Assessment of progress toward regional haze rule visibility goals using United States anthropogenic emissions rate of progress

References

• Air Sciences. 2020. Fire emission inventories for regional haze planning: Methods and results. Air Sciences, Inc, Portland, Oregon. April. http://wrapair2.org/pdf/fswg_rhp_fire-ei_final_report_20200519_FINAL.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Bar-Ilan, A., R. Friesen, A. Pollack, and A. Hoats. 2007. WRAP area source emissions inventory projections and control strategy evaluation, phase II. ENVIRON International Corporation, Novato, California. September. https://www.wrapair.org/forums/ogwg/documents/2007-10_Phase_II_O&G_Final)Report(v10-07%20rev.s).pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bey, I., D. Jacob, R. Yantosca, J. Logan, B. Field, A. Fiore, Q. Li, H. Liu, L. Mickley, and M. Schultz. 2001. Global modeling of tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology: Model description and evaluation. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 106 (D19): 23073–95, October 16. doi:10.1029/2001JD000807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowden, J., K. Talgo, and Z. Adelman. 2016. Western-State Air Quality Modeling Study (WAQS) – weather research forecast 2014 meteorological model Application/Evaluation. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill – Institute for the Environment. January 1. http://views.cira.colostate.edu/wiki/Attachments/Modeling/WAQS_2014_WRF_MPE_January2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Boys, B., R. Martin, A. van Donkelaar, R. MacDonell, N. Hsu, M. Cooper, R. Yantosca, Z. Lu, D. Streets, Q. Zhang, et al. 2014. Fifteen-year global time series of satellite-derived fine particulate matter. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48 (19):11109–18. doi:10.1021/es502113p.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CAAA. 1977. Section 7491 of the 1997 Clean Air Act Amendments. United States Code, Title 42 – the Public Health and Welfare, Chapter 85 – Air Pollution Prevention and Control, Subchapter I – Program and Activities, Part C – Prevention of Significant Deterioration, subpart ii – visibility protection, Sec 7491 – Visibility protection for Federal class areas. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2013-title42/html/USCODE-2013-title42-chap85-subchapI-partC-subpartii-sec7491.htm
   Google Scholar
• Chin, M., T. Diehl, Q. Tan, J. Prospero, R. Kahn, L. Remer, H. Yu, A. Sayer, H. Bian, I. Geogdzhayev, et al. 2014. Multi-decadal aerosol variations from 1980 to 2009: A perspective from observations and a global model. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14 (7):3657–90. doi:10.5194/acp-14-3657-2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copeland, S., M. Pitchford, and R. Ames. 2008. Regional haze rule natural level estimates using the revised IMPROVE aerosol reconstructed light extinction algorithm. Presented at: Air & Waste Management Association Aerosol & Atmospheric Optics Visual Air Quality and Radiation specialty conference in Moab, Utah, April. Final Paper #48. http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/improve/publications/graylit/032_NaturalCondIIpaper/Copeland_etal_NaturalConditionsII_Description.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, R., T. Fox, M. Fuentes, A. Gilliland, S. Hanna, C. Hogrefe, J. Irwin, S. T. Rao, R. Scheffe, K. Schere, et al. 2010. A framework for evaluating regional-scale numerical photochemical modeling systems. Environ. Fluid Mech. 10 (4):471–89. doi:10.1007/s10652-009-9163-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emery, C. E., Z. Liu, A. G. Russell, M. T. Odman, G. Yarwood, and N. Kumar. 2016. Recommendations on statistics and benchmarks to assess photochemical model performance. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 67 (5). doi:10.1080/10962247.2016.1265027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, K., P. Dolwick, C. Hogrefe, H. Simon, B. Timin, and N. Possiel. 2015b. Dynamic evaluation of CMAQ part II: Evaluation of relative response factor metrics for ozone attainment demonstrations. Atmos. Environ. 103:188–95. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.12.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, K., C. Hogrefe, G. Pouliot, N. Possiel, S. Roselle, H. Simon, and B. Timin. 2015a. Dynamic evaluation of CMAQ part I: Separating the effects of changing emissions and changing meteorology on ozone levels between 2002 and 2005 in the eastern US. Atmos. Environ. 103:247–55. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.12.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebhart, K. A., D. E. Day, A. J. Prenni, B. A. Schichtel, J. L. Hand, and A. R. Evanoski-Cole. 2018. Visibility impacts at Class I areas near the Bakken oil and gas development. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 68 (5):477–93. doi:10.1080/10962247.2018.1429334.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gilliland, A., C. Hogrefe, R. Pinder, J. Godowitch, K. Foley, and S. T. Rao. 2008. Dynamic evaluation of regional air quality models: Assessing changes in O3 stemming from changes in emissions and meteorology. Atmos. Environ. 42 (20):5110–23. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.02.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karamchandani, P., R. Morris, A. Wentland, T. Shah, S. Reid, and J. Lester. 2017. Dynamic evaluation of photochemical grid model response to emission changes in the South Coast Air Basin in California. Atmosphere 8 (12):145. doi:10.3390/atmos8080145.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, C., M. Long, R. Yantosca, A. Da Silva, Pawson, D. Jacob, S. Pawson, and S. Pawson. 2014. HEMCO v1.0: A versatile, ESMF-compliant component for calculating emissions in atmospheric models. Geosci. Model Dev. 7 (4):1409–17. doi:10.5194/gmd-7-1409-2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo, B., G. Wilson, R. Morris, A. Dunker, and G. Yarwood. 2009. Comparison of source apportionment and sensitivity analysis in a particulate matter air quality model. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43 (17):6669–75. doi:10.1021/es9008129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napelenok, S., K. Foley, D. Kang, R. Mathur, T. Pierce, and S. T. Rao. 2011. Dynamic evaluation of regional air quality model’s response to emission reductions in the presence of uncertain emission inventories. Atmos. Environ. 45 (24):4091–98. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.03.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nopmongcol, U., Y. Alvarez, J. Jung, J. Grant, N. Kumar, and G. Yarwood. 2017. Source contributions to United States ozone and particulate matter over five decades from 1970 to 2020. Atmos. Environ. 167:116–28. October. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.08.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NRC. 1993. Protecting visibility in National Parks and Wilderness Areas. Washington D.C: The National Academies Press. National Research Council https://www.nap.edu/catalog/2097/protecting-visibility-in-national-parks-and-wilderness-areas.
   Google Scholar
• Pitchford, M., W. Malm, B. Schichtel, N. Kumar, D. Lowenthal, and J. Hand. 2007. Revised algorithm for estimating light extinction from IMPROVE particle speciation data. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 57 (11):1326–36. doi:10.3155/1047-3289.57.11.1326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozzer, A., A. de Meij, J. Yoon, H. Tost, A. Georgoulias, and M. Astitha. 2015. AOD trends during 2001–2010 from observations and model simulations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15 (10):5521–35. doi:10.5194/acp-15-5521-2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramboll. 2020. User’s guide comprehensive air quality model with extensions, version 7.1. Ramboll Environmental and Health. ramboll.com. camx.com. December. https://camx-wp.azurewebsites.net/Files/CAMxUsersGuide_v7.10.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Skamarock, W. C., J. B. Klemp, J. Dudhia, D. O. Gill, D. M. Barker, M. G. Duda, X.-Y. Huang, W. Wang, and J. G. Powers, 2008. A description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3. NCAR Technical Note 475. http://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/docs/arw_v3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, P., D. Crumpler, J. Flanagan, R. Jayanty, E. Rickman, and C. McDade. 2014. U.S. National PM 2.5 Chemical Speciation Monitoring Networks—CSN and IMPROVE: Description of networks. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 64 (12):1410–38. doi:10.1080/10962247.2014.956904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thunis, P., and A. Clappier. 2014. Indicators to support the dynamic evaluation of air quality models. Atmos. Environ. 98:402–09. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.09.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnock, S., D. Spracklen, K. Carslaw, G. Mann, M. Woodhouse, P. Forster, J. Haywood, C. Johnson, M. Dalvi, N. Bellouin, et al. 2015. Modelled and observed changes in aerosols and surface solar radiation over Europe between 1960 and 2009. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15 (16):9477–500. doi:10.5194/acp-15-9477-2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. EPA. 1999. Regional Haze Regulations, Final Rule. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 40 CFR Part 51. Federal Register/Vol. 64, No. 126/Thursday, July 1, 1999, pp. 35714–74. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-1999-07-01/pdf/99-13941.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. EPA. 2001. Procedures Document for National Emission Inventory Criteria Air Pollutants 1985-1999. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. EPA-454/R-01-006. March. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-07/documents/aerr_final_rule.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. EPA. 2017. Protection of Visibility Amendments to Requirements for State Plans, Final Rule. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 40 CFR Parts 51 and 52. Federal Register/Vol. 82, No. 6/Tuesday, January 10, 2017, pp. 3078–129. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2017-01-10/pdf/2017-00268.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. EPA. 2018a. Technical guidance on tracking visibility progress for the second implementation period of the regional haze Program. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Air Quality Assessment Division, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. EPA-454/R-18-010. December https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2018-12/documents/technical_guidance_tracking_visibility_progress.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. EPA. 2018b. 2014 National Emissions Inventory, version 2 Technical Support Document. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Air Quality Assessment Division, Emissions Inventory and Analysis Group. North Carolina: Research Triangle Park. July. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2018-07/documents/nei2014v2_tsd_05jul2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. EPA. 2018c. Modeling guidance for demonstrating air quality goals for ozone, PM2.5, and regional haze. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Air Assessment Division. Research Triangle Park, NC. EPA 454/R-18-009. November 29. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-10/documents/o3-pm-rh-modeling_guidance-2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. EPA. 2019a. Software for the Modeled Attainment Test – Community Edition. (SMAT0-CE). https://www.epa.gov/scram/photochemical-modeling-tools
   Google Scholar
• U.S. EPA. 2019b. Technical support document for EPA’s updated 2028 regional haze modeling. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC. September 19. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2019-10/documents/updated_2028_regional_haze_modeling-tsd-2019_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. EPA. 2021a. Technical Support Document (TSD) preparation of emissions Inventories for the 2016v1 North American Emissions Modeling Platform. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Air Quality Assessment Division, Emissions Inventory and Analysis Group, Research Triangle Park, NC. March. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-11/documents/2016v1_emismod_tsd_508.pdf?VersionId=WqEfVK7VuEZk1q42UkUNzhRodhjwb7bP
   Google Scholar
• U.S. EPA. 2021b. Recommendations for the HALE1-HACR1 monitoring site combination and volcano adjustments for sites representing Hawaii class I areas for the regional haze rule. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC. August 5. https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2021-08/white_paper_for_regional_haze_hi_volcano_adjust_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vijayaraghavan, K., C. Lindhjem, B. Koo, A. DenBleyker, E. Tai, T. Shah, Y. Alvarez, and G. Yarwood. 2016. Source apportionment of emissions from light-duty gasoline vehicles and other sources in the United States for ozone and particulate matter. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 66 (2):98–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WRAP. 2019. Recommendations for base year modeling. Western regional air partnership regional haze planning workgroup, emissions inventory and modeling subcommittee. February 1. https://www.wrapair2.org/pdf/WRAP%20Regional%20Haze%20SIP%20Emissions%20Inventory%20Review%20Documentation_for_Docket%20Feb2019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• WRAP. 2020a. Representative baseline (RepBase2) and 2028 on-the-books CAMx simulations, run specification sheet. Western regional air partnership and Ramboll. September 30. https://views.cira.colostate.edu/docs/iwdw/platformdocs/WRAP_2014/EmissionsSpecifications_WRAP_RepBase2_and_2028OTBa2_RegionalHazeModelingScenarios_Sept30_2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• WRAP. 2020b. Dynamic evaluation – 2002 CAMx simulation and analysis, run specification sheet. Western regional air partnership and Ramboll. February 24. https://views.cira.colostate.edu/docs/iwdw/platformdocs/WRAP_2014/Run_Spec_WRAP_2014_Task3_Dynamic-Evaluation_v1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• WRAP. 2021. Procedures for making visibility projections and adjusting glidepaths using the WRAP-WAQS 2014 modeling platform. Western Regional Air Partnership and Ramboll. March 1. http://wrapair2.org/pdf/2028_Vis_Proj_Glidepath_Adj_2021-03-01draft_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, W., D. Cohan, and S. Napelenok. 2013. Reconciling NOx emissions reductions and ozone trends in the U.S., 2002–2006. Atmos. Environ. 70:236–44. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1352231013000058?via%3Dihub.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar