Rethinking Faculty as Street-Level Bureaucrats: Exploring the Role of Ethics and Administrative Discretion in Contemporary Higher Education

References

• Alcadipani, R., Cabral, S., Fernandes, A., & Lotta, G. (2020). Street-level bureaucrats under COVID-19: Police officers’ responses in constrained settings. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 42(3), 394–403.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, G. (2022). Florida Gov. DeSantis takes aim at what he sees as indoctrination in schools. National Public Radio. Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/2022/07/13/1110842453/florida-gov-desantis-is-doing-battle-against-woke-public-schools.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, C. Y., & Henly, J. R. (2018). “They are underpaid and understaffed”: How clients interpret encounters with street-level bureaucrats. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(2), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, E., & Smith, K. (2022). Working within a system of administrative burden: How street-level bureaucrats’ role perceptions shape access to the promise of higher education. Administration & Society, 54(2), 167–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, E., Ter Mkrtchyan, A., Wehde, W., & Smith, K. (2021). Just or unjust? How ideological beliefs shape street‐level bureaucrats’ perceptions of administrative burden. Public Administration Review, 81(4), 610–624. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binhas, A. (2020). Teachers as street-level bureaucrats and their role as cultural mediators in the integration of immigrants: The Israeli case. Israel Affairs, 26(5), 739–758. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537121.2020.1806694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blankenberger, B., & Williams, A. (2020). COVID and the impact on higher education: The essential role of integrity and accountability. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 42(3), 404–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2020.1771907
   Google Scholar
• Bleeker, K. (2008). To be honest: Championing academic integrity in community colleges. Community College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borry, E. (2017). Ethical climate and rule bending: How organizational norms contribute to unintended rule consequences. Public Administration, 95(1), 78–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borry, E. L., DeHart-Davis, L., Kaufmann, W., Merritt, C. C., Mohr, Z., & Tummers, L. (2018). Formalization and consistency heighten organizational rule following: Experimental and survey evidence. Public Administration, 96(2), 368–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borry, E., & Henderson, A. (2020). Patients, protocols, and prosocial behavior: Rule breaking in frontline health care. The American Review of Public Administration, 50(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074019862680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., Fay, D., & Gaughan, M. (2013). Power to do… what? Department heads’ decision autonomy and strategic priorities. Research in Higher Education, 54(3), 303–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-012-9270-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brathwaite, J. (2017). Neoliberal education reform and the perpetuation of inequality. Critical Sociology, 43(3), 429–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920516649418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brathwaite, J. R. (2015). Unequal opportunities: Graduation rates in New York City under neoliberal reform. Temple University.
   Google Scholar
• Brower, R., Bertrand Jones, T., Tandberg, D., Hu, S., & Park, T. (2017). Comprehensive developmental education reform in Florida: A policy implementation typology. The Journal of Higher Education, 88(6), 809–834. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.1272091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, P. A., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2018). Digital discretion: A systemic literature review of ICT and street-level discretion. Information Polity, 23(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-170050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, N., & Hertz, U. (2020). Street- level bureaucrats’ social value orientation on and off duty. Public Administration Review, 80(3), 442–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colbeck, C. L. (2002). State policies to improve undergraduate teaching: Administrator and faculty responses. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2002.11777128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R. III., (2004). Accountability and responsibility in organizations: the Ethics of discretion. Viesoji Politika IR Administravimas, 13, 39–51.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, K. C. (1969). Discretionary justice: A preliminary inquiry. Louisiana State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Day, T., Chang, I. C. C., Chung, C. K. L., Doolittle, W. E., Housel, J., & McDaniel, P. N. (2021). The immediate impact of COVID-19 on postsecondary teaching and learning. The Professional Geographer, 73(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2020.1823864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boer, N. (2020). How do citizens assess street‐level bureaucrats’ warmth and competence? A typology and test. Public Administration Review, 80(4), 532–542. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlop, L., Atkinson, L., Stubbs, J. E., & Diepen, M. T. V. (2021). The role of schools and teachers in nurturing and responding to climate crisis activism. Children’s Geographies, 19(3), 291–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2020.1828827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R. M. (1967). The model of rules. The University of Chicago Law Review, 35(1), 14–46. d https://doi.org/10.2307/1598947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, J., de Boer, H., & Weyer, E. (2013). Regulatory autonomy and performance: The reform of higher education re-visited. Higher Education, 65(1), 5–23. (1), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9578-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fidelity Investments (2020). Research brief: “On the verge of burnout” COVID-19’s impact on faculty well-being and career plans. The Chronicle of Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Finer, H. (1941). Administrative responsibility in democratic government. Public Administration Review, 1(4), 335–350. https://doi.org/10.2307/972907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flaherty, C. (2021). LSU board weighs faculty governance change. Inside Higher Education, Retrieved September 15, 2021 from https://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2021/09/13/lsu-board-weighs-faculty-governance-changes.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich, C. J. (1940). Public policy and the nature of administrative responsibility. In C. J. Friedrich & E. S. Mason (Eds.), Public policy (pp. 3–23). Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gamage, K. A., Wijesuriya, D. I., Ekanayake, S. Y., Rennie, A. E., Lambert, C. G., & Gunawardhana, N. (2020). Online delivery of teaching and laboratory practices: continuity of university programmes during COVID-19 pandemic. Education Sciences, 10(10), 291. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10100291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaus, J. M. (1947). Reflections on public administration. University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gofen, A., & Lotta, G. (2021). Street-level bureaucrats at the forefront of pandemic responses: A comparative perspective. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 23(1), 3–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, C. (2016). Implementing English further/higher education partnerships: The street level perspective. Higher Education Quarterly, 70(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grote, D., Knight, D., Lee, W., & Watford, B. (2020). Exploring influences of policy collisions on transfer student access: Perspectives from street-level bureaucrats. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42(4), 576–602. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373720962509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haque, A. (2004). Ethics and administrative discretion in a unified administration: A Burkean perspective. Administration & Society, 35(6), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399703256775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, D. E., & Laanan, F. S. (2006). Characteristics and perspectives of faculty at public 2-year colleges. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 30(10), 787–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668920600901806
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J. (2018). Managing state social work: Front-line management and the labour process perspective. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, A., & Borry, E. (2020). The emotional burdens of public service: rules, trust, and emotional labour in emergency medical services. Public Money & Management, 50(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2020.1831180
   Google Scholar
• Herd, P., Moynihan, D., & Harvey, H. (2015). Administrative burden: Learning, psychological, and compliance costs in citizen-state interactions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 43–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, M. (2009). The public policy process (5th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Horsford, S. (2016). Social justice for the advantaged: Freedom from racial equality post-Milliken. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 118(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811611800305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horsford, S. (2017). A race to the top from the bottom of the well? The paradox of race and U.S. education reform. The Educational Forum, 81(2), 136–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horsford, S. (2019). School integration in the new Jim Crow: Opportunity or oxymoron? Educational Policy, 33(1), 257–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904818810526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeler, R. L. (2013). Managing outsourced administrative discretion. State and Local Government Review, 45(3), 183–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X13496108
   Google Scholar
• Keiser, L. R. (2010). Understanding street-level bureaucrats’ decision making: Determining eligibility in the social security disability program. Public Administration Review, 70(2), 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02131.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keiser, L. R. (2001). Street-level bureaucrats, administrative power, and the manipulation of federal social security disability programs. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 1(2), 144–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/153244000100100202
   Google Scholar
• Keiser, L. R. (2003). The determinants of street-level bureaucratic behavior: gate-keeping in the social security disability program. In National Public Management Research Conference, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Khelifi, S. (2019). Interplay between politics and institution in higher education reform. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 671–681. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.3.671
   Google Scholar
• Linder, S., & Peters, B. G. (1987). A design perspective on policy implementation: The fallacies of misplaced prescription. Review of Policy Research, 6(3), 459–475. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1987.tb00761.x
   Google Scholar
• Lipman, P. (2008). Mixed‐income schools and housing: Advancing the neoliberal urban agenda. Journal of Education Policy, 23(2), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930701853021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street level bureaucracy. Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service (30th Anniv. Expanded Ed.). Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lomas, L. (2007). Are students customers? Perceptions of academic staff. Quality in Higher Education, 13(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538320701272714
   Google Scholar
• Lovell, D., Dolamore, S., & Collins, H. (2022). Examining public organization communication misalignments during COVID-19 through the lens of higher education. Administration & Society, 54(2), 212–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loyens, K., & Maesschalck, J. (2010). Toward a theoretical framework for ethical decision making of street-level bureaucracy: Existing models reconsidered. Administration & Society, 42(1), 66–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399710362524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malek, J. (2015). Academic integrity in the community college setting: Full-time faculty as street-level bureaucrats. Illinois State University.
   Google Scholar
• May, P. J., & Winter, S. C. (2009). Politicians, managers, and street-level bureaucrats: Influences on policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(3), 453–476. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard-Moody, S., & Musheno, M. (2000). State-agent or citizen-agent: Two narratives of discretion. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 329–358. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024272
   Google Scholar
• Maynard-Moody, S., & Musheno, M. (2012). Social equities and inequities in practice: Street-level workers as agents and pragmatists. Public Administration Review, 72(s1), 516–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02633.x
   Google Scholar
• Mayo, A.E. (2011). Cops, teachers, and vampire slayers: Buffy as a street-level bureaucrat. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 33(4), 599–603.
   Google Scholar
• McCabe, D. (1993). Faculty responses to academic dishonesty. Research in Higher Education, 34(5), 647–658. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe, D. L., & Pavela, G. (2004). Ten (updated) principles of academic integrity: How faculty can foster student honesty. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 36(3), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091380409605574
   Google Scholar
• McCulloch, A. (2009). The student as co-producer: Learning from public administration about the student–university relationship. Studies in Higher Education, 34(2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802562857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, M. W. (1987). Learning from experience: Lessons from policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(2), 171–178. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737009002171
   Google Scholar
• McMahon-Howard, J., Scherer, H. L., & McCafferty, J. T. (2021). Examining the effects of passing a campus carry law: Comparing campus safety before and after Georgia’s new campus carry law. Journal of School Violence, 20(4), 430–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2021.1930016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon-Howard, J., Scherer, H., & McCafferty, J. T. (2020). Concealed guns on college campuses: Examining support for campus carry among faculty, staff, and students. Journal of School Violence, 19(2), 138–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2018.1553717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers, M., Vorsanger, S., & Peters, B. (2007). Street-level bureaucrats and the implementation of public policy. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Handbook of Public Administration (pp. 153–163). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. F. (1987). Varieties of administrative abuse: Some reflections on ethics and discretion. Administration & Society, 19(3), 267–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539978701900301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, M., & Skillen, P. (2015). The politics of time on the frontline: Street-level bureaucracy, professional judgement, and public accountability. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(9), 632–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.952823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newswander, C. B. (2017). Administrative ethics and executive decisions: Channeling and containing administrative discretion. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Olejarski, A. M. (2013). Administrative discretion in action: A narrative of eminent domain. Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, J., & Hysing, E. (2012). Theorizing inside activism: Understanding policymaking and policy change from below. Planning Theory & Practice, 13(2), 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2012.677123
   Google Scholar
• Piatak, J., Mohr, Z., & McDonald, J. (2022). Rule formalization, gender, and gender congruence: Examining prosocial rule breaking for internal and external stakeholders. International Public Management Journal, 25(4), 566–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2020.1790445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pivoras, S., & Kaselis, M. (2019). The impact of client status on street-level bureaucrats’ identity and informal accountability. Public Integrity, 21(2), 182–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2018.1433424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pors, A., & Schou, J. (2021). Street-level morality at the digital frontlines: An ethnographic study of moral mediation in welfare work. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 43(2), 154–171.
   Google Scholar
• Postsecondary Education HB 233, (2021). FLA
   Google Scholar
• Prottas, J. M. (1978). The power of the street-level bureaucrat in public service bureaucracies. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 13(3), 285–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/107808747801300302
   Google Scholar
• Ray, R., Gibbons, A. (2021). Why are states banning critical race theory? Brookings.com. Retrieved September 17, 2021, from https://www.brookings.edu/blog/fixgov/2021/07/02/why-are-states-banning-critical-race-theory/
   Google Scholar
• Riccucci, N. M. (2005). Street-level bureaucrats and intrastate variation in the implementation of temporary assistance for needy families policies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(1), 89–111. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riccucci, N. M., Meyers, M. K., Lurie, I., & Han, J. S. (2004). The implementation of welfare reform policy: The role of public managers in front-line practices. Public Administration Review, 64(4), 438–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00390.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P., & Mazmanian, D. (1979). The conditions of effective implementation: A guide to accomplishing policy objectives. Policy Analysis, 5(4), 481–504.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schneider, M. (2021). University of Florida professors prohibited from testifying in voting rights lawsuit. USA Today. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/10/30/university-florida-professors-barred-testifying-voting-rights-lawsuit/6212864001/
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, J. T., Twombly, J., & Headrick, B. (1991). Street-level political controls over federal bureaucracy. American Political Science Review, 85(3), 829–850. https://doi.org/10.2307/1963852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shivaram, D. (2021). University of Florida allows professors to testify in a voting rights case after all. National Public Radio. https://www.npr.org/2021/11/05/1052879445/university-florida-professors-testify-permission-desantis.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, I. (2007). Discretion and control in education: The teacher as street-level bureaucrat. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 35(4), 555–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143207081063
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, A., Price, J. H., Dake, J., & Teeple, K. (2013). Faculty perceptions and practices regarding carrying concealed handguns on university campuses. Journal of Community Health, 38(2), 366–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-012-9626-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldo, D. (1980). The enterprise of public administration. Chandler & Sharp.
   Google Scholar
• Webb Farley, K. E., & Olejarski, A. M. (2020). Mega-gifts: Hijacking administrative discretion? Public Integrity, 22(6), 525–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2020.1755070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, S. (2000). Information asymmetry and political control of street-level bureaucrats: Danish agro-environmental regulation. Institut for Statskundskab, Aarhus Univesrsitet.
   Google Scholar
• Wolverton, M., Ackerman, R., & Holt, S. (2005). Preparing for leadership: What academic department chairs need to know. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(2), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800500120126
   Google Scholar