Spontaneous Focusing on Quantitative Relations: Towards a Characterization

References

• Batchelor, S. (2014). Dispositional factors affecting children’s early numerical development. Leicestershire, United Kingdom: Loughborough University. Retrieved from https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/dspace-jspui/handle/2134/17474
   Google Scholar
• Batchelor, S., Inglis, M., & Gilmore, C. (2015). Spontaneous focusing on numerosity and the arithmetic advantage. Learning and Instruction, 40, 79–88. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, T., & Levine, S. C. (2012). Child proportional scaling: Is 1/3 = 2/6 = 3/9 = 4/12? (2012). Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 111, 516–533. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, T. W., Levine, S. C., & Huttenlocher, J. (2008). Development of proportional reasoning: Where young children go wrong. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1478–1490. doi:10.1037/a0013110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, F. B., & Kamii, C. (1996). Identification of multiplicative thinking in children in grades 1–5. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 41–51. doi:10.2307/749196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer, K., Post, T., & Currier, S. (1993). Learning and teaching ratio and proportion: Research implications. In D. T. Owens (Ed.), Research ideas for the classroom: Middle grades mathematics (pp. 159–178). New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Degrande, T., Verschaffel, L., & Van Dooren, W. (2014). How do Flemish children solve ‘Greek’ word problems? On students’ quantitative analogical reasoning in open word problems. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 13(1–2), 57–74.
   Google Scholar
• Degrande, T., Verschaffel, L., & Van Dooren, W. (2016). Proportional word problem solving through a modelling lens: A half-empty or half-full glass? In P. Felmer, E. Pehkonen, & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Posing and solving mathematical problems (pp. 209–229). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Degrande, T., Verschaffel, L., & Van Dooren, W. (in press). Beyond additive and multiplicative reasoning abilities: How preference enters the picture. European Journal of Psychology of Education. doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0352-y
   Google Scholar
• Edens, K. M., & Potter, E. F. (2013). An exploratory look at the relationships among math skills, motivational factors and activity choice. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41, 235–243. doi:10.1007/s10643-012-0540-y
   Google Scholar
• Fernández, C., Llinares, S., Van Dooren, W., de Bock, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2012). The development of students’ use of additive and proportional methods along primary and secondary school. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27, 421–438. doi:10.1007/s10212-011-0087-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greer, B. (1997). Modelling reality in mathematics classroom: The case of word problems. Learning and Instruction, 7, 293–307. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(97)00006-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannula, M. M., & Lehtinen, E. (2001). Spontaneous tendency to focus on numerosities in the development of cardinality. In M. Van Den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of 25th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 113–120). Amersfoort, The Netherlands: Drukkerij Wilco.
   Google Scholar
• Hannula, M. M., & Lehtinen, E. (2005). Spontaneous focusing on numerosity and mathematical skills of young children. Learning and Instruction, 15, 237–256. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannula, M. M., Lepola, J., & Lehtinen, E. (2010). Spontaneous focusing on numerosity as a domain-specific predictor of arithmetical skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107, 394–406. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2010.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannula, M. M., Räsänen, P., & Lehtinen, E. (2007). Development of counting skills: Role of spontaneous focusing on numerosity and subitizing-based enumeration. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9, 51–57. doi:10.1080/10986060709336605
   Google Scholar
• Hannula-Sormunen, M., Lehtinen, E., & Räsänen, P. (2015). Preschool children’s spontaneous focusing on numerosity, subitizing, and counting skills as predictors of their mathematical performance seven years later at school. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 17, 155–177. doi:10.1080/10986065.2015.1016814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannula-Sormunen, M. M. (2015). Spontaneous focusing on numerosity and its relation to counting and arithmetic. In R. Cohen-Kadosh, & A. Dowker (Eds.), Oxford handbook of numerical cognition (pp. 275–290). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, L., & Willis, S. (2003). The development of multiplicative thinking in young children. In L. Bragg, C. Campbell, G. Herbert, & J. Mousley (Eds.): Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Mathematical Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 460–467). Sydney: Deakin University.
   Google Scholar
• Kaput, J. J., & West, M. M. (1994). Missing- value proportional reasoning problems: Factors affecting informal reasoning patterns. In G. Harel, & J. Confrey (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 235–287). New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karplus, R., Pulos, S., & Stage, E. (1983). Proportional reasoning of early adolescents. In R. Lesh, & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematical concepts and processes (pp. 45–89). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lamon, S. J. (2008). Teaching fractions and ratios for understanding: Essential content knowledge and instructional strategies for teachers ((2nd ed.). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Lamon, S. J., & Lesh, R. (1992). Interpreting responses to problems with several levels and types of correct answers. In R. Lesh, & S. J. Lamon (Eds.), Assessment of authentic performance in school mathematics (pp. 319–342). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMullen, J. (2014). Spontaneous focusing on quantitative relations and the development of rational number conceptual knowledge ( Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://www.doria.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/94538/AnnalesB380.pdf?sequence=2
   Google Scholar
• McMullen, J., Hannula-Sormunen, M. M., Laakkonen, E., & Lehtinen, E. (2016). Spontaneous focusing on quantitative relations as a predictor of the development of rational number conceptual knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 857–868. doi:10.1037/edu0000094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMullen, J., Hannula-Sormunen, M. M., & Lehtinen, E. (2011). Young children’s spontaneous focusing on quantitative aspects and their verbalizations of their quantitative reasoning. In B. Ubuz (Ed.), Proceedings of the 35th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 217–224). Ankara, Turkey: PME.
   Google Scholar
• McMullen, J., Hannula-Sormunen, M. M., & Lehtinen, E. (2013). Young children’s recognition of quantitative relations in mathematically unspecified settings. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32, 450–460. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.06.001
   Google Scholar
• McMullen, J., Hannula-Sormunen, M. M., & Lehtinen, E. (2014). Spontaneous focusing on quantitative relations in the development of children’s fraction knowledge. Cognition and Instruction, 32, 198–218. doi:10.1080/07370008.2014.887085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMullen, J., Hannula-Sormunen, M. M., & Lehtinen, E. (2015). Preschool spontaneous focusing on numerosity predicts rational number conceptual knowledge six years later. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47, 813–824. doi:10.1007/s11858-015-0669-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modestou, M., & Gagatsis, A. (2010). Cognitive and metacognitive aspects of proportional reasoning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12, 36–53. doi:10.1080/10986060903465822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ni, Y., & Zhou, Y.-D. (2005). Teaching and learning fraction and rational numbers: The origins and implications of whole number bias. Educational Psychologist, 40, 27–52. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4001_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (2010). Paper 4: Understanding relations and their graphical representation. In T. Nunes, P. Bryant, & A. Watson (Eds.), Key understanding in mathematics learning. Retrieved from http://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/sites/defaukt/files/P4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nunes, T., Bryant, P., Evans, D., & Barros, R. (2015). Assessing quantitative reasoning in young children. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 17, 178–196. doi:10.1080/10986065.2015.1016815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathé, S., Torbeyns, J., Hannula-Sormunen, M., & Verschaffel, L. (2016). Kindergartners‘ spontaneous focusing on numerosity in relation to their number-related utterances during numerical picture book reading. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 18, 125–141. doi:10.1080/10986065.2016.1148531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemon, D., Breed, M., & Virgona, J. (2005). From additive to multiplicative thinking - The big challenge of the middle years. In J. Mousley, L. Bragg, & C. Campbell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 42nd Conference of the Mathematical Association of Victoria. Bundoora, Australia: The Mathematical Association of Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• Vamvakoussi, X., Van Dooren, W., & Verschaffel, L. (2012). Naturally biased? In search for reaction time evidence for a natural number bias in adults. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31, 344–355. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2012.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Vamvakoussi, X., Vraka, L., Lioliousi, A., & McMullen, J. (2016). Young children’s spontaneous focusing on simple multiplicative relations. Paper presented at the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education (ICME), Hamburg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., Hessels, A., Janssens, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2005). Not everything is proportional: Effects of age and problem type on propensities for overgeneralization. Cognition and Instruction, 23, 57–86. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2301_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2010). From addition to multiplication … and back. The development of students’ additive and multiplicative reasoning skills. Cognition and Instruction, 28, 360–381. doi:10.1080/07370008.2010.488306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., Vleugels, K., & Verschaffel, L. (2010). Just answering … or thinking? Contrasting pupils’ solutions and classifications of missing-value word problems. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12, 20–35. doi:10.1080/10986060903465806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dooren, W., Lehtinen, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2015). Unravelling the gap between natural and rational numbers. Learning and Instruction, 37, 1–4. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hoof, J., Degrande, T., McMullen, J., Hannula-Sormunen, M., Lehtinen, E., Verschaffel, L., & Van Dooren, W. (2016). The relation between learners’ spontaneous focusing on quantitative relations and their rational number knowledge. Studia Psychologica, 58, 156–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hoof, J., Vandewalle, J., Verschaffel, L., & Van Dooren, W. (2015). In search for the natural number bias in secondary school students’ interpretation of the effect of arithmetical operations. Learning and Instruction, 37, 30–38. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergnaud, G. (1997). The nature of mathematical concepts. In T. Nunes, & P. Bryant (Eds.), Learning and teaching mathematics: An international perspective (pp. 5–28). Hove, United Kingdom: Psychology Press Ltd.
   Google Scholar