New ways of interacting with data, context, and chance in statistical modeling processes

References

• Biehler, R., Frischemeier, D., & Podworny, S. (2015). Preservice teachers’ reasoning about uncertainty in the context of randomization tests. In A. Zieffler & E. Fry (Eds.), Reasoning about uncertainty: Learning and teaching informal inferential reasoning. Catalyst Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buolamwini, J. A. (2017). Gender shades: Intersectional phenotypic and demographic evaluation of face datasets and gender classifiers. [ Doctoral dissertation], Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Doerr, H. M., & Pratt, D. (2008). The learning of mathematics and mathematical modeling. In K. M. Heid & G. W. Blume (Eds.), Research on technology and the teaching and learning of mathematics: Research syntheses (pp. 259–285). Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dvir, M., & Ben-Zvi, D. (this issue). Informal statistical models and modeling. Mathematical Thinking and Learning.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fergusson, A., & Pfannkuch, M. (this issue). Introducing teachers who use GUI-driven tools for the randomization test. Mathematical Thinking and Learning.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Justice, N., Zieffler, A., Huberty, M. D., & delMas, R. (2018). Every rose has its thorn: Secondary teachers’ reasoning about statistical models. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 50(7), 1253–1265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0953-1
   Google Scholar
• Kazak, S., Fujita, T., & Turmo, M. P. (this issue). Students’ informal statistical inferences through data modeling with a large multivariate dataset. Mathematical Thinking and Learning.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., & English, L. (2018). Introducing children to modeling variability. In D. Ben-Zvi, K. Makar, & J. Garfield (Eds.), International handbook of research in statistics education (pp. 229–260). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Makar, K., & Rubin. (2009). A framework for thinking about informal statistical inference. Statistics Education Research Journal, 8(1), 82–105.
   Google Scholar
• Noll, J., & Kirin, D. (2017). TinkerPlots model construction approaches for comparing two groups: Student perspectives. Statistics Education Research Journal, 16(2), 213–243.
   Google Scholar
• Noll, J., Kirin, D., Clement, K., & Dolor, J. (this issue). Revealing students’ stories as they construct and use a statistical model in TinkerPlots to conduct a randomization test for comparing two groups. Mathematical Thinking and Learning.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O‘Neil, C. (2017). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown Publishing Group, Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Pfannkuch, M., Ben-Zvi, D., & Budgett, S. (2018). Innovations in statistical modeling to connect data, chance and context. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 50(7), 1113–1123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0989-2
   Google Scholar
• Pfannkuch, M., Budgett, S., & Arnold, P. (2015). Experiment-to-causation inference: Understanding causality in a probabilistic setting. In A. Zieffler & E. Fry (Eds.), Reasoning about uncertainty: Learning and teaching informal inferential reasoning (pp. 95–128). Catalyst Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pfannkuch, M., & Wild, C. (2000). Statistical thinking and statistical practice: Themes gleaned from professional statisticians. Statistical Science, 15(2), 132–152. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1009212754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podworny, S., & Biehler, R. (this issue). The process of actively building a model for a randomization test – Insights into learners’ modeling activities based on a case study. Mathematical Thinking and Learning.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy, M. J. (2007). Research on statistics learning and reasoning. In F. K. Lester Jr (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 957–1009). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Wild, C. J., & Pfannkuch, M. (1999). Statistical thinking in empirical enquiry. International Statistical Review, 67(3), 223–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.1999.tb00442.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkerson, M. H., Lanouette, K., & Shareff, R. L. (this issue). Exploring variability during data preparation: A way to connect data, chance, and context when working with complex public datasets. Mathematical Thinking and Learning.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapata-Cardona, L., & Martínez-Castro, C. A. (this issue). Statistical modeling in teacher education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar