Social Reporting in the Italian Justice System: Milan Court Experience

REFERENCES

• Andriof, J., & Waddock, S. (2002). Unfolding stakeholder engagement. In J. Andriof S. Waddock B. Husted & S. S. Rahman (Eds.), Unfolding stakeholder thinking: Theory, responsibility and engagement (pp. 19–42). Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf.
   Google Scholar
• Andriof, J., Waddock, S., Husted, B., & Sutherland Rahman, S. (2002). Introduction. In J. Andriof S. Waddock B. Husted & S. S. Rahman (Eds.), Unfolding stakeholder thinking: Theory, responsibility and engagement (pp. 9–16). Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf.
   Google Scholar
• Anselmi, L., Pavan, A., & Reginato, E. (2012). Cassa, competenza finanziaria e competenza economica: la scelta delle basi contabili in un sistema armonizzato di contabilità pubblica [Cash, financial and accrual accounting: The choice of accounting basis for a harmonized public accounting system]. Azienda Pubblica, 1, 53–67.
   Google Scholar
• Badia, F., & Donato, F. (2013). Governo partecipato e controllo relazionale in un management pubblico in transizione [Participatory governance and relational audit in a transitional public management]. In L. Anselmi F. Donato L. Marinò A. Pavan & M. Zuccardi Merli (Eds.), Il declino del sistema dei controlli manageriali nelle pubbliche amministrazioni. Dal federalismo ai costi standard [The decline of the managerial audit in public administration system. From federalism to standard costs] (pp. 119–168). Milan, Italy: Franco Angeli.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, A., & Bebbington, J. (2008). Editorial: Accounting and reporting for sustainable development in public service organizations. Public Money and Management, 28(6), 323–326. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9302.2008.00662.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, A., & Grubnic, S. (2007). Sustainability accounting and accountability in the public sector. In J. Unerman J. Bebbington & B. O’Dwyer (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and accountability (pp. 243–265). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bripi, F., Carmignani, A., & Giordano, R. (2011). La qualità dei servizi pubblici in Italia (Questioni di economia e finanza [Occasional Papers] 84) [The quality of public services in Italy (Issues of economics and finance [Occasional Papers] 84)]. Rome, Italy: Banca d’Italia. Retrieved from http://www.bancaditalia.it/pubblicazioni/qef/2011–0084/QEF_84.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Browne, J., & Nuttall, R. (2013). Beyond corporate social responsibility: Integrated external engagement. New York, NY: McKinsey & Co. Retrieved from http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/strategy/beyond_corporate_social_responsibility_integrated_external_engagement.
   Google Scholar
• Carmignani, A., & Giacomelli, S. (2009). La giustizia civile in Italia: i divari territoriali (Questioni di economia e finanza [Occasional Paper] 40) [The civil justice in Italy: Regional gaps (Issues of economics and finance [Occasional Papers] 40)]. Rome, Italy: Banca d’Italia. Retrieved from http://www.bancaditalia.it/pubblicazioni/qef/2009-0040/QEF_40.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chan, J. L. (2008). The structure of government accounting standards. Rivista Italiana di Ragioneria e di Economia Aziendale, 11/12, 732–742.
   Google Scholar
• Dixit, A. (2009). Governance institutions and economic activity. American Economic Review, 99(1), 5–24. doi:10.1257/aer.99.1.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito, P., & Ricci, P. (2015), How to turn public (dis)value into new public value? The re-conversion seized Mafia assets: Evidence from an Italian perspective. Public Money & Management, 35(3), 227–231. doi:10.1080/09540962.2015.1027499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014). The 2014 EU justice scoreboard: Towards more effective justice systems in the EU. Retrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-14–273_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2014). Directive 2014/95/EU, 22 October 2014. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014L0095
   Google Scholar
• Giancane, S., Moro, A., Tarfusser, C. J., & Turra, B. V. (2007). La sperimentazione del bilancio sociale della procura della Repubblica di Bolzano: aspetti metodologici e pratici [The social report trial of Prosecutor’s Office of Bolzano: Methodological and practical aspects]. In P. Ricci (Ed.), Lo standard G.B.S. per la rendicontazione sociale nella pubblica amministrazione. Atti del convegno di Caserta del 23 e 24 febbraio 2006 [The GBS standard for the social reporting in public administration. Proceedings of the conference in Caserta on 23 and 24 February 2006] (pp. 202–221). Milan, Italy: Franco Angeli.
   Google Scholar
• Goodstein, J. D., & Wicks, A. C. (2007). Corporate and stakeholder responsibility: Making business ethics a two-way conversation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(3), 375–398. doi:10.5840/beq200717346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, R. (2002). The social accounting project and accounting organizations and society: Privileging engagement, imaginings, new accountings and pragmatism over critique? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(7), 687–708. doi:10.1016/s0361-3682(00)00003-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, R. (2006). Social, environmental and sustainability reporting and organisational value creation? Whose value? Whose creation? Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(6), 793–819. doi:10.1108/09513570610709872
   Google Scholar
• Gray, R., Owen, D. L., & Adams, C. (1996). Accounting and accountability: Social and environmental accounting in a changing world. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Gruppo di Studio per il Bilancio Sociale (GBS). (2005). Il bilancio sociale. Standard. La rendicontazione sociale nel settore pubblico [The social report. Standard. Social reporting in public sector]. Retrieved from http://www.gruppobilanciosociale.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/STANDARD-LA-RENDICONTAZIONE-SOCIALE-NEL-SETTORE-PUBBLICO.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J., & Farneti, F. (2008). GRI sustainability reporting by Australian public sector organizations. Public Money and Management, 28(6), 361–366. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9302.2008.00670.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinna, L., Meneguzzo, M., Mussari, R., & Decastri, M. (2006). Economia delle aziende pubbliche [Economics of public sector]. Milan, Italy: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Lanteri, V., & De Carlo, N. A. (Eds.). (2009). Giustizia al bivio [Justice at the crossroads]. Milan, Italy: Franco Angeli.
   Google Scholar
• Lapsley, I. (2012). Accounting mutations: Accrual accounting in the UK public sector. In F. Capalbo (Ed.), Accrual accounting in public administration: International experiences. Milan, Italy: Giuffrè.
   Google Scholar
• Lapsley, I., Ezzamel, M., Pallot, J., Johnsen, A., Scarparo, S., & Hyndman, N. (2010). Management accounting, devolution and democratic accountability: Management accounting; devolution and democratic accountability (CIMA research report). London, UK: Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA). http://www.cimaglobal.com/Documents/Thought_leadership_docs/MigratedDocsMarch2010/Resouces%20(pdfs)/Research%20full%20reports/Management%20accounting%20devolution%20and%20democratic%20accountability.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lapsley, I., Mussari, R., & Paulsson, G. (2009). On adoption of accrual accounting in the public sector: A self evident and problematic reform. European Accounting Review, 4, 719–723. doi:10.1080/09638180903334960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapsley, I., & Wright, E. (2004). The diffusion of management accounting innovations in the public sector: A research agenda. Management Accounting Research, 15(3), 355–374. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2003.12.007
   Google Scholar
• Lepore, L. (2009). Efficienza, efficacia ed equità nell’amministrazione della giustizia [Efficiency, effectiveness and equity in justice administration]. Azienda Pubblica, 3, 429–448.
   Google Scholar
• Maggi, D. (2012). Accountability e strumenti di rendicontazione sociale nelle province italiane [Accountability and social reporting tools in Italian provinces]. Azienda Pubblica, 4, 467–483.
   Google Scholar
• Messner, M. (2009). The limits of accountability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 918–938. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2009.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirabelli, C., Paganetto, L., & Tria, G. (Eds.). (2005). Economia della giustizia. Domanda, offerta organizzazione delle cause civili [Economics of justice. Demand, supply, organization of civil lawsuits]. Rome, Italy: Donzelli.
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, R. (2000). Accountability: An ever-expanding concept? Public Administration, 78(3), 555–573. doi:10.1111/1467–9299.00218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, D. C. (1992). Institutions, ideology, and economic performance. CATO Journal, 11(3), 477–488. http://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/cato-journal/1992/1/cj11n3-11.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. (2010). Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation, & Development (OECD). (2013). What makes civil justice effective? (OECD Economics Department Policy Notes, No. 18). Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/eco/growth/Civil%20Justice%20Policy%20Note.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P., & Ball, A. (2010). Social accounting and public management: Accountability for the public good. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Nasi, G. (2013). A new theory for public service management? Toward a (public) service-dominant approach. American Review of Public Administration, 43(2), 135–158. doi:10.1177/0275074012466935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pezzani, F. (Ed.) (2003). L’accountability delle amministrazioni pubbliche [Accountability in public administration]. Milan, Italy: Egea.
   Google Scholar
• Ricci, P. (2006). Il valore aggiunto nello standard di base GBS per la rendicontazione sociale nel settore pubblico [The added value in GBS standard for social reporting in public sector]. La Finanza Locale, 6, 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Ricci, P. (Ed.). (2007). Lo standard G.B.S. per la rendicontazione sociale nella pubblica amministrazione. Atti del Convegno di Caserta del 23 e 24 febbraio 2006 [The GBS standard for the social reporting in public administration. Proceedings of the conference in Caserta on 23 and 24 February 2006]. Milan, Italy: Franco Angeli.
   Google Scholar
• Ricci, P. (2011). Article 41 of the Italian constitution and the Italian model of corporate social responsibility. Review of International Comparative Management, 12(3), 497–506. http://www.rmci.ase.ro/no12vol3/11.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ricci, P. (2012). Impatto delle nuove disposizioni contabili sui comportamenti aziendali e il risultato economico [Impact of new public accouting rules on financial performance]. Azienda Pubblica, 1, 41–51.
   Google Scholar
• Ricci, P. (2013). What future for social reporting and accountability in academic systems. An overview of the Italian case. Review of International Comparative Management, 14(2), 202–221. http://www.rmci.ase.ro/no14vol2/02.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ricci, P. (2014). La rendicontazione di sostenibilità nei tribunali [Sustainability reporting in Courts]. In P. Ricci B. Siboni & M. T. Nardo (Eds.), La rendicontazione di sostenibilità. Evoluzione, linee guida ed esperienze di imprese, amministrazioni pubbliche e aziende non profit [Sustainability reporting. Development, guidelines and firms, public administration and non-profit organizations experiences] (pp. 147–192). Rome, Italy: Rirea.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. (2009). No one is perfect: The limits of transparency and the ethic for “intelligent” accountability.” Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 957–970. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (2000). La ricchezza della ragione: denaro, valori, identità [The wealth of reason: money, values, identity]. Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Shiller, R. J. (2012). Finance and the good society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, A. (1995). The chameleon of accountability: Forms and discourses. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2–3), 219–237. doi:10.1016/0361–3682(93)e0003-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarfusser, C. (2009). Per il miglior servizio degli uffici inquirenti [To the best service of investigating offices]. In V. Lanteri & N. A. De Carlo (Eds.), Giustizia al bivio (pp. 84–91). Milan, Italy: Franco Angeli.
   Google Scholar
• Tribunale di Milano. (2013). Doing justice 2013. The Social Responsibility Report. Milan, Italy: Tribunale di Milano. Retrived from https://www.tribunale.milano.giustizia.it/files/BRS%20Tribunale%20Milano%202013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2013). Doing business 2014: Understanding regulations for small and medium-size enterprises. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/16204/19984.pdf
   Google Scholar