An alternative generic subslab soil gas-to-indoor air attenuation factor for application in commercial, industrial, and other nonresidential settings

References

• Axiall. 2016. Product stewardship summary: VersaTRANS solvent. 2 ed. Altlanta, GA. https://www.westlake.com/sites/default/files/VersaTRANS%20Summary%20Ed1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Doucette, W. J., A. J. Hall, and K. A. Gorder. 2010. Emissions of 1,2-dichloroethane from holiday decorations as a source of indoor air contamination. GWMR 30 (1):65–71.
   Google Scholar
• EPA. 2004. Cleaning up the nation’s waste sites: Markets and technology trends. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response Publication EPA 542-R-04-015. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• EPA. 2011a. Background indoor air concentrations of volatile organic compounds in North American residences (1990–2005): A compilation of statistics for assessing vapor intrusion. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response Publication EPA 530-R-10-001. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• EPA. 2011b. Exposure factors handbook: 2011 edition. Publication EPA/600/R-09/052F. See Table 16–108. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• EPA. 2012. EPA’s vapor intrusion database: Evaluation and characterization of attenuation factors for chlorinated volatile organic compounds and residential buildings. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response Publication EPA 530-R-10-002. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• EPA. 2015a. OSWER technical guide for assessing and mitigating the vapor intrusion pathway from subsurface vapor sources to indoor air. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response Publication 9200. 2–154. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• EPA. 2015b. Technical guide for addressing petroleum vapor intrusion at leaking underground storage tank sites. Office of Underground Storage Tanks Publication EPA 510-R-15-001. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• EPA. 2020a. Regional screening levels (RSLs) – user’s guide. Accessed February, 2021. https://www.epa.gov/risk/regional-screening-levels-rsls-users-guide
   Google Scholar
• EPA. 2020b. Building assessment survey and evaluation study. Accessed February, 2021. https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/building-assessment-survey-and-evaluation-study
   Google Scholar
• EPA. Vapor intrusion screening levels (VISL) calculator. Accessed February, 2021. https://epa-visl.ornl.gov/cgi-bin/visl_search
   Google Scholar
• EPA Region 7. 2017. Revised vapor intrusion risk management decision matrix. Memorandum to Air and Waste Management Division and Superfund Division Managers. Lenexa, KS.
   Google Scholar
• ICF Consulting. 2016. The U.S. Solvent cleaning industry and the transition to non ozone depleting substances, Prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington DC. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-11/documents/epasolventmarketreport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Indiana Department of Environmental Management. 2012. Remediation closure guide. Office of Land Quality. Indianapolis, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council. 2014. Petroleum vapor intrusion: Fundamentals of screening, investigation, and management. Petroleum Vapor Intrusion Team. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, P. C., and R. A. Ettinger. 1991. Heuristic model for predicting the intrusion rate of contaminant vapors into buildings. Environ. Sci. Technol 25:1445–52. doi:10.1021/es00020a013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loh, M. M., E. A. Houseman, G. M. Gray, J. I. Levy, J. D. Spengler, and D. H. Bennett. 2006. Measured concentrations of VOCs in several non-residential microenvironments in the United States. Environ. Sci. Technol 40 (22):6903–11. doi:10.1021/es060197g.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maryland Department of the Environment. 2019. Technical guidelines for vapor intrusion. Land Restoration Program. Baltimore, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy. 2013. Guidance for the vapor intrusion pathway. Remediation and Redevelopment Division. (with 2017 and 2020 updates). Lansing, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Montana Department of Environmental Quality. 2012. Typical indoor air concentrations of volatile organic compounds in non-smoking Montana residences not impacted by vapor intrusion. Helena, MT.
   Google Scholar
• New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services. 2006. Vapor intrusion guidance. Waste Management Division. (with 2011 and 2013 updates). Concord, NH.
   Google Scholar
• New York State Department of Health. 2006a. Final guidance for evaluating soil vapor intrusion in the state of New York. Center for Environmental Health, Bureau of Environmental Exposure Investigation. Troy, NY.
   Google Scholar
• New York State Department of Health. 2006b. Final guidance for evaluating soil vapor intrusion in the state of New York. Center for Environmental Health, Bureau of Environmental Exposure Investigation. See Appendix C, Section C.2 and Table C2. Troy, NY.
   Google Scholar
• North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality. 2014. Division of Waste Management (DWM) vapor intrusion screening levels guidance document. Raleigh, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. 2010. Guidance for assessing and remediating vapor intrusion in buildings. Environmental Cleanup Program. Portland, OR.
   Google Scholar
• Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. 2019. Land recycling program technical guidance manual. Section IV: Vapor Intrusion. Harrisburg, PA.
   Google Scholar
• The R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2021. The R project for statistical computing. Accessed February, 2021. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rago, R. J. 2015. Background indoor air levels of volatile organic compounds and air phase petroleum hydrocarbons in office buildings and schools. Presented at the Environmental Business Council of New England Program on Vapor Intrusion, Woburn, MA, June.
   Google Scholar
• Simms, J., C. Lutes, and L. Lund. 2019. Distinguishing indoor source effects from preferential pathway and conventional vapor intrusion. Presented at the 29th Annual International Conference on Soil, Water, Energy, and Air, Association for Environmental Health and Sciences, San Diego, CA, March.
   Google Scholar
• Venable, P., T. Chaundhry, D. Caldwell, I. Rivera-Duarte, C. Lutes, L. Lund, and K. Hallberg. 2015. A quantitative decision framework for assessing navy vapor intrusion sites. Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) Engineering and Expeditionary Warfare Center (EXWC) Report TR-NAVFAC-EXWC-EV-1603. Port Hueneme, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. 2016. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-3-319-24277-4
   Google Scholar
• Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. 2018. Addressing vapor intrusion at remediation & redevelopment sites in Wisconsin, Wis. Stat. ch. 292; Wis. Admin. Code ch. NR 700. Remediation and Redevelopment Program Publication RR-800.
   Google Scholar
• Yao, Y., R. Shen, K. G. Pennell, and E. M. Suuberg. 2013. Examination of the U.S. EPA’s vapor intrusion database based on models. Environ. Sci. Technol 47 (3):1425–33. doi:10.1021/es304546f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar