References
- Cimorelli, A. J., S. G. Perry, A. Venkatram, J. C. Weil, R. J. Paine, R. B. Wilson, R. F. Lee, W. D. Peters, and R. W. Brode. 2005. AERMOD: A dispersion model for industrial source applications. Part I: General model formulation and boundary layer characterization. J. Appl. Meteorol 44 (5):682–93. doi:10.1175/JAM2227.1.
- Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of Victoria. 2013. Guidance notes for using the regulatory air pollution model AERMOD in Victoria. October 2013. Publication 1551. EPA Victoria.
- Freedman, F. 2011. METR 130: Lecture 4. Spring Semester 2011. Last Accessed October 18, 2021. https://www.sjsu.edu/people/frank.freedman/courses/metr130/s1/Met130_Spring11_Lect4.pdf
- Hanna, S. R., and J. C. Chang. 1992. Boundary-layer parameterizations for applied dispersion modeling over urban areas. J. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 58 (3):229–59. doi:10.1007/BF02033826.
- Lyons, R., H. A. Panofsky, and S. Wollaston. 1964. The critical Richardson number and its implications for forecast problems. J. Appl. Meteorol 3 (2):136–42. doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1964)003<0136:TCRNAI>2.0.CO;2.
- Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP), 2020. Adopting updated air dispersion models under the local air quality regulation (O. Reg 419/05): Adopting AERMOD/AERMOD 19191 and ASHRAE 2019. Last Accessed April 14, 2022. https://ero.ontario.ca/notice/019-1229
- Moore, G. E., L. B. Milich, and M. K. Liu. 1988. Plume behaviors observed using lidar and SF6 tracer at a flat and hilly site. Atmos. Environ 22 (8):1673–88. . doi:10.1016/0004-6981(88)90396-4.
- Strimaitis, D., E. Insley, M. E. Korc, and F. W. Lurmann. 1993. User’s guide for the model evaluation methodology (MEM) system for comparing model performance. Final report prepared for the U.S. In Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, by Sonoma Technology, STI-93261-1392-FR, December, Santa Rosa, CA: Inc.
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1992. Protocol for determining the best performing model. EPA-454/R-92-025, September. Last Accessed October 7, 2021. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-10/documents/model_eval_protocol.pdf
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2003. Comparison of regulatory design concentrations. AERMOD vs ISCST3, CTDMPLUS, ISC-PRIME. EPA-454/R-03-002, June. Last Accessed October 7, 2021. https://gaftp.epa.gov/Air/aqmg/SCRAM/models/preferred/aermod/compar.pdf
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2015. Proposed updates to AERMOD system. Presentation at 11th Conference on Air Quality Modeling, Research Triangle Park, Raleigh, NC, August. https://newftp.epa.gov/Air/aqmg/SCRAM/conferences/2015_11th_Conference_On_Air_Quality_Modeling/Presentations/1-5_Proposed_Updates_AERMOD_System.pdf
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2021a. AERMOD evaluation databases. Last Accessed November 22, 2021a. https://gaftp.epa.gov/Air/aqmg/SCRAM/models/preferred/aermod/eval_databases/
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2021b. AERMOD model formulation and evaluation. EPA-454/B-21-003, April. Last Accessed October 7, 2021b. https://gaftp.epa.gov/Air/aqmg/SCRAM/models/preferred/aermod/aermod_mfed.pdf
- Warren, C. J., R. Paine, and J. Connors. Evaluation of AERMOD SO2 predictions for a research-grade field experiment. Guideline on air quality models: Planning ahead. Air and Waste Management Association Specialty Conference, Durham, NC, March 2019.
- Weil, J. C. 2020. New dispersion model for highly-buoyant plumes in the convective boundary layer. Modeling report to the Western Australia department of environmental conservation. January 2020.
- Weil, J. C., L. A. Corio, and R. P. Brower. 1997. A PDF dispersion model for buoyant plumes in the convective boundary layer. J. Appl. Meteorol 36 (8):982–1003. doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1997)036<0982:APDMFB>2.0.CO;2.