2,250
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Length measurement in the early years: teaching and learning with learning trajectories

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 267-290 | Received 11 Dec 2019, Accepted 28 Nov 2020, Published online: 15 Jan 2021

References

  • Barrett, J. E., Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2017). Children’s measurement: A longitudinal study of children’s knowledge and learning of length, area, and volume. In B. Herbel-Eisenmann (Ed.), Journal for research in mathematics education (Vol. 16, pp. 254). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Boulton-Lewis, G. M., Wilss, L. A., & Mutch, S. L. (1996). An analysis of young children’s strategies and use of devices of length measurement. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15(3), 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(96)90009-7
  • Bragg, P., & Outhred, L. N. (2004, July 14–18). A measure of rulers - The importance of units in a measure [ Paper presentation]. The 28th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, Bergen, Norway. www.emis.de/proceedings/PME28/RR/RR169_Bragg.pdf
  • Brown, M., Blondel, E., Simon, S., & Black, P. (1995). Progression in measuring. Research Papers in Education, 10(2), 143–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267152950100202
  • Clements, D. H. (1987). Strategy spotlight: Computers and problem solving. The Arithmetic Teacher, 35(4), 26–27. https://doi.org/10.5951/AT.35.4.0026
  • Clements, D. H. (1999). Teaching length measurement: Research challenges. School Science and Mathematics, 99(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1999.tb17440.x
  • Clements, D. H., & Burns, B. A. (2000). Students’ development of strategies for turn and angle measure. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003938415559
  • Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2004a). Hypothetical learning trajectories. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0602_1
  • Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2004b). Learning trajectories in mathematics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0602_1
  • Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2009). Learning and teaching early math: The learning trajectories approach. Routledge.
  • Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2014a). Learning and teaching early math: The learning trajectories approach (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  • Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2014b). Learning trajectories: Foundations for effective, research-based education. In A. P. Maloney, J. Confrey, & K. H. Nguyen (Eds.), Learning over time: Learning trajectories in mathematics education (pp. 1–30). Information Age Publishing.
  • Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2020). Learning and teaching with learning trajectories ([LT]2). Marsico Institute, Morgridge College of Education, University of Denver website. www.learningtrajectories.org
  • Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., Van Dine, D. W., Barrett, J. E., Cullen, C. J., Hudyma, A., Dolgin, R., Cullen, A. L., & Eames, C. L. (2018). Evaluation of three interventions teaching area measurement as spatial structuring to young children. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 50(23), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.12.004
  • Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., & Wilson, D. C. (2001). Composition of geometric figures. In M. Van den Heuvel-panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 273–280). Freudenthal Institute.
  • Ellis, S., Siegler, R. S., & Van Voorhis, F. E. (2003, April). Developmental changes in children’s understanding of measurement procedures and principles [ Paper presentation]. The society for research in child development, Tampa, FL.
  • Ginsburg, A., Cooke, G., Leinwand, S., Noell, J., & Pollock, E. (2005). Reassessing U.S. international mathematics performance: New findings from the 2003 TIMSS and PISA. American Institutes for Research.
  • Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (1999). How emergent models may foster the constitution of formal mathematics. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(2), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0102_4
  • Héraud, B. (1989). A conceptual analysis of the notion of length and its measure. In G. Vergnaud, J. Rogalski, & M. Artique (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 83–90). City University.
  • Hiebert, J. C. (1981). Cognitive development and learning linear measurement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 12(3), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/748928
  • Huntley-Fenner, G. (1999, April). Infants’ expectation of quantity varies with material kind [ Paper presentation]. The society for research in child development, Albuquerque, NM.
  • Kamii, C., & Clark, F. B. (1997). Measurement of length: The need for a better approach to teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 97(3), 116–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1997.tb17354.x
  • Kosslyn, S. M., Reiser, B. J., & Ball, T. M. (1978). Visual images preserve metric spatial information: Evidence from studies of image scanning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 4(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.4.1.47
  • Lehrer, R. (2003). Developing understanding of measurement. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 179–192). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Maloney, A. P., & Confrey, J. (2010). The construction, refinement, and early validation of the equipartitioning learning trajectory [ Paper presentation]. The ICLS, Chicago, IL.
  • McClain, K., Cobb, P., Gravemeijer, K. P. E., & Estes, B. (1999). Developing mathematical reasoning within the context of measurement. In L. V. Stiff & F. R. Curcio (Eds.), Developing mathematical reasoning in grades K-12 (pp. 93–106). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Newcombe, N. S., & Huttenlocher, J. (2000). Making space: The development of spatial representation and reasoning. MIT Press.
  • National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers (NGA/CCSSO). (2010). Common core state standards.
  • Nührenbörger, M. (2001). Insights into children’s ruler concepts—Grade-2-students’ conceptions and knowledge of length measurement and paths of development. In M. Van den Heuvel-panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th conference of the international group for the psychology in mathematics education (Vol. 3, pp. 447–454). Freudenthal Institute.
  • Perkins, D. N., & Martin, F. (1986). Fragile knowledge and neglected strategies in novice programmers. In E. Soloway & S. Iyengar (Eds.), Empirical studies of programmers (pp. 213–229). Ablex.
  • Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2009). Early childhood mathematics education research: Learning trajectories for young children. Routledge.
  • Sarama, J., Clements, D. H., Barrett, J. E., Van Dine, D. W., & McDonel, J. S. (2011). Evaluation of a learning trajectory for length in the early years. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 43(5), 667–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0326-5
  • Siegler, R. S. (2006). Microgenetic analyses of learning. In W. Damon, R. M. S. E. Lerner, D. Kuhn, & R. S. V. E. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Volume 2: Cognition, perception, and language (6th ed., pp. 464–510). John Wiley & Sons.
  • Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 114–145. https://doi.org/10.2307/749205
  • Simon, M. A., Tzur, R., Heinz, K., & Kinzel, M. (2004). Explicating a mechanism for conceptual learning: Elaborating the construct of reflective abstraction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5), 305–329. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034818
  • Smith, J. P., Males, L. M., Dietiker, L. C., Lee, K., & Mosier, A. (2013). Curricular treatment of length measurement in the United States: Do they address known learning challenges? Cognition and Instruction, 31(4), 388–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2013.828728
  • The Spatial Reasoning Study Group. (2015). Spatial reasoning in the early years: Principles, assertions, and speculations. Routledge.
  • Steffe, L. P. (1991). Operations that generate quantity. Learning and Individual Differences, 3(1), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/1041-6080(91)90004-K
  • Steffe, L. P., Thompson, P. W., & Glasersfeld, E. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 267–306). Erlbaum.
  • Stephan, M., Bowers, J., Cobb, P., & Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (2003). Supporting students’ development of measuring conceptions: Analyzing students’ learning in social context (Vol. 12). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Stephan, M., Cobb, P., Gravemeijer, K. P. E., & Estes, B. (2001). The role of tools in supporting students’ development of measuring conceptions. In A. Cuoco (Ed.), The roles of representation in school mathematics (pp. 63–76). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Szilagyi, J., Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2013). Young children’s understandings of length measurement: Evaluating a learning trajectory. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(3), 581–620. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.3.0581
  • Verdine, B. N., Irwin, C. M., Golinkoff, R. M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2014). Contributions of executive function and spatial skills to preschool mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 126, 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.02.012
  • Vergnaud, G. (1982). A classification of cognitive tasks and operations of thought involved in addition and subtraction problems. In T. P. Carpenter, J. M. Moser, & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Addition and subtraction: A cognitive perspective (pp. 39–59). Erlbaum.
  • Wilson, P. H. (2014). Learning trajectories and professional development. In A. P. Maloney, J. Confrey, & K. H. Nguyen (Eds.), Learning over time: Learning trajectories in mathematics education (pp. 227–242). Information Age Publishing.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.