Drawing the Line: On the Public/Private Distinction in Debates on New Modes of Governance

REFERENCES

• Alford, J., & Hughes, O. (2008). Public management pragmatism as the next phase of public management. The American Review of Public Administration, 38, 130–148. doi:10.1177/0275074008314203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, G. T. (1982). Public and private management: Are they fundamentally alike in all unimportant respects? In F. S. Lane (Ed.), Current issues in public administration (pp. 13–33). New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. (2006). What is freedom? In H. Arendt (Ed.), Between past and future (pp. 142–169). New York, NY: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Beck-Jørgensen, T. B., & Bozeman, B. (2006). The public values universe: An inventory. Administration & Society, 39, 354–381. doi:10.1177/0095399707300703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlin, I. (1969). Two concepts of liberty. In I. Berlin (Ed.), Four essays on liberty (pp. 118–172). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. (2002). Public value failure: When efficient markets may not do. Public Administration Review, 52(2), 145–161. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values and public interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., & van der Donk, W. (2010). The third sector and the policy process in The Netherlands: A study in invisible ink. In J. Kendall (Ed.), Handbook on third sector policy in Europe: Multi-level processes and organized civil society (pp. 140–159). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. (2011). Privates, publics and values. In J. B. M. H. Moore (Ed.), Public value: Theory and practice (pp. 52–73). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2007). The new public service: Serving not steering. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Dibben, P., Wood, G., & Roper, I. (2004). Contesting public sector reforms: Critical perspectives, international debates. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dye, T. R. (1992). Understanding public policy. Inglewood Cliffs, CA: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, D. J. (1995). The language of public administration. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, E. (2014). Liberalism: The life of an idea. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1963). Naissance de la clinique. Une archéologie du regard médical [The birth of the clinic. An archaeology of medical perception]. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1975). Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison [Discipline and punish. Birth of the prison]. Paris, France: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1976/1984). Histoire de la sexualité [The History of sexuality]. Paris, France: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Frederickson, H. G. (1991). Toward a theory of the public for public administration. Administration & Society, 22(4), 395–417. doi:10.1177/009539979102200401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geuss, R. (2001). Public goods, private goods. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haque, M. S. (2001). The diminishing publicness of public service under the current mode of government. Public Administration Review, 61(1), 65–82. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. H. (2004). The road to serfdom. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hegel, G. W. F. (1821/1967). Hegel’s philosophy of right. T. M. Knox ( Trans.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C., & Dixon, R. (2015). A government that worked better and cost less: Three decades of reform and change in UK central government. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. (1992). Systems of survival: A dialogue on the moral foundations of commerce and politics. London, UK: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• John, P. (1998). Analysing public policy. London, UK, & New York, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. (1784/2009). An answer to the question: What is enlightenment? London, UK: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H. (2011). New public management and governance. A comparison. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), The oxford handbook of governance (pp. 201–214). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laborde, C., & Maynor, J. W. (2008). Republicanism and political theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Larmore, C. (1995). The foundations of modern democracy: Reflections on Jürgen Habermas. European Journal of Philosophy, 3(1), 55–68. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0378.1995.tb00039.x
   Google Scholar
• Locke, J. (1690/1982). Two treatises on government. London, UK: Dent.
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, A. C. (1985). After virtue. London, UK: Duckworth.
   Google Scholar
• Mathews, D. (1984). The public in practice and theory. Public Administration Review, 44(March), 120–125. doi:10.2307/975551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mill, J. S. (1851/1991). On liberty. In J. Gray (Ed.), On liberty and other essays (pp. 5–128). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, J. S. (1861/1991). Considerations on representative government. In J. Gray (Ed.), On liberty and other essays (pp. 205–467). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value strategic management in government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J., & Clarke, J. (2009). Publics, politics and power: Remaking the public in public service. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L., & Hondeghem, A. (2008). Motivation in public management: The call of public service. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pesch, U. (2005). The predicaments of publicness. Delft, Netherlands: Eburon.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism. A theory of freedom and government. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pocock, J. G. A. (1975). The Machiavellian moment: Florentine political thought and the Atlantic republican tradition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2000). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Possner, W. L. (1984). Privacy. A legal analysis. In F. D. Schoeman (Ed.), Philosophical dimensions of privacy. An anthology (pp. 104–155). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raadschelders, J. (2003). Government. A public administration perspective. Armonk, NY, & London, UK: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbloom, D. H., & Goldman, D. (1989). Public administration: Understanding management, politics, and law in the public sector. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Rössler, B. (2005). The value of privacy. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, A. (2012). The making of modern liberalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schubert, G. (1960). The public interest: A critique of the theory of a political concept. Glemcoe, IL: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. (1977). The fall of the public man. New York, NY: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, H. (2000). The “public-private” demarcation. In M. P. d. E. U. Vogel (Ed.), Public and private: Legal, political and philosophical perspectives (pp. 19–27). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. (2006). Public value management. A new narrative for networked governance? American Review of Public Administration, 36, 41–57. doi:10.1177/0275074005282583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (1979). Hegel and modern society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (1985). Philosophy and the human sciences. Philosophical papers 2. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self. The making of the modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ventriss, C. (1987). Two critical issues of American public administration. Administration & Society, 19(1), 25–47. doi:10.1177/009539978701900102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walzer, M. (1984). Liberalism and the art of separation. Political Theory, 12(3), 315–330. doi:10.1177/0090591784012003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walzer, M. (1990). The communitarian critique of liberalism. Political Theory, 18(1), 6–23. doi:10.1177/0090591790018001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, M. (1999, October). Civil society and good governance. Paper presented at the civil society and governance conference, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1991). Selected writings in H. H. Gerth & C. Wright Mills from Max Weber: Essays in sociology. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weintraub, J. (1997). The theory and politics of the public/private distinction. In J. K. K. Weintraub (Ed.), Public and private in thought and practice (pp. 1–42). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar