Recruitment of RBM6 to DNA Double-Strand Breaks Fosters Homologous Recombination Repair

REFERENCES

• Jackson SP, Bartek J. The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature. 2009;461:1071–1078. doi:10.1038/nature08467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackford AN, Jackson SP. ATM, ATR, and DNA-PK: the Trinity at the heart of the DNA damage response. Mol Cell. 2017;66:801–817. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2017.05.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord CJ, Ashworth A. PARP inhibitors: synthetic lethality in the clinic. Science. 2017;355:1152–1158. doi:10.1126/science.aam7344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tubbs A, Nussenzweig A. Endogenous DNA damage as a source of genomic instability in cancer. Cell. 2017;168:644–656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machour FE, Ayoub N. Transcriptional regulation at DSBs: mechanisms and consequences. Trends Genet. 2020;36:981–997. doi:10.1016/j.tig.2020.01.001.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kulkarni A, Wilson DM. 3rd. The involvement of DNA-damage and -repair defects in neurological dysfunction. Am J Hum Genet. 2008;82:539–566. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.01.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morio T. Recent advances in the study of immunodeficiency and DNA damage response. Int J Hematol. 2017;106:357–365. doi:10.1007/s12185-017-2263-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alt FW, Schwer B. DNA double-strand breaks as drivers of neural genomic change, function, and disease. DNA Repair. 2018;71:158–163. doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2018.08.019.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bednarski JJ, Sleckman BP. At the intersection of DNA damage and immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol. 2019;19:231–242. doi:10.1038/s41577-019-0135-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shrivastav M, De Haro LP, Nickoloff JA. Regulation of DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice. Cell Res. 2008;18:134–147. doi:10.1038/cr.2007.111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasin M, Rothstein R. Repair of strand breaks by homologous recombination. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013;5:a012740. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a012740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clouaire T, Legube G. DNA double strand break repair pathway choice: a chromatin based decision? Nucleus. 2015;6:107–113. doi:10.1080/19491034.2015.1010946.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sfeir A, Symington LS. Microhomology-mediated end joining: a back-up survival mechanism or dedicated pathway? Trends Biochem Sci. 2015;40:701–714. doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2015.08.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhargava R, Onyango DO, Stark JM. Regulation of single-strand annealing and its role in genome maintenance. Trends Genet. 2016;32:566–575. doi:10.1016/j.tig.2016.06.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceccaldi R, Rondinelli B, D’Andrea AD. Repair pathway choices and consequences at the double-strand break. Trends Cell Biol. 2016;26:52–64. doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2015.07.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustedt N, Durocher D. The control of DNA repair by the cell cycle. Nat Cell Biol. 2016;19:1–9. doi:10.1038/ncb3452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scully R, Panday A, Elango R, Willis NA. DNA double-strand break repair-pathway choice in somatic mammalian cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019;20:698–714. doi:10.1038/s41580-019-0152-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aleksandrov R, Hristova R, Stoynov S, Gospodinov A. The chromatin response to double-strand DNA breaks and their repair. Cells. 2020;9:1853. doi:10.3390/cells9081853.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li S, Kuhne WW, Kulharya A, Hudson FZ, Ha K, Cao Z, Dynan WS. Involvement of p54(nrb), a PSF partner protein, in DNA double-strand break repair and radioresistance. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:6746–6753. doi:10.1093/nar/gkp741.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paulsen RD, Soni DV, Wollman R, Hahn AT, Yee MC, Guan A, Hesley JA, Miller SC, Cromwell EF, Solow-Cordero DE, et al. A genome-wide siRNA screen reveals diverse cellular processes and pathways that mediate genome stability. Mol Cell. 2009;35:228–239. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2009.06.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salton M, Lerenthal Y, Wang SY, Chen DJ, Shiloh Y. Involvement of Matrin 3 and SFPQ/NONO in the DNA damage response. Cell Cycle. 2010;9:1568–1576. doi:10.4161/cc.9.8.11298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamson B, Smogorzewska A, Sigoillot FD, King RW, Elledge SJ. A genome-wide homologous recombination screen identifies the RNA-binding protein RBMX as a component of the DNA-damage response. Nat Cell Biol. 2012;14:318–328. doi:10.1038/ncb2426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastrocola AS, Kim SH, Trinh AT, Rodenkirch LA, Tibbetts RS. The RNA-binding protein fused in sarcoma (FUS) functions downstream of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) in response to DNA damage. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:24731–24741.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Montecucco A, Biamonti G. Pre-mRNA processing factors meet the DNA damage response. Front Genet. 2013;4:102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khoury-Haddad H, Guttmann-Raviv N, Ipenberg I, Huggins D, Jeyasekharan AD, Ayoub N. PARP1-dependent recruitment of KDM4D histone demethylase to DNA damage sites promotes double-strand break repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:E728–E737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoabi M, Nadar-Ponniah PT, Khoury-Haddad H, Usaj M, Budowski-Tal I, Haran T, Henn A, Mandel-Gutfreund Y, Ayoub N. RNA-dependent chromatin localization of KDM4D lysine demethylase promotes H3K9me3 demethylation [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:13026–13038. doi:10.1093/nar/gku1021.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khoury-Haddad H, Nadar-Ponniah PT, Awwad S, Ayoub N. The emerging role of lysine demethylases in DNA damage response: dissecting the recruitment mode of KDM4D/JMJD2D to DNA damage sites [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. Cell Cycle. 2015;14:950–958. doi:10.1080/15384101.2015.1014147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naro C, Bielli P, Pagliarini V, Sette C. The interplay between DNA damage response and RNA processing: the unexpected role of splicing factors as gatekeepers of genome stability. Front Genet. 2015;6:142.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giono LE, Nieto Moreno N, Cambindo Botto AE, Dujardin G, Munoz MJ, Kornblihtt AR. The RNA response to DNA damage. J Mol Biol. 2016;428:2636–2651.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kai M. Roles of RNA-binding proteins in DNA damage response. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17:310. doi:10.3390/ijms17030310.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abu-Zhayia ER, Khoury-Haddad H, Guttmann-Raviv N, Serruya R, Jarrous N, Ayoub N. A role of human Rnase P subunits, Rpp29 and Rpp21, in homology directed-repair of double-strand breaks. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1002. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-01185-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hawley BR, Lu WT, Wilczynska A, Bushell M. The emerging role of RNAs in DNA damage repair. Cell Death Differ. 2017;24:580–587. doi:10.1038/cdd.2017.16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochan JA, Desclos ECB, Bosch R, Meister L, Vriend LEM, van Attikum H, Krawczyk PM. Meta-analysis of DNA double-strand break response kinetics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:12625–12637. doi:10.1093/nar/gkx1128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchesini M, Ogoti Y, Fiorini E, Aktas Samur A, Nezi L, D’Anca M, Storti P, Samur MK, Ganan-Gomez I, Fulciniti MT, et al. ILF2 is a regulator of RNA splicing and DNA damage response in 1q21-amplified multiple myeloma. Cancer Cell. 2017;32:88–100 e106. doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2017.05.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milek M, Imami K, Mukherjee N, Bortoli F, Zinnall U, Hazapis O, Trahan C, Oeffinger M, Heyd F, Ohler U, et al. DDX54 regulates transcriptome dynamics during DNA damage response. Genome Res. 2017;27:1344–1359. doi:10.1101/gr.218438.116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishida K, Kuwano Y, Nishikawa T, Masuda K, Rokutan K. RNA binding proteins and genome integrity. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18:1341. doi:10.3390/ijms18071341.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abu-Zhayia ER, Awwad SW, Ben-Oz BM, Khoury-Haddad H, Ayoub N. CDYL1 fosters double-strand break-induced transcription silencing and promotes homology-directed repair. J Mol Cell Biol. 2018;10:341–357. doi:10.1093/jmcb/mjx050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishara LA, Machour FE, Awwad SW, Ayoub N. NELF complex fosters BRCA1 and RAD51 recruitment to DNA damage sites and modulates sensitivity to PARP inhibition. DNA Repair. 2021;97:103025. doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2020.103025.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Awwad SW, Abu-Zhayia ER, Guttmann-Raviv N, Ayoub N. NELF-E is recruited to DNA double-strand break sites to promote transcriptional repression and repair. EMBO Rep. 2017;18:745–764. doi:10.15252/embr.201643191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang Y, Elsayed Z, Eki R, He S, Du KP, Abbas T, Kai M. Intrinsically disordered protein RBM14 plays a role in generation of RNA:DNA hybrids at double-strand break sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117:5329–5338. doi:10.1073/pnas.1913280117.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gardiner M, Toth R, Vandermoere F, Morrice NA, Rouse J. Identification and characterization of FUS/TLS as a new target of ATM. Biochem J. 2008;415:297–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levone BR, Lenzken SC, Antonaci M, Maiser A, Rapp A, Conte F, Reber S, Mechtersheimer J, Ronchi AE, Muhlemann O, et al. FUS-dependent liquid-liquid phase separation is important for DNA repair initiation. J Cell Biol. 2021;220:e202008030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krietsch J, Caron MC, Gagne JP, Ethier C, Vignard J, Vincent M, Rouleau M, Hendzel MJ, Poirier GG, Masson JY. PARP activation regulates the RNA-binding protein NONO in the DNA damage response to DNA double-strand breaks. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:10287–10301. doi:10.1093/nar/gks798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechara EG, Sebestyen E, Bernardis I, Eyras E, Valcarcel J. RBM5, 6, and 10 differentially regulate NUMB alternative splicing to control cancer cell proliferation. Mol Cell. 2013;52:720–733. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2013.11.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machour FE, Abu-Zhayia ER, Awwad SW, Bidany-Mizrahi T, Meinke S, Bishara LA, Heyd F, Aqeilan RI, Ayoub N. RBM6 splicing factor promotes homologous recombination repair of double-strand breaks and modulates sensitivity to chemotherapeutic drugs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:11708–11727. doi:10.1093/nar/gkab976.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dinant C, de Jager M, Essers J, van Cappellen WA, Kanaar R, Houtsmuller AB, Vermeulen W. Activation of multiple DNA repair pathways by sub-nuclear damage induction methods. J Cell Sci. 2007;120:2731–2740. doi:10.1242/jcs.004523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacovoni JS, Caron P, Lassadi I, Nicolas E, Massip L, Trouche D, Legube G. High-resolution profiling of gammaH2AX around DNA double strand breaks in the mammalian genome. embo J. 2010;29:1446–1457. doi:10.1038/emboj.2010.38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuoka S, Ballif BA, Smogorzewska A, McDonald ER, 3rd, Hurov KE, Luo J, Bakalarski CE, Zhao Z, Solimini N, Lerenthal Y, et al. ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage. Science. 2007;316:1160–1166. doi:10.1126/science.1140321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennetzen MV, Larsen DH, Bunkenborg J, Bartek J, Lukas J, Andersen JS. Site-specific phosphorylation dynamics of the nuclear proteome during the DNA damage response. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2010;9:1314–1323. doi:10.1074/mcp.M900616-MCP200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elia AE, Boardman AP, Wang DC, Huttlin EL, Everley RA, Dephoure N, Zhou C, Koren I, Gygi SP, Elledge SJ. Quantitative proteomic atlas of ubiquitination and acetylation in the DNA damage response. Mol Cell. 2015;59:867–881. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2015.05.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlam-Babayov S, Bensimon A, Harel M, Geiger T, Aebersold R, Ziv Y, Shiloh Y. Phosphoproteomics reveals novel modes of function and inter-relationships among PIKKs in response to genotoxic stress. embo J. 2021;40:e104400.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sousa FG, Matuo R, Soares DG, Escargueil AE, Henriques JA, Larsen AK, Saffi J. PARPs and the DNA damage response. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33:1433–1440. doi:10.1093/carcin/bgs132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallis M, Morra R, Barkauskaite E, Ahel I. Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation in regulation of chromatin structure and the DNA damage response. Chromosoma. 2014;123:79–90. doi:10.1007/s00412-013-0442-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khadka P, Hsu JK, Veith S, Tadokoro T, Shamanna RA, Mangerich A, Croteau DL, Bohr VA. Differential and concordant roles for Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase 1 and Poly(ADP-Ribose) in regulating WRN and RECQL5 activities. Mol Cell Biol. 2015;35:3974–3989. doi:10.1128/MCB.00427-15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spegg V, Altmeyer M. Biomolecular condensates at sites of DNA damage: more than just a phase. DNA Repair. 2021;106:103179. doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2021.103179.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pinder J, Salsman J, Dellaire G. Nuclear domain ‘knock-in’ screen for the evaluation and identification of small molecule enhancers of CRISPR-based genome editing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:9379–9392. doi:10.1093/nar/gkv993.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abu-Zhayia ER, Bishara LA, Machour FE, Barisaac AS, Ben-Oz BM, Ayoub N. CDYL1-dependent decrease in lysine crotonylation at DNA double-strand break sites functionally uncouples transcriptional silencing and repair. Mol Cell. 2022;82:1940–1955 e1947. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2022.03.031.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith R, Sellou H, Chapuis C, Huet S, Timinszky G. CHD3 and CHD4 recruitment and chromatin remodeling activity at DNA breaks is promoted by early poly(ADP-ribose)-dependent chromatin relaxation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:6087–6098. doi:10.1093/nar/gky334.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aravind L, Walker DR, Koonin EV. Conserved domains in DNA repair proteins and evolution of repair systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27:1223–1242. doi:10.1093/nar/27.5.1223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert-Paganin J, Rety S, Leulliot N. Regulation of DEAH/RHA helicases by G-patch proteins. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:931857. doi:10.1155/2015/931857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel A, Lee HO, Jawerth L, Maharana S, Jahnel M, Hein MY, Stoynov S, Mahamid J, Saha S, Franzmann TM, et al. A liquid-to-solid phase transition of the ALS protein FUS accelerated by disease mutation. Cell. 2015;162:1066–1077. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaric JA, Wust S, Panier S. New faces of old friends: emerging new roles of RNA-binding proteins in the DNA double-strand break response. Front Mol Biosci. 2021;8:668821. doi:10.3389/fmolb.2021.668821.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar