Effects of electrode materials and dimensions of an electrostatic spray scrubber on water droplet charging for dust removal

References

• Ahmed, A., T. Soban, and R.-I. Ohyama. 2014. Experimental studies on influence of different conductivities on water mist charging with electrostatic induction. Annual Report Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena.
   Google Scholar
• Almekinders, H., H. E. Ozkan, D. L. Reichard, T. G. Carpenter, and R. D. Brazee. 1992. Spray deposit patterns of an electrostatic atomizer. Trans. ASAE 35 (5):1361–67. doi:10.13031/2013.28741.
   Google Scholar
• Almuhanna, E. A., R.G. Maghirang, J.P. Murphy, and L.E. Erickson. 2008. Effectiveness of electrostatically charged water spray in reducing dust concentration in enclosed spaces. Trans. ASABE. 51 (1):279–86. doi:10.13031/2013.24221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almuhanna, E. A., A. H. Amer Eissa, A. O. Alghannam and A.M. Al-Amri. 2012. Optimization of dust removal in poultry houses using electrostatic wet scrubber. Res. J. Appl. Sci. 8 (12):5651–60.
   Google Scholar
• Balachandran, W., A. Jaworek, A. Krupa, J. Kulon and M. Lackowski. 2003. Efficiency of smoke removal by charged water droplets. J. Electrost. 58 (3–4):209–20. doi:10.1016/S0304-3886(03)00049-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F., H. Chen, L. Zhang, S. Yin, S. Huang, G. Zhang, and Q. Tang. 2019. Controllable distribution of ultrafine diamond particles by electrostatic spray deposition. Powder Technol. 345:267–73. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2019.01.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenghang, Z., D. Dawei, C. Qianyun, S. Liu, Z. Yang, X. Liu, W. Weng and X. Gao.2019. Experiments on enhancing the particle charging performance of an electrostatic precipitator. Aerosol. Air Qual. Res. 19 (6):1411–20. doi:10.4209/aaqr.2018.11.0400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Natale, F., C. Carotenuto, L. D’Addio, A. Jaworek, A. Krupa, M. Szudyga and A. Lancia. 2015. Capture of fine and ultrafine particles in a wet electrostatic scrubber. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 3:349–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaunt, L. F., J.F. Hughes and N.M Harrison. 2003. Removal of domestic airborne dust particles by naturally charged liquid sprays. J. Electrost. 58 (3–4):159–69. doi:10.1016/S0304-3886(03)00044-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, S., and H. Xue. 2021. The enhancement of droplet collision by electric charges and atmospheric electric field, Atmos. Chem. Phys. 21:69–85.
   Google Scholar
• Hao, Z., and B. Pratim. 2021. The prediction of size and charge of particles formed from evaporation of charged droplets generated in an electrospray system. Chem. Eng. Sc.i 232:116237.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, S. H., and C. C. Chen. 2002. Ultrafine aerosol penetration through electrostatic preciptators. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36 (21):4625–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaworek, A., W. Balachandran, M. Lackowski, J. Kulon, and A. Krupa. 2006a. Multi-nozzle electrospray system for gas cleaning processes. J. Electrost. 64 (3–4):194–202. doi:10.1016/j.elstat.2005.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaworek, A., W. Balachandran, A. Krupa, J. Kulon, and M. Lackowski. 2006b. Wet electroscrubbers for state of the art gas cleaning. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40 (20):6197–207. doi:10.1021/es0605927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaworek, A., A. Krupa, A.T. Sobczyk, A. Marchewicz, M. Szudyga, T. Antes, W. Balachandran, F. Di Natale, and C. Carotenuto. 2013. Submicron particles removal by charged sprays. Fundamentals. J. Electrostat. 71 (3):345–50. doi:10.1016/j.elstat.2012.11.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John Carroz, W., and N. Keller. 1978. Electrostatic induction parameters to attain maximum spray charge. Trans. ASAE 21 (1):63–69. doi:10.13031/2013.35251.
   Google Scholar
• Krupa, A., A. Jaworek, A. T. Sobczyk, A. Marchewicz, M. Szudyga, and T. Antes. 2013. Charged spray generation for gas cleaning applications. J. Electrost. 71 (3):260–64. doi:10.1016/j.elstat.2012.11.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar Patel, M., M. Kundu, H. Kumar Sahoo, and M. Kumar Nayak. 2016. Enhanced performance of an air-assisted electrostatic nozzle: Role of electrode material and its dimensional considerations in spray charging. Eng. Agric. Environ. Food 9 (4):332–38. doi:10.1016/j.eaef.2016.05.002.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K., K.I. Lee, S.Y. Jeon, and S. Kim. 2019. Preparation of monodisperse charged droplets via electrohydrodynamic device for the removal of fine dust particles smaller than 10 mu m. Adv. Powder Technol. 30 (1):190–98. doi:10.1016/j.apt.2018.10.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manoj Kumar Patel, C. G., and P. Kapur. 2013. Characterization of electrode material for electrostatic spray charging: Theoretical and engineering practices. J. Electrost. 71 (1):55–60. doi:10.1016/j.elstat.2012.11.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchewicz, A., A. T. Sobczyk, A. Krupa, and A. Jaworek. 2019. Induction charging of water spray produced by pressure atomizer. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 135:631–48. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maski, D., and D. Durairaj. 2010. Effects of electrode voltage, liquid flow rate, and liquid properties on spray chargeability of an air-assisted electrostatic-induction spray-charging system. J. Electrost. 68 (2):152–58. doi:10.1016/j.elstat.2009.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammad-Reza, P., and P. Jose Carlos. 2021. Numerical analysis of charged droplets size distribution in the electrostatic coating process: Effect of different operational conditions. Phys. Fluids 33 (3):033317. doi:10.1063/5.0041021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penney, G. 1944. Electrostatic liquid spray precipitator. US. Patent No. 2357 354.
   Google Scholar
• Post, S. L., and R. L. Roten. 2018. A review of the effects of droplet size and flow rate on the chargeability of spray droplets in electrostatic agricultural sprays. Trans. ASABE 61 (4):1243–48. doi:10.13031/trans.12516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ru, Y., L. Zhao, L. J. S. Hadlocon, H. Zhu, and S.K. Ramdon.2017. Laboratory evaluation of electrostatic spray wet scrubber to control particulate matter emissions from poultry facilities. Environ. Technol. 38 (1):23–33. doi:10.1080/09593330.2016.1184319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubio, M., S. H. Sadek, A. M. Ganan-Calvo, and J. M. Montanero. 2021. Diameter and charge of the first droplet emitted in electrospray. Phys. Fluids 33 (3):032002. doi:10.1063/5.0041428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinato, K. W., A. A. Zewde, and Y. Jin. 2020. Corrosion protection of copper and copper alloys in different corrosive medium using environmentally friendly corrosion inhibitors. Corros. Rev. 38 (2):101–09. doi:10.1515/corrrev-2019-0105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng, C., and J. Li. 2020. Experimental study on particle removal of a wet electrostatic precipitator with atomization of charged water drops. Energy & Fuels 34 (6):7257–68. doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c00646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng, C., and J. Li. 2021. Performance of reduction on particle emission by combining the charged water drop atomization and electric field in wet electrostatic precipitator. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 155:543–54. doi:10.1016/j.psep.2021.09.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tessum, M. W., and P. C. Raynor. 2021. Measuring electrostatic charge on pneumatically generated spray drops. J. Aerosol. Sci. 151:105691. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2020.105691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, B., H. Liu, Z. Chunlai, H. Huo, K. Dong, and Y. Jiang. 2020. Enhancing the collection efficiency of a gas cyclone with atomization and electrostatic charging. Powder Technol. 364:562–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Y. Sun, M. S. M. Xiaodan Gao, and B. Wilhite. 2019. Experimental study of electrostatic hazard inside scrubber column using response surface methodology. Chem. Eng. Sci. 200:46–68. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2018.12.060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang, X. D., and I. Colbeck. 1997. Charged water drops and smoke dissipation. Fire Saf. J. 28 (3):227–32. doi:10.1016/S0379-7112(96)00080-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, D., X. Li, W. Yan, and Z. Fang. 2019. Experimental investigation and numerical simulation of small-volume transverse-flow air curtain performances. Powder Technol. 352:262–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiaochuan, L., X. Xinhao, M. Zhang, and Y. Jiao. 2019. Column dust scrubber based on the orifice plate to intensify the gas-liquid mixing. Chem. Eng. Technol. 42 (11):2302–09. doi:10.1002/ceat.201800685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar