Comments on some important issues concerning the establishment of a GSSP for Cambrian Stage 5

REFERENCES

• Álvaro, J.J., Elicki, O., Geyer, G., Rushton, A.W.A. & Shergold, J.H., 2003: Palaeogeographical controls on the Cambrian trilobite immigration and evolutionary patterns reported in the western Gondwana margin. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology195, 5–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babcock, L.E., Peng, S.C., Geyer, G. & Shergold, J.H., 2005: Changing perspectives on Cambrian chronostratigraphy and progress toward subdivision of the Cambrian System. Geosciences Journal9, 101–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babcock, L.E., Robison, R.A. & Peng, S.C., 2011: Cambrian stage and series nomenclature of Laurentia and the developing global chronostratigraphic scale. Museum of Northern Arizona Bulletin67, 12–26.
   Google Scholar
• Egorova, L.I., Shabanov, Y.Y., Rozanov, A.Y., Savitsky, V.E., Tchernysheva, N.E. & Shishkin, B.B., 1976: The Elanka and Kuonamka facies stratotype of the lower boundary of the Siberian Middle Cambrian. Sibirskiy nauchno-issledovatelskiy institute geologii, geofiziki I mineralnogo syr'ya (SNIIGGIMS), Trudy211, 1–167. (in Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, T.P., 2003: Ovatoryctocara granulata: the key to a global Cambrian stage boundary and the correlation of the olenellid, redlichiid and paradoxidid realms. Palaeontology70, 73–102.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, T.P., 2007: The base of Cambrian Series 3: the global significance of key oryctocephalid trilobite ranges in the Kaili Formation of South China. Memoir of Association of Australasian Palaeontologists33, 29–33.
   Google Scholar
• Gámez Vintaned, J.A., Zhuravlev, A.Yu., Bauluz, B., Bubías, I., Chirivella Martorell, J.B., Mayoral, E., Gursky, H.-J., Andrés, J.A. & Liñán, E, 2011: Proposal of a reference section and point for the Cambrian Series 2–3 boundary in the Mediterranean subprovince in Murero (NE Spain) and its international correlation. Geological Journal, https://doi.org/10. 1002/gj.1330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geyer, G. & Peel, S.J., 2011: The Henson Gletscher Formation, North Grenland, and its bearing on the global Cambrian series boundary. Bulletin of Geoscince86, 466–534.
   Google Scholar
• Geyer, G. & Shergold, J., 2000: The quest for internationally recognized divisions of Cambrian time. Episodes23, 188–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goryaeva, I.E., Pegel, T.V., Shabanov, Y.Y. & Bushuev, E.V., 2012: New data on stratigraphic range of trilobite Bathynotus genus in Cambrian of Siberia Platform. Journal of Guizhou University29 (Supplement 1), 164.
   Google Scholar
• Gozalo, R., Bautista, J., Martorell, C., Esteve, J. & Liñán, E., 2011: Correlation between the base of Drumian Stage and the base of middle Caesaraugustan Stage in the Iberian Chains (NE Spain). Bulletin of Geosciences86 (3), 545–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Q., Strauss, H., Zhao, Y., Yang, X., Peng, J., Yang, Y. & Deng, Y.2013: Reconstructing marine redox conditions for the transition between Cambrian Series 2 and Cambrian Series 3, Kaili area, Yangtze Platform: Evidence from biogenic sulfur and degree of pyritization. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2013.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jell, P.A. & Hughes, N.C., 1997: Himalayan Cambrian trilobites. Special Paper in Paleontology58, 1–113.
   Google Scholar
• Korovnikov, I.V., 2001: Lower and Middle Cambrian boundary and trilobite from northeast Siberia platform. Palaeoworld13, 270–273.
   Google Scholar
• Korovnikov, I.V., 2006: Lower and Middle Cambrian boundary in open shelf facies of Siberian platform. Palaeoworld15, 424–430.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, H.L., Hu, S.X., Hou, S.G., Cao, H.G., Zhan, D.Q. & Li, W.H., 2009: Cambrian Stratigraphy and Trilobites from Southeastern Yunnan, China. Cambrian stratigraphy and trilobites from Southeastern Yunnan, China, Kunming. 250 pp. (in Chinese with English abstract).
   Google Scholar
• McCollum, L.B. & Sundberg, F.A., 2007: Cambrian trilobite biozonation of the Laurentia Delamaran Stage in the southern Great Basin, U.S.A.: implications for global correlations and defining a Series 3 global boundary stratotype. Memoirs of Association of Australasian Palaeontology34, 147–156.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, S.C., Babcock, L.E., Geyer, G. & Moczydłowska, M., 2006: Nomenclature of Cambrian epochs and series based on GSSPs – comments on an alternative proposal by Rowland and Hicks. Episodes29, 130–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, J., Zhao, Y.L., Yuan, J.L., Yao, L. & Yang, H., 2009: Bathynotus—a key trilobite taxon for global stratigraphic boundary correlation between Cambrian Series 2 and Series 3. Progress in Natural Science19, 99–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robison, R.A., 1976: Middle Cambrian trilobite biostratigraphy of the Great Basin. Brigham Young University Geology Studies23 (2), 93–109.
   Google Scholar
• Robison, R.A. & Babcock, L.E., 2011: Systematics, paleobiology, and taphonomy of some exceptionally preserved trilobites from Cambrian Lagerstätten of Utah. Paleontological Contributions5, 1–47; http://hdl.handle.net/1808/8543.
   Google Scholar
• Shabanov, Y.Y., Korovnikov, I.V., Pereladov, V.S. & Fefelov, A.F., 2008: Excursion 1a. The traditional Lower–Middle Cambrian boundary in the Kuonamka Formation of the Molodo River section (the southeastern slope of the Olenek Uplift of the Siberian Platform) proposed as a candidate for GSSP of the lower boundary of the Middle Cambrian and its basal (Molodian) stage, defined by the FAD of Ovatoryctocaragranulata. The Cambrian System of the Siberian Platform. Part 2: North-East of the Siberian Platform, XIII International Field Conference of the Cambrian Stage Subdivision Working Group, Moscow, Novosibirsk.
   Google Scholar
• Sundberg, F.A. & McCollum, L.B. 1997: Oryctocephalids (Corynexochida: Trilobita) of the Lower-Middle Cambrian Boundary Interval from California and Nevada. Journal of Palaeontology71 (6), 1065–1090.
   Google Scholar
• Sundberg, L.A., Zhao, Y.L., Yuan, J.L. & Lin, J.P., 2011: Detailed trilobite biostratigraphy across the proposed GSSP for Stage 5 (“Middle Cambrian” boundary) at the Wuliu-Zengjiayan section, Guizhou, China. Bulletin of Geoscience86, 423–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, L.M., Zhao, Y.L., Yang, R.D. & Peng, J., 2010: Restudy of Acritarchs from the Early-Middle Cambrian Kaili Formation at Wuliu-Zengjiayan Section, east Guizhou Province, China. Acta Palaeontolgica Sinica49 (2), 164–173.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, J.L., Zhu, X.J., Lin, J.P. & Zhu, M.Y., 2011: Tentative correlation of Cambrian Series 2 between South China and other continents. Bulletin of Geoscince86, 397–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y.L., Peng, J., Yuan, J.L., Loren, E.B., Guo, Q.J., Yin, L.M., Yang, X.L., Tai, T.S., Wang, C.J., Lin, J.P., Robert, R.G., Sun, H.J. & Yang, Y.N., 2012a: Discussion of candidate stratotypes for the GSSP defining the conterminous base of Cambrian provisional Series 3 and Stage 5. Journal of Guizhou University29 (Supplement), 35–48.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y.L., Yang, Y.N., Peng, J., Yuan, J.L., Sun, H.J., Yan, X. & Zhang, P.X., 2012b: The Kaili Formation and Kaili Biota at the Sanwan Section in Guizhou Province, China and boundary between Cambrian Series 2/Series 3. Journal of Guizhou University29 (Supplement), 77–88.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y.L., Yuan, J.L., Peng, S.C., Babcock, L.E., Peng, J., Lin, J.P., Guo, Q.-J. & Wang, Y.X., 2007: New data on the Wuliu-Zengjiayan section (Balang,South China),GSSP candidate for the base of Cambrian Series 3. Memoirs of Association of Australasian Palaeontologist33, 57–65.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y.L., Yuan, J.L., Zhu, L.J., Guo, Q.J., Yang, R.D., Yang, X.L. & Tai, T.S., 2001: An advance in the research of the Lower–Middle Cambrian boundary in South China and its propects. Jounal of Stratigraphy25 (Supplement), 383–390.
   Google Scholar