Using Active Learning Activities to Increase Student Outcomes in an Information Technology Course

References

• Asal, V., & Kratoville, J. (2013). Constructing international relations simulations: Examining the pedagogy of IR simulations through a constructivist learning theory lens. Journal of Political Science Education, 9, 132–143.
   Google Scholar
• Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It’s not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banta, T. W., Jones, E. A., & Black, K. E. (2009). Designing effective assessment: Principles and profiles of good practice. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Beichner, R. J., Saul, J. M., Abbott, D. S., Morse, J. J., Deardorff, D. L., Allain, R. J., … Risley, J. S. (2007). The Student-Centered Activities for Large Enrollment Undergraduate Programs (SCALE-UP) project. In E. F. Redish & P. J. Cooney (Eds.), Research-based reform of university physics (pp. 1–42). College Park, MD: American Association of Physics Teachers.
   Google Scholar
• Bissell, A. N., & Lemons, P. P. (2006). A new method for assessing critical thinking in the classroom. BioScience, 56, 66–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S., Englehart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, Handbook 1 Cognitive Domain. New York, NY: McKay.
   Google Scholar
• Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1). Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.
   Google Scholar
• Brickner, D. R., & Etter, E. R. (2008). Strategies for promoting active learning in a principles of accounting course. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 12(2), 87–95.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, D. C. (2011). Space matters: The impact of formal learning environments on student learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 719–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 289–325). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cranage, D., Lambert, C. U., Morais, D., & Lane, J. L. (2006). The influence of learning style on hospitality and tourism students’ preference for Web assignments. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 18(4), 18–26.
   Google Scholar
• Das, B., & Sarkar, C. (2015). An innovative flipped class intervention to improve dose calculation skills of phase I medical students: A preliminary study. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 182, 67–74.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dori, Y. J., & Belcher, J. (2005). How does technology-enabled active learning affect undergraduate students’ understanding of electromagnetism concepts? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 243–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgerton, R. (2001). Education white paper. Report prepared for the Pew Charitable Trusts. Washington, DC: Pew Forum on Undergraduate Learning. Retrieved from www.faculty.umb.edu/john_saltmarsh/resources/Edgerton Higher Education White Paper.rtf
   Google Scholar
• Fire, N., & Casstevens, W. J. (2013). The use of cultural historical activity theory within a constructivist learning environment to develop core competencies in social work. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 33, 41–58.
   Google Scholar
• Garmston, R., & Wellman, B. (1994). Insights from constructivist learning theory. Educational Leadership, 52(7), 6–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner, A. M., & Bonds-Raccke, J. M. (2013). Influence of university level direct instruction on educators’ use of technology in the classroom. Reading Improvement, 50(4), 145–157.
   Google Scholar
• Gopnik, A., & Wellman, H. M. (2012). Reconstructing constructivism: Causal models, Bayesian learning mechanisms, and the theory. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1085–1108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, A. J., & Repetti, T. (2015). Clickers: A strategy for active learning in a hospitality classroom. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 27(4), 171–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, A. J., & Sammons, G. E. (2014). Student learning styles: Assessing active learning in the hospitality learners model. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 26(1), 29–38.
   Google Scholar
• Hockings, C., Cooke, S., Yamashita, H., McGinty, S., & Bowl, M. (2008). Switched off? A study of disengagement among computing students at two universities. Research Papers in Education, 23(2), 191–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, S. D., & Laverie, D. A. (2004). Experiential learning and the Hunt-Vitell theory of ethics: Teaching marketing ethics by integrating theory and practice. Marketing Education Review, 14(3), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Inglis, A. (1996). Theories of learning in educational development: Relocating the paradigm divide. Open Learning, 11(2), 28–37.
   Google Scholar
• Järvelä, S., & Niemivirta, M. (1999). The changes in learning theory and the topicality of the recent research on motivation. Research Dialogue in Learning and Instruction, 1, 57–65.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R., & Smith, K. A. (1991). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, S. K., & Gould, R. (2002). Hospitality graduates’ employment status and job satisfaction. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 14(4), 11–18.
   Google Scholar
• La Lopa, J. M. (2005). The benefits of teaching a course on hospitality and tourism sales and service via active learning. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 17(1), 39–47.
   Google Scholar
• Liburd, J., & Hualager, A. (2010). Changing approaches towards open education, innovation and research in tourism. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Management, 17, 2–20.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, R. E., & Derby, J. M. (2015). Active learning to improve presentation skills: The use of Pecha Kucha in undergraduate sales management classes. Marketing Education Review, 25(1), 21–25.
   Google Scholar
• Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R. F., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. P., Milholland, E. S., & Gould, S. M. (2012). Determining the attitudes of students toward the use of a classroom response in hospitality courses. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 24(2–3), 73–79.
   Google Scholar
• Missildine, K., Fountain, R., Summers, L., & Gosselin, K. (2013). Flipping the classroom to improve student performance and satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Education, 52(10), 1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morosan, C., & DeFranco, A. (2016). It’s about time: Revisiting UTAUT2 to examine consumers’ intentions to use NFC mobile payments in hotels. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 53, 17–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morosan, C., Karns, G., & George, B. (2011). A study of adoption of electronic textbooks in marketing classes. Proceedings of the 2011 Marketing Educators’ Association Conference, San Diego, CA, May 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Mzoughi, T. (2015). An investigation of student Web activity in a “flipped” introductory physics class. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 235–240.
   Google Scholar
• Nyikos, M., & Hashimoto, R. (1997). Constructivist theory applied to collaborative learning in teacher education: In search of ZPD. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 506–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang, L., Penfold, P., & Wong, S. (2013). Chinese learners’ perceptions of blended learning in a hospitality and tourism management program. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 22(1), 15–22.
   Google Scholar
• Park, E. L., & Choi, B. K. (2014). Transformation of classroom spaces: Traditional versus active learning classroom in colleges. Higher Education, 68, 749–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1964). Part I: Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(3), 176–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1972). Psychology and epistemology: Towards a theory of knowledge. London, UK: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riendeau, D. (2012). Flipping the classroom. The Physics Teacher, 50, 507.
   Google Scholar
• Roach, T. (2014). Student perceptions toward flipped learning: New methods to increase interaction and active learning in economics. International Review of Economics Education, 17, 74–84.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, A., & Macchiette, B. (2005). Debating the issues: A tool for augmenting critical thinking skills of marketing students. Journal of Marketing Education, 27(3), 264–276.
   Google Scholar
• Savery, J., & Duffy, T. (1995). Problem-based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31–38.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, S. (2008). Perceptions of students’ learning critical thinking through debate in a technology classroom: A case. Journal of Technology Studies, 34(1), 39–44.
   Google Scholar
• See, S., & Conry, J. M. (2014). Flip my class! A faculty development demonstration of a flipped-classroom. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 6, 585–588.
   Google Scholar
• Steffe, L. O., & Gale, J. (1995). Constructivism in education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environmental Research, 15(2), 171–193.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Thong, J., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Glasersfeldt, E. (1989). Constructivism in education. In T. Husén & T. L. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (pp. 11–12). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (1st ed., V. John-Steiner, M. Cole, & S. Scribner, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yelamarthi, K., & Drake, E. (2015). A flipped first-year digital circuits course for engineering and technology students. IEEE Transactions on Education, 58(3), 179–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zane, T. W. (2009). Performance assessment design principles gleaned from constructivist learning theory (part 1). Tech Trends, 53(1), 81–88.
   Google Scholar
• Zapatero, E. G., Maheshwari, S. K., & Chen, J. (2012). Effectiveness of active learning environment: Should testing methods be modified? Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 16(4), 101–114.
   Google Scholar