The process of actively building a model for a randomization test – insights into learners’ modeling activities based on a case study

References

• Ainley, J., & Pratt, D. (2017). Computational modelling and children’s expressions of signal and noise. Statistics Education Research Journal, 16(2), 15–37. https://iase-web.org/documents/SERJ/SERJ16(2)_Ainley.pdf?1512143127
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, A., & Van Eerde, D. (2015). An introduction to design-based research with an example from statistics education. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education (pp. 429–446). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Batanero, C., & Borovcnik, M. (2016). Statistics and probability in high school. Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Biehler, R., Frischemeier, D., & Podworny, S. (2015). Preservice teachers’ reasoning about uncertainty in the context of randomization tests. In A. Zieffler & E. Fry (Eds.), Reasoning about uncertainty: Learning and teaching informal inferential reasoning (pp. 129–162)). Catalyst Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biehler, R., Frischemeier, D., & Podworny, S. (2018). Elementary preservice teachers’ reasoning about statistical modeling in a civic statistics context. ZDM Mathematics Education, 50(7), 1237–1251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-1001-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinker, K., & Sager, S. F. (2010). Linguistische Gesprächsanalyse. Eine Einführung (5th ed.). Erich Schmidt. [Linguistic conversation analysis. An introduction].
   Google Scholar
• Busse, A., & Borromeo Ferri, R. (2003). Methodological reflections on a three-step-design combining observation, stimulated recall and interview. ZDM Mathematics Education, 35(6), 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02656690
   Google Scholar
• Chance, B., & McGaughey, K. (2014). Impact of a simulation/randomization-based curriculum on student understanding of p-values and confidence intervals. In K. Makar, B. De Sousa, & R. Gould. (Eds.), Sustainability in statistics education. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Teaching Statistics (ICOTS9). ISI. 1-6. https://icots.info/9/proceedings/pdfs/ICOTS9_6B1_CHANCE.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, G. (2007). The introductory statistics course: A Ptolemaic curriculum? Technology Innovations in Statistics Education, 1(1), 1–15. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6hb3k0nz
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., Confrey, J., Di Sessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001009
   Google Scholar
• Doerr, H. M., & Pratt, D. (2008). The learning of mathematics and mathematical modeling. In K. M. Heid & G. W. Blume (Eds.), Research on technology and the teaching and learning of mathematics: Research syntheses (pp. 259–285). Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, T. (2002). Data in Depth. Key Curriculum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, J., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2008). Developing students’ statistical reasoning: Connecting research and teaching practice. Springer Science+Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, R., Davis, G., Patel, R., & Esfandiari, M. (2010). Enhancing conceptual understanding with data driven labs. C. Reading, Ed. Data and context in statistics education: Towards an evidence-based society. Proceedings of the eighth international conference on teaching statistics. ISI. 1-6. http://iase-web.org/documents/papers/icots8/ICOTS8_C208_GOULD.pdf?1402524973
   Google Scholar
• Haller, H., & Krauss, S. (2002). Misinterpretations of significance: A problem students share with their teachers? Methods of Psychological Research Online, 7(1), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, S. A. L., & Rummerfield, W. (2020). Simulation methods for teaching sampling distributions: Should hands-on activities precede the computer? Journal of Statistics Education, 28(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2020.1720551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holcomb, J., Chance, B., Rossman, A., Tietjen, E., & Cobb, G. (2010). Introducing concepts of statistical inference via randomization tests. C. Reading, Ed. Data and context in statistics education: Towards an evidence-based society. Proceedings of the eighth international conference on teaching statistics. ISI. 1-6. http://iase-web.org/documents/papers/icots8/ICOTS8_8D1_HOLCOMB.pdf?1402524971
   Google Scholar
• Justice, N., Zieffler, A., Huberty, M. D., & delMas, R. (2018). Every rose has its thorn: Secondary teachers’ reasoning about statistical models. ZDM Mathematics Education, 50(7), 1253–1265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0953-1
   Google Scholar
• Knapp, H., & Fitzgerald, G. (1989). The antihypertensive effects of fish oil: A controlled study of polyunsaturated fatty acid supplements in essential hypertension. New England Journal of Medicine, 320(16), 1037–1043. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198904203201603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konold, C., Harradine, A., & Kazak, S. (2007). Understanding distributions by modelling them. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 12(3), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-007-9123-1
   Google Scholar
• Krummheuer, G. (2015). Methods for reconstructing processes of argumentation and participation in primary mathematics classroom interaction. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education. Advances in mathematics education (pp. 51–74). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Leavy, A. M. (2010). The challenge of preparing preservice teachers to teach informal inferential reasoning. Statistics Education Research Journal, 9(1), 46–67. http://iase-web.org/documents/SERJ/SERJ9(1)_Leavy.pdf?1402525009
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2010). What kind of explanation is a model? In M. K. Stein & L. Kucan (Eds.), Instructional explanation in the disciplines (pp. 9–22). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Manor Braham, H., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2017). Student’s emergent articulations of statistical models and modeling in making informal statistical inferences. Statistics Education Research Journal, 16(2), 116–143. http://iase-web.org/documents/SERJ/SERJ16(2)_ManorBraham.pdf?1512143349
   Google Scholar
• Noll, J., & Kirin, D. (2017). TinkerPlots model construction approaches for comparing two groups: Student perspectives. Statistics Education Research Journal, 16(2), 213–243. http://iase-web.org/documents/SERJ/SERJ16(2)_Noll.pdf?1512143389
   Google Scholar
• Pfannkuch, M., Budgett, S., & Arnold, P. (2015). Experiment-to-causation inference: Understanding causality in a probabilistic setting. In A. Zieffler & E. Fry (Eds.), Reasoning about uncertainty: Learning and teaching informal inferential reasoning (pp. 95–128). Catalyst Press.
   Google Scholar
• Podworny, S., Frischemeier, D., & Biehler, R. (2017). Design, realization and evaluation of a statistics course for preservice teachers for primary school in Germany. In A. Molnar (Ed.), Teaching statistics in a data rich world (pp. 1–6). Proceedings of the Satellite Conference of the International Association of Statistics Education (IASE).
   Google Scholar
• Podworny, S. (2019). Simulationen und randomisierungstests mit der software TinkerPlots. Springer Spektrum. [Simulations and randomization tests with TinkerPlots].
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey, F. L., & Shafer, D. W. (2013). The statistical sleuth. A course in methods of data analysis. Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Ridgway, J. (2016). Implications of the data revolutions for statistics education. International Statistical Review, 84(3), 528–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/insr.12110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossman, A. (2008). Reasoning about informal statistical inference: One statistician’s view. Statistics Education Research Journal, 7(2), 5–19. http://iase-web.org/documents/SERJ/SERJ7(2)_Rossman.pdf?1402525008
   Google Scholar
• Rossman, A., Chance, B., Cobb, G., & Holcomb, R. (2008). Concepts of statistical inference: Approach, scope, sequence and format for an elementary permutation-based first course. Unpublished paper. http://statweb.calpoly.edu/bchance/csi/CSIcurriculumMay08.doc
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. W., Liu, Y., & Saldanha, L. (2007). Intricacies of statistical inference and teachers’ understandings of them. In M. C. Lovett & P. Shah (Eds.), Thinking with data (pp. 207–231). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tintle, N., VanderStoep, J., & Swanson, T. (2009). An active approach to statistical inference, preliminary edition. Hope College Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wild, C., & Pfannkuch, M. (1999). Statistical thinking in empirical enquiry. International Statistical Review, 67(3), 223–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.1999.tb00442.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar