A Scoping Review on Perception-Based Definitions and Measurements of Corruption

References

• Aguilera, R. V., & Vadera, A. K. (2008). The dark side of authority: Antecedents, mechanisms, and outcomes of organizational corruption. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(4), 431–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9358-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, L., & Moore, M. (2007). Deontological ethics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 202). Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, S. (2017). Beyond unidimensional measurement of corruption. Public Integrity, 19(1), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2016.1200408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, S., & Heywood, P. M. (2009). The politics of perception: Use and abuse of transparency international’s approach to measuring corruption. Political Studies, 57(4), 746–767. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00758.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
   Google Scholar
• Barker, T. (1977). Social definitions of police corruption: The case of South City. Criminal Justice Review, 2(2), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/073401687700200210
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. (1997). Writing narrative literature reviews. Review of General Psychology, 1(3), 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.3.311
   Google Scholar
• Bautista-Beauchesne, N., & Garzon, C. (2019). Conceptualizing corruption prevention: A systematic literature review. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(3), 719–745. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-10-2018-0106
   Google Scholar
• Bayley, D. H. (1966). The effects of corruption in a developing nation. Western Political Quarterly, 19(4), 719–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591296601900410
   Google Scholar
• Becquart-Leclercq, J. (1984). Paradoxes de la corruption politique. Pouvoirs, Revue Française D’études Constitutionnelles et Politiques, 31, 19–36.
   Google Scholar
• Beetham, D. (Ed.). (1994). Defining and measuring democracy. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Beetham, D. (2015). Moving beyond a narrow definition of corruption. In D. Whyte (Ed.), How corrupt is Britain? (pp. 41–46). Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beratšová, A., Krchová, K., Gažová, N., & Jirásek, M. (2018). Framing and bias: A literature review of recent findings. Central European Journal of Management, 3(2), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.5817/CEJM2016-2-2
   Google Scholar
• Birch, S., & Allen, N. J. (2015). Judging politicians: The role of political attentiveness in shaping how people evaluate the ethical behaviour of their leaders. European Journal of Political Research, 54(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch, S., Allen, N. J., & Sarmiento-Mirwaldt, K. (2017). Anger, anxiety and corruption perceptions: Evidence from France. Political Studies, 65(4), 893–911. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321717691294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borges, M. M. (2003). Reflexos da Tecnologia Digital no Processo de Comunicação da Ciência. In M. J. V. Jorente & D. I. Padrón (Eds.), Una Mirada a la ciencia de la información desde los nuevos contextos paradigmáticos de la posmodernidad (pp. 179–196). Cultura Acadêmica.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J., & Loosemore, M. (2015). Behavioural factors influencing corrupt action in the Australian construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 22(4), 372–389. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-03-2015-0034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burduja, S. I., & Zaharia, R. M. (2019). Romanian Business leaders’ perceptions of business-to-business corruption: Leading more responsible businesses? Sustainability, 11(20), 5548. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell Collaboration (2019). What is a systematic review? https://campbellcollaboration.org/better-evidence/systemic-review.html
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L., & Göritz, A. S. (2014). Culture corrupts! A qualitative study of organizational culture in corrupt organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(3), 291–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1665-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardenas Cardenas, G., García Gamez, S., & Salas Suarez, A. (2018). A synthetic indicator of corruption for Latin America: A global vision. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 28(2), 194–212. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-09-2017-0061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartier-Bresson, J. (1992). Éléments d’analyse pour une économie de la corruption. Tiers-Monde, 33(131), 581–609. https://doi.org/10.3406/tiers.1992.4710
   Google Scholar
• Chang, E. C. C., & Kerr, N. N. (2017). An insider–outsider theory of popular tolerance for corrupt politicians. Governance, 30(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, E., & Woo, J. (2010). Political corruption, economic performance, and electoral outcomes: A cross-national analysis. Contemporary Politics, 16(3), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2010.501636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cintra, R. F., Cassol, A., Ribeiro, I., & de Carvalho, A. O. (2018). Corruption and emerging markets: Systematic review of the most cited. Research in International Business and Finance, 45(1), 607–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.177
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (2009). Handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Crank, J. P., & Caldero, M. A. (2000). Police ethics: The corruption of noble cause. Anderson Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Curtin University (2019). Systematic reviews. Curtin University Library. https://libguides.library.curtin.edu.au/Systematic-Reviews
   Google Scholar
• Dacombe, R. (2018). Systematic reviews in political science: What can the approach contribute to political research? Political Studies Review, 16(2), 148–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929916680641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Graaf, G., Huberts, L., & Strüwer, T. (2018). Integrity violations and corruption in western public governance: Empirical evidence and reflection from the Netherlands. Public Integrity, 20(2), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2017.1350796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Sousa, L. (2008). I don’t bribe, I just pull strings’: Assessing the fluidity of social representations of corruption in Portuguese Society. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 9(1), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/15705850701825402
   Google Scholar
• de Sousa, L., Hindess, B., & Larmour, P. (Eds.). (2012). Governments, NGOs and anti-corruption: The new integrity warriors. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891971
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D., & Vannucci, A. (2017). Corrupt exchanges: Actors, resources, and mechanisms of political corruption. Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• DFID (2015). Why corruption matters: Understanding causes, effects and how to address them. UK Department for International Development. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/why-corruption-matters-understanding-causes-effects-and-how-to-address-them
   Google Scholar
• Donchev, D., & Ujhelyi, G. (2014). What do corruption indices measure? Economics & Politics, 26(2), 309–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doorenspleet, R. (2019). Democracy and corruption. In Rethinking the value of democracy (pp. 165–200). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91656-9_5
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, J. (2009). The law reviews: Do their “paths of glory lead but to the grave”? Journal of Appellate Practice and Process, 10(1), 179–208. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1347069
   Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A. (2014). Political corruption in the United States: A design draft. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(1), 141–144. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096513001492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, M. C., Fischer, R., Porto, J. B., Pilati, R., & Milfont, T. L. (2012). Unraveling the mystery of Brazilian Jeitinho: A cultural exploration of social norms. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(3), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211427148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreyra-Orozco, G. (2010). Understanding corruption in a state Supreme Court in Central Mexico: An ethnographic approach. Human Organization, 69(3), 242–251. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.69.3.g378078k2686m38j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, H. J. (1904). Municipal corruption. Political Science Quarterly, 19(4), 673–686. https://doi.org/10.2307/2140327
   Google Scholar
• Frost, J., & Tischer, S. (2014). Unmasking collective corruption: The dynamics of corrupt routines. European Management Review, 11(3–4), 191–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galtung, F. (2006). Measuring the immeasurable: Boundaries and functions of (Macro) corruption indices. In C. Sampford, A. Shacklock, C. Connors, & F. Galtung (Eds.), Measuring corruption. (pp. 101–130). Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Gans-Morse, J., Borges, M., Makarin, A., Mannah-Blankson, T., Nickow, A., & Zhang, D. (2018). Reducing bureaucratic corruption: Interdisciplinary perspectives on what works. World Development, 105(1), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.12.015
   Google Scholar
• Gouvêa Maciel, G., & de Sousa, L. (2018). Legal corruption and dissatisfaction with democracy in the European Union. Social Indicators Research, 140(2), 653–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1779-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grødeland, Å. B. (2013). Public perceptions of corruption and anti-corruption reform in the Western Balkans. The Slavonic and East European Review, 91(3), 535–598. https://doi.org/10.5699/slaveasteurorev2.91.3.0535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, R., Bishop, S., Nadel, S., Scheffler, G., & Durlacher, K. (2011). The effectiveness of anti-corruption policy: What has worked, what hasn’t, and what we don’t know – A systematic review (Issue 1909). EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Heidenheimer, A. J. (1970). Political corruption: Readings in comparative analysis. Holt, Rinehart & Winston of Canada Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebl, M. R. W. (2021). Sample selection in systematic literature reviews of management research. Organizational Research Methods. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120986851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hurd, J. M. (2000). The transformation of scientific communication: A model for 2020. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(14), 1279–1283. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::AID-ASI1044>3.0.CO;2-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, D., & Köbis, N. C. (2018). Anti-corruption through a social norms lens (Vol. 7). U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre, Chr. Michelsen Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, M., & Smith, R. (1996). Inside moves and outside views: An Australian case study of elite and public perceptions of political corruption. Governance, 9(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.1996.tb00232.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jancsics, D. (2019). Corruption as resource transfer: An interdisciplinary synthesis. Public Administration Review, 79(4), 523–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, S. H. G. (2017). Bias within systematic and non-systematic literature reviews: The case of the Balanced Scorecard Student [Master’s thesis]. University of Twente. http://purl.utwente.nl/essays/73771
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, M. (1996). The search for definitions: The vitality of politics and the issue of corruption. International Social Science Journal, 48(149), 321–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.00035
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, M. (2005). Syndromes of corruption: Wealth, power, and democracy. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Judge, W. Q., McNatt, D. B., & Xu, W. (2011). The antecedents and effects of national corruption: A meta-analysis. Journal of World Business, 46(1), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2010.05.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues (pp. 1–29). The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 5430.
   Google Scholar
• Kinder, D. R., & Kiewiet, D. R. (1981). Sociotropic politics: The American case. British Journal of Political Science, 11(2), 129–161. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400002544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klašnja, M., & Tucker, J. A. (2013). The economy, corruption, and the vote: Evidence from experiments in Sweden and Moldova. Electoral Studies, 32(3), 536–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2013.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klašnja, M., Tucker, J. A., & Deegan-Krause, K. (2016). Pocketbook vs. Sociotropic corruption voting. British Journal of Political Science, 46(1), 67–94. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123414000088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kling, R., & McKim, G. (1999). Scholarly communication and the continuum of electronic publishing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(10), 890–906. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:10<890::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinkhammer, J. (2013). On the dark side of the code: Organizational challenges to an effective anti-corruption strategy. Crime, Law and Social Change, 60(2), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-013-9453-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köbis, N. C., Iragorri-Carter, D., & Starke, C. (2018). A social psychological view on the social norms of corruption. In I. Kubbe & A. Engelbert (Eds.), Corruption and norms (pp. 31–52). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66254-1_3
   Google Scholar
• Kominis, G., & Dudau, A. (2018). Collective corruption–How to live with it: Towards a projection theory of post-crisis corruption perpetuation. European Management Journal, 36(2), 235–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2017.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouznetsov, A., Kim, S., & Pierce, J. (2018). A longitudinal meta-analysis of corruption in international business and trade: Bridging the isolated themes. The International Trade Journal, 32(5), 414–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/08853908.2017.1376724
   Google Scholar
• Lambsdorff, J. G. (2006). Causes and consequences of corruption. In S. Rose-Ackerman (Ed.), International handbook on the economics of corruption (pp. 3–51). Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Ledeneva, A. (2009). Corruption in postcommunist societies in Europe: A re-examination. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 10(1), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/15705850802700017
   Google Scholar
• Leff, N. H. (1964). Economic development through bureaucratic corruption. American Behavioral Scientist, 8(3), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276426400800303
   Google Scholar
• Lessig, L. (2013). Foreword: “Institutional corruption” defined. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 41(3), 553–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlme.12063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O'Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, C., Munn, Z., & Porritt, K. (2015). Qualitative research synthesis. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyrio, M. V. L., Lunkes, R. J., & Taliani, E. T. C. (2018). Thirty years of studies on transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector: The state of the art and opportunities for future research. Public Integrity, 20(5), 512–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2017.1416537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McManus-Czubińska, C., Miller, W. L., Markowski, R., & Wasilewski, J. (2004). Why is corruption in Poland “a serious cause for concern”? Crime, Law and Social Change, 41(2), 107–132. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CRIS.0000016222.40146.4e
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mény, Y., & de Sousa, L. (2001). Corruption: Political and public aspects. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 2824–2830). Pergamon. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/04490-9
   Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLOS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina, E., Carella, L., Pacheco, A., Cruces, G., & Gasparini, L. (2017). Community monitoring interventions to curb corruption and increase access and quality in service delivery: A systematic review. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 9(4), 462–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2017.1378243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navot, D. (2014). The concept of political corruption. Public Integrity, 16(4), 357–374. https://doi.org/10.2753/PIN1099-9922160403
   Google Scholar
• Navot, D. (2016). Real politics and the concept of political corruption. Political Studies Review, 14(4), 544–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/1478-9302.12079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (1997). Towards a more cosmopolitan political science? European Journal of Political Research, 31(1–2), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1997.tb00761.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, J. G., & Welch, S. (1978). Politics, corruption, and political culture: A view from the state legislature. American Politics Quarterly, 6(3), 345–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X7800600305
   Google Scholar
• Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Philp, M. (1997). Defining political corruption. Political Studies, 45(3), 436–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philp, M., & Dávid-Barrett, E. (2015). Realism about political corruption. Annual Review of Political Science, 18(1), 387–402. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-092012-134421
   Google Scholar
• Pozsgai-Alvarez, J., & Pastor Sanz, I. (2021). Mapping the (anti-)corruption field: Key topics and changing trends, 1968–2020. Journal of Computational Social Science, 4(2), 851–881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-021-00110-2
   Google Scholar
• Prasad, M., Martins da Silva, M. B., & Nickow, A. (2019). Approaches to corruption: A synthesis of the scholarship. Studies in Comparative International Development, 54(1), 96–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-018-9275-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redlawsk, D. P., & McCann, J. A. (2005). Popular interpretations of ‘corruption’ and their Partisan consequences. Political Behavior, 27(3), 261–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-005-4469-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, J. (2018). The meaning of corruption: Testing the coherence and adequacy of corruption definitions. Public Integrity, 20(3), 220–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2017.1397999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, R., & Peiffer, C. (2016). Integrating institutional and behavioural measures of bribery. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 22(3), 525–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-016-9309-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosid, A., Evans, C., & Tran-Nam, B. (2018). Tax non-compliance and perceptions of corruption: Policy implications for developing countries. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 54(1), 25–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2017.1364349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B., & Eek, D. (2009). Political corruption and social trust: An experimental approach. Rationality and Society, 21(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463108099349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowley, J., & Slack, F. (2004). Conducting a literature review. Management Research News, 27(6), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170410784185
   Google Scholar
• Ruhl, J. M. (2011). Political corruption in Central America: Assessment and explanation. Latin American Politics and Society, 53(1), 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2011.00108.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sajó, A. (2003). From corruption to extortion: Conceptualization of post-communist corruption. Crime, Law and Social Change, 40(2/3), 171–194. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025736621543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori, G. (1970). Concept misformation in comparative politics. American Political Science Review, 64(4), 1033–1053. https://doi.org/10.2307/1958356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, A., Mehta, M., Johnson, N., & Chin, W. W. (2007). Understanding frameworks and reviews: A commentary to assist us in moving our field forward by analyzing our past. ACM SIGMIS Database: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 38(3), 29–50. https://doi.org/10.1145/1278253.1278259
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. (1972). Comparative political corruption. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: Elaboration and explanation. BMJ, 349(1), g7647. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104(1), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
   Google Scholar
• Stern, C., Jordan, Z., & Mcarthur, A. (2014). Developing the review question and inclusion criteria: The first steps in conducting a systematic review. American Journal of Nursing, 114(4), 53–56. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000445689.67800.86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavits, M. (2010). Why do people engage in corruption? The case of Estonia. Social Forces, 88(3), 1257–1279. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.0.0288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, X., Liu, L., Huang, Z., Zheng, W., & Liang, Y. (2016). The effects of general system justification on corruption perception and intent. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1107. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenopir, C., Allard, S., Douglass, K., Aydinoglu, A. U., Wu, L., Read, E., Manoff, M., & Frame, M. (2011). Data sharing by scientists: Practices and perceptions. PLOS One, 6(6), e21101. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trautman, L. J. (2018). The value of legal writing, law review, and publication. 51 Indiana Law Review, 51(3), 693–772. https://doi.org/10.18060/4806.1201
   Google Scholar
• Treisman, D. (2007). What have we learned about the causes of corruption from ten years of cross-national empirical research? Annual Review of Political Science, 10(1), 211–244. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.081205.095418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truman, D. B. (1971). The governmental process: Political interests and public opinion. Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Ugur, M., & Dasgupta, N. (2011). Corruption and economic growth: A meta-analysis of the evidence on low-income countries and beyond. In Munich Personal RePEc Archive No.31226, April (pp. 1–43). Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbre.2013.06.002
   Google Scholar
• van Bergeijk, P. A. G., & Lazzaroni, S. (2015). Macroeconomics of natural disasters: Strengths and weaknesses of meta-analysis versus review of literature. Risk Analysis, 35(6), 1050–1072. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Halderen, R. C., & Kolthoff, E. (2017). Noble cause corruption revisited: Toward a structured research approach. Public Integrity, 19(3), 274–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2016.1230689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Niehaves, B., Riemer, K., Plattfaut, R., Cleven, A. (2009). Reconstructing the giant: On the importance of rigour in documenting the literature. In Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2009) (pp. 2206–2217). https://doi.org/10.1108/09600031211269721
   Google Scholar
• Walton, G. W. (2015). Defining corruption where the state is weak: The case of Papua New Guinea. The Journal of Development Studies, 51(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2014.925541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, M. E. (2004). What does corruption mean in a democracy? American Journal of Political Science, 48(2), 328–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00073.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Web of Science (2019). Search for “WC = Political Science” articles published in English for all years in the Web of Science Core Collection (1900–present). Clarivate. http://www.webofknowledge.com/
   Google Scholar
• Winchester, C. L., & Salji, M. (2016). Writing a literature review. Journal of Clinical Urology, 9(5), 308–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/2051415816650133
   Google Scholar
• Wysmułek, I. (2019). Using public opinion surveys to evaluate corruption in Europe: Trends in the corruption items of 21 international survey projects, 1989–2017. Quality & Quantity, 53(5), 2589–2610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-019-00873-x
   Google Scholar
• Zechmeister, E. J., & Zizumbo-Colunga, D. (2013). The varying political toll of concerns about corruption in good versus bad economic times. Comparative Political Studies, 46(10), 1190–1218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012472468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, H., Zhang, H., & Xu, Y. (2019). Effects of perceived descriptive norms on corrupt intention: The mediating role of moral disengagement. International Journal of Psychology, 54(1), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar