Blind Spots in Public Ethics and Integrity Research: What Public Administration Scholars Can Learn from Aristotle

REFERENCES

• Aristotle. (2000). Nicomachean ethics (R. Crisp, trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bannink, D., Bosselaar, H. & Trommel, W. (Eds.) (2013). Crafting local welfare landscapes. The Hague: Eleven.
   Google Scholar
• Bevir, M. (2009). Key concepts in governance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Boutellier, H. (2013). The improvising society: Social order in a boundless world. The Hague: Eleven.
   Google Scholar
• Coghlan, D., & Brannick, T. (2014). Doing. Action research in your own organization (4th ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• de Graaf, G., Huberts, L., & Smulders, J. (2016). Coping with public value conflicts. Administration & Society, 48 (9), 1101–1127. doi:10.1177/0095399714532273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Graaf, G., Huberts, L., & Strüwer, T. (2018). Integrity violations and corruption in Western public governance: Empirical evidence and reflection from the Netherlands. Public Integrity, 20(2), 131–149. doi:10.1080/10999922.2017.1350796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Graaf, G., & van Asperen, H. (2018). The art of good governance: Images from the past provide inspiration for modern practice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(2), 405–420. doi:10.1177/0020852316630392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, M., & Kim, P. (2011). Introduction to value and virtue in public administration. In M. de Vries & P. Kim (Eds.), Value and virtue in public administration: A comparative perspective (pp. 1–17). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Eikeland, O. (2006). Phrónêsis, Aristotle, and action research. International Journal of Action Research, 2 (1), 5–53.
   Google Scholar
• Eikeland, O. (2007). From epistemology to gnoseology – understanding the knowledge claims of action research. Management Research News, 30 (5), 344–358. doi:10.1108/01409170710746346
   Google Scholar
• Huberts, L. & Huberts, L. (Eds.). (2014). The integrity of governance: What it is, what we know, what is done, and where to go. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Huberts, L., Anechiarico, F. & Six, F. (Eds.) (2008). Local integrity systems: World cities fighting corruption and safeguarding integrity. The Hague: BJU Legal Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Huberts, L. (1998). Blinde vlekken in de politiepraktijk en de politiewetenschap [Blind spots in police practice and police science]. Amsterdam/Arnhem: Vrije Universiteit/Gouda Quint.
   Google Scholar
• Huberts, L. (2014). Introduction. In L. Huberts (Ed.), The integrity of governance: What it is, what we know, what is done, and where to go (pp. 1–13). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Huberts, L., Kaptein, M., & Lasthuizen, K. (2007). A study of the impact of three leadership styles on integrity violations committed by police officers. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 30(4), 587–607. doi:10.1108/13639510710833884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huberts, L., & van der Wal, Z. (2014). What is valued most in politics and administration. In L. Huberts (Ed.), The integrity of governance: What it is, what we know, what is done, and where to go (pp. 144–166). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Huberts, L., Verberk, S., Lasthuizen, K., & van den Heuvel, H. (2004). Paradoxaal politiebestel: Burgemeesters, openbaar ministerie en politiechefs over de sturing van de politie [The paradoxical police organization: Mayors, public prosecutors and police commanders perceptions about the governance of the police]. Zeist/Apeldoorn: Kerckebosch/Politie en Wetenschap.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, J., & Patapan, H. (2006). In search of prudence: The hidden problem of managerial reform. Public Administration Review, 66(5), 711–724. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00636.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasthuizen, K., Huberts, L., & Heres, L. (2011). How to measure integrity violations: Towards a validated typology of unethical behavior. Public Management Review, 13(3), 383–408. doi:10.1080/14719037.2011.553267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, A. (2010 [1981]). After virtue: A study in moral theory. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D. (2013). Practice theory, work and organization: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Overeem, P. (2014). Naar een beter integriteitsbegrip: Van deontologie naar deugdethiek’ [‘Towards a better understanding of integrity: From deontology to virtue ethics’]. Liberaal Reveil, 3, 124–128.
   Google Scholar
• Overeem, P., & Tholen, B. (2011). After managerialism: MacIntyre’s lessons for the study of public administration. Administration & Society, 43 (7), 722–748. doi:10.1177/0095399711413728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. (1966 [2009]). The tacit dimension. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. (2002). Towards a theory of social practices: A development in cultural theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263. doi:10.1177/13684310222225432
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. (2016). Recovering the craft of public administration. Public Administration Review, 76(4), 638–647. doi:10.1111/puar.12504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherkoske, G. (2012). Could integrity be an epistemic virtue? International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 20(2), 185–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, B., & Sharpe, K. (2010). Practical wisdom: The right way to do the right thing. New York, NY: Riverhead Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. (2008). The craftsman. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Siedentop, L. (2014). Inventing the individual: The origins of Western liberalism. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Trommel, W., & Boutellier, H. (2018). The emergence of a new paradigm in governance of welfare and security. In H. Boutellier & W. Trommel (Eds.), Emerging governance: Crafting communities in an improvising society (pp. 9–29). Eleven: Boom.
   Google Scholar
• van der Wal, Z., & Huberts, L. (2008). Value solidity in government and business: Results of an empirical study on public and private sector values. The American Review of Public Administration, 38(3), 264–285. doi:10.1177/0275074007309154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hulst, M., de Graaf, L., & van den Brink, G. (2011). Exemplary practitioners. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 33(1), 120–143. doi:10.2753/ATP1084-1806330110
   Google Scholar
• van Steden, R., & Huberts, L. (2005). Private security industry growth in western countries. In L. Sullivan. & M. Haberfeld (Eds.), Encyclopedia of law enforcement (volume 3, pp. 1261–1268). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• van Steden, R., van Putten, R., & Hoogland, J. (2019). Security networks: Applying the normative practice approach to nodal governance theory. In M. de Vries & H. Jochemsen (Eds.), The normative nature of social practices and ethics in professional environments (pp. 277–294). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Vos, P. (2018). Learning from exemplars: Emulation, character formation and the complexities of ordinary life. Journal of Beliefs and Values, 39(1), 17–28. doi:10.1080/13617672.2017.1393295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar