8,910
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Responsibility in Public Administration Ethics

REFERENCES

  • Adams, G. B. (2011). The problem of administrative evil in a culture of technical rationality. Public Integrity, 13(3), 275–285. doi:10.2753/PIN1099-9922/130307.
  • Andersson, S. (2017). Beyond unidimensional measures of corruption. Public Integrity, 19(10), 58–76. doi:10.1080/10999922.2016.1200408.
  • Bertelli, A. M., & Lynn, L. E., Jr. (2003). Managerial responsibility. Public Administration Review, 63(3), 259–268. doi:10.1111/15460-6210.00288.
  • Bruce, W. (Ed.). (2001) Classics of administrative ethics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Burke, J. P. (1986). Bureaucratic responsibility. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Campbell, C. (2000). Democratic accountability and models of governance: Purchaser/provider, owner/trustee. In R. A. Chapman (Ed.), Ethics in public service for the new millennium (pp. 141–164). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
  • Chapman, R. A. (Ed.). (2000). Ethics in public service for the new millennium. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
  • Cooper, T. L. (1990). The responsible administrator: An approach to ethics for the administrative role (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • de Graaf, G., & van der Wal, Z. (2017). Without blinders: Public values scholarship in political science, economics, and law—Content and contribution to public administration. Public Integrity, 19(3), 196–218. doi:10.1080/10999922.2016.1269277.
  • Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2007). The new public service: Serving, not steering (2nd ed.). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe. doi:10.4324/9781315289496.
  • Denhardt, K. G. (1988). The ethics of public service: Resolving moral dilemmas in public organizations. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
  • Finer, H. (1941). Administrative responsibility in democratic governance. Public Administration Review, 1(4), 335–350. doi:10.2307/972907.
  • Frederickson, H. G. (1991). Toward a theory of the public. Administration & Society, 22(4), 395–417. doi:10.1177/009539979102200401.
  • Friedrich, C. J. (1935). Responsible government service under the American Constitution. In C. J. Friedrich, W. C. Beyer, S. D. Spero, J. F. Miller, & G. A. Graham (Eds.), Problems of the American public service: Five monographs on specific aspects of personnel administration (pp. 26–45). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Friedrich, C. J. (1940). Public policy and the nature of administrative responsibility. In C. J. Friedrich & E. S. Mason (Eds.), Public policy (pp.1–24). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Friedrich, C. J. (1946). Constitutional government and democracy: Theory and practice in Europe and America. Boston, MA: Ginn & Co.
  • Friedrich, C. J. (1958). Authority. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Gaus, J. M. (1936). The responsibility of public administrators. In J. M. Gaus (Ed.), The frontiers of public administration (pp. 26–45). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Glor, E. P., & Greene, I. (2003). The government of Canada’s approach to ethics: The evolution of ethical governance. Public Integrity, 5(1), 39–65. doi:10.1080/15580989.2003.11770933.
  • Gortner, H. T. (1991). Ethics for public managers. New York, NY: Praeger.
  • Guy, M. E., & Chandless, S. A. (2012). Social equity: Its legacy, its promise. Public Administration Review, 72(s1), S5–S13. doi:10.111/j.1540-6210.2012.02635.x
  • Harmon, M. M. (1995). Responsibility as paradox: A critique of rational discourse on government. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  • Heidenheimer, A. J., & Johnston, M. (2002). Political corruption: Concepts and contexts (3rd ed.). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction. doi:10.4324/9781315126647.
  • Huberts, L. W. J. C., & Six, F. E. (2012). Local integrity systems: Toward a framework for comparative analysis and assessment. Public Integrity, 14(2), 151–172. doi:10.2753/PIN1099-9922140203.
  • Jackson, M. (2009). Responsibility versus accountability in the Friedrich–Finer debates. Journal of Management History, 15(1), 66–77. doi:10.1108/17511340910921790.
  • Johnston, M. (2005). Syndromes of corruption: Wealth, power, and democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511490965.
  • Johnston, M. (2010). Assessing vulnerabilities to corruption: Indicators and benchmarks of government performance. Public Integrity, 12(2), 125–142. doi:10.2753/PIN1099-9922120202.
  • Jos, P. H. (1990). Administrative responsibility revisited: Moral consensus and moral autonomy. Administration & Society, 22(2), 228–248. doi:10.1177/009539979002200205.
  • Mosher, F. C. (1982). Democracy and the public service (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Niewenburg, P. (2003). Can administrative virtue be taught: Educating the virtuous administrator. Public Integrity, 5(1), 25–38. doi:10.1080/15580989.2003.1177093.2
  • O’Leary, R. (2006). The ethics of dissent: Managing guerrilla government (1st ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
  • O’Reilly, P. (2011). Herbert Simon: “is’s” and “oughts” after sixty years. Public Integrity, 13(4), 371–383. doi:10.2753/PIN1099-9921130405.
  • Pennock, J. R. (1960). The problems of responsibility. In C. J. Friedrich (Ed), Responsibility (pp. 3–27). New York, NY: Liberal Arts Press.
  • Spiro, H. J. (1969). Responsibility in government: Theory and practice. New York, NY: Van Nostrand.
  • Steinberg, J. B. (2012). Restoring government service as a valued and honored profession. Public Administration Review, 72(2), 175–176. doi:10.111/j1540-6210.2011.02560.x.
  • Stevulak, C., & Brown, M. P. (2011). Activating public sector ethics in transitional societies: The promise of integrity. Public Integrity, 13(2), 97–114. doi:10.2753/PIN1099-9922130201.
  • Van Doeveren, V. (2011). Rethinking good governance: Identifying common principles. Public Integrity, 13(4), 301–318. doi:10.2753/PIN1099-992130401.
  • Wilt, M. T. (2011). Exit, voice, loyalty revisited: Contours and implications for public administration in dark times. Public Integrity, 13(3), 239–251. doi:10.2753/PIN1099-9922130304.
  • Wooldridge, B., & Gooden, S. (2009). The epic of social equity: Evolution, essence and emergence. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 31(2), 222–234. doi:10.2753/ATP1084-1806310205.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.