What to Do Here? What to Do There? The Effect of Change in Organization Size on Public Management

REFERENCES

• Andrews, R. and G. Boyne. 2011. “Corporate Capacity and Public Service Performance.” Public Administration 89(3): 894–908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., G. A. Boyne, K. J. Meier, L. J. O’Toole, and R. M. Walker. 2011. “Environmental and Organizational Determinants of External Networking.” The American Review of Public Administration 41 (4): 355–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatti, Y., M. Gørtz, and L. H. Pedersen. 2015. “The Causal Effect of Profound Organizational Change When Job Insecurity is Low—A Quasi-experiment Analyzing Municipal Mergers.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25(4): 1185–1220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatti, Y. and K. M. Hansen. 2011. “Who ‘Marries’ Whom? The Influence of Societal Connectedness, Economic and Political Homogeneity, and Population Size on Jurisdictional Consolidations.” European Journal of Political Research 50(2): 212–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatti, Y., A. L. Olsen, and L. H. Pedersen. 2011. “Administrative Professionals and the Diffusion of Innovations: The Case of Citizen Service Centres.” Public Administration 89(2): 577–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blom‐Hansen, J., K. Houlberg, and S. Serritzlew. 2014. “Size, Democracy, and the Economic Costs of Running the Political System.” American Journal of Political Science 58(4): 790–803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A. 2003. “Sources of Public Service Improvement: A Critical Review and Research Agenda.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13(3): 367–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camisón-Zornoza, C., R. Lapiedra-Alcamí, M. Segarra-Ciprés, and M. Boronat-Navarro. 2004. “A Meta-Analysis of Innovation and Organizational Size.” Organization Studies 25(3): 331–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denters, B., M. Goldsmith, A. Ladner, P. E. Mouritzen, and L. E. Rose. 2014. Size and Local Democracy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dunning, T. 2012. Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences: A Design-Based Approach, Strategies for Social Inquiry. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Favero, N., K. J. Meier, and L. J. O’Toole. 2014. “Goals, Trust, Participation, and Feedback: Linking Internal Management with Performance Outcomes.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 26(2): 327–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C. and J. B. Carr. 1997. “A Reassessment of City/County Consolidation: Economic Development Impacts.” State & Local Government Review 166–171.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, S. 2005. “Developing and Testing an Integrative Framework of Public Sector Leadership: Evidence from the Public Education Arena.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15(2): 197–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, A. S. and D. P. Green. 2012. Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs Springer, C., R. C. Feiock, J. B. Carr, and L. S. Johnson. 2006. “Structuring the Debate on Consolidation: A Response to Leland and Thurmaier.” Public Administration Review 66(2): 274–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, J. R. and A. R. Villadsen. 2010. “Comparing Public and Private Managers’ Leadership Styles: Understanding the Role of Job Context.” International Public Management Journal 13(3): 247–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. B. 2011. “Antecedents of Organizational Innovation: The Diffusion of New Public Management into Danish Local Government.” Public Administration 89: 285–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haveman, H. A. 1993. “Organizational Size and Change: Diversification in the Savings and Loan Industry after Deregulation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 20–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indenrigsministeriet. 2005. Kommunalreformen: Kort Fortalt. Copenhagen, Denmark: Indenrigs-og Sundhedsministeriet.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, C. S. 2013. “Navigating a Rough Terrain of Public Management: Examining the Relationship between Organizational Size and Effectiveness.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23(3): 663–686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, C. S. 2014. “Why are Goals Important in the Public Sector? Exploring the Benefits of Goal Clarity for Reducing Turnover Intention.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24(1): 209–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurke, L. B. and H. E. Aldrich. 1983. “Note—Mintzberg was Right! A Replication and Extension of the Nature of Managerial Work.” Management Science 29(8): 975–984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassen, D. D. and S. Serritzlew. 2011. “Jurisdiction Size and Local Democracy: Evidence on Internal Political Efficacy from Large-Scale Municipal Reform.” American Political Science Review 105(2): 238–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, A. W., A. R. Newman, and L. A. Broedling. 1980. “The Nature of Managerial Work in the Public Sector.” Public Administration Review 513–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leland, S. and K. Thurmaier. 2005. “When Efficiency is Unbelievable: Normative Lessons from 30 Years of City–County Consolidations.” Public Administration Review 65(4): 475–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L. L. and J. H. Schiff. 2011. “City–County Consolidations: Promise Versus Performance.” State and Local Government Review 43(2): 167–177.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J. and L. J. O’Toole. 2001. “Managerial Strategies and Behavior in Networks: A Model with Evidence from US Public Education.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11(3): 271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J. and L. J. O’Toole. 2003. “Public Management and Educational Performance: The Impact of Managerial Networking.” Public Administration Review 63(6): 689–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., L. J. O’Toole, G. A. Boyne, and R. M. Walker. 2007. “Strategic Management and the Performance of Public Organizations: Testing Venerable Ideas against Recent Theories.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 17(3): 357–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., L. J. O’Toole and H. T. Goerdel. 2006. “Management Activity and Program Performance: Gender as Management Capital.” Public Administration Review 66(1): 24–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. 1973. Nature of Managerial Work. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. 1975. “The Manager’s Job: Folklore and Fact.” Harvard Business Review 53(4): 49–61.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. 2009. Managing. London, England: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Opstrup, N. and A. R. Villadsen. “The Right Mix? Gender Diversity in Top Management Teams and Financial Performance.” Public Administration Review 75(2): 291–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Toole, L. J. and K. J. Meier. 1999. “Modeling the Impact of Public Management: Implications of Structural Context.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 9(4): 505–526.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, L. J. and K. J. Meier. 2011. Public Management: Organizations, Governance, and Performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pandey, S. K. and B. E. Wright. 2006. “Connecting the Dots in Public Management: Political Environment, Organizational Goal Ambiguity, and the Public Manager’s Role Ambiguity.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16(4): 511–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainey, H. G. 2009. Understanding and Managing Public Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. 1974. “Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies.” Journal of Educational Psychology 66(5): 688–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidle, B., S. Fernandez, and J. L. Perry. 2016. “Do Leadership Training and Development Make a Difference in the Public Sector? A Panel Study.” Public Administration Review 76(4): 603–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strukturkommissionen. 2004. Strukturkommisionens Betænkning 1: Hovedbetænkningen. Copenhagen, Denmark: Indenrigs-og Sundhedsministeriet.
   Google Scholar
• Villadsen, A. R. 2012. “New Executives from Inside or Outside? The Effect of Executive Replacement on Organizational Change.” Public Administration Review 72(5): 731–740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M. 2013. “Strategic Management and Performance in Public Organizations: Findings from the Miles and Snow Framework.” Public Administration Review 73(5): 675–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M. and R. Andrews. 2015. “Local Government Management and Performance: A Review of Evidence.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25(1): 101–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. 2010. Econometric Analysis of Cross-Section and Panel Data, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B. E. and S. K. Pandey. 2010. “Transformational Leadership in the Public Sector: Does Structure Matter?” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20(1): 75–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yukl, G. 2013. Leadership in Organizations, 8th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar