4,554
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Good Governance as Reflexive Governance: In Praise of Good Colleagueship

References

  • Achterhuis, H. (1998). De erfenis van de utopie. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Ambo.
  • Beck, U. (1986). Risikogesellschaft: Auf den Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.
  • Beck, U. (1994). Self-dissolution and self-endangerment of industrial society: What does this mean? In U. Beck, A. Giddens, & S. Lash (eds.), Reflexive modernization. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  • Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2008). Managing performance; international comparisons. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Bouckaert, G., & van de Walle, S. (2003). Comparing measures of citizen trust and user satisfaction as indicators of ‘good governance’: Difficulties in linking trust and satisfaction indicators. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 69, 329–343.
  • Bovaird, T. (2004). Evaluating the quality of local governance: Some lessons from European experience. Local Governance, 30(4), 178–187.
  • Bovaird, T., & Löffler, E. (2003). Evaluating the quality of public governance: Indicators, models and methodology. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 69(3), 313–328. doi:10.1177/0020852303693002
  • Bovens, M. A. P. (2001). Openbaar Bestuur. Beleid, Organisatie en Politiek. Alphen aan de Rijn, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
  • Doornbos, M. R. (2004). Good governance: The pliability of a policy concept. Trames, 4, 372–387.
  • Gerstenberg, O., & Sabel, C. (2002). Directly-deliberative polyarchy; an institutional ideal for Europe? In C. Joerges (ed.), Good governance in Europe’s integrated market. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  • Giddens, A. (1994). Living in a post-industrial society. In U. Beck, A. Giddens, & S. Lash (eds.), Reflexive modernization. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  • Gray, J. (2007). Black mass: Apocalyptic religion and the death of Utopia. New York, NY: Farrar, Straux, Giroux.
  • Gulati, R., & Nickerson, J. (2008). Interorganizational trust, governance choice, and exchange performance. Organization Science, 19(5), 688–621. doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0345
  • Hajer, M. (2003). Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sciences, 36(2), 175–195.
  • Hajer, M., van Tatenhove, J., & Laurent, C. (2004). Nieuwe vormen van governance. Bilthoven, The Netherlands: RIVM.
  • Hendriks, C., & Grin, J. (2007). Contextualising reflexive governance; the politics of Dutch transition to sustainability. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 9(3–4), 333–350. doi:10.1080/15239080701622790
  • Huberts, L. (2014). Public integrity. What it is, what we know, what has done and where to go. London, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Huberts, L., Maesschalck, L., Jurkiewicz, J. (eds.). (2008). Ethics and integrity of governance. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  • Jessop, B. (2004). Governance and metagovernance: on reflexivity, requisite variety and requisite irony. In H. Bang (ed.), Governance as social and political communication. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
  • Kersbergen, K., & van Waarden, F. (2001). Shifts in governance: Problems of legitimacy and accountability. Den Haag, The Netherlands: NWO.
  • Lynch, M. (2000). Against reflexivity as an academic virtue and source of privileged knowledge. Theory, Culture & Society, 17(3), 26–54. doi:10.1177/02632760022051202
  • Mayntz, R. (1993). Modernisation and the logic of interorganisational networks. In J. Child, M. Crozier, & R. Mayntz, (eds.), Societal change between market and organisation. Avebury, UK: Aldershot.
  • Meuleman, L. (2008). Public management and the metagovernance of hierarchies, networks and markets. Heidelberg, Germany: Physica-Verlag.
  • Miller, C. (2006). The study of public reasoning. Retrieved from https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/30769542/10.1.1.67.4119.pdf?response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DStick_with_Policy_Advice_Inoffensive_to.pdf&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A%2F20190628%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20190628T091659Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Signature=8083ddd9a877dde23f037d1e75280278ba95b6997c414d6c4379af1e64de4f32.
  • Montfort, C. (2004). Ruimte voor goed bestuur. Tussen prestatie, proces en principe. Den Haag, The netherlands: WRR.
  • Parto, S. (2005). Good governance and policy analysis: What of institutions research memorandum. Maastricht, The Netherlands: MERIT.
  • Pierre, J. P., & Peters, B. G. (2005). Governing complex societies. Trajectories and scenarios. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony and solidarity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ruscio, K. (1996). Trust, democracy and public management: A theoretical argument. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(3), 461–477. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024321
  • Schön, D., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Teubner, G. (1993). Law as an autopietic system. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Voss, J.-P., & Kemp, R. (2006). Sustainability and reflexive governance; introduction. In J.-P. Voss, D. Bauknecht, & R. Kemp (eds.), Reflexive governance for sustainable development. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  • Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of justice. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Winner, D. (2000). Brilliant orange: The neurotic genius of Dutch football. London, UK: Bloomsbury.