Environmental Dynamism as a Moderator of Familiness and Performance in Mexican SMEs

References

• Abdullahi, I. I., & Sulaiman, C. (2015). The determinants of small and medium-sized enterprises performance in Nigeria. Advances in Economics and Business, 3(5), 184–189.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2003). A Contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. The Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 71–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronoff, C. E., & Ward, J. L. (1997). Pay in family businesses. Nation’s Business, 85(5), 62–63.
   Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.
   Google Scholar
• Baños Monroy, V. I., Ramírez Solís, E. R., & Rodríguez Aceves, L. (2015). Familiness and its relationship with performance in Mexican family firms. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 14(2), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettis, R. A., & Hitt, M. A. (1995). The new competitive landscape. Strategic Management Journal, 16(S1), 7–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoa, T., Herrera, E., & Trevino, J. (2013). Study on family business administration in Mexico: Main problems and challenges confronted. International Journal of Good Conscience, 8(2), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Carlock, R. S., & Ward, J. L. (2001). Strategic planning for the family business: Parallel planning to unify the family and business (1st ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Casillas, J. C., Moreno, A. M., & Barbero, J. L. (2010). A Configurational approach of the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and growth of family firms. Family Business Review, 23(1), 27–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carsrud, A., Brännback, M., Elfving, J., & Brandt, K. (2009). Motivations: The entrepreneurial mind and behaviour. In A. Carsrud and J. Brännback. (Eds.), Understanding the entrepreneurial mind (pp. 141–165). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chirico, F., & Bau, M. (2014). Is the family an “asset” or “liability” for firm performance? The moderating role of environmental dynamism. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(2), 210–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2009). Priorities, resource stocks, and performance in family and non-family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 739–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Litz, R. (2003). A unified systems perspective of family firm performance: An extension and integration. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 467–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Sharma, P. (2005). Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5), 555–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Steier, L. P. (2003). An Introduction to theories of family business. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 441–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comisión Intersecretarial de Política Industrial Secretaría de Economía. (2003). Observatorio PyME México: Primer reporte de resultados 2002. Retrieved from http://www.protlcuem.gob.mx/swb/work/models/economia/Resource/965/1/images/ESTUDIOPYMESCIPI.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Combs, J. G., Ketchen, J. D., Ireland, R. D., & Webb, J. W. (2011). The role of resource flexibility in leveraging strategic resources. Journal of Management Studies, 48(5), 1098–1125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz, C., Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Becerra, M. (2010). Perceptions of benevolence and the design of agency contracts: CEO-TMT relationships in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 69–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: what, why, when and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, A., & Mussolino, D. (2014). Exploring what makes family firms different: Discrete or overlapping constructs in the literature. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(2), 169–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado-Verde, M., Martín-de-Castro, G., Navas-López, J. E., & Cruz-González, J. (2011). Capital social, capital relacional e innovación tecnológica. Una aplicación al sector manufacturero español de alta y media-alta tecnología. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, 14(4), 207–221.
   Google Scholar
• Dess, G. G., & Beard, D. W. (1984). Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 29(1), 52–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer, W. G. (2006). Examining the “family effect” on firm performance. Family Business Review, 19(4), 253–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddleston, K., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2007). Destructive and productive family relationships: A stewardship theory perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 545–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddleston, K., Kellermanns, F. W., & Sarathy, R. (2008). Resource configuration in family firms: Linking resources, strategic planning and environmental dynamism to performance. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 26–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Encuesta Nacional sobre Productividad y Competitividad de las Micro, Pequeñas y Medianas Empresas (2015). Comunicación social. México: Instituto Nacional de Geografía e Informática.
   Google Scholar
• Family Firm Institute. (2018). Defining family enterprise. Retrieved from http://www.ffi.org/?definitions
   Google Scholar
• Fini, R., Grimaldi, R., Marzocchi, G. L., & Sobrero, M. (2012). The Determinants of corporate entrepreneurial intention within small and newly established firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(2), 387–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fombrun, C. J., Gardberg, N. A., & Sever, J. M. (2000). The Reputation quotient: A multi-stakeholder measure of corporate reputation. Journal of Brand Management, 7(4), 241–255.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, H., Kessler, A., Rusch, T., Suess-Reyes, J., & Weismeier-Sammer, D. (2017). Capturing the familiness of family businesses: Development of the Family Influence Family Scale (FIFS). Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 41(5), 709–742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, H., Lueger, M., Nosé, L., & Suchy, D. (2010). The concept of “Familiness”: Literature review and systems theory-based reflections. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(3), 119–130.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (1984). Business unit strategy, managerial characteristics, and business unit effectiveness at strategy implementation. Academy of Management Journal, 27(1), 25–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habbershon, T. G., & Williams, M. (1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 9(2), 157–170.
   Google Scholar
• Habbershon, T. G., Williams, M., & MacMillan, I. C. (2003). A unified systems theory of family firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 18(4), 451–465.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, A., Melin, L., & Nordqvist, M. (2001). Entrepreneurship as radical change in the family business: Exploring the role of cultural patterns. Family Business Review, 14(3), 193–208.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2015). An Index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 1–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives’. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain, J., Rahman, W., & Ali Sha, F. (2016). Market orientation and performance: The interaction effect of entrepreneurial orientation. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 10(2), 388–403.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. (2015). Reporte de la micro, pequeña, mediana y gran empresa. Estratificación de los estabelecimentos (Censos Económicos 2014), México. Retrieved from: http://internet.contenidos.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/productos/prod_serv/contenidos/espanol/bvinegi/productos/nueva_estruc/702825077952.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Irava, W., & Moores, K. (2010). Clarifying the strategy advantage of familiness: Unbundling its dimensions and highlighting its paradoxes. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(3), 131–144.
   Google Scholar
• Kellermanns, F. W., & Eddleston, K. A. (2004). Feuding families: When conflict does a family firm good. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(3), 209–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler, E. H., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (1996). Innovation speed: A conceptual model of context, antecedents and outcomes. Academy Management Journal, 21(4), 1143–1191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, E. A., & Quaddus, M. (2017). What factors make micro-firms sustainable? A proposal for a model. The Journal of Developing Areas, 51(4), 255–269.
   Google Scholar
• Kirca, A., Jayachandran, S., & Bearden, W. (2005). Market orientation: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and impact on performance. Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 24–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, S. B., Astrachan, J. H., & Smyrnios, K. X. (2005). The F-PEC scale of family influence: Construction, validation, and further implication for theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3), 321–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum, D. G., Kupper, L. L., & Muller, K. E. (1988). Applied regression analysis and other multivariate analysis methods (1st ed.). Boston: PWS-Kent Publisher Company.
   Google Scholar
• Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• König, A., Kammerlander, N., & Enders, A. (2013). The family innovator’s dilemma. How family influence affects the adoption of discontinuous technologies by incumbent firms. Academy of Management Review, 38(3), 418–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lechner, C., Dowling, M., & Welpe, I. (2006). Firm networks and firm development: The role of the relational mix. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(4), 514–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. (2004). The effects of family ownership and management on firm performance. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 69(4), 46–53.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M. S., & Rogoff, E. G. (1996). Research note: Comparison of small businesses with family participation versus small businesses without family participation: An investigation of differences in goals, attitudes, and family/business conflict. Family Business Review, 9(4), 423–437.
   Google Scholar
• Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 429–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Conesa, I., Soto-Acosta, P., & Carayannis, E. G. (2017). On the path towards open innovation: Assessing the role of knowledge management capability and environmental dynamism in SMEs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(3), 553–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matz, C., & Ireland, D. R. (2013). Familiness and innovation: Resource bundling as the missing link. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(6), 1399–1419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArthur, A. W., & Nystrom, P. C. (1991). Environmental dynamism, complexity, and munificence as moderators of strategy-performance relationships. Journal of Business Research, 23(4), 349–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of the Economy of Mexico (2002). Secretaría de Economía (2002). [Website]. Retrieved from www.economia.gob.mx
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D., & Droge, C. (1986). Psychological and traditional determinants of structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(4), 539–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D., & Friesen, P. (1983). Strategy-making and environment: The third link. Strategic Management Journal, 4(3), 221–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2005). Managing for the long run: Lessons in competitive advantage from great family businesses (1st ed.). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. I., Jangwoo, L., Sooduck, C., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2009). Filling the institutional void: The social behavior and performance of family vs. non-family technology firms in emerging markets. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(5), 802–817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. I., Le Breton-Miller, I., & Scholnick, B. (2008). Stewardship vs. stagnation: An empirical comparison of small family and non-family businesses. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 51–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minichilli, A., Corbetta, G., & MacMillan, I. C. (2010). Top management teams in family-controlled companies: Familiness, faultiness, and their impact on financial performance. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 205–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moores, K. (2009). Paradigms and theory building in the domain of business families. Family Business Review, 22(2), 167–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moores, K., & Craig, J. (2005). Balanced scorecards to drive the strategic planning of family firms. Family Business Review, 18(2), 105–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, R. T., Harris, P. R., & Moran, S. (2007). Managing cultural differences (7th ed.). Routledge: London.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, P. D., Zuiker, V. S., Danes, S. M., Stafford, K., Heck, R. K. Z., & Duncan, K. A. (2003). The impact of the family and the business on family business sustainability. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(5), 639–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oreja-Rodriguez, J. R., & Yanes-Estevez, V. (2010). Environmental scanning: dynamism with rack and stack from Rasch Model. Management Decision, 48(2), 260–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization in prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 492–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., & Waters, E. (2002). Four assumptions of multiple regression that researchers should always test. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 8(2), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Park, T., & Ryu, D. (2015). Drivers of technology commercialization and performance in SMEs: The moderating effect of environmental dynamism. Management Decision, 53(2), 338–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, A. W., Carr, J. C., & Shaw, J. C. (2008). Toward a theory of familiness: A social capital perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(6), 949–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, A. W., Holt, D. T., & Carr, J. C. (2014). Scales in family business studies. In L. Melin, M. Nordqvist, & P. Sharma (Eds.), The Sage handbook of family business (pp. 551–572). London, England: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method bias in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajagopal, P. (2012). Darwinian fitness in the global marketplace: Analysing the competition. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ramírez-Pérez, H. (2016). A resource-based view model for private family business to measure the added value of family members on performance with a socioemotional wealth perspective (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest 10117920.
   Google Scholar
• Ramírez-Solís, E., Baños-Monroy, V., & Rodríguez-Aceves, L. (2017). Family Business in Latin America. In F. W. Kellermanns & F. Hoy (Eds.), The Routledge companion to family business. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos-Rodríguez, A.-R., Medina-Garrido, J.-A., Lorenzo-Gómez, J.-D., & Ruiz-Navarro, J. (2010). What you know or who you know? The role of intellectual and social capital in opportunity recognition. International Small Business Journal, 28(6), 566–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauch, A., & Hatak, I. (2016). A meta-analysis of different HR-enhancing practices and performance of small and medium-sized firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(5), 485–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roxas, B., Ashill, N., & Chadee, D. (2017). Effects of entrepreneurial and environmental sustainability orientations on firm performance: A study of small businesses in the Philippines. Journal of Small Business Management, 55(1), 163–178.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, M. W., Muse, L., & Oswald, S. (2006). A new perspective on the developmental model for family business. Family Business Review, 19(4), 317–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutherford, M. W., Kuratko, D. F., & Holt, D. T. (2008). Examining the link between ‘‘Familiness’’ and performance: can the F-Pec untangle the family business theory jungle?. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(6), 1089–1110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvato, C., Chirico, F., & Sharma, P. (2010). Understanding exit from the founder’s business in family firms. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, 12, 31–85.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, M. L., Sanzo, M. J., Álvarez, L. I., & Vázquez, R. (2005). Effects of market orientation on business strategic behavior. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 13, 17–42.
   Google Scholar
• Schafer, J. L., & Olsen, M. K. (1998). Multiple imputations for multivariate missing-data problems: A data analyst’s perspective. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33(4), 545–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., Dino, R. N., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12(2), 99–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serviere-Munoz, L., Vicdan, H., & Saran, A. (2013). Two Peas in a Pod? Exploring the market orientation, innovation, and dynamism of Mexico and Turkey´s entrepreneurial culture. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 17, 77–98.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, P., & Zahra, S. (2004). Family business research: A strategic reflection. Family Business Review, 17(4), 331–346.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, J. A. (2017). Family businesses in Mexico. Revista Espacios, 38(53), 21–34.
   Google Scholar
• Sinkula, J. M., Baker, W. E., & Noordewier, T. (1997). A framework for market-based organizational learning: linking values, knowledge, and behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(4), 305–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Gilbert, B. A. (2011). Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage: breadth, depth, and life-cycle effects. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1390–1412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Templ, M., Kowarik, A., & Filzmoser, P. (2011). Iterative stepwise regression imputation using standard and robust methods. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 55(10), 2793–2806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanoni, G. (2017). Dependencia de trayectoria (path dependence) en las decisiones implementadas por los grupos económicos bancarios ecuatorianos (1970–2000). Revista Espacios, 38(42), 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: a comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801–814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. (2016). Environmental dynamism, trust and dynamic capabilities of family businesses. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 22(5), 643–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, J. L. (1988). The special role of strategic planning for family businesses. Family Business Review, 1(2), 105–117.
   Google Scholar
• Weismeier-Sammer, D., Frank, H., & Von Schlippe, A. (2013). Untangling “familiness”: A literature review and directions for future research. International Journal for Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 14(3), 165–177.
   Google Scholar
• Zafar, A., & Mustafa, S. (2017). SMEs and its role in economic and socio-economic development of Pakistan. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 6(4), 2226–3624.
   Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. (2003). International expansion of U.S. manufacturing family businesses: The effect of ownership and involvement. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 495–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zellweger, T., Eddleston, K., & Kellermanns, F. (2010). Exploring the concept of familiness: Introducing family firm identity. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(1), 54–63.
   Google Scholar