Talking Numbers? Analyzing the Presence of Financial Information in Councilors’ Speech During the Budget Debate in Flemish Municipal Councils

REFERENCES

• Adam, B. and C. Behm. 2006. “The Use of Budget Reforms to Modernize Governance in German Local Government.” Public Money & Management 26(4): 217–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askim, J. 2007. “How Do Politicians Use Performance Information? An Analysis of the Norwegian Local Government Experience.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 73(3): 453–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askim, J. 2008. “Determinants of Performance Information Utilization in Political Decision Making.” In S. Van de Walle and W. van Dooren ed., Performance Information in the Public Sector: How it is Used. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Askim, J. 2009. “The Demand Side of Performance Measurement: Explaining Councillors’ Utilization of Performance Information in Policymaking.” International Public Management Journal 12(1): 24–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askim, J. and H. Baldersheim. 2012. “Policy Learning in Local Government: The Role of Reflexive Leadership.” Croatian and Comparative Public Administration 12(2): 319–338.
   Google Scholar
• Bastida, F., B. Benito, and M.-D. Guillamón. 2009. “An Empirical Assessment of the Municipal Financial Situation in Spain.” International Public Management Journal 12(4): 484–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckett-Camarata, J. 2009. “Local Government Measurement and Use of Performance Accounting and Financial Reporting Data in Planning and Budgeting Decision Support: A Multicase Study.” Public Performance & Management Review 33(2): 255–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belfius. 2013. Lokale Financiën 2013: Gemeenten. Brussels: Belfius Bank & Verzekeringen.
   Google Scholar
• Benito, B., F. Bastida, and C. Vicente. 2012. “Political Budget Cycles in Local Governments.” Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government 10(4): 341–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brugue, Q. and J. M. Valles. 2005. “New-Style Councils, New-Style Councillors: From Local Government to Local Governance.” Governance 18(2): 197–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buylen, B. and J. Christiaens. 2014. “Why are Some Flemish Municipal Party Group Leaders More Familiar with NPM Principles than Others? Assessing the Influence of Individual Factors.” Lex Localis Journal of Local Self-Government 12(1): 79–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caamaño-Alegre, J., S. Lago-Peñas, F. Reyes-Santias, and A. Santiago-Boubeta. 2012. “Budget Transparency in Local Governments: An Empirical Analysis.” Local Government Studies: 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmeli, A. 2006. “The Managerial Skills of the Top Management Team and the Performance of Municipal Organisations.” Local Government Studies 32(2): 153–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, J., P. S. Gomes, and M. J. Fernandes. 2012. “The Main Determinants of the Use of the Cost Accounting System in Portuguese Local Government.” Financial Accountability & Management 28(3): 306–334.
   Google Scholar
• Christiaens, J. 1999. “Financial Accounting Reform in Flemish Municipalities: An Empirical Investigation.” Financial Accountability & Management 15(1): 21–40.
   Google Scholar
• Curristine, T. 2005. “Performance Information in the Budget Process: Results of the OECD 2005 Questionnaire.” OECD Journal on Budgeting 5(2): 87.
   Google Scholar
• de Lancer Julnes, P. 2006. “Performance Measurement An Effective Tool for Government Accountability? The Debate Goes On.” Evaluation 12(2): 219–235.
   Google Scholar
• Demaj, L. and L. Summermatter. 2012. “What Should We Know about Politicians’ Performance Information Need and Use?” International Public Management Review 13(2): 85–111.
   Google Scholar
• Demski, J. S. and G. A. Feltham. 1976. Cost Determination: A Conceptual Approach. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Di Maggio, P. J. and W. W. Powell. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited, Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48(2): 147–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egner, B. and H. Heinelt. 2008. “Explaining the Differences in the Role of Councils: an Analysis Based on a Survey of Mayors.” Local Government Studies 34(4): 529–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fattore, G., H. F. W. Dubois, and A. Lapenta. 2012. “Measuring New Public Management and Governance in Political Debate.” Public Administration Review 72(2): 218–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisco, V. and O. J. Stalebrink. 2008. “Congressional Use of the Program Assessment Rating Tool.” Public Budgeting & Finance 28(2): 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, G. and A. J. McLelland. 2003. Governance Structures and Accounting at Large Municipalities.” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 22(3): 203–230.
   Google Scholar
• Goeminne, S., B. Geys, and C. Smolders. 2008. “Political Fragmentation and Projected Tax Revenues: Evidence from Flemish Municipalities.” International Tax and Public Finance 15(3): 297–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grizzle, G. A. 1986. “Does Budget Format Really Govern the Actions of Budgetmakers?” Public Budgeting & Finance 6(1): 60–70.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J., O. Olson, and C. Humphrey. 1999. “Debating Developments in New Public Financial Management: The Limits of Global Theorising and Some New Ways Forward.” Financial Accountability & Management 15(3–4): 209–228.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, K. 2001. “Local Councillors: Between Local ‘Government’ and Local ‘Governance.'” Public Administration 79(1): 105–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilbe, J. M. 2011. Negative Binomial Regression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, A. T. K. 2006. “Accounting for the Value of Performance Measurement from the Perspective of Midwestern Mayors.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16(2): 217–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, A. T. K. 2011. “PBB in American Local Governments: It's More than a Management Tool.” Public Administration Review 71(3): 391–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxham, C. and P. Hibbert. 2011. “Use Matters … and Matters of Use: Building Theory for Reflective Practice.” Public Management Review 13(2): 273–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbeau, L. M. 2009. Do They Walk Like They Talk?: Speech and Action in Policy Processes, Vol. 15. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, D. I. 2011. “Convergence, Divergence or Stability: How Do Politicians’ and Bureaucrats’ Attitudes Change During an Election Period? Public Management Review 13(5): 621–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, T. and S. Siverbo. 2009. “Explaining the Utilization of Relative Performance Evaluation in Local Government: A Multi Theoretical Study Using Data from Sweden.” Financial Accountability & Management 25(2): 197–224.
   Google Scholar
• Julnes, P. and M. Holzer. 2002. “Promoting the Utilization of Performance Measures in Public Organizations: An Empirical Study of Factors Affecting Adoption and Implementation.” Public Administration Review 61(6): 693–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs, T. B. and J. P. Pelissero. 2010. “What Influences City Council Adoption and Support for Reinventing Government? Environmental or Institutional Factors?” Public Administration Review 70(2): 258–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutner, M., C. Nachtsheim, J. Neter, and W. Li. 2005. Applied Linear Statistical Models. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Lapsley, I. 1999. “Accounting and the New Public Management: Instruments of Substantive Efficiency or a Rationalising Modernity?” Financial Accountability & Management 15(3–4): 201–207.
   Google Scholar
• Laver, M., K. Benoit, and J. Garry. 2003. “Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data.” The American Political Science Review 97(2): 311–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Maux, B., Y. Rocaboy, and T. Goodspeed. 2011. “Political Fragmentation, Party Ideology and Public Expenditures.” Public Choice 147(1–2): 43–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liguori, M., M. Sicilia, and I. Steccolini. 2009. “Politicians Versus Managers: Roles and Interactions in Accounting Cycles.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 22(4): 310–323.
   Google Scholar
• Liguori, M., M. Sicilia, and I. Steccolini. 2012. “Some Like it Non-Financial … Politicians’ and Managers’ Views on the Importance of Performance Information.” Public Management Review 14(7): 903–922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, M. 2008. “Institutional Rationality and Practice Variation: New Directions in the Institutional Analysis of Practice.” Accounting Organizations and Society 33(4–5): 349–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V. and D. Wilson. 2003. “Balancing Revisability and Robustness? A New Institutionalist Perspective on Local Government Modernization.” Public Administration 81(2): 275–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melkers, J. and K. Willoughby. 2005. “Models of Performance‐Measurement Use in Local Governments: Understanding Budgeting, Communication, and Lasting Effects.” Public Administration Review 65(2): 180–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. 2006. “What Do We Talk about When We Talk about Performance? Dialogue Theory and Performance Budgeting.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16(2): 151–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasi, G. and I. Steccolini. 2008. “Implementation of Accounting Reforms: An Empirical Investigation into Italian Local Governments.” Public Management Review 10(2): 175–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olislagers, E., J. Ackaert, and F. De Rynck. 2009. Percepties van Burgemeesters, Schepenen, Raadsleden, Secretarissen en Ontvangers over Het Gemeentedecreet Vergeleken.” In SBOV Report. Leuven: Steunpunt Bestuurlijke Organisatie Vlaanderen.
   Google Scholar
• Pina, V., L. Torres, and A. Yetano. 2009. “Accrual Accounting in EU Local Governments: One Method, Several Approaches.” European Accounting Review 18(4): 765–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poister, T. H. and G. Streib. 1999. “Performance Measurement in Municipal Government: Assessing the State of the Practice.” Public Administration Review 59(4): 325–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. and G. Bouckaert. 2011. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis: New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raudla, R. 2012. “The Use of Performance Information in Budgetary Decision-Making by Legislators: Is Estonia any Different? Public Administration. 90(4): 1000–1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudla, R. 2013. “The Use of Performance Information in Cutback Budgeting: The Case of Estonia.” In 2013 EGPA Annual Conference, Edinburgh, September 11–13.
   Google Scholar
• Reynaert, H. 2012. “The Social Base of Political Recruitment: A Comparative Study of Local Councillors in Europe” Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government 10(1): 19–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynaert, H., K. Steyvers, and T. Verhelst. 2010. De Gemeente- en Provincieraad: Meer dan Ritueel Mopperen en Legitimeren ? Brugge: Vanden Broele.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. 1997. Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schedler, K. 2003. “‘… and Politics?’ Public Management Developments in the Light of Two Rationalities.” Public Management Review 5(4): 533–550.
   Google Scholar
• Schiff, A. D. and L. R. Hoffman. 1996. “An Exploration of the Use of Financial and Nonfinancial Measures of Performance by Executives in a Service Organization.” Behavioral Research in Accounting 8: 134–153.
   Google Scholar
• Steyvers, K., H. Reynaert, K. De Ceuninck, and T. Valcke. 2006. “Mayors in Governance: Heading for Efficiency and Democracy? The Belgian Case.” Local Government Studies 32(4): 429–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ter Bogt, H. 2001. “Politicians and Output-Oriented Performance Evaluation in Municipalities.” European Accounting Review 10(3): 621–643.
   Google Scholar
• Ter Bogt, H. J. 2004. “Politicians in Search of Performance Information? Survey Research on Dutch Aldermen's Use of Performance Information.” Financial Accountability & Management 20(3): 221–252.
   Google Scholar
• Ter Bogt, H. J., G. J. van Helden, and B.Van der Kolk. 2015. “Challenging NPM Ideas about Performance Management: Selectivity and Differentiation in Outcome Oriented Performance Budgeting.” Financial Accountability & Management 31(3): 287–315.
   Google Scholar
• Torres, L., V. Pina, and C. Martí. 2012. “Using Non-Mandatory Performance Measures in Local Governments.” Baltic Journal of Management 7(4): 416–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vakkuri, J. and P. Meklin. 2003. “The Impact of Culture on the Use of Performance Measurement Information in the University Setting.” Management Decision 41(8): 751–759.
   Google Scholar
• van Dooren, W., G. Bouckaert, and J. Halligan. 2010. Performance Management in the Public Sector. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van Dooren, W. and S. Van de Walle. 2008. Performance Information in the Public Sector: How it is Used. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Van Helden, G. J. and E. P. Jansen. 2003. “New Public Management in Dutch Local Government.” Local Government Studies 29(2): 68–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Helden, G. J. and D. Northcott. 2010. “Examining the Practical Relevance of Public Sector Management Accounting Research.” Financial Accountability & Management 26(2): 213–240.
   Google Scholar
• Windels, P. and J. Christiaens. 2006. “Management Reform in Flemish Public Centres for Social Welfare: Examining Organisational Change.” Local Government Studies 32(4): 389–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yetano, A. 2009. “Managing Performance at Local Government Level: The Cases of the City of Brisbane and the City of Melbourne.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 68 (2): 167–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar