In search of innovation capability and its sources in local government organizations: a critical interpretative synthesis of the literature

References

• (Articles with * were used for the critical interpretative synthesis.)
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, S. C., and M. L. Jakobsen. 2018. “Political Pressure, Conformity Pressure, and Performance Information as Drivers of Public Sector Innovation Adoption.” International Public Management Journal 21(2):213–42. doi: 10.1080/10967494.2018.1425227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Andrews, R., G. A. Boyne, and R. M. Walker. 2012. “Overspending in Public Organizations: Does Strategic Management Matter?” International Public Management Journal 15(1):39–61. doi: 10.1080/10967494.2012.684017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Arduini, D., F. Belotti, M. Denni, G. Giungato, and A. Zanfei. 2010. “Technology Adoption and Innovation in Public Services the Case of e-Government in Italy.” Information Economics and Policy 22(3):257–75. doi: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2009.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Arduini, D., M. Denni, M. Lucchese, A. Nurra, and A. Zanfei. 2013. “The Role of Technology, Organization and Contextual Factors in the Development of e-Government Services: An Empirical Analysis on Italian Local Public Administrations.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 27:177–89. doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2013.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Arslan, A. 2011. “Innovative Management Practices and Their Impact on the Local e-Government Performance: The Turkish Provincial Municipalities.” African Journal of Business Management 5(24):10190–97.
   Google Scholar
• Arundel, A., C. Bloch, and B. Ferguson. 2019. “Advancing Innovation in the Public Sector: Aligning Innovation Measurement with Policy Goals.” Research Policy 48(3):789–98. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Askim, J., Å. Johnsen, and K.-A. Christophersen. 2007. “Factors behind Organizational Learning from Benchmarking: Experiences from Norwegian Municipal Benchmarking Networks.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18(2):297–320. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mum012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bartlett, D., and P. Dibben. 2002. “Public Sector Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Case Studies from Local Government.” Local Government Studies 28(4):107–21. doi: 10.1080/714004159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bearfield, D. A., and A. O. M. Bowman. 2017. “Can You Find It on the Web? An Assessment of Municipal e-Government Transparency.” The American Review of Public Administration 47(2):172–88. doi: 10.1177/0275074015627694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bengtsson, F., and P. J. Ågerfalk. 2011. “Information Technology as a Change Actant in Sustainability Innovation: Insights from Uppsala.” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 20(1):96–112. doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2010.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Berman, E. M., and J. P. West. 1998. “Responsible Risk-Taking.” Public Administration Review 58(4):346–52. doi: 10.2307/977564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bhatti, Y., A. L. Olsen, and L. H. Pedersen. 2011. “Administrative Professionals and the Diffusion of Innovations: The Case of Citizen Service Centres.” Public Administration 89(2):577–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01882.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bingham, R. D. 1978. “Innovation, Bureaucracy, and Public Policy: A Study of Innovation Adoption by Local Government.” Western Political Quarterly 31(2):178–205. doi: 10.1177/106591297803100203.
   Google Scholar
• *Borins, S. 2000. “What Border? Public Management Innovation in the United States and Canada.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 19(1):46–74. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(200024)19:1<46::AID-PAM4>3.0.CO;2-Z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Borins, S. 2001. “Public Management Innovation: Toward a Global Perspective.” The American Review of Public Administration 31(1):5–21. doi: 10.1177/02750740122064802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Boyne, G. A. 2002. “Public and Private Management: What’s the Difference?” Journal of Management Studies 39(1):97–122. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Boyne, G. A., J. S. Gould-Williams, J. Law, and R. M. Walker. 2005. “Explaining the Adoption of Innovation: An Empirical Analysis of Public Management Reform.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 23(3):419–35. doi: 10.1068/c40m.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Brown, M. M. 2007. “Understanding e-Government Benefits: An Examination of Leading-Edge Local Governments.” The American Review of Public Administration 37(2):178–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Brudney, J. L., and S. C. Selden. 1995. “The Adoption of Innovation by Smaller Local Governments: The Case of Computer Technology.” The American Review of Public Administration 25(1):71–86. doi: 10.1177/027507409502500105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Chen, A. J., S. L. Pan, J. Zhang, W. W. Huang, and S. M. Zhu. 2009. “Managing e-Government Implementation in China: A Process Perspective.” Information & Management 46(4):203–12. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2009.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., R. M. Walker, and M. Sawhney. 2020. “Public Service Innovation: A Typology.” Public Management Review 22(11):1674–95. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2019.1645874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Chen, T. L. 2014. “Exploring e-Learning Effectiveness Perceptions of Local Government Staff Based on the Diffusion of Innovations Model.” Administration & Society 46(4):450–66. doi: 10.1177/0095399713482313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinar, E., P. Trott, and C. Simms. 2019. “A Systematic Review of Barriers to Public Sector Innovation Process.” Public Management Review 21(2):264–90. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2018.1473477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarivate Analytics. 2021. "Web of Science." Retrieved March 20, 2021 (https://clarivate.com/products/Ib-of-science/).
   Google Scholar
• Clausen, T. H., M. A. Demircioglu, and G. A. Alsos. 2020. “Intensity of Innovation in Public Sector Organizations: The Role of Push and Pull Factors.” Public Administration 98(1):159–76. doi: 10.1111/padm.12617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Considine, M., and J. M. Lewis. 2007. “Innovation and Innovators inside Government: From Institutions to Networks.” Governance 20(4):581–607. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00373.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Damanpour, F., and M. Schneider. 2009. “Characteristics of Innovation and Innovation Adoption in Public Organizations: Assessing the Role of Managers.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19(3):495–522. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mun021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Damanpour, F., R. M. Walker, and C. N. Avellaneda. 2009. “Combinative Effects of Innovation Types and Organizational Performance: A Longitudinal Study of Service Organizations.” Journal of Management Studies 46(4):650–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00814.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Dawson, G. S., J. S. Denford, and K. C. Desouza. 2016. “Governing Innovation in US State Government: An Ecosystem Perspective.” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 25(4):299–318. doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2016.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, H., V. Bekkers, and L. Tummers. 2016. “Innovation in the Public Sector: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda.” Public Administration 94(1):146–66. doi: 10.1111/padm.12209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon-Woods, M., S. Bonas, A. Booth, D. R. Jones, T. Miller, A. J. Sutton, R. L. Shaw, J. A. Smith, and B. Young. 2006a. “How Can Systematic Reviews Incorporate Qualitative Research? A Critical Perspective.” Qualitative Research 6(1):27–44. doi: 10.1177/1468794106058867.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon-Woods, M., D. Cavers, S. Agarwal, E. Annandale, A. Arthur, J. Harvey, R. Hsu, S. Katbamna, R. Olsen, L. Smith, et al. 2006b. “Conducting a Critical Interpretive Synthesis of the Literature on Access to Healthcare by Vulnerable Groups.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 6(1):35. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• *Durose, C. 2011. “Revisiting Lipsky: Front-Line Work in UK Local Governance.” Political Studies 59(4):978–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00886.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Entwistle, T. 2011. “For Appropriateness or Consequences? Explaining Organizational Change in English Local Government.” Public Administration 89(2):661–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01850.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, Z., Q. Meng, and N. Wei. 2020. “Fiscal Slack or Environmental Pressures: Which Matters More for Technological Innovation Assimilation? A Configurational Approach.” International Public Management Journal 23(3):380–404. doi: 10.1080/10967494.2019.1647318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felin, T., N. J. Foss, K. H. Heimeriks, and T. L. Madsen. 2012. “Microfoundations of Routines and Capabilities: Individuals, Processes, and Structure.” Journal of Management Studies 49(8):1351–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01052.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felin, T., N. J. Foss, and R. E. Ployhart. 2015. “The Microfoundations Movement in Strategy and Organization Theory.” Academy of Management Annals 9(1):575–632. doi: 10.5465/19416520.2015.1007651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flemming, K. 2010. “Synthesis of Quantitative and Qualitative Research: An Example Using Critical Interpretive Synthesis.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 66(1):201–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05173.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foss, N. J., and T. Pedersen. 2019. “Microfoundations in International Management Research: The Case of Knowledge Sharing in Multinational Corporations.” Journal of International Business Studies 50(9):1594–621. doi: 10.1057/s41267-019-00270-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Franzel, J. M. 2008. “Urban Government Innovation: Identifying Current Innovations and Factors That Contribute to Their Adoption.” Review of Policy Research 25(3):253–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2008.00326.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Gabris, G. T., R. T. Golembiewski, and D. M. Ihrke. 2001. “Leadership Credibility, Board Relations, and Administrative Innovation at the Local Government Level.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11(1):89–108. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Gianakis, G. A., and C. P. McCue. 1997. “Administrative Innovation among Ohio Local Government Finance Officers.” The American Review of Public Administration 27(3):270–86. doi: 10.1177/027507409702700304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Giebels, E., R. S. M. de Reuver, S. Rispens, and E. G. Ufkes. 2016. “The Critical Roles of Task Conflict and Job Autonomy in the Relationship between Proactive Personalities and Innovative Employee Behavior.” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 52(3):320–41. doi: 10.1177/0021886316648774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Gonzalez, R., J. Llopis, and J. Gasco. 2013. “Innovation in Public Services: The Case of Spanish Local Government.” Journal of Business Research 66(10):2024–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., and M. K. Feeney. 2017. “Developing and Testing an Integrative Framework for Open Government Adoption in Local Governments.” Public Administration Review 77(4):579–90. doi: 10.1111/puar.12689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gullmark, P. 2021. “Do All Roads Lead to Innovativeness? A Study of Public Sector Organizations’ Innovation Capabilities.” The American Review of Public Administration 51(7):509–25. doi: 10.1177/02750740211010464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hansen, M. B. 2011. “Antecedents of Organizational Innovation: The Diffusion of New Public Management into Danish Local Government.” Public Administration 89(2):285–306. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01855.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, J., S. Parker, and J. Beashel. 2019. “Leading and Recognizing Public Value.” Public Administration 97(2):264–78. doi: 10.1111/padm.12563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hinnant, C. C., and J. A. O’Looney. 2003. “Examining Pre-Adoption Interest in Online Innovations: An Exploratory Study of e-Service Personalization in the Public Sector.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 50(4):436–47. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2003.820133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ho, A. T. K., and A. Y. Ni. 2004. “Explaining the Adoption of e-Government Features: A Case Study of Iowa County Treasurers’ Offices.” The American Review of Public Administration 34(2):164–80. doi: 10.1177/0275074004264355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Homburg, V., A. Dijkshoorn, and M. Thaens. 2014. “Diffusion of Personalised Services among Dutch Municipalities: Evolving Channels of Persuasion.” Local Government Studies 40(3):429–50. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2013.795892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyvönen, T., J. Järvinen, L. Oulasvirta, and J. Pellinen. 2012. “Contracting Out Municipal Accounting: The Role of Institutional Entrepreneurship.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 25(6):944–63. doi: 10.1108/09513571211250198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Jans, W., B. Denters, A. Need, and M. Van Gerven. 2016. “Mandatory Innovation in a Decentralised System: The Adoption of an e-Government Innovation in Dutch Municipalities.” Acta Politica 51(1):36–60. doi: 10.1057/ap.2014.36.
   Google Scholar
• *Jun, K.-N., and C. Weare. 2011. “Institutional Motivations in the Adoption of Innovations: The Case of e-Government.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21(3):495–519. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muq020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kamal, M. M., A. Z. Bigdeli, M. Themistocleous, and V. Morabito. 2015. “Investigating Factors Influencing Local Government Decision Makers While Adopting Integration Technologies (IntTech).” Information & Management 52(2):135–50. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2014.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazimierczak, K. A., Z. C. Skea, M. Dixon-Woods, V. A. Entwistle, D. Feldman-Stewart, J. M. O. N'Dow, and S. J. MacLennan. 2013. “Provision of Cancer Information as a “Support for Navigating the Knowledge Landscape”: Findings from a Critical Interpretive Literature Synthesis.” European Journal of Oncology Nursing 17(3):360–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2012.10.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kim, S., and G. Yoon. 2015. “An Innovation-Driven Culture in Local Government: Do Senior Manager’s Transformational Leadership and the Climate for Creativity Matter?.” Public Personnel Management 44(2):147–68. doi: 10.1177/0091026014568896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kim, Y. 2010. “Stimulating Entrepreneurial Practices in the Public Sector: The Roles of Organizational Characteristics.” Administration & Society 42(7):780–814. doi: 10.1177/0095399710377432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kinder, T. 2012. “Learning, Innovating and Performance in Post-New Public Management of Locally Delivered Public Services.” Public Management Review 14(3):403–28. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2011.637408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, K. J., H. Tosi, and A. A. Cannella. Jr. 1999. “Multilevel Theory Building: Benefits, Barriers, and New Developments.” Academy of Management Review 24(2):248–53. doi: 10.5465/amr.1999.1893934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobarg, S., J. Wollersheim, I. M. Welpe, and M. Spörrle. 2017. “Individual Ambidexterity and Performance in the Public Sector: A Multilevel Analysis.” International Public Management Journal 20(2):226–60. doi: 10.1080/10967494.2015.1129379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Korac, S., I. Saliterer, and R. M. Walker. 2017. “Analysing the Environmental Antecedents of Innovation Adoption among Politicians and Public Managers.” Public Management Review 19(4):566–87. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2016.1200119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kwon, M., and H. S. Jang. 2011. “Motivations behind Using Performance Measurement: City-Wide vs. selective Users.” Local Government Studies 37(6):601–20. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2011.615833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lee, J. 2008. “Determinants of Government Bureaucrats’ New PMIS Adoption: The Role of Organizational Power, IT Capability, Administrative Role, and Attitude.” The American Review of Public Administration 38(2):180–202. doi: 10.1177/0275074007304386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lee, J. 2013. “Exploring the Role of Knowledge Networks in Perceived e-Government: A Comparative Case Study of Two Local Governments in Korea.” The American Review of Public Administration 43(1):89–108. doi: 10.1177/0275074011429716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Li, M.-H., and M. K. Feeney. 2014. “Adoption of Electronic Technologies in Local US Governments: Distinguishing between e-Services and Communication Technologies.” The American Review of Public Administration 44(1):75–91. doi: 10.1177/0275074012460910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ma, L. 2017. “Political Ideology, Social Capital, and Government Innovativeness: Evidence from the US States.” Public Management Review 19(2):114–33. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2016.1177108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Manoharan, A. 2013. “A Study of the Determinants of County e-Government in the United States.” The American Review of Public Administration 43(2):159–78. doi: 10.1177/0275074012437876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Michelucci, F. V., and A. De Marco. 2017. “Smart Communities inside Local Governments: A Pie in the Sky?” International Journal of Public Sector Management 30(1):2–14. doi: 10.1108/IJPSM-03-2016-0059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Nasi, G., F. Frosini, and D. Cristofoli. 2011. “Online Service Provision: Are Municipalities Really Innovative? The Case of Larger Municipalities in Italy.” Public Administration 89(3):821–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01865.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Nedovic-Budic, Z., and D. R. Godschalk. 1996. “Human Factors in Adoption of Geographic Information Systems: A Local Government Case Study.” Public Administration Review 56(6):554–68. doi: 10.2307/977254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Nelson, K. L., and J. H. Svara. 2012. “Form of Government Still Matters: Fostering Innovation in US Municipal Governments.” The American Review of Public Administration 42(3):257–81. doi: 10.1177/0275074011399898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Newman, J., J. Raine, and C. Skelcher. 2001. “Developments: Transforming Local Government: Innovation and Modernization.” Public Money and Management 21(2):61–8. doi: 10.1111/1467-9302.00262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Nidumolu, S. R., S. E. Goodman, D. R. Vogel, and A. K. Danowitz. 1996. “Information Technology for Local Administration Support: The Governorates Project in Egypt.” MIS Quarterly 20(2):197–224. doi: 10.2307/249478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Otto, D. M., and M. A. Edelman. 1990. “Innovation in Structural Change of Local Government.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72(4):1074–80. doi: 10.2307/1242639.
   Google Scholar
• *Oulasvirta, L., and A. V. Anttiroiko. 2017. “Adoption of Comprehensive Risk Management in Local Government.” Local Government Studies 43(3):451–74. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2017.1294071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvato, C., and R. Vassolo. 2018. “The Sources of Dynamism in Dynamic Capabilities.” Strategic Management Journal 39(6):1728–52. doi: 10.1002/smj.2703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. 1949. Economic Theory and Entrepreneurial History—Change and the Entrepreneur, Postulates and Patterns for Entrepreneurial History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Secchi, L. 2010. “Entrepreneurship and Participation in Public Management Reforms at the Local Level.” Local Government Studies 36(4):511–27. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2010.494103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Smith, A. C., and D. A. Taebel. 1985. “Administrative Innovation in Municipal Government.” International Journal of Public Administration 7(2):149–77. doi: 10.1080/01900698508524487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Sobaci, M. Z., and K. Y. Eryigit. 2015. “Determinants of e-Democracy Adoption in Turkish Municipalities: An Analysis for Spatial Diffusion Effect.” Local Government Studies 41(3):445–69. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2014.995296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, R. I., and B. M. Staw. 1995. “What Theory Is Not.” Administrative Science Quarterly 40(3):371–84. doi: 10.2307/2393788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Swann, W. L. 2017. “Modelling the Relationship between Entrepreneurial Orientation, Organizational Integration, and Programme Performance in Local Sustainability.” Public Management Review 19(4):542–65. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2016.1199729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J. 2016. “Dynamic Capabilities and Entrepreneurial Management in Large Organizations: Toward a Theory of the (Entrepreneurial) Firm.” European Economic Review 86:202–16. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *ter Bogt, H. J., and G. J. van Helden. 2011. “The Role of Consultant-Researchers in the Design and Implementation Process of a Programme Budget in a Local Government Organization.” Management Accounting Research 22(1):56–64. doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2010.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Tolbert, C. J., K. Mossberger, and R. McNeal. 2008. “Institutions, Policy Innovation, and e‐Government in the American States.” Public Administration Review 68(3):549–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00890.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torfing, J. 2019. “Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector: The Argument.” Public Management Review 21(1):1–11. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2018.1430248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trivellato, B., M. Martini, and D. Cavenago. 2021. “How Do Organizational Capabilities Sustain Continuous Innovation in a Public Setting?” The American Review of Public Administration 51(1):57–71. doi: 10.1177/0275074020939263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A. H., and M. S. Poole. 1995. “Explaining Development and Change in Organizations.” The Academy of Management Review 20(3):510–40. doi: 10.2307/258786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A. H., and E. M. Rogers. 1988. “Innovations and Organizations: Critical Perspectives.” Communication Research 15(5):632–51. doi: 10.1177/009365088015005007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Versailles, D., and N. Foss. 2019. “Unpacking the Constituents of Dynamic Capabilities: A Microfoundations Perspective.” Management International/International Management/Gestiòn Internacional 23(4):18–29.
   Google Scholar
• *Waldorff, S. B. 2013. “Accounting for Organizational Innovations: Mobilizing Institutional Logics in Translation.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 29(3):219–34. doi: 10.1016/j.scaman.2013.03.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Walker, R. M. 2006. “Innovation Type and Diffusion: An Empirical Analysis of Local Government.” Public Administration 84(2):311–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00004.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Walker, R. M. 2007. “An Empirical Evaluation of Innovation Types and Organizational and Environmental Characteristics: Towards a Configuration Framework.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18(4):591–615. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mum026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Walker, R. M. 2014. “Internal and External Antecedents of Process Innovation: A Review and Extension.” Public Management Review 16(1):21–44. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2013.771698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Walker, R. M., C. N. Avellaneda, and F. S. Berry. 2011. “Exploring the Diffusion of Innovation among High and Low Innovative Localities: A Test of the Berry and Berry Model.” Public Management Review 13(1):95–125. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2010.501616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Walker, R. M., F. S. Berry, and C. N. Avellaneda. 2015. “Limits on Innovativeness in Local Government: Examining Capacity, Complexity, and Dynamism in Organizational Task Environments.” Public Administration 93(3):663–83. doi: 10.1111/padm.12159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Walker, R. M., F. Damanpour, and C. A. Devece. 2011. “Management Innovation and Organizational Performance: The Mediating Effect of Performance Management.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21(2):367–86. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muq043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wang, S., and M. K. Feeney. 2016. “Determinants of Information and Communication Technology Adoption in Municipalities.” The American Review of Public Administration 46(3):292–313. doi: 10.1177/0275074014553462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. 1995. “What Theory Is Not, Theorizing Is.” Administrative Science Quarterly 40(3):385–90. doi: 10.2307/2393789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whetten, D. A. 1989. “What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution?” The Academy of Management Review 14(4):490–5. doi: 10.2307/258554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wu, J., L. Ma, and Y. Yang. 2013. “Innovation in the Chinese Public Sector: Typology and Distribution.” Public Administration 91(2):347–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02010.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Zerbinati, S. 2012. “Multi-Level Governance and EU Structural Funds: An Entrepreneurial Local Government Perspective.” Local Government Studies 38(5):577–97. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2011.649914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Zerbinati, S., and V. Souitaris. 2005. “Entrepreneurship in the Public Sector: A Framework of Analysis in European Local Governments.” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 17(1):43–64. doi: 10.1080/0898562042000310723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Zhao, Q. 2012. “The Regional Disparities in Chinese Provincial Government Innovation.” Innovation 14(4):595–604. doi: 10.5172/impp.2012.14.4.595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar