Identifying Kinds of Reasoning in Collective Argumentation

REFERENCES

• Ayalon, M., & Even, R. (2008). Deductive reasoning: In the eye of the beholder. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(3), 235–247. doi:10.1007/s10649-008-9136-2.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2003). Making mathematics reasonable in school. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter ( Eds.), A Research Companion to Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (pp. 27–44). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Blanton, M. L., & Kaput, J. J. (2005). Characterizing a classroom practice that promotes algebraic reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(5), 412–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boero, P., Douek, N., Morselli, F., & Pedemonte, B. (2010). Argumentation and proof: A contribution to theoretical perspectives and their classroom implementation. In M. Pinto & T. Kawasaki ( Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education ( Vol. 1, pp. 179–204). Belo-Horizonte, Brazil: PME.
   Google Scholar
• Chazan, D. (1993). High school geometry students’ justification for their views of empirical evidence and mathematical proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24, 359–387.
   Google Scholar
• Conner, A., Singletary, L. M., Smith, R. C., Wagner, P. A., & Francisco, R. T. (2014). Teacher support for collective argumentation: A framework for examining how teachers support students’ engagement in mathematical activities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(3), 401–429. doi:10.1007/s10649-014-9532-8.
   Google Scholar
• English, L. D. (1997). Analogies, metaphors, and images: Vehicles for mathematical reasoning. In L. D. English ( Ed.), Mathematical Reasoning: Analogies, Metaphors, and Images (pp. 3–20). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• English, L. D. (1998). Reasoning by analogy in solving comparison problems. Mathematical Cognition, 4(2), 125–146.
   Google Scholar
• Forman, E. A., Larreamendy-Joerns, J., Stein, M. K., & Brown, C. A. (1998). “You’re going to want to find out which and prove it”: Collective argumentation in a mathematics classroom. Learning and Instruction, 8(6), 527–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garuti, R., Boero, P., Lemut, E., & Mariotti, M. A. (1996). Challenging the traditional school approach to theorems: A hypothesis about the cognitive unity of theorems, In L. Puig & A. Guierrez ( Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education ( Vol. 2, pp. 113–120). Valencia, Spain: PME.
   Google Scholar
• Georgia Department of Education (2008). Accelerated Mathematics I Framework Student Edition. Retrieved from https://www.georgiastandards.org/Frameworks/GSO%20Frameworks/Acc-Math-I-Unit-2-SE-Polygons-in-the-Plane.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Harel, G., & Sowder, L. (1998). Students’ proof schemes: Results from exploratory studies. In A. Schoenfeld, J. Kaput, & E. Dubinsky ( Eds.), Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education III ( Vol. 3, pp. 234–283). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyles, C., & Kuchemann, D. (2002). Students’ understandings of logical implication. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 51, 193–223.
   Google Scholar
• Inglis, M., Mejia-Ramos, J. P., & Simpson, A. (2007). Modeling mathematical argumentation: The importance of qualification. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 3–21. doi:10.1007/s10649-006-9059-8.
   Google Scholar
• Knipping, C. (2008). A method for revealing structures of argumentations in classroom proving processes. ZDM, 40(3), 427–441. doi:10.1007/s11858-008-0095-y.
   Google Scholar
• Krummheuer, G. (1995). The ethnography of argumentation. In P. Cobb & H. Bauersfeld ( Eds.), The Emergence of Mathematical Meaning: Interaction in Classroom Cultures (pp. 229–269). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Krummheuer, G. (2000). Mathematical learning in narrative classroom cultures: Studies of argumentation in primary mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 20(1), 22–32.
   Google Scholar
• Krummheuer, G. (2007). Argumentation and participation in the primary mathematics classroom: Two episodes and related theoretical abductions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26(1), 60–82. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2007.02.001.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, K. C., & Carlson, M. P. (2012). Students’ images of problem contexts when solving applied problems. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(1), 48–59.
   Google Scholar
• Moshman, D. (2004). From inference to reasoning: The construction of rationality. Thinking & Reasoning, 10(2), 221–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2009). Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards Mathematics. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved June 1, 2012 from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_Math%20Standards.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pedemonte, B. (2007). How can the relationship between argumentation and proof be analysed? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66, 23–41.
   Google Scholar
• Pedemonte, B., & Reid, D. (2011). The role of abduction in proving processes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76(3), 281–303. doi:10.1007/s10649-010-9275-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1956). Sixth paper: Deduction, induction, and hypothesis. In M. R. Cohen ( Ed.), Chance, Love, and Logic: Philosophical Essays (pp. 131–153). New York, NY: G. Braziller. (Original work published 1878).
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, C. L., & Stephan, M. (2008). A methodology for documenting collective activity. In A. Kelly, R. Lesh, & J. Baek ( Eds.), Handbook of Design Research Methods in Education: Innovations in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 195–215). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, D. A. ( with Knipping, C.). (2010). Proof in mathematics education: Research, learning, and teaching. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, V., & Clark, D. B. (2008). Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions. Science Education, 92(3), 447–472. doi:10.1002/sce.20276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stylianides, G. J., & Stylianides, A. J. (2008). Proof in school mathematics: Insights from psychological research into students’ ability for deductive reasoning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10, 103–133. doi:10.1080/10986060701854425.
   Google Scholar
• Tall, D., & Mejia-Ramos, J. P. (2010). The long-term cognitive development of reasoning and proof. In G. Hanna, H. N. Jahnke, & H. Pulte ( Eds.), Explanation and Proof in Mathematics: Philosophical and Educational Perspectives (pp. 137–149). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. W. (1996). Imagery and the development of mathematical reasoning. In L. P. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G. A. Goldin, & B. Greer ( Eds.), Theories of Mathematical Learning (pp. 267–283). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument (updated ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1958).
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S., Rieke, R., & Janik, A. (1984). An Introduction to Reasoning. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hiele, P. M. (1986). Structure and insight: A theory of mathematics education. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, K. (2001). Student difficulty in constructing proofs: The need for strategic knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48, 101–119.
   Google Scholar
• Yackel, E. (2002). What we can learn from analyzing the teacher’s role in collective argumentation. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21, 423–440.
   Google Scholar
• Yackel, E., & Hanna, G. (2003). Reasoning and proof. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter ( Eds.), A Research Companion to Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (pp. 227–236). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Zbiek, R. M., & Conner, A. (2006). Beyond motivation: Exploring mathematical modeling as a context for deepening students’ understandings of curricular mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(1), 89–112.
   Google Scholar