Relating students’ units coordinating and calculus readiness

References

• Agresti, A. (2018). An introduction to categorical data analysis. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, S., & Wyld, K. (2017). Supporting students’ understanding of calculus concepts: Insights from middle-grades mathematics education research. In a. Weinberg, C. Rasmussen, J. Rabin, M. Wawro, & S. Brown (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th annual conference on research in undergraduate mathematics education (pp. 1152–1157). San Diego, CA: SIGMAA on RUME.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, S., Byerley, C., Darling, A., Grabhorn, J. A., & Tyburski, B. (2019). Relationships between calculus students’ structures for static and dynamic reasoning. In S. Otten, a. Candela, Z. de Araujo, C. Haines, & C. Munter (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41st annual meeting of the North American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education. (pp. 991–1000). St. Louis, MO: University of Missouri.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, S., Grabhorn, J., & Byerley, C. (2018). Relationships between calculus students’ ways of coordinating units and their ways of understanding integration. Poster session presented at the 22nd annual conference on research in undergraduate mathematics education. San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, S., & Norton, A. (2016). Co-construction of fractions schemes and units coordinating structures. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 41, 10–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bressoud, D. M., Carlson, M. P., Mesa, V., & Rasmussen, C. (2013). The calculus student: Insights from the mathematical association of America national study. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(5), 685–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.798874
   Google Scholar
• Byerley, C., & Thompson, P. W. (2014). Secondary teaches’ relative size schemes. In P. Liljedal & C. C. Nicol (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th meeting of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol 2, pp. 217–224). Vancouver, BC: PME.
   Google Scholar
• Byerley, C. (2019). Calculus students’ fraction and measure schemes and implications for teaching rate of change functions conceptually. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 55, 100694. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2019.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byerley, C., & Thompson, P. W. (2017). Secondary teachers’ meanings for measure, slope, and rate of change. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 48, 168–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, M., Larsen, S., & Lesh, R. (2003). Integrating a models and modeling perspective with existing research and practice. In R. Lesh & H. M. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (pp. 465–478). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, M., Jacobs, S., Coe, E., Larsen, S., & Hsu, E. (2002). Applying covariational reasoning while modeling dynamic events: A framework and a study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(5), 352–378. https://doi.org/10.2307/4149958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, M., Oehrtman, M., & Engelke, N. (2010). The precalculus concept assessment: A tool for assessing students’ reasoning abilities and understandings. Cognition and Instruction, 28(2), 113–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370001003676587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, M. P. (1998). A cross-sectional investigation of the development of the function concept. In J. Kaput, A. H. Shoenfeld, & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education. III. CBMS issues in mathematics education (pp. 114–162). American Mathematical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Collingridge, D. S. (2013). A primer on quantitized data analysis and permutation testing. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(1), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812454457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corder, G. W., & Foreman, D. I. (2014). Nonparametric statistics: A step-by-step approach. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Cromley, J. G., Booth, J. L., Wills, T. W., Chang, B. L., Tran, N., Madeja, M., Shipley, T. F., & Zahner, W. (2017). Relation of spatial skills to calculus proficiency: A brief report. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 19(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2017.1258614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, K. M. (2017). Examining the development of students’ covariational reasoning in the context of graphing [ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global].
   Google Scholar
• Haciomeroglu, E. S., Aspinwall, L., & Presmeg, N. C. (2010). Contrasting cases of calculus students’ understanding of derivative graphs. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12(2), 152–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060903480300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackenberg, A., & Lee, M. (2015). Relationships between students’ fractional knowledge and equation writing. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(2), 196–243. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.2.0196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackenberg, A. J. (2010). Students’ reasoning with reversible multiplicative relationships. Cognition and Instruction, 28(4), 383–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2010.511565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackenberg, A. J., & Tillema, E. S. (2009). Students’ whole number multiplicative concepts: A critical constructive resource for fraction composition schemes. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 28(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2009.04.004
   Google Scholar
• Lamon, S. J. (2007). Rational numbers and proportional reasoning: Toward a theoretical framework. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 629–667). Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Neuhäuser, M. (2011). Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney Test. In M. Lovric (Ed.), International encyclopedia of statistical science (pp. 1656–1658). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, A., & Wilkins, J. L. M. (2009). A quantitative analysis of children’s splitting operations and fractions schemes. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 28(2–3), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2009.06.002
   Google Scholar
• Norton, A., & Wilkins, J. L. M. (2012). The splitting group. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(5), 557–583. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.43.5.0557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, A., & Wilkins, J. L. M. (2013). Supporting students’ constructions of the splitting operation. Cognition and Instruction, 31(1), 2–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2012.742085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, A., & Boyce, S. (2013). A cognitive core for common state standards. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(2), 266–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Norton, A., & Boyce, S. (2015). Provoking the construction of a structure for coordinating n+1 levels of units. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 40(Part B), 211–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, A., Boyce, S., Phillips, N., Anwyll, T., Ulrich, C., & Wilkins, J. (2015). A written instrument for assessing students’ units coordinating structures. Mathematics Education, 10(2), 111–136. https://doi.org/10.12973/mathedu.2015.108a
   Google Scholar
• Norton, A., & D’Ambrosio, B. (2008). ZPC and ZPD: Zones of teaching and learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(3), 220–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuzzo, R. (2017). Randomization test: An alternative analysis for the difference of two means. PM&R: The Journal of Injury, Function, and Rehabilitation, 9(3), 306–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.02.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1970a). Genetic epistemology. (E. Duckworth, Trans.). Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1970b). Structuralism. (C. Maschler, Trans.). Basic Books (Original work published 1968).
   Google Scholar
• Saldanha, L., & Thompson, P. (1998). Re-thinking covariation from a quantitative perspective: Simultaneous continuous variation. In S. B. Berensah & W. N. Coulombe (Eds.), Proceedings of the annual meeting of the psychology of mathematics education - North America. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, M. A., Placa, N., & Avitzur, A. (2016). Participatory and anticipatory states of mathematical concept learning: Further empirical and theoretical development. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 47(1), 63–93. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.47.1.0063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffe, L. P., & Olive, J. (2010). Children’s fractional knowledge. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Steffe, L. P. (1991). The learning paradox: A plausible counterexample. In L. P. Steffe (Ed.), Epistemological foundations of mathematical experience (pp. 26–44). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Steffe, L. P. (1992). Schemes of action and operation involving composite units. Learning and Individual Differences, 4(3), 259–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/1041-6080(92)90005-Y
   Google Scholar
• Steffe, L. P. (2001). A new hypothesis concerning children’s fractional knowledge. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 20(3), 267–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732–3123(02)00075-5
   Google Scholar
• Steffe, L. P., Liss, D. R., II, & Lee, H. Y. (2014). On the operations that generate intensive quantity. In L. P. Steffe, K. C. Moore, L. L. Hatfield, & S. Belbase (Eds.), Epistemic algebraic students: Emerging models of students’ algebraic knowing (Vol. 4, pp. 49–79). University of Wyoming.
   Google Scholar
• Steffe, L. P. (2017). Psychology in mathematics education: Past, present, and future. In E. Galindo & J. Newton (Eds). Proceedings of the 39th annual meeting of the north american chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 27–56). Indianapolis, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Steffe, L. P., & Cobb, P. (1988). Construction of arithmetical meanings and strategies. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. W. (2008). Conceptual analysis of mathematical ideas: Some spadework at the foundations of mathematics education. In O. Figueras, J. L. Cortina, S. Alatorre, T. Rojano, & a. Sepulveda (Eds.), Plenary paper presented at the annual meeting of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, (Vol 1, pp. 31–49). Morelia, Mexico: PME.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. W., & Carlson, M. (2017). Variation, covariation, and functions: Foundational ways of thinking mathematically. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 421–456). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Tillema, E. S. (2013). Relating one and two-dimensional quantities: Students’ multiplicative reasoning in combinatorial and spatial contexts. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(3), 331–352.
   Google Scholar
• Tzur, R. (1999). An integrated study of children’s construction of improper fractions and the teacher’s role in promoting that learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(4), 390–416. https://doi.org/10.2307/749707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinner, S. (1997). The pseudo-conceptual and the pseudo-analytical thought processes in mathematics learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34(2), 97–129. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1002998529016
   Google Scholar
• Von Glaserfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. The Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Von Glasersfeld, E. (1981). An attentional model for the conceptual construction of units and number. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 12(2), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/748704
   Google Scholar
• Wilcoxon, F. (1945). Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bulletin, 1(6), 80–83. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001968
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, J. L. M., & Norton, A. (2018). Learning progression toward a measurement conception of fractions. International Journal of STEM Education, 27(2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0119-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar