Curricular approaches to algebra in Estonia, Finland and Sweden – a comparative study

References

• Andrews, P. (2007). The curricular importance of mathematics: A comparison of English and Hungarian teachers’ espoused beliefs. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39(3), 317–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270600773082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, P., Ryve, A., Hemmi, K., & Sayers, J. (2014). PISA, TIMSS and Finnish mathematics teaching: An enigma in search of an explanation. Educational Studies in Mathematics., 87(1), 7—26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9545-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcavi, A. (1994). Symbol sense: Informal sense-making in formal mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(3), 24—35.
   Google Scholar
• Arcavi, A., Drijvers, P., & Stacey, K. (2017). The teaching and learning of algebra: Ideas, insights and activities. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baek, J. M. (2008). Developing algebraic thinking through explorations in multiplication. In C. E. Greenes & R. Rubenstein (Eds.), Algebra and algebraic thinking in school mathematics, 70th yearbook (pp. 141–154). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, A. (1996). Problem-solving approaches to algebra: Two aspects. In N. Bednarz, C. Kieran, & L. Lee (Eds.), Approaches to algebra (pp. 167—185). Mathematics Education Library, vol 18. Springer, Dordrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Bergqvist, E., & Bergqvist, T. (2017). The role of the formal written curriculum in standards-based reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(2), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2016.1202323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergsten, C., Häggström, J., & Lindberg, L. (1997). Nämnaren tema: Algebra för alla [Nämnaren theme: Algebra for all]. Nationellt Centrum för Matematikdidaktik (NCM).
   Google Scholar
• Blanton, M., Levi, L., Crites, T., Dougherty, B., & Zbiek, R. M. (2011). Developing essential understanding of algebraic thinking for teaching mathematics in grades 3-5. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Blanton, M., Stephens, A., Knuth, E., Murphey Gardiner, A., Isler, I., & Kim, J.-S. (2015). The development of children’s algebraic thinking: The impact of a comparative early algebra intervention in third grade. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(1), 39–87. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.1.0039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bokhove, C., & Drijvers, P. (2010). Symbol sense behavior in digital activities. For the Learning of Mathematics, 30(3), 43–49. https://flm-journal.org/Articles/45D5ED606856931839C164A32C1092.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brandell, G., Hemmi, K., & Thunberg, H. (2008). The widening gap – A Swedish perspective. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(2), 38–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217476
   Google Scholar
• Bråting, K., Hemmi, K., & Madej, L. (2018). Teoretiska och praktiska perspektiv på generaliserad aritmetik [Theoretical and practical perspectives on generalized arithmetic]. In J. Häggström, Y. Liljekvist, J. Bergman Ärlebäck, M. Fahlgren, & O. Olande (Eds.), Perspectives on professional development of mathematics teachers. Proceedings of MADIF 11. (27–36). NCM & SMDF.
   Google Scholar
• Bråting, K., Madej, L., & Hemmi, K. (2019). Development of algebraic thinking: Opportunities offered by the Swedish curriculum and elementary mathematics textbooks. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 24(1), 101–124. http://ncm.gu.se/nomad-sokresultat-vy?brodtext=24_1_brating
   Google Scholar
• Bråting, K., & Pejlare, J. (2015). On the relations between historical epistemology and students’ conceptual developments in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(2), 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9600-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, J. (2004). Developing algebraic thinking in the earlier grades: A case study of the Chinese elementary school curriculum. The Mathematics Educator (Singapore), 8(1), 107–130. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.580.4108&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cai, J., Lew, H. C., Morris, A., Moyer, J. C., Ng, S. F., & Schmittau, J. (2005). The development of students’ algebraic thinking in earlier grades. ZDM – the International Journal on Mathematics Education, 37(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655892
   Google Scholar
• Cai, J., Nie, B., & Moyer, J. C. (2010). The teaching of equation solving: Approaches in standards-based and traditional curricula in the United States. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 5(3), 170–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2010.485724
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., & Levi, L. (2003). Thinking mathematically: Integrating arithmetic & algebra in elementary school. Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Carraher, D. W., & Schliemann, A. (2018). Cultivating early algebraic thinking. In C. Kieran (Ed.), Teaching and learning algebraic thinking with 5-to-12-year-olds. ICME-13 monographs (pp. 107–138). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Carraher, D. W., Schliemann, A., Brizuela, B., & Earnest, D. (2006). Arithmetic and algebra in early mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(2), 87–115. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30034843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, D. (2013, Feb 6th–Feb 10th). The validity-comparability compromise in crosscultural studies in mathematics education. In B. Ubuz, C. Haser, & M. A. Mariotti (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, Antalya (pp. 1855–1864). Ankara, Turkey: Middle East Technical University and ERME.
   Google Scholar
• Confrey, J., Gianopulos, G., McGowan, W., Shah, M., & Belcher, M. (2017). Scaffolding learner-centered curricular coherence using learning maps and diagnostic assessments designed around mathematics learning trajectories. ZDM – the International Journal on Mathematics Education, 49(5), 717–734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0869-1
   Google Scholar
• Davydov, V. V. (1990). Soviet studies in mathematics education, Vol. 2, types of generalization in instruction: Logical and psychological problems in the structuring of school curricula. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1906 Association Dr., Reston, VA 22091.
   Google Scholar
• Davydov, V. V., & Rubtsov, V. V. (2018). Developing reflective thinking in the process of learning activity. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 55(4–6), 287–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/10610405.2018.1536008
   Google Scholar
• Eesti Vabariigi Valitsuse määrus. (2011). Põhikooli riiklik õppekava [Estonian national curriculum for comprehensive school]. https://www.riigiteataja.ee/aktilisa/1140/1201/1001/VV1_lisa3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Finnish National Board of Education. (2016). National Core Curriculum for Basic Education 2014. Next Print Oy.
   Google Scholar
• Fong, N. S. (2004). Developing algebraic thinking in early grades: Case study of the Singapore primary mathematics curriculum. The Mathematics Educator, 8(1), 39–59. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/aac9/ebe9af94353a9f0d814f6d173269ab573971.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Greenes, C. E., & Rubenstein, R. (2008). Algebra and algebraic thinking in school mathematics, 70th Yearbook. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Grønmo, L. S., Borge, I. C., & Hole, A. (2014). Mathematics in the Nordic countries – Trends and challenges in students’ achievement in Norway, Sweden, Finland and Denmark. In K. Yang Hansen, J.-E. Gustafsson, M. Rosén, S. Sulkunen, K. Nissinen, P. Kupari, & A. Hole (Eds.), Northern lights on TIMSS and PIRLS 2011 - differences and similarities in the Nordic countries (pp. 107–136). Nordic Council of Ministers.
   Google Scholar
• Häggström, J., Kilhamn, C., & Fredriksson, M. (2019). Algebra i grundskolan [Algebra in comprehensive school]. Nationellt Centrum för Matematikdidaktik, NCM.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmi, K., Bråting, K., Liljekvist, Y., Prytz, J., Madej, L., Pejlare, J., & Palm Kaplan, K. (2018). Characterizing Swedish school algebra – Initial findings from analyses of steering documents, textbooks and teachers’ discourses. In E. Norén, H. Palmér, & A. Cooke (Eds.), Nordic research in mathematics education, Papers of NORMA 17, The Eighth Nordic Conference on Mathematics Education, Stockholm (pp. 299–308). Stockholm: Skrifter från SMDF, Nr. 12.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmi, K., Krzywacki, H., & Partanen, A.-M. (2017). Mathematics curriculum: The case of Finland. In D. R. Thompson, M. A. Huntley, C. Suurtamm (Eds.), International perspectives on mathematics curriculum (pp. 71–102). Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmi, K., Lepik, L., Madej, L., Bråting, K., & Smedlund, J. (2019). Introduction to early algebra in Estonia, Finland and Sweden – Some distinctive features identified in textbooks for Grades 1-3. In U. T. Jankvist, M. Van den Heuvel-panhuizen, & M. Veldhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME11, February 6 – 10, 2019). Utrecht, The Netherlands: Freudenthal Group & Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University and ERME.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmi, K., Lepik, M., & Viholainen, A. (2013). Analysing proof-related competences in Estonian, Finnish and Swedish mathematics curricula—towards a framework of developmental proof. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(3), 354–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.754055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmi, K., & Löfwall, C. (2011). Making discovery function of proof visible for students. In M. Pytlak, T. Rowland, & E. Swoboda (Eds.) Proceedings of the 7th Conference of European Researchers in Mathematics Education. (CERME 7, February 9- 13, 2011) (pp. 172-180). Rzeszów, Poland: University of Rzeszów and ERME.
   Google Scholar
• Herscovics, N., & Linchevski, L. (1994). A cognitive gap between arithmetic and algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27(1), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01284528
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt, D. (2014). A symbolic dance: The interplay between movement, notation, and mathematics on a journey toward solving equations. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 16(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2014.857803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., Stigler, J. W., Jacobs, J. K., Givvin, K. B., Garnier, H., Smith, M., Hollingsworth, H., Manaster, A., Wearne, D., & Gallimore, R. (2005). Mathematics teaching in the United States today (and tomorrow): Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27(2), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737027002111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jablonka, E., & Gellert, U. (2010). Ideological roots and uncontrolled flowering of alternative curriculum conceptions. In U. Gellert, E. Jablonka, & C. Morgan (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Mathematics Education and Society Conference Vol. I (pp. 31–49). Berlin: Freie Universität.
   Google Scholar
• Jupri, A., Drijvers, P., & van den Heuvel-panhuizen, M. (2014). Difficulties in initial algebra learning in Indonesia. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(4), 683–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0097-0
   Google Scholar
• Kaput, J. J. (2008). What is algebra? What is algebraic reasoning? In J. J. Kaput, D. Carraher, & M. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 5–18). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kaput, J. J. (2000). Transforming algebra from an engine of inequity to an engine of mathematical power by” algebrafying” the K-12 curriculum. (Report No. Ed441 664) Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, V., & Barton, B. (2007). Stages in the history of algebra with implications from teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(2), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9023-7
   Google Scholar
• Kieran, C. (1981). Concepts associated with the equality symbol. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(3), 317–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00311062
   Google Scholar
• Kieran, C. (2004). Algebraic thinking in the early grades. What is it? The Mathematics Educator (Singapore), 8(1), 139–151. https://gpc-maths.org/data/documents/kieran2004.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kieran, C. (2007). Learning and teaching algebra at the middle school through college levels. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 707–762). Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kieran, C. (Ed.). (2018). Teaching and learning algebraic thinking with 5- to 12-year-olds. ICME-13 monographs. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kieran, C., Pang, J., Schifter, D., & Ng., S. F. (2016). Early algebra. Research into its nature, its learning, its teaching (ICME-13, Topical Surveys). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kilhamn, C. (2014). When does a variable vary? Identifying mathematical content knowledge for teaching variables. Nordisk Matematikkdidaktikk - Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 19(3–4), 83–100. https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/208569
   Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick, J., & Izsak, A. (2008). A history of algebra in the school curriculum. In C. E. Greenes & R. Rubenstein (Eds.), Algebra and algebraic thinking in school mathematics, 70th Yearbook (pp. 3–19). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lagrange, J.-B. (2014). A functional perspective on the teaching of algebra: Current challenges and the contribution of technology. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 3–10. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01740456/document
   Google Scholar
• Lepik, M., Grevholm, B., & Viholainen, A. (2015). Using textbooks in the mathematics classroom – The teachers’ view. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 20(3–4), 129–156.
   Google Scholar
• Leung, F. K. S., Park, K., Holton, D., & Clarke, D. (Eds). (2014). Algebra teaching around the world. Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, G. M., Cai, J., & Tarr, J. E. (2017). Issues in curriculum studies: Evidence-based insights and future directions. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 824–853). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J. (2018). How early is too early for thinking algebraically? In C. Kieran (Ed.), Teaching and learning algebraic thinking with 5- to 12-year-olds (pp. 329–350). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., & Chrostowski, S. J. (2004). TIMSS 2003 international mathematics report. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement, IEA. Boston Coll., Chestnut Hill, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, Å., & Liljefors, R. (1983). Matematik i svensk skola. Utbildningsforskning, FoU-rapport 46 [Mathematics in the Swedish school. Educational research, FoU-report 46]. Swedish National Agency for Education and Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Nathan, M. J., & Koellner, K. (2007). A framework for understanding and cultivating the transition from arithmetic to algebraic reasoning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9(3), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060701360852
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD. (2018). PISA 2012, mathematics test levels. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/test-2012/
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD. (2019). Mathematics performance (PISA) (indicator). Retrieved 26 September 2019 from https://doi.org/10.1787/04711c74-en
   Google Scholar
• Prediger, S. (2010). How to develop mathematics for teaching and for understanding: The case of meanings of the equal sign. Journal for Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(1), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9119-y
   Google Scholar
• Radford, L. (2018). The emergence of symbolic algebraic thinking in primary school. In C. Kieran (Ed.), Teaching and learning algebraic thinking with 5- to 12-year-olds: The global evolution of an emerging field of research and practice (pp. 1–23). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Röj-Lindberg, A.-S., Partanen, A.-M., & Hemmi, K. (2017, February 1-5). Introduction to equation solving for a new generation of algebra learners. In T. Dooley & G. Gueudet (Eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, CERME10 (pp. 495–503). Dublin, Ireland: DCU Institute of Education and ERME.
   Google Scholar
• Schifter, D. (2018). Early algebra as analysis of structure. A focus on structure. In C. Kieran (Ed.), Teaching and learning algebraic thinking with 5- to 12-year-olds (pp. 309–327). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schmittau, J. (2004). Vygotskian theory and mathematics education: Resolving the conceptual-procedural dichotomy. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19(1), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmittau, J. (2005). The development of algebraic thinking. ZDM – the International Journal on Mathematics Education, 37(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655893
   Google Scholar
• Schmittau, J., & Morris, A. (2004). The development of algebra in the elementary mathematics curriculum of V.V. Davydov. The Mathematics Educator, 8(10), 60–87. http://math-teach.2386.n7.nabble.com/attachment/22746/0/Development%20of%20Algebra%20in%20Elementary%20Math%20by%20Schmittau.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schubring, G. (2011). Conceptions for relating the evolution of mathematical concepts to mathematics learning – Epistemology, history, and semiotics interacting. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77(1), 79–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9301-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, N., Stevens, S. Y., Short, H., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Learning progressions to support coherence curricula in instructional material, instruction, and assessment design. Paper presented at the Learning Progressions in Science (LeaPS) Conference [ Paper presentation]. Iowa City, IA.
   Google Scholar
• The Swedish National Agency for Education. (2008). Svenska elevers matematikkunksaper I TIMSS 2007 [Swedish students’ knowledge in mathematics in TIMSS 2007]. https://www.skolverket.se/publikationsserier/aktuella-analyser/2010/svenska-elevers-matematikkunskaper-i-timss-2007
   Google Scholar
• The Swedish National Agency for Education. (2011). Kursplan i matematik i grundskolan. [Syllabus for mathematics in compulsory school]. Lgr 11. http://www.skolverket.se
   Google Scholar
• The Swedish National Agency for Education. (2012). TIMSS 2011 – Svenska grundskoleelevers kunskaper i matematik och naturvetenskap i ett internationellt perspektiv [Swedish school students’ skills in mathematics and science in an international perspective]. https://www.skolverket.se/publikationsserier/rapporter/2012/timss-2011
   Google Scholar
• The Swedish National Agency for Education. (2016). TIMSS 2015 – Svenska grundskoleelevers kunskaper i matematik och naturvetenskap i ett internationellt perspektiv [Swedish school students’ skills in mathematics and science in an international perspective]. https://www.skolverket.se/getFile?file=3707
   Google Scholar
• Usiskin, Z. (1988). Conceptions of school algebra and uses of variables. In A. Coxford & A. Shuite (Eds.), The ideas of algebra, K-12. 1988 Yearbook (pp. 8–19). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Valverde, G. A., Bianchi, L. J., Wolfe, R. G., Schmidt, W. H., & Houang, R. T. (2002). According to the book. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Akker, J. (2003). Curriculum perspectives: An introduction. In J. van den Akker, W. Kuiper, & U. Hameyer (Eds.), Curriculum landscapes and trends (pp. 1–10). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Heuvel-panhuizen, M. (2003). The didactical use of models in realistic mathematics education: An example from a longitudinal trajectory on percentage. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54(1), 9–35. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000005212.03219.dc
   Google Scholar
• Zinchenko, V. P. (2011). For the eightieth anniversary of the birthday of V.V. Davydov (1930-1998). The Experience of Thinking about Thinking. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 49(6), 18–44. https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405490602
   Google Scholar