Operational bias correction for PM_2.5 using the AIRPACT air quality forecast system in the Pacific Northwest

References

• Antonopoulos, S., J. Montpetit, V. Fortin, and G. Roy. 2014. Improving O3, PM2.5, and NO2 surface fields by optimally interpolating updatable MOS forecast, Chapter 40. In Air pollution modeling and its application XXII, ed. D. G. Steyn, Builtjes P., Timmermans R., 233–237. Dordrecht: NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C, Springer Science.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J., J. Vaughan, J. Avise, S. O’Neill, and B. Lamb. 2008. Enhancement and evaluation of the AIRPACT ozone and PM2.5 forecast system for the Pacific Northwest. J. Geophys. Res. 113:D14305. doi:10.1029/2007JD009554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crooks, J. L., and H. Ozkaynak. 2014. Simultaneous statistical bias correction of multiple PM2.5 species from a regional photochemical grid model. Atmos. Environ. 95:126–41. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.06.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deligiorgi, D., and K. Philippopoulos. 2011. Spatial interpolation methodologies in urban air pollution modeling: Application for the greater area of metropolitan Athens, Greece. In Advanced air pollution, ed. F. Nejadkoorki, 341–362. IntechOpen. doi:10.5772/17734.
   Google Scholar
• Delle Monache, L., T. Nipen, X. X. Deng, Y. M. Zhou, and R. Stull. 2006. Ozone ensemble forecasts: 2. A Kalman filter predictor bias correction. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 111 (D5):D05308. doi:10.1029/2005JD006311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djalalova, I., L. D. Monache, and J. Wilczak. 2015. PM2.5 analog forecast and Kalman filter post-processing for the community multiscale air quality (CMAQ) model. Atmos. Environ. 119:431–42. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.05.057.
   Google Scholar
• Guenther, A. B., X. Jiang, C. L. Heald, T. Sakulyanontvittaya, T. Duhl, L. K. Emmons, and X. Wang. 2012. The model of emissions of gases and aerosols from nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): An extended and updated framework for modeling biogenic emissions. Geosci. Model Dev. 5 (6):1471–92. doi:10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herron-Thorpe, F. L., G. H. Mount, L. K. Emmons, B. K. Lamb, D. A. Jaffe, N. L. Wigder, S. H. Chung, R. Zhang, M. D. Woelfle, and J. K. Vaughan. 2014. Air quality simulations of wildfires in the Pacific Northwest evaluated with surface and satellite observations during the summers of 2007 and 2008. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14 (22):12533–51. doi:10.5194/acp-14-12533-2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, J. J., M. J. Wilczak, I. Djalalova, I. Stajner, P. Shafran, D. Allured, P. Lee, L. Pan, D. Tong, H. C. Huang, et al. 2017. Improving NOAA NAQFC PM_2.5 predictions with a bias correction approach. Weather and Forecasting. doi:10.1175/WAF-D-16-0118.1.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, D., R. Mathur, and S. T. Rao. 2010a. Real-time bias-adjusted O3 and PM2.5 air quality index forecasts and their performance evaluations over the continental united states. Atmos. Environ. 44 (18):2203–12. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.03.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, D., R. Mathur, and S. T. Rao. 2010b. Assessment of bias-adjusted PM2.5 air quality forecasts over the continental United States during 2007. Geosci. Model Dev. 3 (1):309–20. doi:10.5194/gmd-3-309-2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, D., R. Mathur, S. T. Rao, and S. Yu. 2008. Bias adjustment techniques for improving ozone air quality forecasts. J. Geophys. Res. 113 (D23):D23308. doi:10.1029/2008JD010151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin, N. K., S. M. O’Neill, R. Solomon, S. Raffuse, T. Strand, D. C. Sullivan, C. Krull, M. Rorig, J. Peterson, and S. A. Ferguson. 2009. The bluesky smoke modeling framework. JOUR. Int. J. Wildland Fire 18 (8):906. doi:10.1071/WF07086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyu, B., Y. Zhang, and Y. Hu. 2017. Improving PM2.5 air quality model forecasts in China using a bias-correction framework. Atmosphere 8 (12):147–62. doi:10.3390/atmos8080147.
   Google Scholar
• Mass, C.F., M. Albright, D. Ovens, R. Steed, E. Grimit, T. Eckel, B. Lamb, J. Vaughan, K. Westrick, P. Storck, B. Coleman, C. Hill, N. Maykut, M. Gilroy, S. Ferguson, J. Yetter, J. M. Sierchio, C. Bowman, D. Stender, R. Wilson, and W. Brown. 2003. Regional environmental prediction over the Pacific Northwest, Bulletin Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 84, 1353–1366.
   Google Scholar
• Mavko, M., and R. Morris. 2013. DEASCO3 project updates to the fire plume rise methodology to model smoke dispersion. Denver, CO: Technical Memorandum, Air Sciences, Inc. https://deasco3.wraptools.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Monteiro, A., I. Ribeiro, O. Tchepel, E. Sa, J. Ferreira, A. Carvalho, V. Martins, A. Strunk, S. Galmarini, H. Elbern, et al. 2013. Bias correction techniques to improve air quality ensemble predictions: Focus on O3 and PM over Portugal. Environ. Model Asses. doi:10.1007/s10666-013-9358-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munson, J. A., 2019. Decadal evaluation of the AIRPACT regional air. quality forecast system in the Pacific Northwest from 2009-2018. M.S. thesis, Washington State University.
   Google Scholar
• Raffuse, S. M., D. A. Pryden, D. C. Sullivan, N. K. Larkin, T. Strand, and R. Solomon. 2009. SMARTFIRE algorithm description. JOUR. US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, by Sonoma Technology, Inc., Petaluma, CA, and the US Forest Service, AirFire Team, Pacific Northwest Research Laboratory, Seattle,WA STI-905517-3719.
   Google Scholar
• Silibello, C., A. D’Allura, S. Finardi, A. Bolignano, and R. Sozzi. 2015. Application of bias adjustment techniques to improve air quality forecasts. Atmos Pollut. Research 6 (6):928–38. doi:10.1016/j.apr.2015.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan, J., B. Lamb, R. Wilson, C. Bowman, C. Figueroa-Kaminsky, S. Otterson, M. Boyer, C. Mass, M. Albright, J. Koenitg, et al. 2004. A numerical daily air-quality forecast system for the Pacific Northwest. Bulletin Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 85:549–61. doi:10.1175/BAMS-85-4-549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, D. W., L. Yuan, and S. A. Perlin. 2004. Comparison of spatial interpolation methods for the estimation of air quality data. J. Expo. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 14 (5):404–15. doi:10.1038/sj.jea.7500338.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar