Cambrian (Guzhangian Stage) trilobites from Ohio, USA, and modification of the Cedaria Zone as used in Laurentia

REFERENCES

• Ahlberg, P., Axheimer, N., Babcock, L.E., Eriksson, M.E., Schmitz, B. & Terfelt, F., 2009: Cambrian high-resolution biostratigraphy and carbon isotope chemostratigraphy in Scania, Sweden: first record of the SPICE and DICE excursions in Scandinavia. Lethaia42, 2–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amato, J.M. & Mack, G.H., 2012: Detrital zircon geochronology from the Cambrian–Ordovician Bliss Sandstone, New Mexico: evidence for contrasting Grenville-age and Cambrian sources on opposite sides of the Transcontinental Arch. Geological Society of America Bulletin124 (1826), 1840, 10.1130/B30657.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aswasereelert, W., Simo, J.A. & LePain, D.L., 2008: Deposition of the Cambrian Eau Claire Formation, Wisconsin: hydrostratigraphic implications of fine-grained cratonic sandstones. Geoscience Wisconsin19, 21.
   Google Scholar
• Babcock, L.E., 1994a: Biostratigraphic significance and paleogeographic implications of Cambrian fossils from a deep core, Warren County, Ohio. Journal of Paleontology68, 24–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babcock, L.E., 1994b: Systematics and phylogenetics of polymeroid trilobites from the Henson Gletscher and Kap Stanton formations (Middle Cambrian), North Greenland. Grønlands Geologiske Undersøgelse Bulletin169, 79–127.
   Google Scholar
• Babcock, L.E., 1996: Phylum Arthropoda, class Trilobita. In R.M.Feldmann & M.Hackathorn (eds.): Fossils of Ohio, 90–113., Ohio Division of Geological Survey Bulletin 70.
   Google Scholar
• Babcock, L.E. & Peng, S., 2007: Cambrian chronostratigraphy: current state and future plans. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology254, 62–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babcock, L.E., Peng, S.C., Geyer, G. & Shergold, J.H., 2005: Changing perspectives on Cambrian chronostratigraphy and progress toward subdivision of the Cambrian System. Geosciences Journal9, 101–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babcock, L.E., Robison, R.A. & Peng, S.C., 2011: Cambrian stage and series nomenclature of Laurentia and the developing global chronostratigraphic scale. Museum of Northern Arizona Bulletin67, 12–26.
   Google Scholar
• Babcock, L.E., Robison, R.A., Rees, M.N., Peng, S.C. & Saltzman, M.R., 2007: The Global boundary Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) of the Drumian Stage (Cambrian) in the Drum Mountains, Utah, USA. Episodes30, 85–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baranoski, M.T., Riley, R.A. & Wolfe, M.E., 1996: Play COk: Cambrian Knox Group unconformity play. In J.B.Roen & B.J.Walker (eds.): The atlas of major Appalachian gas plays, 181–187. West Virginia Geological and Economic Survey Publication V-25, Morgantown.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, D.A., Bacon, D.H. & Kelley, S.R., 2009: Geological sequestration of carbon dioxide in the Cambrian Mount Simon Sandstone: regional storage capacity, site characterization, and large-scale injection feasibility, Michigan Basin. Environmental Geosciences16, 163–183. 10.1306/eg.05080909009.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, B.B., Ochoa, R.I., Wilkens, N.D., Brophy, J., Lovell, T.R., Fischietto, N., Medina, C.R. & Rupp, J.A., 2011: Deposition and diagenetic variability within the Cambrian Mount Simon Sandstone: implications for carbon dioxide sequestration. Environmental Geosciences18, 69–89, 10.1306/eg.07271010012.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlin, T.C., 1883: Cambrian age – Potsdam period. In T.C.Chamberlin (ed.): Geology of Wisconsin: Survey of 1873–1879. Wisconsin Geological Survey, Madison, Wisconsin. Vol. I, 119–144.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, K.M., Finney, S.M., Gibbard, P.L. & Fan, J.-X., 2013: The ICS International Chronostratigraphic Chart. Episodes36 (3), 199–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coogan, A.H., 1996: Ohio's surface rocks and sediments. In R.M.Feldmann & M.Hackathorn (eds.): Fossils of Ohio, 31–50. Ohio Division of Geological Survey Bulletin 70, Ohio Division of Natural Resources, Columbus, Ohio.
   Google Scholar
• Drahovzal, J.A., Harris, D.C., Wickstrom, L.H., Walker, D., Baranoski, M.T., Keith, B. & Furer, L.C., 1992: The East Continent Rift Basin: a new discovery. Ohio Division of Geological Survey Information Circular57, 25.
   Google Scholar
• Driese, S.G., Byers, C. & DottJr, R.H., 1981: Tidal Deposition in the basal Upper Cambrian Mt. Simon Formation in Wisconsin. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology51, 367–381.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D.C. & Baranoski, M.T., 1996: Play Cpk: Cambrian Pre-Knox Group Play. In J.B.Roen & B.J.Walker (eds.): The atlas of major Appalachian gas plays, 188–192. West Virginia Geological and Economic Survey Publication V-25.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, B.F., Bridge, J., Deiss, C.F., Edwards, I., Lochman, C., Raasch, G.O., Resser, C.E., Duncan, D.C., Mason, J.F. & Denson, N.M., 1944: Correlation of the Cambrian formations of North America. Geological Society of America Bulletin55, 993–1004.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, B.F. & Lochman, C., 1939: Succession of Late Cambrian faunas in the northern hemisphere. Journal of Paleontology13, 115–122.
   Google Scholar
• Howley, R.A. & Jiang, G.Q., 2010: The Cambrian Drumian carbon isotope excursion (DICE) in the Great Basin, western United States. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology296, 138–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howley, R.A., Rees, M.N. & Jiang, G.Q., 2006: Significance of Middle Cambrian mixed carbonate-siliciclastic units for global correlation: southern Nevada, USA. Palaeoworld15, 360–366.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, N.C., Gunderson, G.O. & Weedon, M.J., 1997: Circumocular suture and visual surface of “Cedaria” woosteri (Trilobita, Late Cambrian) from the Eau Claire Formation, Wisconsin. Journal of Paleontology71, 103–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull, D.N.(compiler), 1990: Generalized column of bedrock units in Ohio. Ohio Division of Geological Survey1 p
   Google Scholar
• Hull, D.N.(compiler), Larsen, G.E. & Slucher, E.R., (revisers)2004: Generalized column of bedrock units in Ohio. Ohio Division of Geological Survey1 p
   Google Scholar
• Janssens, A., 1973: Stratigraphy of Cambrian and Lower Ordovician rocks in Ohio. Ohio Division of Geological Survey Bulletin64, 197.
   Google Scholar
• Landing, E., Peng, S.C., Babcock, L.E., Geyer, G. & Moczydlowska-Vidal, M., 2007: Global standard names for the lowermost Cambrian series and stage. Episodes30, 287–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lochman-Balk, C. & Wilson, J.L., 1958: Cambrian biostratigraphy in North America. Journal of Paleontology32, 312–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovell, T.R. & Bowen, B.B., 2013: Fluctuations in sedimentary provenance of the upper Cambrian Mount Simon Sandstone, Illinois Basin, United States. Journal of Geology121, 129–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludvigsen, R. & Westrop, S.R., 1985: Three new Upper Cambrian stages for North America. Geology13, 139–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludvigsen, R., Westrop, S.R., Pratt, B.R., Tuffnell, P.A. & Young, G.A., 1986: Dual biostratigraphy: zones and biofacies. Geoscience Canada13, 139–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meek, F.B., 1870: Descriptions of fossils collected by the U.S. Geological Survey under the charge of Clarence King, esq. Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of Philadelphia (2nd Series)14, 56–64.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R.C., 1933: Historical Geology. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York and London, 673 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, A.R., 1962: Glyptagnostus and associated trilobites in the United States. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper374-F, 49.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, A.R., 1973: Cambrian trilobites. In A.Hallam (ed.): Atlas of Palaeobiogeography, 3–11. Elsevier, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, A.R., 1982: Fossils of Dresbachian and Franconian (Cambrian) age from the subsurface of west-central Indiana. Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Geological Survey, Special Report 29, 12 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, A.R., 1998: A proposed nomenclature for stages and series for the Cambrian of Laurentia. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences35, 323–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, S.C. & Babcock, L.E., 2008: Cambrian Period. In J.G.Ogg, G.Ogg & F.M.Gradstein (eds.): A Concise Geologic Time Scale, 37–46. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, S.C., Babcock, L.E. & Cooper, R.A., 2012a: The Cambrian System. In F.M.Gradstein, J.G.Ogg & G.Ogg (eds.): A Geologic Time Scale 2012, 451–502. Elsevier, Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, S.C., Babcock, L.E., Robison, R.A., Lin, H.L., Rees, M.N. & Saltzman, M.R., 2004: Global Standard Stratotype-section and Point (GSSP) of the Furongian Series and Paibian Stage (Cambrian). Lethaia37, 365–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, S.C., Babcock, L.E., Zuo, J.X., Lin, H.L., Zhu, X.J., Yang, X.F., Qi, Y.P., Bagnoli, G. & Wang, L.W., 2012b: Global Standard Stratotype-section and Point (GSSP) for the base of the Jiangshanian Stage (Cambrian: Furongian) at Duibian, Jiangshan, Zhejiang, Southeast China. Episodes35 (4), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, S.C., Babcock, L.E., Zuo, J.X., Lin, H.L., Zhu, X.J., Yang, X.F., Robison, R.A., Chi, Y.P., Bagnoli, G. & Chen, Y., 2009: The Global boundary Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) of the Guzhangian Stage (Cambrian) in the Wuling Mountains, northwestern Hunan, China. Episodes32, 41–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley, R.A., Wicks, J. & Thomas, J., 2002: Cambrian–Ordovician Knox production in Ohio: three case studies of structural–stratigraphic traps. AAPG Bulletin86, 539–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robison, R.A., 1964: Middle–Upper Cambrian boundary in North America. Geological Society of America Bulletin75, 987–994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robison, R.A., 1971: Additional Middle Cambrian trilobites from the Wheeler Shale of Utah. Journal of Paleontology45, 796–804.
   Google Scholar
• Robison, R.A., 1976: Middle Cambrian trilobite biostratigraphy of the Great Basin. Brigham Young University Geology Studies23 (2), 93–109.
   Google Scholar
• Robison, R.A., 1988: Trilobites of the Holm Dal Formation (late Middle Cambrian), central North Greenland, Meddelelser om Grønland. Geoscience20, 23–103.
   Google Scholar
• Robison, R.A. & Babcock, L.E., 2011: Systematics, paleobiology, and taphonomy of some exceptionally preserved trilobites from Cambrian Lagerstätten of Utah. Paleontological Contributions5, 1–47; http://hdl.handle.net/1808/8543.
   Google Scholar
• Ryder, R.T., Burruss, R.T. & Hatch, J.R., 1998: Black shale source rocks and oil generation in the Cambrian and Ordovician of the central Appalachian Basin, USA. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin82, 412–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltzman, M.R., Ripperdan, R.L., Brasier, M.D., Lohmann, K.C., Robison, R.A., Chang, W.T., Peng, S.C., Ergaliev, G.K. & Runnegar, B., 2000: A global carbon isotope excursion (SPICE) during the Late Cambrian: relation to trilobite extinctions, organic-matter burial and sea level. Palaeogeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology162, 211–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuchert, C., 1943: Stratigraphy of the Eastern and Central United States. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1013 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Schuchert, C. & Dunbar, C.O., 1941: A Textbook of Geology. Part II. Historical Geology. 4th ed.John Wiley & Sons, New York, 544 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Shimer, H.W. & Shrock, R.R., 1944: Index Fossils of North America. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, MA. 837 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Shrake, D.L., 1991: The Middle Run Formation: a subsurface stratigraphic unit in southwestern Ohio. Ohio Journal of Science91, 49–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrake, D.L., Wolfe, P.J., Richard, B.H., Swinford, E.M., Wickstrom, L.H., Potter, P.E. & Sitler, G.W., 1990: Lithologic and geophysical description of a continuously cored hole in Warren County, Ohio, including description of the Middle Run Formation (Precambrian?) and a seismic profile across the core site. Ohio Division of Geological Survey Information Circular56, 11 pp
   Google Scholar
• Sundberg, F.A., 2005: The Topazan Stage, a new Laurentian stage (Lincolnian Series – “Middle Cambrian”). Journal of Paleontology79, 63–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walcott, C.D., 1924: Cambrian geology and paleontology V, No. 2, Cambrian and lower Ozarkian trilobites. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections75 (2), 53–60.
   Google Scholar
• Walcott, C.D., 1889: Descriptions of new genera and species of fossils from the Middle Cambrian. Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum11 (for 1888)441–446.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J.D., Geissman, J.W., Bowring, S.A. & Babcock, L.E., 2013: The Geological Society of America Geologic Time Scale. Geological Society of America Bulletin125, 259–272; published online, 2012, https://doi.org/doi:10.1130/B30712.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitfield, R.P., 1878: Preliminary descriptions of new species of fossils from the lower geological formations of Wisconsin. Wisconsin Geological Survey, Annual Report for 1877, 50–89.
   Google Scholar
• Whitfield, R.P., 1882: Species from the Potsdam Limestone. In T.C.Chamberlin (ed.): Geology of Wisconsin. Survey of 1873–1879. Wisconsin Geological Survey, Madison, Wisconsin, Vol. IV, 169–193.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, M.Y., Babcock, L.E. & Peng, S.C., 2006: Advances in Cambrian stratigraphy and paleontology: integrating correlation techniques, paleobiology, taphonomy and paleoenvironmental reconstruction. Palaeoworld15, 217–222.
   Google Scholar