The Invisible Side of Political Parties: The Case of the PCdoB

References

• Aldrich, J. H. (1995). Why parties? The origin and transformation of political parties in America.Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bardin, L. (1994). Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa, Portugal: Edições Setenta.
   Google Scholar
• Bawn, K., & Noel, H. (2007). Long coalitions under electoral uncertainty: The electoral origins of political parties. Paper presented at annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Bawn, K., Cohen, M., Karol, D., Masket, S., Noel, H., & Zaller, J. (2012). A theory of political parties: Groups, policy demands and nominations in American politics. Perspectives on Politics, 10(03), 571–597. doi:10.1017/S1537592712001624
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, J. (1999). The expanded party in American politics (Ph.D. dissertation). University of California, Berkeley, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, J. (2005). Party network research, factions, and the next agenda. Paper prepared for delivery at the 2005 State of The Parties Conference, Akron, OH, October 5–7.
   Google Scholar
• Borba, J., Gimenes, É. R., & Ribeiro, E. (2015). Os determinantes do ativismo partidário na América Latina. Revista Latinoamericana de Opinión Pública, (5), 13–47.  doi: 10.1590/339711/2018
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S., Everett, M., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H. R., & Tsai, W. (2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 795–817. doi:10.5465/20159624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carreirão, Y. S. (2014). O sistema partidário brasileiro: um debate com a literatura recente. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, (14), 255–295. doi:10.1590/0103-335220141410
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M., Karol, D., Noel, H., & Zaller, J. (2008). The party decides: Presidential nominations before and after reform. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, R., & Parker, A. (2004). The hidden powers of social networks (p. 11). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dominguez, C. B. K. (2005). Groups and the party coalitions: A network analysis of overlapping donor lists. Paper prepared for delivery at the 2005 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty, J. W. (2003). The strength of campaign ties: Political networks as political parties. The Annual Meeting of the Northeastern Political Science Association, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty, J. W. (2005). Organized by competition: candidate-consultant networks in California legislative campaigns. The Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, N. (2008). The invisible organization: How informal networks can lead organizational change. A Grower Book. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, N., & Lankester, B. (1996). Total business design. Chichester, UK: John Willey & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Fazito, D., & Soares, W. (2010). Capital social, análise de redes e os mecanismos intermediários do sistemamigratório Brasil/EUA. Revista Geografias Artigos Científicos, 6, 27–41.
   Google Scholar
• Garton, L., Haythornthwaite, C., & Wellman, B. (1997). Studying online social networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(1), 4–32. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101
   Google Scholar
• Gimenes, E. R. (2015). A relação dos eleitores com partidos políticos em novas democracias: partidarismo na América Latina. 2015. Tese (Doutorado em Sociologia Política) – Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sociologia Política, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. doi:10.1086/225469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. doi:10.1086/228311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (2000). Sociologie Économique. Paris, France: Édition duSeuil.
   Google Scholar
• Hanneman, R. A. (2001). Introduction to social network methods. Retrieved from: http://faculty.ucr.edu/∼hanneman/soc157/nettext.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Heaney, M., & Rojas, F. (2007). Partisans, nonpartisans, and the antiwar movement in the United States. American Politics Research, 34(4), 431–464. doi:10.1177/1532673X07300763
   Google Scholar
• Key, V. O. (1949). Southern politics in state and nation.New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf. doi:10.1086/ahr/55.4.939
   Google Scholar
• Koger, G., Masket, S., & Noel, H. (2009). Partisan webs: Information exchange and party networks. British Journal of Political Science, 39(03), 633–653. doi:10.1017/S0007123409000659
   Google Scholar
• Koger, G., Masket, S., & Noel, H. (2010). Cooperative party factions in American politics. American Politics Research, 38(1), 33. doi:10.1177/1532673X09353509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krackhardt, D., & Hanson, J. (1993). Informal networks: The company behind the chart. Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 104–111. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, N. (2001). Building a theory of social capital. In N.Lin, K.Cook, & R.Burt (Eds.). Social capital: Theory and research (pp. 3–30). New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Lupu, N. (2015). Partisanship in Latin America. In R. E.Carlin, M. M.Singer, E. J.Zechmeister (orgs.), The Latin American voter: Pursuing representation and accountability in challenging contexts. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press. Retrieved from: www.noamlupu.com/partisanshipLAV.pdf, accessed on 23 January, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Lusher, D., Koskinen, J., & Robins, G. (2013). Exponential random graph models: Theory, methods and applications.New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Masket, S. (2002). The emergence of unofficial party organizations in California. Spectrum: The Journal of State Politics, 75(Fall), 29–33.
   Google Scholar
• Masket, S. (2004). A party by other means: The rise of informal party organizations in California (PhD dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Masket, S. (2009). No middle ground: How informal party organizations control nominations and polarize legislatures. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Masket, S. (2014). Party networks. Retrieved from: http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-780199756223/obo-9780199756223-0091.xml#obo-9780199756223-0091-div1-0003.
   Google Scholar
• Michels, R. (1962). Political parties: A sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy.New York, NY: Free Press. Reprinted.
   Google Scholar
• Monroe, J. P. (2001). The political party matrix: The persistence of organization. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noel, H. (2012). Toward a network theory of political parties: A social network analysis of internal party cleavages in presidential nominations. American Political Parties: Past, Present, and Future Conference, October, 8–9. Charlottesville, VA. Retrieved on July, 02, 2016 from: http://faculty.virginia.edu/jajenkins/Noel.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Okado, L. T. A., Ribeiro, E. A., & Lazare, D. C. M. (2018). Partidarismo, ciclos de vida e socialização política no Brasil. Pro-posições, 29 (1), 267–295. doi:10.1590/1980-6248-2016-0063
   Google Scholar
• Polsby, N. W. (1983). Consequences of party reform. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polsby, N. W. (2005). How Congress evolves. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rennó, L. R. (2001). Confiança interpessoal e comportamento político: Microfundamentos da teoria do capital social na América Latina. Opinião Pública, 7(1), 33–59. doi:10.1590/S0104-62762001000100003
   Google Scholar
• Saint-Jean, I. (2000). La nouvelle sociologia economique de Mark Granovetter. In M.Granovetter (Ed.), Sociologie Économique.Paris, France: Édition duSeuil.
   Google Scholar
• Sawicki, F., & Siméant, J. (2011). Inventário da sociologia do engajamento militante: nota crítica sobre algumas tendências recentes dos trabalhos franceses. Sociologias, 13(28), 200–255. doi:10.1590/S1517-45222011000300008
   Google Scholar
• Schattschneider, E. E. (1942). Party government. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. A. (1990). The party network: The robust organization of Illinois Republicans.Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, R. (2005). Do 527’s add up to a party? Thinking about the shadows of politics. The Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Sozen, C., Basim, N., & Hazir, K. (2009). Social network analysis. Organizational Studies, International Journal of Business and Management, 1(1), 21–35. Retrieved from http://dergipark.gov.tr/ijbms/issue/26072/274774
   Google Scholar
• Tribunal Regional Eleitoral de Minas Gerais. (2015). Eleições 2012, 2014.Belo Horizonte, Brazil: Tribunal Regional Eleitoral de Minas Gerais. Retrieved from: http://www.tre-mg.jus.br
   Google Scholar
• Van Veen, K., & Kratzer, J. (2011). National and international interlocking directorates within Europe: Corporate networks within and among fifteen European countries. Economy and Society, 40(1), 1–25. doi:10.1080/03085147.2011.529376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware, A. (1996). Political parties and party systems. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, MA: University Press Cambridge.
   Google Scholar