Herbert Simon’s Forgotten Legacy for Improving Decision Processes

REFERENCES

• Achen, C. H., and L. M. Bartels. 2016. Democracy for Realists. Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andre, J. 1991. “Role Morality as a Complex Instance of Ordinary Morality.” American Philosophical Quarterly 28(1):73–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvai, J., and R. Gregory. 2003. “Testing Alternative Decision Approaches for Identifying Cleanup Priorities at Contaminated Sites.” Environmental Science & Technology 37(8):1469–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augier, M., and E. Feigenbaum. 2003. “Herbert A. Simon: Biographical Memoirs.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 147(2):194–8.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, N. 2014. “Modesto World Religions Course Recognized in New Book, State Resolution.” Modesto Bee.
   Google Scholar
• Baekgaard, M., and S. Serritzlew. 2016. “Interpreting Performance Information: Motivated Reasoning or Unbiased Comprehension.” Public Administration Review 76(1):73–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzelay, M., and F. Thompson. 2010. “Back to the Future: Making Public Administration a Design Science.” Public Administration Review 70:S295–S7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behn, R. D. 1988. “Management as Groping Along.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 7(4):643–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellé, N. 2013. “Experimental Evidence on the Relationship between Public Service Motivation and Job Performance.” Public Administration Review 73(1):143–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendor, J. B. 2010. Bounded Rationality and Politics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, A. 1998. “Trustees Heed Advice of Safe-Schools Panel.” Modesto Bee.
   Google Scholar
• Blom-Hansen, J., R. Morton, and S. Serritzlew. 2015. “Experiments in Public Management Research.” International Public Management Journal 18(2):151–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., B. C. Crosby, and L. Bloomberg. 2014. “Public Value Governance: Moving beyond Traditional Public Administration and the New Public Management.” Public Administration Review 74(4):445–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceaser, J. W. 1992. Liberal Democracy and Political Science. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crowther-Heyck, H. 2005. Herbert A. Simon: The Bounds of Reason in Modern America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dequech, D. 2001. “Bounded Rationality, Institutions, and Uncertainty.” Journal of Economic Issues 35(4):911–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N., J. H. Kuklinski, and L. Sigelman. 2009. “The Unmet Potential of Interdisciplinary Research: Political Psychological Approaches to Voting and Public Opinion.” Political Behavior 31(4):485–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, W., H. Lindman, and L. J. Savage. 1963. “Bayesian Statistical Inference for Psychological Research.” Psychological Review 70(3):193–242. http://content.apa.org/journals/rev/70/3/193 (March 6, 2017).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flink, C. M. 2017. “Rethinking Punctuated Equilibrium Theory: A Public Administration Approach to Budgetary Changes.” Policy Studies Journal 45(1):101–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2001. Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Follett, M. P. 1987. Freedom and Coordination: Lectures in Business Organization. [Orig. 194. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Frederick, S. 2002. “Automated Choice Heuristics.” Pp. 548–58 in Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment, edited by T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, and D. Kahneman. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frederickson, G. 2001. “Herbert Simon and Dwight Waldo: Truly the Giants of Public Administration.” PA Times. Washington DC: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Frederickson, H. G., K. B. Smith, C. W. Larimer, and M. J. Licari. 2015. The Public Administration Theory Primer. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fry, B. R., and J. C. N. Raadschelders. 2013. Mastering Public Administration: From Max Weber to Dwight Waldo. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A. 2006. “Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance.” Public Administration Review 66(s1):66–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaylor, A. L. 2014. “The Dangers of Religious Instruction in Public Schools.” Religion & Politics January 7. Available at: https://religionandpolitics.org/2014/01/07/the-dangers-of-religious-instruction-in-public-schools/ [accessed 9/3/2018].
   Google Scholar
• George, B., M. Baekgaard, A. Decramer, M. Audenaert, and S. Goeminne. 2018. “Institutional Isomorphism, Negativity Bias and Performance Information Use by Politicians: A Survey Experiment.” Public Administration. [1–15]. [Epub ahead of print]. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/padm.12390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, K. 2003. “Contrasting Role Morality and Professional Morality: Implications for Practice.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 20(1):17–29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., and R. Selten. 2002. Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilovich, T., and D. W. Griffin. 2002. “Introduction – Heuristics and Biases: Then and Now.” Pp. 1–18 in Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment, edited by T. Gilovich, D. W. Griffin, and D. Kahneman. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilovich, T., D. Griffin, and D. Kahneman. (Eds.). 2002. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, R., L. Failing, M. Harstone, G. Long, T. McDaniels, and D. Ohlson. 2012. Structured Decision-Making: A Practical Guide to Environmental Management Choices. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, R., and G. Long. 2009. “Using Structured Decision-Making to Help Implement a Precautionary Approach to Endangered Species Management.” Risk Analysis 29(4):518–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, R., T. McDaniels, and D. Fields. 2001. “Decision Aiding, Not Dispute Resolution: Creating Insights through Structured Environmental Decisions.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 20(3):415–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, S., L. Tummers, and S. K. Pandey. 2017. “Promoting State-of-the-Art Methods in Public Management Research.” International Public Management Journal 20(1):7–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, K. M., A. L. Olsen, and M. Bech. 2015. “Cross-National Yardstick Comparisons: A Choice Experiment on a Forgotten Voter Heuristic.” Political Behavior 37(4):767–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmon, M. 1995. Responsibility as Paradox: A Critique of Rational Discourse on Government. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes, C. C. 2010. A Teacher’s Guide to Religion in the Public Schools. Nashville, TN: First Amendment Center.
   Google Scholar
• Head, B. W. 2013. “Evidence‐Based Policymaking–Speaking Truth to Power?” Australian Journal of Public Administration 72(4):397–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, B. W., and J. Alford. 2015. “Wicked Problems: Implications for Public Policy and Management.” Administration & Society 47(6):711–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herendeen, S. 2002. “Study of Religions Sets Modesto Schools Apart.” Modesto Bee.
   Google Scholar
• Holling, C. S. 1978. Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Israni, E. T. 2017. “When an Algorithm Helps Send You to Prison.” New York Times, October 26.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffa, H. 1968. Liberalism Ancient and Modern. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• James, O., and G. V. Ryzin. 2017. “Motivated Reasoning about Public Performance: An Experimental Study of How Citizens Judge the Affordable Care Act.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 27(1):197–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, M., M. A. Wimmer, A. Deljoo, and T. Ahmed. 2015. Policy Practice and Digital Science: Integrating Complex Systems, Social Simulation and Public Administration in Policy Research. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• John, P. 2011. Nudge, Nudge, Think, Think: Using Experiments to Change Civic Behaviour. London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. 2006. “Consequences of Positivism: A Pragmatist Assessment.” Comparative Political Studies 39(2):224–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. D. 2001. Politics and the Architecture of Choice: Bounded Rationality and Governance. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, B. D. 2003. “Bounded Rationality and Political Science: Lessons from Public Administration and Public Policy.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13(4):395–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. 2003. “Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics.” The American Economic Review 93(5):1449–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. 2011a. “Forward.” In The Behavioral Foundations of Public Policy, edited by Eldar Shafir. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. 2011b. Thinking Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., and S. Frederick. 2002. “Representativeness Revisited: Attribute Substitution in Intuitive Judgment.” Pp. 49–81 in Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment, edited by T. Gilovich, D. W. Griffin, and D. Kahneman. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 47(2):263–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1982. “The Psychology of Preferences.” Scientific American 246(1):160–73.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. (Eds.) 2000. Choices, Values, and Frames. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keeney, R. L. 1992. Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decision-Making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keeney, R. L., and H. Raiffa. 1976. Decisions with Multiple Objectives. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Keiser, L. 2010. “Understanding Street-Level Bureaucrats’ Decision-Making: Determining Eligibility in the Social Security Disability Program.” Public Administration Review 70(2):247–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelman, S. 2007. “Public Administration and Organization Studies.” Academy of Management Annals 1(1):225–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, N. L., R. J. MacCoun, and G. P. Kramer. 1996. “Bias in Judgment: Comparing Individuals and Groups.” Psychological Review 103(4):687–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, N. L., and R. S. Tindale. 2004. “Group Performance and decision making.” Annual Review of Psychology 55:623–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H., R. H. MacDonald, and D. F. Andersen. 2013. “Simulation and Managerial Decision-Making: A Double-Loop Learning Framework.” Public Administration Review 73(2):291–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G. 2015. “Preface: Big Data Is Not About the Data!” In Computational Social Science: Discovery and Prediction, edited by R. Michael Alvarez. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kunda, Z. 1990. “The Case for Motivated Reasoning.” Psychological Bulletin 108(3):480–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester, E., and P. S. Roberts. 2009. “How Teaching World Religions Brought a Truce to the Culture Wars in Modesto, California.” British Journal of Religious Education 31(3):187–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester, E., and P. S. Roberts. 2011. “Learning about World Religions in Modesto, California: The Promise of Teaching Tolerance in Public Schools.” Politics and Religion 4(02):264–88.
   Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein, S., B. Fischhoff, L. Phillips. 1982. “Calibration of Probabilities: The State of the Art to 1980.” Pp. 306–34 in Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, edited by D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, and A. Tversky. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C. E. 1979. “Still Muddling, Not yet through.” Public Administration Review 39(6):517–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowi, T. 1992. “The State in Political Science: How We Become What We Study.” American Political Science Review 86(01):1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, L. E. Jr., 2001. “The Myth of the Bureaucratic Paradigm: What Traditional Public Administration Really Stood for.” Public Administration Review 61(2):144–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCurdy, H. E., and R. E. Cleary. 1984. “Why Can’t We Resolve the Research Issue in Public Administration?” Public Administration Review 44(1):49–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniels, T. L., R. S. Gregory, and D. Fields. 1999. “Democratizing Risk Management: Successful Public Involvement in Local Water Management Decisions.” Risk Analysis 19(3):497–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meehl, P. E. 1954. Clinical versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis and a Review of the Evidence. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J. 2015. “Proverbs and the Evolution of Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 75(1):15–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe, T. 1984. “The New Economics of Organization.” American Journal of Political Science 28(4):739–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. 1993. Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. 1996. “Focus Groups.” Annual Review of Sociology 22(1):129–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. 2018. “A Great Schism Approaching? Towards a Micro and Macro Public Administration.” Journal of Behavioral Public Administration 1(1):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. 2010. “From Performance Management to Democratic Performance Governance.” Pp. 21–6 in The Future of Public Administration around the World: The Minnowbrook Perspective. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, A., J. C. Shaw, and H. A. Simon. 1959. “Report on a General Problem-Solving Program.” In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Processing, 256–64.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolaides, P. 1988. “Limits to the Expansion of Neoclassical Economics.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 12(3):313–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, P. 2011. “Herbert Simon “Is’s” and “Oughts” after Sixty Years.” Public Integrity 13(4):371–84.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, L. J. Jr., 1997. “Treating Networks Seriously: Practical and Research-Based Agendas in Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 57:45–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, A. L. 2015. “Simon Said,” We Didn’t Jump.” Public Administration Review 75(2):325–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olsen, A. L. 2017. “Compared to What? How Social and Historical Reference Points Affect Citizens’ Performance Evaluations.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 27(4):562–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, V. 2008. The Intellectual Crisis in American Public Administration. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pardo, T. A., J. L. Brudney, and B. Gazley. 2010. “Collaborative Governance and Cross-Boundary Information Sharing: Envsioning a Networked and IT-Enabled Public Administration.” Pp. 129–40 in The Future of Public Administration around the World: The Minnowbrook Perspective. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pareto, V. 1935. Mind and Society, edited by Arthur Livingston and Andrew Bongiorno. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace, and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, D. C. 1987. Philosophy, Science and Social Inquiry: Contemporary Methodological Controversies in Social Science and Related Applied Fields of Research. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piotrowski, S. J. 2014. “Transparency: A Regime Value Linked with Ethics.” Administration & Society 46(2):181–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raadschelders, J. 2003. Government: A Public Administration Perspective. New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Raadschelders, J. 2008. “Understanding Government: Four Intellectual Traditions in the Study of Public Administration.” Public Administration 86(4):925–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raadschelders, J. 2011. Public Administration: The Interdisciplinary Study of Government. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radtke, R. R. 2005. “Role Morality and Accountants’ Ethically Sensitive Decisions.” Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research 8:113–38.
   Google Scholar
• Raiffa, H. 1968. Decision Analysis: Introductory Lectures on Choices under Uncertainty – Howard Raiffa – Google Books. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Redford, E. S. 1961. “Reflections on a Discipline.” American Political Science Review 55(04):755–62.
   Google Scholar
• Redlawsk, D. P. 2002. “Hot Cognition or Cool Consideration? Testing the Effects of Motivated Reasoning on Political Decision-Making.” Journal of Politics 64(4):1021–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riccucci, N. M. 2010. Public Administration: Traditions of Inquiry and Philosophies of Knowledge. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, A. S. 2018. “Shaking Hands With Hitler: What American Public Administration Learned From Engagement With Fascism.” May 21. (https://ssrn.com/abstract=3179721).
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, P. S., and K. Wernstedt. 2016. “Using Climate Forecasts across a State’s Emergency Management Network.” Natural Hazards Review 17(3):05016002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, P., and K. Wernstedt. In Press. “Decision Biases and Heuristics Among Emergency Managers: Just Like the Public They Manage For?” American Review of Public Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, S. E., C. M. Flink, and C. M. King. 2014. “Organizational History and Budgetary Punctuation.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24(2):459–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohr, J. A. 1986. To Run a Constitution: The Legitimacy of the Administrative State. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, M. 2001. “Teen: ‘Be Honest and Open.’” Modesto Bee.
   Google Scholar
• Schintler, L. A., and R. Kulkarni. 2014. “Big Data for Policy Analysis: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.” Review of Policy Research 31(4):343–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, Hugh. 2002. “Herbert Simon and Behavioral Economics.” The Journal of Socio-Economics 31(3):181–9.
   Google Scholar
• Selznick, P. 1994. The Moral Commonwealth: Social Theory and the Promise of Community. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shafritz, J. M., C. Borick, E. W. Russell, and A. C. Hyde. 2016. Introducing Public Administration. 9th ed. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A., W. R. Divine, E. M. Cooper, and M. Chernin. 1941. Determining Work Loads for Professional Staff in a Public Welfare Agency. Berkeley, CA: Bureau of Public Administration: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 1946. “The Proverbs of Administration.” Public Administration Review 6(1):53–67.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 1956. “Rational Choice and the Structure of the Environment.” Psychological Review 63(2):129–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 1960. The New Science of Management Decision. New York, NY: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 1961. “The Changing Theory and Practice of Publc Administration.” In Contemporary Political Science, edited by Ithiel de Sola Pool. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 1977. Models of Discovery. Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 1978. “Rational Decisionmaking in Business Organiations.” In Nobel Memorial Lecture, December 8. Retrieved July 8, 2016. (http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economic-sciences/laureates/1978/simon-lecture.pdf).
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 1987. “Making Management Decisions: The Role of Intuition and Emotion.” Academy of Management Perspectives 1(1):57–64.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 1987b. “Rationality in Psychology and Economics.” Pp. 25–40 in Rational Choice., edited by Robin Hogarth and Melvin Reder. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 1991. “Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning.” Organization Science 2(1):125–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 1996. The Sciences of the Artificial. [Orig. 1969]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 1997. Administrative Behavior. [Orig. 1947]. 4th ed. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 2000. “Bounded Rationality in Social Science: Today and Tomorrow.” Mind & Society 1(1):25–39.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 2002. “Near Decomposability and the Speed of Evolution.” Industrial and Corporate Change 11(3):587–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, Herbert A. 1996. Models of My Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A., P. F. Drucker, and D. Waldo. 1952. “Development of Theory of Democratic Administration: Replies and Comments.” American Political Science Review 46(02):494–503.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A., and Y. Iwasaki. 1988. “Causal Ordering, Comparative Statics, and near Decomposability.” Journal of Econometrics 39(1-2):149–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A., D. W. Smithburg, and V. A. Thompson. 1950. Public Administration. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Slothuus, R., and C. H. De Vreese. 2010. “Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Issue Framing Effects.” Journal of Politics 72(3):630–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sniderman, P. M., R. Brody, and P. E. Tetlock. 1993. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. 2014. Why Nudge? The Politics of Libertarian Paternalism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., and R. F. West. 2000. “Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate?.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23(5):645–65.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R., and R. Thaler. 2008. Nudge: The Politics of Libertarian Paternalism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Svara, J. H. 2001. “The Myth of the Dichotomy: Complementarity of Politics and Administration in the past and Future of Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 61(2):176–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, L. G., A. L. Olsen, S. Jilke, and S. G. Grimmelikhuijsen. 2016. “Introduction to the Virtual Issue on Behavioral Public Administration.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 3(1):1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1983. “Extensional Versus Intuitive Reasoning: The Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgment.” Psychological Review 90(4):293–315.
   Google Scholar
• Van Slyke, D. M. 2010. “Making Public Administration Scholarship Matter.” Pp. 249–54 in The Future of Public Administration around the World: The Minnowbrook Perspective, edited by Rosemary O’Leary, David M. Van Slyke, and Soonhee Kim. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Slyke, D. M., R. O’Leary, and S. Kim. 2010. “Challenges and Opportunities, Crosscutting Themes, and Thoughts on the Future of Public Administration.” Pp. 281–93 in The Future of Public Administration Aroudn the World: The Minnowbrook Perspective, edited by David M. Van Slyke, Rosemary O’Leary, and Soonhee Kim. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waldo, D. 1952. “Development of Theory of Democratic Administration.” American Political Science Review 46(01):81–103.
   Google Scholar
• Walters, C. J., and C. S. Holling. 1990. “Large-Scale Management Experiments and Learning by Doing.” Ecology 71(6):2060–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wamsley, G., C. T. Goodsell, J. A. Rohr, C. M. Stivers, O. F. White, and J. F. Wolf. 1990. “Public Administration and the Governance Process: Shifting the Political Dialog.” In Refounding Public Administration, ed. G. Wamsley. London, UK: Sage, 31–51.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 1992. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. [Orig. 1922]. edited by trans. T. Parsons. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wernstedt, K., P. S. Roberts, J. Arvai, and K. Redmond. 2018. “How Emergency Managers (Mis?) Interpret Forecasts.” Disasters. [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1111/disa.12293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. 1988. “The Logic of Economic Organization.” The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 4(1):65–93.
   Google Scholar
• Wittenbaum, G. M., A. P. Hubbell, and C. Zuckerman. 1999. “Mutual Enhancement: Toward an Understanding of the Collective Preference for Shared Information.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77(5):967–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, B. E. 2011. “Public Administration as an Interdisciplinary Field: Assessing Its Relationship with the Fields of Law, Management, and Political Science.” Public Administration Review 71(1):96–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, B. E., and A. M. Grant. 2010. “Unanswered Questions about Public Service Motivation: Designing Research to Address Key Issues of Emergence and Effects.” Public Administration Review 70(5):691–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar