A Study of Students’ Perceptions of Course Management Systems in Hospitality Programs: A Case of Blackboard System in the United States

REFERENCES

• Ainin, S., & Hisham, N. H. (2008). Applying importance-performance analysis to information systems: An exploratory case study. Journal of Information, Information Technology, and Organizations, 3, 95–103.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, D. R. (2003). A comparison of approaches to importance-performance analysis. International Journal of Market Research, 45(1), 55–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batts, D. (2008). Comparison of student and instructor perceptions of best practices in online technology courses. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4, 477–489.
   Google Scholar
• Beldona, S., & Cobanoglu, C. (2007). Importance-performance analysis of guest technologies in the lodging industry. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 48(3), 299–312.
   Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology, 54(2), 199–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouhnik, D., & Marcus, T. (2006). Interaction in distance-learning courses. Journal of the American Society Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 299–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradford, P., Porciello, M., Balkon, N., & Backus, D. (2007). The Blackboard learning system. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 35, 301–314.
   Google Scholar
• Costello, B., Lenholt, R., & Stryker, J. (2004). Using Blackboard in library instruction: Addressing the learning styles of Generations X and Y. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 30, 452–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, C. (2002). Becoming part of the course: Using Blackboard to extend one-shot library instruction. College & Research Libraries News, 63(1), 11–39.
   Google Scholar
• Deale, C., & White, B. J. (2012). Hospitality students’ and instructors’ perceptions of a sense of community and learning in online classes. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 24(2/3), 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Dennen, A. A., Darabi, A. A., & Smith, L. J. (2007). Instructor–learner interaction in online courses: The relative perceived importance of particular instructor actions on performance and satisfaction. Distance Education, 28(1), 65–79.
   Google Scholar
• Eom, S. B., & Wen, H. J. (2006). The determinants of students’ perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An empirical investigation. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(2), 215–235.
   Google Scholar
• Erman, L. D., Hayes-Roth, F., Lesser, V. R., & Reddy, D. R. (1980). The HEARSAY-II speech-understanding system: Integrating knowledge to resolve uncertainty. Computing Surveys, 12, 213–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, H., & Madden-Hallett, H. (2010). Adoption of a learning management system by polytechnic students: A case study in Singapore. Studies in Learning, Evaluation Innovation & Development, 7(1), 23–36.
   Google Scholar
• Hodges, C. B. (2004). Designing to motivate: Motivational techniques to incorporate in e-learning experiences. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 2(3), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Hollenbeck, C. R., Mason, C. H., & Song, J. H. (2011). Enhancing student learning in marketing courses: An exploration of fundamental principles for website platforms. Journal of Marketing Education, 33(2), 171–182.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, H. M. (2001). Enhancing the business communication course through WebCT. Business Communication Quarterly, 64(3), 87–94.
   Google Scholar
• Irlbeck, S., & Mowat, J. (2007). Learning content management system (LCMS). In K. Harman & A. Koohang ( Eds.), Learning objects: Applications, implications, and future directions ( pp. 154–178). Santa Rosa, CA: Informing Science Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, P. A. (2007). Integrating information literacy into Blackboard: Building campus partnerships for successful student learning. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33, 454–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasso, J., Milani, A., & Pallottelli, S. (2009). A visually enhanced synchronous interaction tool for blended e-learning. Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology, 5(3), 45–55.
   Google Scholar
• Kramarski, B., & Michalsky, T. (2010). Preparing preservice teachers for self-regulated learning in the context of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 20, 437–447.
   Google Scholar
• Landry, B. J. L., Griffeth, R., & Hartman, S. (2006). Measuring student perceptions of Blackboard using the technology acceptance model. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(1), 87–99.
   Google Scholar
• Lapointe, L., & Reisetter, M. (2008). Belong online: Students’ perceptions of the value and efficacy of an online learning community. International Journal of e-Learning, 7, 641–655.
   Google Scholar
• Levenburg, N. M., & Magal, S. R. (2005). Applying importance-performance analysis to evaluate e-business strategies among small firms. e-Service Journal, 3(3), 29–48.
   Google Scholar
• Liaw, S-S. (2008). Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education, 51, 864–873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liaw, S-S., & Huang, H. M. (2007). Developing a collaborative e-learning system based on users’ perceptions. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4402, 751–759.
   Google Scholar
• Liaw, S-S., Huang, H-M., & Chen, G-D. (2007). Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning. Computers & Education, 49, 1066–1080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKnight, C. B. (2000). Teaching critical thinking through online discussions. Educause Quarterly Magazine, 23(4), 38–41.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, R. B., Sibley, S. D., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2005). A structural equation model of predictors for effective online learning. Journal of Management Education, 29, 531–563.
   Google Scholar
• Martilla, J. A., & James, J. C. (1977). Importance-performance analysis. Journal of Marketing, 4(1), 77–79.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, F. (2008). Blackboard as the learning management system of a computer literacy course. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4(2), 138–145.
   Google Scholar
• Peltier, J. W., Drago, W., & Schibrowsky, J. A. (2003). Virtual communities and the assessment of online marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education, 25(3), 260–276.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, S. S., & Slotta, J. (2009). Saying yes to online learning: A first-time experience teaching an online graduate course in literacy education. Literacy Research and Instruction, 48(2), 120–136.
   Google Scholar
• Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 21–40.
   Google Scholar
• Rovai, A. P. (2007). Facilitating online discussions effectively. The Internet and Higher Education, 10, 77–88.
   Google Scholar
• Servonsky, E. J., Daniels, W. L., & Davis, B. L. (2005). Evaluation of Blackboard as a platform for distance education delivery. The ABNF Journal, 16(6), 132–135.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, F., & Fernandes, P. (2010). Using importance-performance analysis in evaluating institutions of higher education: A case study. In 2010 International Conference on Education and Management Technology (ICEMT 2010) (pp. 121–123).
   Google Scholar
• Smart, K. L., & Cappel, J. J. (2006). Students’ perceptions of online learning: A comparative study. Journal of Information Technology Education, 5, 201–219.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S., & Costello, C. (2009). Culinary tourism: Satisfaction with a culinary event utilizing importance-performance grid analysis. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 15(2), 99–110.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, P-C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y-Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50, 1183–1202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uribe-Tirado, A., Melgar-Estrada, L.-M., & Bornacelly-Castro, J.-A. (2007). Moodle learning management system as a tool for information, documentation, and knowledge management by research groups. Profesional de la Información, 16, 468–474.
   Google Scholar
• Yukselturk, E., & Top, E. (2006). Reconsidering online course discussions: A case study. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 34(3), 341–367.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, D., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2003). Powering e-learning in the new millennium: An overview of e-learning and enabling technology. Information Systems Frontiers, 5(2), 207–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar