When a Team is More Like a Group: Improving Individual Motivation by Managing Integrity Through Team Action Processes

REFERENCES

• Abramson, M. (1984). Collective responsibility in interdisciplinary collaboration: An ethical perspective for social workers. Social Work in Health Care, 10(1), 35–43. doi:10.1300/J010v10n01_03.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C., & Tornberg, P. (2017). Wickedness and the anatomy of complexity. Futures. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2017.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, C. Y., & Von Hippel, E. (2011) Modeling a paradigm shift: From producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation. Organization Science, 22(6), 1399–1417. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. doi:10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., & Mount, M. K. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 377–391. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.83.3.377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, B., Leung, J. Y. H., & Scott, I. (2015). Value-based integrity management and bureaucratic organizations: Changing the mix. International Public Management Journal, 18(3), 390–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cady, S. H., Jacobs, R., Koller, R., & Spalding, J. (2014). The change formula: Myth, legend, or lore. Organization Development Practitioner, 46(3), 32–39.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, G., & Kanfer, R. (2006). Toward a systems theory of motivated behavior in work teams. In B. M. Staw (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior: An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews (pp. 223–268). Oxford, UK: JAI Press. doi:10.1016/S0191-3085(06)27006-0.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, G., Kanfer, R., DeShon, R., Mathieu, J., & Kozlowski, S. (2009). The motivating potential of teams: Test and extension of Chen and Kanfer’s (2006) cross-level model of motivation in teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110(1), 45–55. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cnaan, R., & Cascio, T. (1998). Performance and commitment: Issues in management of volunteers in human service organizations. Journal of Social Service Research, 24(3/4), 1–37. doi:10.1300/j079v24n03_01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comer, D. (1995). A model of social loafing in real work groups. Human Relations, 48, 647–667. doi:0001839216655090/001872679504800603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courtright, S. H., Thurgood, G. R., Stewart, G. L., & Pierotti, A. J. (2015). Structural interdependence in teams: An integrative framework and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(6), 1825–1846. doi:10.1037/apl0000027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, E. R., & LePine, J. A. (2013). A configural theory of team processes: Accounting for the structure of taskwork and teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 32–48. doi:10.5465/amr.2011.0206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. L., Fodor, A., Pfahl, M. E., & Stoner, J. (2014). Team interdependence and turnover: Evidence from the NFL. American Journal of Business, 29(3/4), 276–292. doi:10.1108/ajb-02-2014-0009.
   Google Scholar
• de Graaf, G., & van der Wall, Z. (2017). Without blinders: Public values scholarship in political science, economics, and law—Content and contribution to public administration. Public Integrity, 19(3), 196–218. doi:10.1080/10999922.2016.1269277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobrzykowski, D. (2012). Examining heterogeneous patterns of electronic health records use: A contingency perspective and assessment. International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics, 7(2), 1–16. doi:10.4018/jhisi.2012040101.
   Google Scholar
• D’Silva, J. L., Ortega, A., & Sulaiman, A. H. (2016). Influence of personal and task interdependence on task conflict and team effectiveness. Modern Applied Science, 10(4), 95–100. doi:10.5539/mas.v10n4p9.5.
   Google Scholar
• Fry, L. W. (2003). Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 693–727. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilpin-Jackson, Y. (2017). Participant experiences of transformational change in large-scale organization development interventions (LODIs). Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 38(3), 419–432. doi:10.1108/lodj-12-2015-0284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groves, E. H., & Austin, J. L. (2017). An evaluation of interdependent and independent group contingencies during the good behavior game. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 50(3), 552–566. doi:10.1002/jaba.393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gully, S. M., Incalcaterra, K. A., Joshi, A., & Beaubien, J. M. (2002). A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 819–832. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.87.5.819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy, M. E. (2010). When diversity makes a difference. Public Integrity, 12(2), 173–183. doi:10.2753/pin1099-9922120205.
   Google Scholar
• Guzzo, R. A., & Dickson, M. W. (1996). Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology, 47(1), 307–338. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (1995). Total quality management: Empirical, conceptual, and practical issues. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 309–342. doi:10.2307/2393640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, S. D., Dunford, B. B., Alge, B. J., & Jackson, C. L. (2016). Corporate social responsibility, ethical leadership, and trust propensity: A multi-experience model of perceived ethical climate. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(4), 649–662. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2745-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkins, S. G., & Petty, R. E. (1982). Effects of task difficulty and task uniqueness on social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(6), 1214–1229. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.6.1214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, P. (2017). The necessary revolution in humanistic psychology. In R. House, D. Kalisch, & J. Maidman (Eds.), Humanistic psychology: Current trends and future prospects (Chap.24). New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315392943-41.
   Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, A., Talsma, J., & Kaptein, M. (2016). Integrity management as interorganizational activity: Exploring integrity partnerships that keep the wheel in motion. Public Integrity, 18(2), 167–184. doi:10.1080/10999922.2015.1073502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollenbeck, J. R., Beersma, B., & Schouten, M. E. (2012). Beyond team types and taxonomies, a dimensional scaling conceptualization for team description. Academy of Management Review, 37(1), 82–106. doi:10.5465/armr.2010.0181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, P., Yang, M., & Dobrzykowski, D. (2014). Strategic customer service orientation, lean manufacturing practices and performance outcomes: An empirical study. Journal of Service Management, 25(5), 699–723. doi:10.1108/josm-12-2013-0355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., Strawderman, L., Babski-Reeves, K., Ahmed, S., & Salehi, A. (2014). Training effectiveness and trainee performance in a voluntary training program: Are trainees really motivated? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(6), 1095–1110. doi:0001839216655090/0899764013506787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, G. R. (1984). Task visibility, free riding, and shirking: Explaining the effect of structure and technology on employee behavior. Academy of Management Review, 9(4), 684–695. doi:10.2307/258490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joreskog, K., & Sorbom, D. (2001). LISREL 8, user’s reference guide. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Kanfer, R. (1990). Motivation and individual differences in learning: An integration of developmental, differential and cognitive perspectives. Learning and Individual Differences, 2(2), 221–239. doi:10.1016/1041-6080(90)90023-a.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, N. L., & Bruun, S. E. (1983). Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 78–94. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.44.1.78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidwell, R., & Bennett, N. (1993). Employee propensity to withhold effort: A conceptual model to intersect three avenues of research. Academy of Management Review, 18(3), 429–456. doi:10.5465/amr.1993.9309035146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, S. M. (2006). The moral manager: Vignettes of virtue from Virginia. Public Integrity, 8(2), 113–133. doi:10.2753/pin1099-9922080201.
   Google Scholar
• Koole, S. L., & Lakens, D. (2012). Rewarding replications: A sure and simple way to improve psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 608–614. doi:0001839216655090/1745691612462586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S.W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology, vol. 12: Industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 333–375). New York, NY: John Wiley. doi:10.1002/0471264385.wei1214.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtz, R. S. (2016). Organizational culture, decision-making, and integrity: The National Park Service and the Exxon Valdez. Public Integrity, 5(4), 305–317. doi:10.1080/15580989.2003.11770956.
   Google Scholar
• Le Blanc, P. M., Hox, J. J., Schaufeli, W. B., Taris, T. W., & Peeters, M.C. W. (2007). Take care! The evaluation of a team-based burnout intervention program for oncology care providers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 213–227. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LePine, J., Piccolo, R., Jackson, C., Mathieu, J., & Saul, J. (2008). A meta-analysis of teamwork processes: Tests of a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria. Personnel Psychology, 61(2), 273–307. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00114.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Bradway, L. K. (1997). Task interdependence as a moderator of the relation between group control and performance. Human Relations, 50(2), 169–181. doi:0001839216655090/001872679705000204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Jaworski, R. A., & Bennett, N. (2004). Social loafing: A field investigation. Journal of Management, 30(2), 285–304. doi:10.1016/j.jm.2003.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting & task performance. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lvina, E., Maher, L. P., & Harris, J. N. (2017). Political skill, trust, and efficacy in teams. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 24(1), 95–105. doi:0001839216655090/1548051816657984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 83–104. doi:10.1037/1082–989X.7.1.83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majka, T., & Longazel, J. (2017). Becoming welcoming: Organizational collaboration and immigrant integration in Dayton, Ohio. Public Integrity, 19(2), 151–163. doi:10.1080/10999922.2016.1256697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maloney, M. M., Johnson, S. G., & Zellmer-Bruhn, M. E. (2010). Assessing group-level constructs under missing data conditions: A Monte Carlo simulation. Small Group Research, 41(3), 281–307. doi:0001839216655090/1046496410363829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356–376. doi:10.5465/amr.2001.4845785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J. E., Hollenbeck, J. R., van Knippenberg, D., & Ilgen, D. R. (2017). A century of work teams in the Journal of Applied Psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 452–467. doi:10.1037/apl0000128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997–2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34(3), 410–476. doi:0001839216655090/0149206308316061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neubert, M., Taggar, S., & Cady, S. (2006). The role of conscientiousness and extraversion in affecting the relationship between perceptions of group potency and volunteer group member selling behavior: An interactionist perspective. Human Relations, 59(9), 1235–1260. doi:0001839216655090/0018726706069767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nouri, R., Erez, M., Rockstuhl, T., Ang, S., Leshem‐Calif, L., & Rafaeli, A. (2013). Taking the bite out of culture: The impact of task structure and task type on overcoming impediments to cross‐cultural team performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(6), 739–763. doi:10.1002/job.1871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S., Bryk, A., Cheong, Y., Congdon, R., & du Toit, M. (2011). HLM7: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Sarker, S., Engwall, M., Trucco, P., & Feldmann, A. (2016). Internal visibility of external supplier risks and the dynamics of risk management silos. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 63(4), 451–461. doi:10.1109/tem.2016.2596144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šmite, D., Moe, N. B., Šāblis, A., & Wohlin, C. (2017). Software teams and their knowledge networks in large-scale software development. Information & Software Technology, 86, 71–86. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2017.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, E. M., Shaw, J. D., & Duffy, M. K. (2007). Preference for group work, winning orientation, and social loafing behavior in groups. Group & Organization Management, 32(6), 699–723. doi:0001839216655090/1059601106291130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay, M., Martineau, J. T., & Pauchant, T. C. (2016). Managing organizational ethics in the public sector: A pluralist contingency approach as an alternative to the integrity management framework. Public Integrity, 19(3), 219–233.
   Google Scholar
• van Buuren, S. (2011). Multiple imputation of multilevel data. In J. J. Hox & J. K. Roberts (Eds.), Handbook of advanced multilevel analysis (pp. 173–196). New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203848852-18.
   Google Scholar
• Vancouver, J. B. (2005). The depth of history and explanation as benefit and bane for psychological control theories. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 38–52. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vancouver, J. B., & Kendall, L. N. (2006). When self-efficacy negatively relates to motivation and performance in a learning context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1146–1153. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbos, A. K., Gerard, J. A., Forshey, P. R., Harding, C. S., & Miller, J. S. (2007). The positive ethical organization: Enacting a living code of ethics and ethical organizational identity. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(1), 17–33. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9275-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wageman, R. (2001). The meaning of interdependence. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research (pp. 197–217). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. doi:10.4324/9781315805986-15.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeland, C. M. (2013). Gregory G. Smith: A township manager effectively managing ethical dilemmas. Public Integrity, 15(3), 265–281. doi:10.2753/pin1099-9922150303.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A., Kennedy, S., Philipp, F., & Whiteman, G. (2017). Systems thinking: A review of sustainability management research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 148(1), 866–881. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.002.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, R. (2003). Measuring explained variation in linear mixed effects models. Statistics in Medicine, 22, 3527–3541. doi:10.1002/sim.1572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young-Hyman, T. (2017). Cooperating without co-laboring: How formal organizational power moderates cross-functional interaction in project teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(1), 179–214. doi:10.1177/0001839216655090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar