Hazardous waste management system for Thailand’s local administrative organization via route and location selection

References

• Adeleke, O. J., and D. O. Olukanni. 2020. Facility location problems: Models, techniques, and applications in waste management. Recycling 5 (10):1–20. doi:10.3390/recycling5020010.
   Google Scholar
• Adeleke, O. J., D. O. Olukanni, and M. O. Olusanya. 2019. An improved location model for the collection of sorted solid waste in densely populated urban centres. In Computational statistics and mathematical modeling methods in intelligent systems. CoMeSySo 2019, advances in intelligent systems and computing, ed. R. Silhavy, P. Silhavy, and Z. Prokopova, vol. 1047, 125–35. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Alenezy, E. J., and R. F. Khalaf. 2013. Implementing lagrangean decomposition technique to acquire an adequate lower bound on the facility location problem solution. Appl. Math. 4 (8):1168–72. doi:10.4236/am.2013.48156.
   Google Scholar
• Alumur, S., and B. Y. Kara. 2007. A new model for the hazardous waste location-routing problem. Comput. Oper. Res. 34 (5):1406–23. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2005.06.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araee, M., and B. Aghamohammadi. 2020. Designing a multi-objective model for a hazardous waste routing problem considering flexibility of routes and social effects. J. Ind. Prod. Eng. 37 (1):33–45. doi:10.1080/21681015.2020.1727970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asefi, H., S. Lim, M. Maghrebi, and S. Shahparvari. 2019. Mathematical modelling and heuristic approaches to the location-routing problem of a cost-effective integrated solid waste management. Ann. Oper. Res. 273 (1–2):75–110. doi:10.1007/s10479-018-2912-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atthirawong, W., and P. Luangpaiboon. 2022. Determination of storage area and hub via the enhanced elevator kinematics optimization method. J. Ind. Prod. Eng. 39 (1):30–41. doi:10.1080/21681015.2021.1955309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badran, M., and S. El-Haggar. 2006. Optimization of municipal solid waste management in port said-Egypt. Waste Manage. 26 (5):534–45. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2005.05.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, O., J. Milner, and H. Naseraldin. 2011. Facility location: A robust optimization approach. Prod. Oper. Manage. 20 (5):772–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berglund, P. G., and C. Kwon. 2014. Robust facility location problem for hazardous waste transportation. Network Spatial Econ. 14 (1):91–116. doi:10.1007/s11067-013-9208-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, and E. L. Rhodes. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2 (6):429–44. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Current, J., M. S. Daskin, and D. Schilling. 2002. Discrete network location models. In Facility location: Applications and theory, Z. Drezner and H. W. Hamacher., ed., ch. 3, 81–118. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Current, J., S. Ratick, and C. ReVelle. 1997. Dynamic facility location when the total number of facilities is uncertain: A decision analysis approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 110 (3):597–609. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00303-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eiselt, H. A. 2007. Locating landfills—Optimization vs. reality. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 179 (3):1040–49. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.11.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eiselt, H. A., and V. Marianov. 2014. A bi-objective model for the location of landfills for municipal solid waste. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 235 (1):187–94. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2013.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erkut, E., A. Karagiannidis, G. Perkoulidis, and S. A. Tjandra. 2008. A multicriteria facility location model for municipal solid waste management in North Greece. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 187 (3):1402–21. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.09.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farahani, R. Z., and M. Hekmatfar. 2009. Facility location concepts, models, algorithms and case studies. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Farahani, R. Z., M. SteadieSeifi, and N. Asgari. 2010. Multiple criteria facility location problems: A survey. Appl. Math. Model. 34 (7):1689–709. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2009.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazzo, L., F. Minichilli, M. Santoro, A. Ceccarini, M. DellaSeta, F. Bianchi, P. Comba, and M. Martuzzi. 2017. Hazardous waste and health impact: A systematic review of the scientific literature. Environ. Health 16 (1):107. doi:10.1186/s12940-017-0311-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feng, J. 2021. Application of a bilevel programming model in disposal site selection for hazardous waste. Environ. Eng. Sci. 38 (8):789–801. doi:10.1089/ees.2020.0375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorucci, P., R. Minciardi, M. Robba, and R. Sacile. 2003. Solid waste management in urban areas: Development and application of a decision support system. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 37 (4):301–28. doi:10.1016/S0921-3449(02)00076-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, R. L., L. F. McGinnis, and J. A. White. 1992. Facility layout and layout: An analytical approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Galante, G., G. Aiello, M. Enea, and E. Panascia. 2010. A multi-objective approach to solid waste management. Waste Manage. 30 (8–9):1720–28. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2010.01.039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardziejczyk, W., and P. Zabicki. 2017. Normalization and variant assessment methods in selection of road alignment variants–case study. J. Civil Eng. Manage. 23 (4):510–23. doi:10.3846/13923730.2016.1210223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghezavati, V., and S. Morakabatchian. 2015. Application of a fuzzy service level constraint for solving a multi-objective location-routing problem for the industrial hazardous wastes. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 28 (5):2003–13. doi:10.3233/IFS-141341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghiani, G., D. Laganà, E. Manni, R. Musmanno, and D. Vigo. 2014. Operations research in solid waste management: A survey of strategic and tactical issues. Comput. Oper. Res. 44 (4):22–32. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2013.10.006.
   Google Scholar
• Ghiani, G., D. Laganà, E. Manni, and C. Triki. 2012. Capacitated location of collection sites in an urban waste management system. Waste Manage. 32 (7):1291–96. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2012.02.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giles, P. K., and T. P. Galvin. 1996. Center of gravity: Determination, analysis, and application. Carlisle Barracks, PA: U.S. Army War College, Center for Strategic Leadership.
   Google Scholar
• Gkoulias, K., G. Palantzas, and D. Nalmpantis. 2021. Development of an on-spot bio-waste screening methodology with vehicle selection using multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA): Implementation in the municipality of Chalkis, Greece. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 1278:780–89.
   Google Scholar
• He, L., and Z. Xie. 2022. Optimization of urban shelter locations using bi-level multi-objective location-allocation model. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 19 (7): article no. 4401. doi:10.3390/ijerph19074401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homayouni, Z., and M. S. Pishvaee. 2020. A bi-objective robust optimization model for hazardous hospital waste collection and disposal network design problem. J. Maternal Cycl. Waste Manage. 22 (6):1965–84. doi:10.1007/s10163-020-01081-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y., X. Zhang, Y. Rong, and Z. Zhang. 2014. A multimodal location and routing model for hazardous materials transportation based on multi-commodity flow model. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 138:791–99. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.262.
   Google Scholar
• Koo, J. K., H. S. Shin, and H. C. Yoo. 1991. Multi-objective siting planning for a regional hazardous waste treatment center. Waste Manage. Res. 9 (3):205–18. doi:10.1177/0734242X9100900128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koohathongsumrit, N., and P. Luangpaiboon. 2020. Multi-objective risk assessment management via zero-one desirability programming model: Thailand-Cambodia beverage logistics solutions. In ACM international conference proceeding series, 144–48. Tokyo, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Krajewski, L. J., L. P. Ritzman, and M. K. Malhotra. 2007. Operations management, processes, and value chains. 8th ed. New Delhi: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Laurent, A., I. Bakas, J. Clavreul, A. Bernstad, M. Niero, E. Gentil, M. Z. Hauschild, and T. H. Christensen. 2014. Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems–part I: Lessons learned and perspectives. Waste Manage. 34 (3):573–88. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2013.10.045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L., S. Wang, Y. T. Lin, W. T. Liu, and T. Chi. 2015. A covering model application on Chinese industrial hazardous waste management based on an integer program method. Ecol. Indic. 51:237–43. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luangpaiboon, P. 2015. Evolutionary elements on composite ascent algorithm for multiple response surface optimisation. J. Intell. Manuf. 26 (3):539–52. doi:10.1007/s10845-013-0813-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, C., W. Hao, R. He, and B. Moghimi. 2018. A multiobjective route robust optimization model and algorithm for hazmat transportation. Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2018:1–12. Article No. 2916391. doi:10.1155/2018/2916391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkhofer, M. L., and R. L. Keeney. 1987. A multiattribute utility analysis of alternative sites for the disposal of nuclear waste. Risk Anal. 7 (2):173–94. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1987.tb00981.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrissey, A. J., and J. Browne. 2004. Waste management models and their application to sustainable waste management. Waste Manage. 24 (3):297–308. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2003.09.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noche, B., F. A. Rhoma, T. Chinakupt, and M. Jawale. 2010. Optimization model for solid waste management system network design case study. In Proceedings of international conference on computers and industrial engineering 2010, 230–36. Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Olusina, J. O., and D. O. Shyllon. 2014. Suitability analysis in determining optimal landfill location using Multi-Criteria Evaluation (MCE), GIS & remote sensing. Int. J. Comput. Eng. Res. 4 (6):2250–3005.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, S. H., and M. S. Daskin. 1998. Strategic facility location: A review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 11 (3):423–47. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00186-6.
   Google Scholar
• Plastria, F. 1997. Profit maximising single competitive facility location in the plane. Stud. Locational Anal. 11:115–26.
   Google Scholar
• Pourhejazy, P., D. Zhang, Q. Zhu, F. Wei, and S. Song. 2021. Integrated E-waste transportation using capacitated general routing problem with time-window. Transp. Res. Part E 145:Article No. 102169. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2020.102169.
   Google Scholar
• Rabbani, M., R. Heidari, and R. Yazdanparast. 2019. A stochastic multi-period industrial hazardous waste location-routing problem: Integrating NSGA-II and Monte Carlo simulation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 272 (3):945–61. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2018.07.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raeisi, D., and S. J. Ghoushchi. 2022. A robust fuzzy multi-objective location-routing problem for hazardous waste under uncertain conditions. Appl. Intell. doi:10.1007/s10489-022-03334-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathore, P., S. P. Sarmah, and A. Singh. 2019. Location–allocation of bins in urban solid waste management: A case study of Bilaspur city, India. Environ. Dev. Sustainable 22 (4):3309–31. doi:10.1007/s10668-019-00347-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Réquia, W. J., H. L. Roig, and P. Koutrakis. 2015. A spatial multicriteria model for determining air pollution at sample locations. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 65 (2):232–43. doi:10.1080/10962247.2014.971976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe, A. G., and W. L. Winston. 1997. LINDO/LINGO/GINO: Optimization software. Chicago: LINDO Systems, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Samanlioglu, F. 2013. A multi-objective mathematical model for the industrial hazardous waste location-routing problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 226 (2):332–40. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2012.11.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stowers, C. L., and U. S. Palekar. 1993. Location models with routing considerations for a single obnoxious center. Transp. Sci. 27 (4):350–62. doi:10.1287/trsc.27.4.350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sule, D. R. 2001. Logistics of facility location and allocation. New York: Marcel Dekker AG.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2009. Household Hazardous Waste (HHW). Accessed May 7, 2021. https://www.epa.gov/hw/learn-basics-hazardous-waste#hwid.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2020. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Xin, C., J. Wang, Z. Wang, C. Wu, M. Nawaz, and S. Tsai. 2021. Reverse logistics research of municipal hazardous waste: A literature review. Environ. Dev. Sustainable doi:10.1007/s10668-021-01526-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, O., B. Y. Kara, and U. Yetis. 2017. Hazardous waste management system design under population and environmental impact considerations. J. Environ. Manage. 203:720–31. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.06.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, H., and W. D. Solvang. 2017. A carbon-constrained stochastic optimization model with augmented multi-criteria scenario-based risk-averse solution for reverse logistics network design under uncertainty. J. Clean. Prod. 164:1248–67. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, H., X. Sun, W. D. Solvang, G. Laporte, and C. K. M. Lee. 2020. A stochastic network design problem for hazardous waste management. J. Clean. Prod. 277: Article No. 123566277. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, J., L. Huang, D. H. Lee, and Q. Peng. 2016. Improved approaches to the network design problem in regional hazardous waste management systems. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 88:52–75. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2016.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar