References
- Aguillo, I. F. (2012). Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis. Scientometrics, 91(2), 343–351. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0582-8
- Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., & Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision, 47(8), 1323–1339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740910984578
- Birkinshaw, J., Hamel, G., & Mol, M. J. (2008). Management Innovation. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 825–845. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.34421969
- Casper, S., & Murray, F. (2005). Careers and clusters: Analyzing the career network dynamic of biotechnology clusters. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 22(1–2), 51–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2004.11.009
- Ceretta, G. F., Dos Reis, D. R., & Da Rocha, A. C. (2016). Innovation and business models: A bibliometric study of scientific production on Web of Science database. Gestão & Produção, 23(2), 433–444. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530x1461-14
- Cetindamar, D., Wasti, S. N., Ansal, H., & Beyhan, B. (2009). Does technology management research diverge or converge in developing and developed countries? Technovation, 29(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.04.002
- Choi, D. G., Lee, Y.-B., Jung, M.-J., & Lee, H. (2012). National characteristics and competitiveness in MOT research: A comparative analysis of ten specialty journals, 2000–2009. Technovation, 32(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.09.004
- Confraria, H., Mira Godinho, M., & Wang, L. (2017). Determinants of citation impact: A comparative analysis of the Global South versus the Global North. Research Policy, 46(1), 265–279. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.11.004
- Cortés, J. D. (2021). Research on innovation in china and Latin America: Bibliometric insights in the field of business, management, and decision sciences. Latin American Business Review. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10978526.2021.1930551
- Cortés-Sánchez, J. D. (2019). Innovation in Latin America through the lens of bibliometrics: Crammed and fading away. Scientometrics, 121(2), 869–895. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03201-0
- Cortés-Sánchez, J. D., Bohle, K., & Guix, M. (2020). Innovation research in management and stem for sustainability in developing countries insights from bibliometrics in the global south (No. 154; Universidad Del Rosario, School of Management). https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/28225
- Cui, T., & Zhang, J. (2018). Bibliometric and review of the research on circular economy through the evolution of Chinese public policy. Scientometrics, 116(2), 1013–1037. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2782-y
- De Carvalho, G. D. G., Cruz, J. A. W., De Carvalho, H. G., Duclós, L. C., & De Fátima Stankowitz, R. (2017). Innovativeness measures: A bibliometric review and a classification proposal. International Journal of Innovation Science, 9(1), 81–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-10-2016-0038
- de Paulo, A. F., Carvalho, L. C., Costa, M. T. G. V., Lopes, J. E. F., & Galina, S. V. R. (2017). Mapping open innovation: A bibliometric review to compare developed and emerging countries. Global Business Review, 18(2), 291–307. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150916668600
- Di Guardo, M. C., & Harrigan, K. R. (2012). Mapping research on strategic alliances and innovation: A co-citation analysis. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(6), 789–811. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-011-9239-2
- Dimensions. (2018). Search. Search. https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication
- Fagerberg, J., Fosaas, M., & Sapprasert, K. (2012). Innovation: Exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy, 41(7), 1132–1153. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.008
- Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338–342. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF
- Finardi, U. (2015). Scientific collaboration between BRICS countries. Scientometrics, 102(2), 1139–1166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1490-5
- Gao, Y., Liu, Z., Song, S., & Zheng, J. (2013). Technological capacity, product position, and firm competitiveness. The Chinese Economy, 46(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2753/CES1097-1475460104
- Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2001). Double effort = Double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry. Scientometrics, 50(2), 199–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010561321723
- Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2005). Analysing Scientific Networks Through Co-Authorship. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems (pp. 257–276). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_12
- Google Scholar. (2018). Google Scholar. https://scholar.google.com/
- Guan, J., & He, Y. (2007). Patent-bibliometric analysis on the Chinese science—Technology linkages. Scientometrics, 72(3), 403–425. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1741-1
- Guan, J., & Ma, N. (2007). China's emerging presence in nanoscience and nanotechnology. A comparative bibliometric study of several nanoscience "giants”. Research Policy, 36(6), 880–886. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.02.004
- Gusenbauer, M. (2019). Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases. Scientometrics, 118(1), 177–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2958-5
- Harzing, A.-W. (2007). Publish or perish. Harzing.Com. https://harzing.com/resources/publish-or-perish
- Harzing, A.-W., & Giroud, A. (2014). The competitive advantage of nations: An application to academia. Journal of Informetrics, 8(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.10.007
- He, T. (2009). International scientific collaboration of China with the G7 countries. Scientometrics, 80(3), 571–582. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-2043-y
- Herzog, C., Hook, D., & Konkiel, S. (2020). Dimensions: Bringing down barriers between scientometricians and data. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 387–395. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00020
- Hook, D. W., Porter, S. J., & Herzog, C. (2018). Dimensions: Building context for search and evaluation. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 3, 23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2018.00023
- Huang, L., Zhang, Y., Guo, Y., Zhu, D., & Porter, A. L. (2014). Four dimensional Science and Technology planning: A new approach based on bibliometrics and technology roadmapping. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 81(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.09.010
- Hug, S. E., & Brändle, M. P. (2017). The coverage of Microsoft Academic: Analyzing the publication output of a university. Scientometrics, 113(3), 1551–1571. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2535-3
- Jenner, F. (2019, May 15). Where China is most heavily investing in Latin America. Latin America Reports. https://latinamericareports.com/where-china-invest-latin-america/2064/
- Jia, H. (2018). China's plan to recruit talented researchers. Nature, 553(7688), S8–S1. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-00538-z
- King, D. A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 430(6997), 311–316. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/430311a
- Koleski, K. (2011). Backgrounder: China in Latin America. U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission. https://www.uscc.gov/research/backgrounder-china-latin-america
- Kostoff, R. N. (2012). China/USA nanotechnology research output comparison-2011 update. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(5), 986–990. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.01.007
- Kousha, K., Thelwall, M., & Rezaie, S. (2011). Assessing the citation impact of books: The role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and Scopus. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(11), 2147–2164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21608
- Lazzarotti, F., Dalfovo, M. S., & Hoffmann, V. E. (2011). A bibliometric study of innovation based on schumpeter. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 6(4), 121–135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242011000400010
- Li, N., Chen, K., & Kou, M. (2017). Technology foresight in China: Academic studies, governmental practices and policy applications. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 119, 246–255. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.010
- Li, X., Zhou, Y., Xue, L., & Huang, L. (2015). Integrating bibliometrics and roadmapping methods: A case of dye-sensitized solar cell technology-based industry in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 97, 205–222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.05.007
- Lopes, A. P. V. B. V., & De Carvalho, M. M. (2012). The evolution of the literature on innovation in cooperative relationships: A bibliometric study for the last two decades. Gestão & Produção, 19(1), 203–217. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-530X2012000100014
- Manjarrez, C. C. A., Pico, J. A. C., & Díaz, P. A. (2016). Industry interactions in innovation systems: A bibliometric study. Latin American Business Review, 17(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10978526.2016.1209036
- Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2018). Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1160–1177. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002
- Mueller, V., Rosenbusch, N., & Bausch, A. (2013). Success patterns of exploratory and exploitative innovation: A meta-analysis of the influence of institutional factors. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1606–1636. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313484516
- Ng, T., Cai, J. (2019). China's funding for science and research to reach 2.5 per cent of GDP in 2019. South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/2189427/chinas-funding-science-and-research-reach-25-cent-gdp-2019
- Padilla-Ospina, A. M., Medina-Vásquez, J. E., & Rivera-Godoy, J. A. (2018). Financing innovation: A bibliometric analysis of the field. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 23(1), 63–102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08963568.2018.1448678
- Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. (2006). Hard facts, dangerous half-truths & total nonsense: Profiting from evidence-based management. Harvard Business School Publishing.
- Pilkington, A., & Teichert, T. (2006). Management of technology: Themes, concepts and relationships. Technovation, 26(3), 288–299. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.01.009
- Prathap, G. (2017). Scientific wealth and inequality within nations. Scientometrics, 113(2), 923–928. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2511-y
- Quan, W., Chen, B., & Shu, F. (2017). Publish or impoverish: An investigation of the monetary reward system of science in China (1999–2016). Aslib Journal of Information Management, 69(5), 486–502. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-01-2017-0014
- Rosenbusch, N., Brinckmann, J., & Bausch, A. (2011). Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(4), 441–457. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.12.002
- Ryan, M. P. (2010). Patent incentives, technology markets, and public–private bio-medical innovation networks in Brazil. World Development, 38(8), 1082–1093. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.12.013
- SCImago. (2018). SCImago journal ranking. https://www.scimagojr.com/
- Scopus. (2018). Scopus - Document search. https://www.scopus.com/search/form.uri?display=basic
- Silveira, F. F., & Zilber, S. N. (2017). Is social innovation about innovation? A bibliometric study identifying the main authors, citations and co-citations over 20 years. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 21(6), 459–484. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEIM.2017.086936
- Sinclair, S., Geoffrey, R. (2012). About Voyant Tools | Voyant Tools Documentation. http://digihum.mcgill.ca/voyant/about/
- Small, H., Sweeney, E., & Greenlee, E. (1985). Clustering the science citation index using co-citations. II. Mapping science. Scientometrics, 8(5–6), 321–340. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018057
- Tanco, M., Escuder, M., Heckmann, G., Jurburg, D., & Velazquez, J. (2018). Supply chain management in Latin America: Current research and future directions. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 23(5), 412–430. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-07-2017-0236
- Thelwall, M. (2018). Dimensions: A competitor to Scopus and the Web of Science? Journal of Informetrics, 12(2), 430–435. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.03.006
- Tijssen, R. J. W. (2009). Internationalisation of pharmaceutical R&D: How globalised are Europe's largest multinational companies? Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 21(7), 859–879. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320903182330
- Tollefson, J. (2018). China declared world's largest producer of scientific articles. Nature, 553(7689), 390–390. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-00927-4
- van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
- Veugelers, R. (2017). The challenge of China's rise as a science and technology powerhouse. Policy Contributions, 19, 1–15.
- Waltman, L., & Larivière, V. (2020). Special issue on bibliographic data sources. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 360–362. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_e_00026
- Wang, K., Shen, Z., Huang, C., Wu, C.-H., Dong, Y., & Kanakia, A. (2020). Microsoft Academic Graph: When experts are not enough. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 396–413. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00021
- Wu, L., Wang, D., & Evans, J. A. (2019). Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology. Nature, 566(7744), 378–382. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0941-9
- Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science (New York, N.Y.), 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099
- Zhao, K. (2015). Product competition and R&D investment under spillovers within full or partial collusion games. Latin American Economic Review, 24(1), 4. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40503-015-0018-6
- Zhao, S., & Yang, H. (2008). Management practices in high-tech environments and enterprises in the People's Republic of China. The Chinese Economy, 41(3), 17–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2753/CES1097-1475410302
- Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
- Zikmund, W. G., Babin, B. J., Carr, J. C., & Griffin, M. (2010). Business research methods. South-Western Cengage Learning.