Mega-Gifts: Hijacking Administrative Discretion?

REFERENCES

• Abrams, B., & Schitz, M. (1978). The ‘crowding-out’ effect of governmental transfers on private charitable giving. Public Choice, 33(1), 29–39. doi:10.1007/BF00123940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreoni, J., & Payne, A. (2011). Is crowding out due entirely to fundraising? Evidence from a panel of charities. Journal of Public Economics, 95(5–6), 334–343. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astin, A. W., & Scherrei, R. A. (1980). Maximizing leadership effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Backer, L., & Haddad, N. (2016). Philanthropy and the character of the public research university – The intersections of private giving, institutional autonomy, and shared governance. In H. Alphin, Jr., J. Lavine, S. Start and A. Hocker (Eds.), Facilitating Higher Education Growth through Fundraising and Philanthropy (pp. 28–56). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Barkan, J. (2013). Plutocrats at work: How big philanthropy undermines democracy. Social Research, 80(2), 635–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnhardt, C. (2017). Philanthropic foundations’ social agendas and the field of higher education. In. M. B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of Theory and Research (pp. 181–257). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Behn, R. D. (1998). What right do public managers have to lead? Public Administration Review, 58(3), 209–224. doi:10.2307/976561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekkers, R., & Wiepking, P. (2011). A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy: Eight mechanisms that drive charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(5), 924–973. doi:10.1177/0899764010380927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertelli, A. (2006). Governing the Quango: An auditing an cheating model of quasi-governmental authorities. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(2), 239–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, R. (1988). How colleges work: The cybernetics of academic organization and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bleiklie, I., & Kogan, M. (2007). Organization and governance of universities. Higher Education Policy, 20(4), 477–493. doi:10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300167
   Google Scholar
• Bok, D. (2017). The struggle to reform our colleges. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolden, R., Petrov, G., & Gosling, J. (2008). Tensions in higher education leadership: Towards a multi‐level model of leadership practice. Higher Education Quarterly, 62(4), 358–376.
   Google Scholar
• Bouckaert, G., & Peters, G. (2004). What is available and what is missing in the study of quangos? In C. Pollitt and C. Talbot (eds.), Unbundled government: A critical analysis of the global trend to agencies, quangos, and contractualisation. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bray, N. (2008). Proscriptive norms for academic deans: Comparing faculty expectations across institutional and disciplinary boundaries. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(6), 692–721. doi:10.1080/00221546.2008.11772124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brecher, C., & Wise, O. (2008). Looking a gift horse in the mouth: Challenges in managing philanthropic support for public resources. Public Administration Review, 68, S146–S161. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00985.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, A. (2003). Do government subsidies to nonprofits crowd out donations to nonprofits? Public Finance Review, 31(2), 166–179.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, R. Y. (2019, October). The professionalization of fundraising: A transcript analysis of CASE President Emeritus Peter McEachin Buchanan (1935-1991) on U.S. higher education. Paper presented at the European Research Network on Philanthropy (ERNOP) 9th BiAnnual International Conference, Basel, Swittzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Cheslock, J. J., & Gianneschi, M. (2008). Replacing state appropriations with alternative revenue sources: The case of voluntary support. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(2), 208–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, A., & Tempel, E. (2006). Philanthropy. In D. M. Priest & E. P. St. John (Eds.), Privatization and higher education. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. doi:10.1353/jhe.2008.0012
   Google Scholar
• Cook, W., & Lasher, W. (1996). Toward a theory of fundraising in higher education. The Review of Higher Education, 20(1), 33–51. doi:10.1353/rhe.1996.0002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dill, C. (1984). The nature of administrative behavior in higher education. Educational Administration Quarterly, 20(3), 69–99. doi:10.1177/0013161X84020003005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R. M. (1967). The model of rules. The University of Chicago Law Review, 35(1), 14–46. doi:10.2307/1598947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebdon, C., & Landow, P. (2012). The balancing act: Using private money for public projects. Public Budgeting & Finance, 32(1), 58–79.
   Google Scholar
• Eckel, C., Grossman, P., & Johnston, R. (2005). An experimental test of the crowding out hypothesis. Journal of Public Economics, 89(8), 1543–1560. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, G. D. (1981). Law, morality, and the public servant. Public Administration Review, 41(1), 29–34. doi:10.2307/975721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, L. J., & McGarvie, M. D. (2002). Charity, philanthropy and civility in American History. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsberg, B. (2011). The fall of the faculty: The rise of the all administrative university and why it matters. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goss, K. (2016). Policy plutocrats: How America’s wealthy seek to influence governance. PS: Political Science & Politics, 49(03), 442–448. doi:10.1017/S1049096516000676
   Google Scholar
• Greve, C., Flinders, M., & Van Thiel, S. (1999). Quangos – What’s in a name? Defining quangos from a comparative perspective. Governance, 12(2), 129–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddad, N., & Reckhow, S. (2018). The shifting role of higher education philanthropy: A network analysis of philanthropic policy strategies. Philanthropy & Education, 2(1), 25–52.
   Google Scholar
• Hague, D., McKenzie, W., & Barker, A. (1975). Public policy and private interests: The institutions of compromise. New York, NY: Holmes and Meier.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. (2006). Alternative revenue sources. In D. M. Priest & E. P. St. John (Eds.), Privatization and higher education (pp. 87–108). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J., Lewis, D., Kallsen, L., Holdsworth, J. M., & Jones, M. (2006). “Incentives for managed growth”: A case study of incentives-based planning and budgeting in a large public research university. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(2), 286–316. doi:10.1353/jhe.2006.0014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, W. (1999). Financing universities through nontraditional revenue sources: Opportunities and threats. In W. Z. Hirsch & L. E. Weber (Eds.), Challenges facing higher education at the millennium. American Council on Education Services on Higher Education (pp. 75–84). Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hovey, H. A. (1999). State spending for higher education in the next decade: The battle to sustain current support (National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education Report No. 99-3). San Jose, CA: National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. (1998). Channeling social protest: Foundation patronage of contemporary social movements. In W. Powell & E. Clemens (Eds.), Private action and the public good (pp. 206–216). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, D. B. (2002). Challenges of financial austerity: Imperatives and limitations of revenue diversification in higher education. The Welsh Journal of Education [Special International Issue](1), 18–36.
   Google Scholar
• Kalargyrou, V., & Woods, R. (2009). What makes a college administrator an effective leader?: An exploratory study. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 9(1–2), 21–36. doi:10.1080/15313220903041980
   Google Scholar
• Kezar, A. J., Carducci, R., & Contreras-McGavin, M. (2006). Rethinking the “L” word in higher education: The revolution of research on leadership (ASHE Higher Education Report, 31(6)). New York, NY: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Koppell, J. (2003). The politics of quasi government: Hybrid organizations and the control of public policy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kretovics, M. (2011). Business practices in higher education: A guide for today’s administrators. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, J., (2007). The spider-web of oversight: An Analysis of external oversight of higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(6), 615–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, J., & Kivisto J. A. (2008). Interests, information, and incentives in higher education: Principal-agent Theory and Its Potential Applications to the Study of Higher Education Governance. In Smart J. C. (ed), Higher education. Handbook of theory and research, (vol 23; pp. 141–179). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Leslie, L., & Slaughter, S. (1997). The development and current status of market mechanisms in United States postsecondary education. Higher Education Policy, 10(3–4), 239–252. doi:10.1016/S0952-8733(97)00016-0
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of individuals in public service. New York, NY: Russel Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J. (2006). Political control versus bureaucratic values: Reframing the debate. Public Administration Review, 66(2), 177–192. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00571.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merchant, J. (2014). From altruism to investment: Venture philanthropy and its impact on shared governance at liberal arts colleges (Unpublished Dissertation). Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Moe, R. (2001). The emerging federal quasi government: Issues of manageme-nt and accountability. Public Administration Review , 61(3), 290–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe, R., & Kosar, K. (2005). The quasi government: Hybrid organizations with both (Congressional Research Service Report for Congress). Retrieved from http://www.policyarchive.org/bitstream/10207/1034/RL30533_20050518.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Montez, J. M., Wolverton, M., & Gmelch, W. H. (2003). The roles and challenges of deans. The Review of Higher Education, 26(2), 241–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulton, S., & Wise, C. (2010). Shifting boundaries between the public and private sectors: Implications from the economic crisis. Public Administration Review, 70(3), 349–360. doi:10.1353/rhe.2002.0034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholson-Crotty, J., & Meier, K. (2003). Politics, structure, and public policy: The case of higher education. Educational Policy, 17(1), 80–97. doi:10.1177/0895904802239287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olejarski, A. M. (2011). Public good as public interest? The principle of tangibility in eminent domain legislation. Public Integrity, 13(4), 333–351. doi:10.2753/PIN1099-9922130403
   Google Scholar
• Olejarski, A. M. (2013). Administrative discretion in action: A narrative of eminent domain. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Panas, J. (2005). Mega gifts, who gives them, who gets them (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: Pluribus.
   Google Scholar
• Payton, R. (1988). Philanthropy: Voluntary action for the public good. New York, NY: American Council on Education/MacMillan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Reckhow, S. (2016). More than patrons: How foundations fuel policy change and backlash. PS: Political Science & Politics, 49(03), 449–454. doi:10.1017/S1049096516000688
   Google Scholar
• Reich, R. (2006). Philanthropy and its uneasy relationship to equality. Philosophy and Public Policy Quarterly, 26(3–4), 17–26.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, R. (2016). Repugnant to the whole idea of democracy? On the role of foundations in democratic societies. PS: Political Science & Politics, 49(03), 466–472. doi:10.1017/S1049096516000718
   Google Scholar
• Reich, R. (2018). Just giving: Why philanthropy is failing democracy and how it can do better. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
   Google Scholar
• Rohr, J. A. (1989). Ethics for bureaucrats: An essay on law and values (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Rosser, V. J., Johnsrud, L. K., & Heck, R. H. (2003). Academic deans and directors: Assessing their effectiveness from individual and institutional perspectives. The Journal of Higher Education, 74(1), 1–25. doi:10.1353/jhe.2003.0007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders-Hastings, E. (2018). Plutocratic philanthropy. The Journal of Politics, 80(1), 149–161. doi:10.1086/694103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidman, H. (1988). The quasi world of federal government. The Brookings Review, 6(3), 23–27. doi:10.2307/20080040
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1997). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations (4th ed.). New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skelcher, C., & Smith, S. R. (2015). Theorizing hybridity: Institutional logics, complex organizations, and actor identities: The case of Nonprofits. Public Administration, 93(2), 433–448. doi:10.1111/padm.12105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skocpol, T. (2016). Introduction. PS: Political Science & Politics, 49(03), 433–436. doi:10.1017/S1049096516000652
   Google Scholar
• St. John., E. & Priest, D. (2006). Privatization in Public Universities. In D. Priest & E. St. John (eds.), Privatization of public universities (pp. 271–284). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• State Council of Higher Education for Virginia. (2011). Higher Education Opportunity Act. Retrieved from http://www.schev.edu/restructuring/restructuring.asp#operationsact
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, M. O., Schnitzer, M. H., & Arroyave, V. M. (2009). Nonprofit governance, management, and organizational learning: Exploring the implications of one “mega-gift.” The American Review of Public Administration, 39(1), 43–59.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, D., Kane, P., & Scruggs, L. (2012). Education and training. In L. M. Salamon (Ed.), State of nonprofit America (pp. 107–148). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stott, T. (1995). ‘Snouts in the Trough’: The politics of Quangos. Parliamentary Affairs, 48(2), 323–340. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pa.a052535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelin, J., & Trollinger, R. (2014). Philanthropy and American higher education. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, D. E. (2019). Donor-driven democracy? Governance implications of foundation-dependent revitalization. Journal of Urban Affairs, 41(4), 551–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• University of Virginia. (2002). Virginia 2020 priorities (Report to the Board of Visitors). Retrieved from http://www.virginia.edu/virginia2020/Final%20Report%20to%20the%20BOV.pdf
   Google Scholar
• University of Virginia. (2007). Committee on programmatic initiatives draft report. Retrieved from http://www.virginia.edu/planningdocuments/commission/2MRC/Seconddrafts/all%20new%20posted/3_Final_Report_Dec_07.pdf
   Google Scholar
• University of Virginia. (n.d). Working group on leadership. Retrieved from http://www.batten.virginia.edu/LWG
   Google Scholar
• Versterlund, L. (2006). Why do people give. In W. Powell & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (2nd ed., pp. 568–590). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Virginia Tech. (2005). Former Virginia Tech fraternity brothers partner to help establish new school of construction. Retrieved from http://www.vtnews.vt.edu/articles/2005/10/2005-1057.html
   Google Scholar
• Virginia Tech. (2006a). CGSP Resolution 2005-06C and CUSP Resolution 2005-2006A, resolution for the establishment of a school of construction at Virginia Tech. Retrieved from http://www.facultysenate.vt.edu/Minutes_12_13_05.html
   Google Scholar
• Virginia Tech. (2006b). Attachment D proposal to establish a school of construction. Retrieved from http://www.bov.vt.edu/minutes/06-03-27minutes/attach_d_060327.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Virginia Tech. (n.d). Invent the future: Quality, innovation, results 2006–2012. Strategic Plan Update 2006–2012. Retrieved from http://www.president.vt.edu/strategicplan/documents/SP0612_complete.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Virginia Tech College of Architecture and Urban Studies. (2002). Strategic plan. Unpublished document.
   Google Scholar
• Virginia Tech College of Engineering. (n.d). Strategic plan. Unpublished document.
   Google Scholar
• Virginia Tech Myers-Lawson School of Construction. (2010). 2010 fall report (Volume 1002). Retrieved from http://www.mlsoc.vt.edu/files/2010%20MLSoC%20Report%20Fall%20-%20Final2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Warren, C. A. B. (2002). ‘Qualitative interviewing.’ In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 83–101). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Webb Farley, K. (2018). Can private donations help public universities build bridges over troubled waters?: Practical lessons for administrators and donors. Public Organization Review, 18(2), 175–190. doi:10.1007/s11115-016-0365-z
   Google Scholar
• Webb Farley, K., Goss, K., & Smith, S. (2018). Introduction to advancing philanthropic scholarship: The implications of transformation. PS: Political Science & Politics, 51(01), 39–42. doi:10.1017/S1049096517001366
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wettenhall, R. (2003). Three-way categorisations, hybrids, and intersectoral mixes in the governance equation. Asian Journal of Public Administration, 25(1), 57–86.
   Google Scholar
• Wettenhall, R., & Thynne, I. (2002). Public enterprise and privatization in a new century: Evolving patterns of governance and public management. Public Finance & Management, 2(1), 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, C. (2010). Organizations of the future: Greater hybridization coming. Public Administration Review, 70(s1), s164–s166. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02263.x
   Google Scholar
• Woliver, L. R. (2002). Ethical dilemmas in personal interviewing. PS: Political Science and Politics, 35(4).
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar