Development, evaluation, and implementation of building downwash and plume rise enhancements in AERMOD

References

• Banks, D., R. N. Meroney, P. P. Sarkar, Z. Zhao, and F. Wu. 2000. Flow visualization of conical vortices on flat roofs with simultaneous surface pressure measurement. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 84 (1):65–85. doi:10.1016/S0167-6105(99)00044-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, G. A. 1975. Plume rise prediction. Lectures on Air Pollution and Environmental Impact Analyses, Workshop Proceedings, 59–111. Boston: American Meteorological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, G. A. 1984. Plume rise and buoyancy effects. In Atmospheric science and power production, DOE/TIC-27601, ed. D. Randerson, 327–66. Technical Information Center, Office of Scientific and Technical Information, United States Department of Energy.
   Google Scholar
• Cimorelli, A. J., S. G. Perry, A. Venkatram, J. C. Weil, R. J. Paine, R. B. Wilson, R. F. Lee, W. D. Peters, and R. W. Brode. 2005. AERMOD: A dispersion model for industrial source applications. part I: General model formulation and boundary layer characterization. JAM 44:682–93.
   Google Scholar
• Contini, D., A. Donateo, D. Cesari, and A. G. Robins. 2011. Comparison of plume rise models against water tank experimental data for neutral and stable crossflows. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 9 (5):539–53. doi:10.1016/j.jweia.2011.02.003.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, W., and J. Tikvart. 1990. A statistical procedure for determining the best performing air quality simulation model. Atmos. Environ. 24A (9):2387–95. doi:10.1016/0960-1686(90)90331-G.
   Google Scholar
• EPA. 1995. User’s guide to the building profile input program. EPA-454/R-93-038, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Technical Support Division, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• EPA. 2003. AERMOD: Latest features and evaluation results. EPA-454/R-03-003, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Technical Support Division, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• EPA. 2017. Guideline on air quality models, Appendix W to 40 CFR part 51. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2020-09/documents/appw_17.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• EPA. 2019. AERMOD model formulation and evaluation. EPA-454/R-19-014, U.S. EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC.
   Google Scholar
• EPA. 2021. User’s guide for the AMW/EPA regulatory model (AERMOD). EPA-454/B-21-001, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• EPA Memorandum. 2019. Release of BPIPPRM, version 19191_DRFT, for public review and comment. August 21. https://www3.epa.gov/ttn/scram/models/relat/BPIPPRM_19191_DRFT-Trans_Memo.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Foroutan, H., W. Tang, D. K. Heist, S. G. Perry, L. H. Brouwer, and E. M. Monbureau. 2018. Numerical analysis of pollutant dispersion around elongated buildings: An embedded large eddy simulation approach. Atmos. Environ. 187:117–30. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.05.053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guenther, A., B. Lamb, and E. Allwine. 1989. Building wake dispersion at an Arctic industrial site: Field tracer observations and plume model evaluations. Atmos. Environ. 24A:2329–47.
   Google Scholar
• Hoult, D. P., and J. C. Weil. 1972. Turbulent plume in a laminar cross flow. Atmos. Environ. V6 (8):513–31. doi:10.1016/0004-6981(72)90069-8.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, A., and W. Snyder. 1982. Wind tunnel investigation of the effects of a rectangular-shaped building on dispersion of effluents from short adjacent stacks. Atmos. Environ. 16 (12):2837–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukkonen, J., J. Nikmo, M. Sofiev, K. Riikonen, R. Petaja, A. Virkkula, L. Levula, S. Schobesberger, and S. D. Webber. 2014. Applicability of an integrated plume rise model for the dispersion from wild-land fires. Geosci. Model Dev. 7 (6):2663–81. doi:10.5194/gmd-7-2663-2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monbureau, E. M., D. K. Heist, S. G. Perry, L. H. Brouwer, H. Foroutan, and W. Tang. 2018. Enhancements to AERMOD’s building downwash algorithms based on the wind-tunnel and embedded-LES modeling. Atmos. Environ. 17:321–30. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.02.022.
   Google Scholar
• Ooms, G. 1972. A new method for the calculation of the plume path of gases emitted by a stack. Atmos. Environ. 6 (12):899–909. doi:10.1016/0004-6981(72)90098-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panek, J. A., J. M. McCarthy, A. Z. Huth, and C. Nowak. 2020. PRCI ambient NO2 AERMOD performance assessment and model improvement project: Modeled to observed comparison. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 70 (5):504–21. doi:10.1080/10962247.2020.1743382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, S. G., A. J. Cimorelli, R. J. Paine, R. W. Brode, J. C. Weil, A. Venkutram, R. B. Wilson, R. F. Less, and W. D. Peters. 2005. AERMOD: A dispersion model for industrial sources applications. Part II. Model performance against 17 field study databases. J. Appl. Meteorol. 44 (5):694–708. doi:10.1175/JAM2228.1.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, S. G., D. K. Heist, L. H. Brouwer, E. M. Monbureau, and L. A. Brixey. 2016. Characterization of pollutant dispersion near elongated buildings based on wind tunnel simulations. Atmos. Environ. 142:286–95. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.07.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, R. 1987. Performance evaluation of integral and analytical plume rise algorithms. JAPCA 37 (11):1314–19. doi:10.1080/08940630.1987.10466327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, R. L., and S. A. Guerra. 2018. PRIME2. Development and evaluation of improved building downwash algorithms for rectangular and streamlined structures. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 173:67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.11.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, R. L., and S. A. Guerra. 2021. Development and implementation of new building downwash options in AERMOD. EM Magazine, A&WMA, April.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, R. L., S. A. Guerra, and A. S. Bova. 2017. Critical review of the building downwash algorithms in AERMOD. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 67 (8):826–35. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10962247.2017.1279088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, R., and J. Reifschneider. 2006. Wind tunnel modeling evaluation for the Mirant Potomac power generating station. CPP Report 05-3527, CPP, Inc, Windsor, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Schulman, L. L., and S. R. Hanna. 1986. Evaluation of downwash modifications to the industrial source complex model. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 36 (3):258–64. doi:10.1080/00022470.1986.10466066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulman, L. L., D. G. Strimaitis, and J. S. Scire. 1997. Addendum to ISC3 user’s guide: The PRIME plume rise and building downwash model. Submitted by EPRI, May 12. https://www3.epa.gov/ttn/scram/7thconf/iscprime/useguide.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Schulman, L., D. Strimaitis, and J. Scire. 2000. Development and evaluation of the PRIME plume rise and building downwash model. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 50 (3):378–90. https://www3.epa.gov/scram001/7thconf/iscprime/tekpapr1.pdf.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, W. H., and R. E. Lawson. 1994. Wind-tunnel measurements of flow fields in the vicinity of buildings. Technical Paper Presented at the Eighth Joint Conference on Applications of Air Pollution Meteorology with the A&WMA, Nashville, TN, January 23–28. Accessed January 23–28, 1994. https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_record_Report.cfm?dirEntryID=41445.
   Google Scholar
• Weil, J. C. 1996. A new dispersion model for stack sources in building wakes. Technical Paper presented at the Ninth Joint Conference on Applications of Air Pollution Meteorology with the Air & Waste Management Association, Atlanta, GA, January 28–February 2.
   Google Scholar