Size and Growth of Mobile Phone Firms in Mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan

REFERENCES

• Battistin, E., Blundell, R., & Lewbel, A. (2009). Why is consumption more log normal than income? Gibrat’s Law revisited. Journal of Political Economy, 117(6), 1140–1154. doi:10.1086/648995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breuer, J. B., McNown, R., & Wallace, M. S. (2001). Misleading inferences from panel unit-root tests with an illustration from purchasing power parity. Review of International Economics, 9(3), 482–493. doi:10.1111/1467-9396.00294
   Google Scholar
• Córdoba, J. C. (2008). A generalized Gibrat’s Law. International Economic Review, 49(4), 1463–1468. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2354.2008.00518.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, Y., Liu, Z., Song, S., & Zheng, J. (2013). Technological capacity, product position, and firm competitiveness an empirical analysis. Chinese Economy, 46(1), 55–74. doi:10.2753/CES1097-1475460104
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, J., Wilson, J., & Blandon, P. (2002). Panel tests of Gibrat’s Law for Japanese manufacturing. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 20(3), 415–433. doi:10.1016/S0167-7187(00)00085-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibrat, R. (1931). Les inequalities economiques. Paris: Librairie di Recueil Sirey.
   Google Scholar
• Hadri, K. (2001). Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data, Econometrics Journal, 3, 148–161. doi:10.1111/1368-423x.00043
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R., & Trainor, M. (2005). Panel-level analysis using the ard: Another look at Gibrat’s Law. Journal of Political Economy, 52(3), 492–518. doi:10.1111/j.0036-9292.2005.00353.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, P. E., & Oulton, N. (1996). The growth and size of firms. Economic Journal, 106(438), 1242–1252. doi:10.2307/2235518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, J. R., Huang, P., & Huang, D. (2006). A unit root test for two time series in China’s tourism industry. Chinese Economy, 39(6), 39–48. doi:10.2753/CES1097-1475390603
   Google Scholar
• Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (1997). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Mimeo, Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53–74. doi:10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, M. S. (1985). Growth, acquisition activity and firm size: Evidence from the United Kingdom, Journal of Industrial Economics, 33, 327–338. doi:10.2307/2098540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, A., & Lin, C. F. (1992). Unit root test in panel data: Asymptotic and finite sample properties. University of California at San Diego, Discussion Paper, 92–93.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. S. (2002). Unit root in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometric, 108(1), 1–24. doi:10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddala, G. S., & Wu, S. (1999). A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(S1), 631–652. doi:10.1111/1468-0084.61.s1.13
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, E. (1962). Entry, Gibrat’s Law, innovation, and the growth of firms. American Economic Review, 52(5), 1023–1051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCloughan, P. (1995). Simulation of concentration development from modified Gibrat growth-entry-exit processes. Journal of Industrial Economics, 43(4), 405–433. doi:10.2307/2950552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monte, A. D., & Papagni, E. (2003). R&D and the growth of firms: Empirical analysis of a panel of Italian firms. Research Policy, 32(6), 1003–1014. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00107-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connell, P. G. J. (1998). The overvaluation of purchasing power parity. Journal of International Economics, 44(1), 1–19. doi:10.1016/S0022-1996(97)00017-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perron, P. (1989). The great crash, the oil price shock and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica, 57(6), 1361–1401. doi:10.2307/1913712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, A., & Whittington, G. (1975). The size and growth of firms. Review of Economic Studies, 42(1), 15–26. doi:10.2307/2296816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, M., & Sarno, L. (1998). The behavior of real exchanges during the post–Bretton Woods period, Journal of International Economics, 46, 281–312. doi:10.1016/S0022-1996(97)00054-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschoegl, A. E. (1983). Size, growth and transnationality among the world’s largest banks. Journal of Business, 56(2), 187–201. doi:10.1086/296196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zellner, A. (1962). An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57(298), 348–368. doi:10.1080/01621459.1962.10480664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar