The Impact of Client Status on Street-Level Bureaucrats’ Identity and Informal Accountability

REFERENCES

• Ash, A. (2014). Safeguarding older people from abuse: Critical contexts to policy and practice. Bristol, UK: Policy Press. doi:10.1332/policypress/9781447305668.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Brodkin, E. Z. (2012). Reflections on street-level bureaucracy: Past, present, and future. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 940–949. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02657.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodkin, E. Z., & Marston, G. (Eds.). (2013). Work and the welfare state: Street-level organizations and workfare politics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctt46n36p
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. K. (1988). Working the street: Police discretion and the dilemmas of reform. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation. doi:10.7758/9781610445948
   Google Scholar
• Buffat, A. (2015). When and why discretion is weak or strong: The case of taxing officers in a public unemployment fund. In P. Hupe, M. Hill, & A. Buffat (Eds.), Understanding street-level bureaucracy (pp. 79–96). Bristol, UK: Policy Press. doi:10.1332/policypress/9781447313267.003.0005
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. (2014). Social science research: From field to desk. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. (1970). Natural symbols: Explorations in cosmology. New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315015828
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, V. (2010). The bureaucrat and the poor: Encounters in French welfare offices. Farnham, UK: Ashgate. doi:10.4324/9781315614205
   Google Scholar
• Gilson, L. (2015). Michael Lipsky, street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. In S. J. Balla, M. Lodge, E. C. Page (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of classics in public policy and administration (pp. 383–404). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199646135.013.19
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1998). The art of the state: Culture, rhetoric, and public management. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0198297653.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (2010). Accountability and transparency: Siamese twins, matching parts, awkward couple? West European Politics, 33(5), 989–1009. doi:10.1080/01402382.2010.486122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hupe, P. (2010). The autonomy of professionals in public service. In T. Jansen, G. Brink, & K. J. van Den (Eds.), Professional pride: A powerful force (pp. 118–137). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Boom.
   Google Scholar
• Hupe, P., & Hill, M. (2007). Street-level bureaucracy and public accountability. Public Administration, 85(2), 279–299. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00650.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hupe, P., Hill, M., & Buffat, A. (Eds.). (2015). Understanding street-level bureaucracy. Bristol, UK: Policy Press. doi:10.1332/policypress/9781447313267.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation. doi:10.7758/9781610447713
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services (30th Ann. exp. ed.). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation. doi:10.7758/9781610446631
   Google Scholar
• Loyens, K. (2013a). Grid-group cultural theory and the causal mechanism approach as requisite partners: Explaining enforcement decisions in Western European labor inspection. European Journal of Social Science Research, 26(4), 416–435. doi:10.1080/13511610.2013.823348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loyens, K. (2013b). Towards a custom-made whistleblowing policy: Using grid-group cultural theory to match policy measures to different styles of peer reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(2), 239–249. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1344-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeschalck, J. (2004). Towards a public administration theory on public servants’ ethics: A comparative study (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven, Belgium. Retrieved from https://soc.kuleuven.be/io/english/research/publication/doctoral-report-towards-a-public-administration-theory-on-public-sector-ethics.-a-comparative-study
   Google Scholar
• Mamadouh, V. (1999). Grid-group cultural theory: An introduction. GeoJournal, 47(3), 395–409. doi:10.1023/A:1007024008646
   Google Scholar
• Maynard-Moody, S., & Musheno, M. (2000). State agent or citizen agent: Two narratives of discretion. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 329–358. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024272
   Google Scholar
• Maynard-Moody, S., & Musheno, M. (2003). Cops, teachers, counselors: Stories from the front lines of public service. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. doi:10.3998/mpub.11924
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, R. E., Egger-Peitler, I., Höllerer, M. A., & Hammerschmid, G. (2013). Of bureaucrats and passionate public managers: Institutional logics, executive identities, and public service motivation. Public Administration, 92(4), 861–885. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2012.02105.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberfield, Z. W. (2010). Rule following and discretion at government’s frontlines: Continuity and change during organization socialization. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4), 735–755. doi:10.1093/jopart/mup025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberfield, Z. W. (2014). Becoming bureaucrats: Socialization at the front lines of government service. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctt6wr8r5
   Google Scholar
• Scott, S. (2015). Negotiating identity: Symbolic interactionist approaches to social identity. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar