Evolution of community residents’ waste classification behavior based on multi-agent simulation

References

• Abdelradi, F. 2018. Food waste behaviour at the household level: A conceptual framework. Waste Manage. 71:485–493. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2017.10.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babaei, A. A., N. Alavi, G. Goudarzi, P. Teymouri, K. Ahmadi, and M. Rafiee. 2015. Household recycling knowledge, attitudes and practices towards solid waste management. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 102:94–100. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.06.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camerer, C. F., and E. Fehr. 2006. When does “Economic Man” dominate social behavior? Science 311 (5757):47–52. doi:10.1126/science.1110600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro, B. M., Y. D. A. D. Melo, N. F. D. Santos, B. Aldc, R. C. Noya, and R. M. Salles. 2021. Multi-agent simulation model for the evaluation of COVID-19 transmission[J]. Comput. Biol. Med. 136:104645. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L. Q., and M. Gao. 2021. Novel information interaction rule for municipal household waste classification behavior based on an evolving scale-free network. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 168 (12):105445. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105445.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, F., X. X. Li, J. Ma, Y. J. Yang, and G. J. Liu. 2018. An exploration of the impacts of compulsory source-separated policy in improving household solid waste-sorting in pilot megacities, China: A case study of Nanjing. Sustainability 10 (5):1327–1327. doi:10.3390/su10051327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cong, X. H., L. Wang, L. Ma, and M. Skibnewski. 2021. Exploring critical influencing factors for the site selection failure of waste-to-energy projects in China caused by the “not in my back yard” effect. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 28 (6):1561–1592. doi:10.1108/ECAM-12-2019-0709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, T. N., X. B. Su, and Y. J. Zhang. 2021. Study on compulsory classification management and behavior synergy of municipal solid waste. Sustainability 13 (11):6265. doi:10.3390/su13116265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domina, T., and K. Koch. 2022. Convenience and frequency of recycling. Environ. Behav. 34 (2):216–38. doi:10.1177/0013916502034002004.
   Google Scholar
• Ehsan, H. 2021. Multi-agent machine learning in self-organizing systems. Inf. Sci. 581:194–214. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2021.09.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, W., D. Liu, and C. Wang. 2021. Energy recovery potential from incineration using municipal solid waste based on multi-scenario analysis in Beijing. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28 (21):27119–27131. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-12478-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, S., and L. Chen. 2022. Why is China struggling with waste classification? A stakeholder theory perspective. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 183:106312. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, H., X. Nie, T. Shu, X. Li, and B. Bai. 2021. Global warming potential of typical rural crisis waste treatment modes in China: A case study in Ankang. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28 (34):47149–47161. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-13983-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, J. X., and B. Q. Lin. 2019. Assessment of waste incineration power with considerations of subsidies and emissions in China. Energy Policy 126 (1):190–199. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.11.025.
   Google Scholar
• Ibranhim, M. H., and S. H. Law. 2014. Social capital and Co2 emission—output relations: A panel analysis. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 29 (7):528–534. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.076.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, P., G. H. Song, M. Xu, R. Miller Travis, H. K. Wang, H. Zhang, G. Liu, Y. Zhou, J. S. Ren, R. Y. Zhong, et al. 2021. Low-carbon pathways for the booming express delivery sector in China. Nat. Commun. 12 (1):450. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20738-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaza, S., L. Yao, P. Bhada-Tata, and F. Van Woerden. 2018. What a waste 2.0: A global snapshot of solid waste management to 2050. World Bank Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Li, K. L. 2021. Analysis and suggestions on classification and recycling of urban domestic waste. IOP Conf. Ser. 647 (1):012177. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/647/1/012177.
   Google Scholar
• Li, X. R., F. Bi, Z. D. Han, Y. Qin, H. S. Wang, and W. X. Wu. 2019. Garbage source classification performance, impact factor, and management strategy in rural areas of China: A case study in Hangzhou. Waste Manage. 89:313–321. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2019.04.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z., Q. Deng, J. Bai, Y. Li, Y. Wang, N. Liu, and Y. Gong. 2022. Management system for engineering and decoration waste: An exploratory study in Shenzhen. J. Environ. Manage. 314:115085. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, H. M., and R. Sidortsov. 2019. Sorting out a problem: A co-production approach to household waste management in Shanghai, China. Waste Manage. 95:271–277. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2019.06.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lü, X., D. Wu, X. Sue, X. Wang, and J. Cheng. 2018. From rational man to behavioral man: The behavioral turn of public policy. Adv. Psychol. Sci. 26 (12):2249. doi:10.3724/sp.j.1042.2018.02249.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, Y., M. A. Koondhar, S. K. Liu, H. L. Wang, and R. Kong. 2020. Perceived value influencing the household waste sorting behaviors in rural China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17 (17):6093. doi:10.3390/ijerph17176093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maria, J., D. A. Combariza Bayona, and K. Sripada. 2021. Mercury exposure among E-waste recycling workers in Colombia: Perceptions of safety, risk, and access to health information. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18 (17):9295. doi:10.3390/ijerph18179295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng, X. Y., X. C. Tan, Y. Wang, Z. G. Wen, Y. Tao, and Y. Qian. 2019. Investigation on decision-making mechanism of residents’ household solid waste classification and recycling behaviors. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 140:224–234. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.09.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miafodzyeva, S., and N. Brandt. 2013. Recycling behaviour among householders: Synthesizing determinants via a meta-analysis. Waste Biomass Valorization 4 (2):221–235. doi:10.1007/s12649-012-9144-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Na, H. S., and A. Banerjee. 2019. Agent-based discrete-event simulation model for no-notice natural disaster evacuation planning. Comput. Ind. Eng. 129:44–55. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2019.01.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. T. P., D. J. Zhu, and N. P. Le. 2015. Factors influencing waste separation intention of residential households in a developing country: Evidence from Hanoi. Vietnam Habitat Int. 48 (8):169–76. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.03.013.
   Google Scholar
• Nie, Y. Y., Y. J. Wu, J. B. Zhao, J. Zha, X. J. Chen, T. Maraseni, and G. R. Qian. 2018. Is the finer the better for municipal solid waste (MSW) classification in view of recyclable constituents? A comprehensive social, economic and environmental analysis. Waste Manage. 79:472–480. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.08.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J., and S. Ha. 2014. Understanding consumer recycling behavior: Combining the theory of planned behavior and the norm activation model. Fam. Consum. Sci. Res. J. 42 (3):278–291. doi:10.1111/fcsr.12061.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, H., N. Shen, H. Q. Ying, and Q. W. Wang. 2021. Factor analysis and policy simulation of domestic waste classification behavior based on a multiagent study—Taking Shanghai’s garbage classification as an example. Environ. Impact. Assess. Rev. 89:106598. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiao, M. M., and S. Y. Hua. 2021. On the problems and countermeasures of source classification management of municipal solid waste by local governments. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 687 (1):012168. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/687/1/012168.
   Google Scholar
• Rafia, A., H. Keisuke, and H. K. Kiyo. 2009. Willingness to pay for waste management improvement in Dhaka city, Bangladesh. J. Environ. Manage. 90 (1):492–503. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.12.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rano, P. 2020. Digital economy: Features and development trends. ACADEMICIA 10 (2):197–202. doi:10.5958/2249-7137.2020.00032.4.
   Google Scholar
• Research Group of the Development Research Center of the State Council. 2019. Survey on China’s People’s Livelihood. Beijing: China Development Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shamshad, K., A. Raheel, R. S. Turab, A. B. Nazir, and I. Muhammad. 2021. Technologies for municipal solid waste management: Current status, challenges, and future perspectives. Chemosphere 288 (P1):132403. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132403.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sukholthaman, P., and A. Sharp. 2016. A system dynamics model to evaluate effects of source separation of municipal solid waste management: A case of Bangkok, Thailand. Waste Manage. 52:50–61. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2016.03.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, H., L. L. Hu, W. C. Shou, and J. Wang. 2021. Self-organized crowd dynamics: Research on earthquake emergency response patterns of drill-trained individuals based on GIS and multi-agent systems methodology[J]. Sensors 21 (4):1353. doi:10.3390/s21041353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan, M., T. Qu, M. N. Huang, L. H. Li, and G. Q. Huang. 2020. Cloud-based product-service systems platform for household solid waste classification management. IET Collab. Intell. Manuf. 2 (2):66–73. doi:10.1049/iet-cim.2019.0062.
   Google Scholar
• Wan, C., G. Q. Shen, and A. Yu. 2015. Key determinants of willingness to support policy measures on recycling: A case study in Hong Kong. Environ. Sci. Policy 54:409–418. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.06.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M. X., Z. Li, L. Chen, P. Liu, R. Zhang, W. Liu, Y. Ma, Y. J. Wang, and X. Li. 2020. Energy conservation and carbon reduction potential for solid waste in China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res 27 (33):42158–42167. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-10571-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W. J., and X. Y. You. 2020. Benefits analysis of classification of municipal solid waste based on system dynamics. J. Clean. Prod. 279 (5–8):123686. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123686.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, X. X., L. Shen, Z. Liu, L. Luo, and Y. Chen. 2020. Comparative analysis on the evolution of ecological carrying capacity between provinces during urbanization process in China. Ecol. Indic. 112:106179. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, X. F., Q. M. Luo, H. L. Hu, N. Wang, Y. Chen, J. Jin, Y. L. Hao, G. Y. Xu, F. M. Li, and W. J. Fang. 2014. Comparison research on waste classification between China and the EU, Japan, and the USA. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manage. 16 (2):321–334. doi:10.1007/s10163-013-0190-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, M., P. Agamuthu, and J. Waluyo. 2020. Challenges for sustainable development of waste to energy in developing countries. Waste Manag. Res. 38 (3):229–231. doi:10.1177/0734242X20903564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Q., L. He, X. X. Liu, and M. Y. Cheng. 2018. Bayesian-based conflict conversion path discovery for waste management policy implementation in China. Int. J. Conflict Manage. 29 (3):347–375. doi:10.1108/IJCMA-09-2017-0109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Q., J. M. Wang, X. X. Liu, and J. J. Xia. 2020b. MAS-based interaction simulation within asymmetric information on emergency management of urban rainstorm disaster. Complexity 2020 (2):1–13. doi:10.1155/2020/1759370.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, B. X., C. Zhang, S. Y. Qi, Y. X. Luo, Y. F. Luo, and Y. D. Wang (2020a) Evaluation model of residents’ waste classification participation degree based on investigation in Changzhi city. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 450:012062. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/450/1/012062.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Q., C. Zuo, X. X. Liu, Z. C. Yang, and H. Zhou. 2020c. Risk response for municipal solid waste crisis using ontology-based reasoning. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17 (9):3312. doi:10.3390/ijerph17093312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, S. L., D. Y. Hu, T. Lin, W. Li, R. Zhao, H. W. Yang, Y. B. Pei, and L. Jiang. 2021. Determinants affecting residents’ waste classification intention and behavior: A study based on TPB and A-B-C methodology. J. Environ. Manage. 290:112591. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, D. L., G. Q. Huang, X. L. Yin, and Q. H. Gong. 2015. Residents’ waste separation behaviors at the source: Using SEM with the theory of planned behavior in Guangzhou, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 12 (8):9475–9491. doi:10.3390/ijerph120809475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, B., K. H. Lai, B. Wang, and Z. H. Wang. 2018. From intention to action: How do personal attitudes, facilities accessibility, and government stimulus matter for household waste sorting? J. Environ. Manage. 233:447–458. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.12.059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. P., and Z. H. Zhang. 2016. Source classification of municipal domestic waste: The dilemma of collective action of residents and its overcoming. Wuhan Univ. J. (Philos. Social Sci.) 69 (6):50–56. In Chinese. doi:10.14086/j.cnki.wujss.2016.06.005.
   Google Scholar