, D. B., D. J. Jacob, K. F. Boersma, T. Fu, T. P. Kurosu, K. Chance, and C. L. H. A. Guenther. 2009. Spatial distribution of isoprene emissions from North America derived from formaldehyde column measurements by the OMI satellite sensor. J. Geophys. Res. 113:D02307. doi:10.1029/2007JD008950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napelenok, S. L., D. S. Cohan, M. T. Odman, and S. Tonse. 2008. Extension and evaluation of sensitivity analysis capabilities in a photochemical model. Environ. Mod. Software 23:994–99. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otte, T. L., and J. E. Pleim. 2010. The Meteorology-Chemistry Interface Processor (MCIP) for the CMAQ modeling system: updates through MCIPv3.4.1. Geosci. Model Dev. 3:243–256. doi:10.1.1.617.7579.
   Google Scholar
• Skamarock, W. C., J. B. Klemp, J. Dudhia, D. O. Gill, D. M. Barker, M. G. Duda, X. Huang, W. Wang, and J. G. Powers. 2008. A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-475+STR.
   Google Scholar
• Tuazon, E. C., A. Alvarado, S. M. Aschmann, R. Atkinson, and J. Arey. 1999. Products of the gas-phase reactions of 1,3-butadiene with OH and NO3 radicals. Environ. Sci. Technol. 33 ((20)):3586–95. doi:10.1021/es990193u.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2010. Data quality evaluation guidelines for ambient air acrolein measurements. Accessed May 14, 2020. http://www.epa.gov/ttnamti1/files/ambient/airtox/20101217acroleindataqualityeval.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2015. https://www.epa.gov/moves/previous-moves-versions-and-documentation.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2018a. 2014 National air toxics assessment. Accessed May 21, 2019. https://www.epa.gov/national-air-toxics-assessment.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2018b. Technical support document: EPA’s 2014 national air toxics assessment. Office of air quality planning and standards, Research Triangle Park, NC, August. Accessed May 21, 2019. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2018-09/documents/2014_nata_technical_support_document.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2018c. 2014 National emissions inventory, version 2: Technical support document. Accessed May 23, 2019. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2018-07/documents/nei2014v2_tsd_05jul2018.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Urbanski, S. P., M. C. Reeves, R. E. Corley, R. P. Silverstein, and W. M. Hao. 2018. Contiguous United States wildland fire emission estimates during 2003–2015. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 10 (4):2241–74. doi:10.5194/essd-10-2241-2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarwood, G., J. Jung, G. Z. Whitten, G. Heo, J. Mellberg, and M. Estes. 2010a. Updates to the carbon bond mechanism for version 6 (CB6). Presented at 9th Annual CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC, October 11-13. Accessed May 23, 2019. https://www.cmascenter.org/conference/2010/abstracts/emery_updates_carbon_2010.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Yarwood, G., G. Z. Whitten, J. Jung, G. Heo, and D. T. Allen. 2010b. Development, evaluation and testing of version 6 of the carbon bond chemical mechanism (CB6). Prepared by Environ Corp. for the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. Accessed May 13, 2019. https://www.tceq.texas.gov/assets/public/implementation/air/am/contracts/reports/pm/5820784005FY1026-20100922-environ-cb6.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zawacki, M., K. Baker, S. Phillips, K. Davidson, and P. Wolfe. 2018. Mobile source contributions to ambient ozone and particulate matter in 2025. Atmos. Environ. 188:129–41. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., J. Li, Q. Ying, B. B. Guven, and E. P. Olaguer. 2013. Source apportionment of formaldehyde during TexAQS 2006 using a source-oriented chemical transport model. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 118:1525–35. doi:10.1002/jgrd.50197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar