Teachers’ abilities to make sense of variable parts reasoning

References

• Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., … Tsai, Y. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Education Research Journal, 4(1), 133–180. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345157
   Google Scholar
• Beckmann, S., & Izsák, A. (2014). Variable parts: A new perspective on proportional relationships and linear functions. In C. Nicol, P. Liljedahl, S. Oesterle, & D. Allan (Eds.), Proceedings of the joint meeting of thirty-eighth conference of the international meeting of the Psychology of mathematics education and the thirty-sixth meeting of the north American chapter of the international group for the Psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 113–120). PME.
   Google Scholar
• Beckmann, S., & Kulow, T. K. (2018). How future teachers reasoned with variable parts and strip diagrams to develop equations for proportional relationships and lines. In L. Yeping, J. W. Lewis, & J. Madden (Eds.), Mathematics matters in education: Essays in honor of Roger E. Howe (pp. 117–148). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Beckmann, S., & Izsák, A. (2015). Two perspectives on proportional relationships: Extending complementary origins of multiplication in terms of quantities. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(1), 17–38. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.1.0017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckmann, S., Izsák, A., & Ölmez, I. B. (2015). From multiplication to proportional relationships. In X. Sun, B. Kaur, & J. Novotna (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-third ICMI study: Primary mathematics study on whole numbers (pp. 518–525). Macau, China: University of Macao.
   Google Scholar
• Bédard, J., & Chi, M. T. H. (1992). Expertise. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(4), 135–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10769799
   Google Scholar
• Berk, D., Taber, S. B., Gorowara, C. C., & Poerzl, C. (2009). Developing prospective elementary teachers’ flexibility in the domain of proportional reasoning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 11(3), 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060903022714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). How people learn. National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. A. (1988). Knowledge in pieces. In G. Forman & P. Pufall (Eds.), Constructivism in the computer age (pp. 49–70). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. A. (2006). A history of conceptual change research: Threads nad fault lines. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 265–282). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. A., Sherin, B. L., & Levin, M. (2016). Knowledge analysis: An introduction. In A. A. diSessa, M. Levin, & N. J. S. Brown (Eds.), Knowledge and interaction: A synthetic agenda for the learning sciences (pp. 30–71). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Franke, M. L., & Kazemi, E. (2001). Learning to teach mathematics: Focus on student thinking. Theory into Practice, 40(2), 102–109. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4002_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer, D. (2000). Student resources for learning introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, Physics Education Research Supplement, 68(S1), S52–S59. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.19520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harel, G., & Behr, M. (1995). Teachers’ solutions for multiplicative problems. Hiroshima Journal of Mathematics Education, 3, 31–51.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. C. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400. https://www.jstor.org/stable/i40023255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’; mathematics knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371–406. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312042002371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, E., Lobato, J., & Orrill, C. H. (2018). Middle school teachers’ use of mathematics to make sense of student solutions to proportional reasoning problems. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(8), 1541–1559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9845-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karplus, R., Pulos, S., & Stage, E. (1983). Adolescents’ proportional reasoning on ‘rate’ problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 14(3), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00410539
   Google Scholar
• Lamon, S. J. (2007). Rational numbers and proportional reasoning: Toward a theoretical framework for research. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (Vol. 1, pp. 629–667). Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lobato, J., & Ellis, A. B. (2010). Developing essential understanding of ratios, proportions, and proportional reasoning for teaching mathematics: Grades 6–8. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchelmore, M., White, P., & McMaster, H. (2007). Teaching ratio and rates for abstraction. In J. Watson & K. Beswick (Eds.), Mathematics: Essential research, essential practice (Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the Mathematics education research group of Australasia (pp. 503–512). MERGA.
   Google Scholar
• Ölmez, İ. B. (2016). Two distinct perspectives on ratios: Additive and multiplicative relationships between quantities. Elementary Education Online, 15(1), 186–203. http://ilkogretim-online.org.tr/index.php/io/article/view/1223
   Google Scholar
• Noelting, G. (1980a). The development of proportional reasoning and the ratio concept Part I - Differentiation of stages. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 11(2), 217–253.
   Google Scholar
• Noelting, G. (1980b). The development of proportional reasoning and the ratio concept Part II- Problem-structure at successive stages: Problem-solving strategies and the mechanism of adaptive restructuring. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 11(3), 331–363.
   Google Scholar
• Orrill, C. H., & Brown, R. E. (2012). Making sense of double number lines in professional development: Exploring teachers’ understandings of proportional relationships. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15(5), 381–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-012-9218-z
   Google Scholar
• Orrill, C. H., Izsák, A., Cohen, A., Templin, J., & Lobato, J. (2010). Preliminary observations of teachers’ multiplicative reasoning: Insights from does it work and diagnosing teachers’ multiplicative reasoning projects (Technical Report #6). Kaput Center for Research and Innovation in STEM Education, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth.
   Google Scholar
• Pitta-Pantazi, D., & Constantino, C. (2011). The structure of prospective kindergarten teachers’ proportional reasoning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(2), 149–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-011-9175-y
   Google Scholar
• Riley, K. J. (2010). Teachers’ understanding of proportional reasoning. In P. Brosnan, D. B. Erchick, & L. Flevares (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd annual meeting of the North American chapter of the international group for the Psychology of Mathematics education (pp. 1055–1061). The Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Son, J.-W., Kim, H.-J., & Jo, S. (2018, April). Exploring learning opportunities in Korean textbooks for developing proportional reasoning. Roundtable presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. W., & Thompson, A. G. (1994). Talking about rates conceptually, Part I: A teacher’s struggle. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(3), 279–303. https://doi.org/10.2307/749339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tourniaire, F., & Pulos, S. (1985). Proportional reasoning: A review of the literature. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 16(2), 181–204.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., Janssens, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2008). The linear imperative: An inventory and conceptual analysis of students’ overuse of linearity. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(3), 311–342. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiland, T., Orrill, C. H., Nagar, G. G., Brown, R. E., & Burke, J. (2020). Framing a robust understanding of proportional reasoning for teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-019-09453-0
   Google Scholar