References
- Flexner S, Hauck L. The Random House dictionary of the English language. 2nd ed. New York: Random House, 1987.
- Beckman S. Professionalization. Borderline authority and autonomy in work. In: Burrage M, Thorstendahl R, editors. Professions in theory and history. Rethinking the study of the professions. New Delhi: SAGA Publications, 1990: 115–138.
- Collins R. Market closure and the conflict theory of the professions. In: Burrage M, Thorstendahl R, editors. Professions in theory and history. Rethinking the study of the professions. New Delhi: SAGA Publications, 1990: 24–43.
- Selander S. Associative strategies in the process of professional strategies and scientification of occupations. In: Burrage M, Thorstendahl R, editors. Professions in theory and history. Rethinking the study of the professions. New Delhi: SAGA Publications, 1990: 139–146.
- Wallis M. Profession’’ and ‘‘professionalism’’ and the emerging profession of occupational therapy. Part I. Br J Occup Ther 1987; 50: 262–263.
- Etzioni A, editor. The semi-professions and their organizations. Teachers, nurses, social workers. New York: Free Press, 1969.
- Elzinga A. The knowledge aspect of professionaliza-tion: the case of science-based nursing education in Sweden. In: Torstendahl R, Burrage M, editors. The formation of professions. Knowledge, state and strategy. New Delhi: SAGA Publications, 1990: 151–173.
- Griffin S. Conflicts in professional practice. Austr Oc-cup Ther J 1988; 35: 9–18.
- Kelly G. Feminist or feminine? The feminine principle in occupational therapy. Br J Occup Ther 1996; 59: 2–6.
- Kielhofner, G. Conceptual foundations of occupational therapy. Philadelphia: FA Davis Company, 1992.
- Yerxa E. Research: the key to the development of occupational therapy as an academic discipline. Am J Occup Ther 1987; 41: 415–419.
- Hagedorn R. The Casson Memorial Lecture. An emergent profession—a personal perspective. Br J Occup Ther 1995; 58: 324–331.
- Nelson D. Why the profession of occupational therapy will flourish in the 21st century. Am J Occup Ther 1997; 51: 11–24.
- Bell B, Bell J. Professionalism as a multidimensional perspective. Am J Occup Ther 1972; 26: 391–398.
- Bellner A-L. Working conditions influencing profes-sionalization of occupational and physical therapists. Part 1: a quantitative perspective. Scand J Occup Ther 1995; 5: 145–152.
- Graham J, Timewell E. The perceived status of occupational therapy. Myth versus reality. Austr Occup Ther J 1990; 37: 50–56.
- Clark F, Sharrott G, Hill D, Campell S. A comparison of impact of undergraduate and graduate education on professional productivity. Am J Occup Ther 1985; 39: 155–162.
- Gilkeson G, Hanten W. A comparative analysis of occupational therapy graduates from baccalaureate and entry-level master’s degree programs. Occup Ther J Res 1984; 4: 67–91.
- Barris R, Kielhofner G. Generating and using knowledge in occupational therapy: implications for professional education. Occup Ther J Res 1985; 5: 113–123.
- Van Deusen J. Occupational therapy theory development. Knowledge and values held by recent graduates. Occup Ther J Res 1981; 1: 79–93.
- Bellner A-L. The impact of educational level on occupational and physical therapists’ perception of professional status. Occup Ther J Res 1996; 6: 147–165.
- Mountain G. A review of the literature in the British Journal of Occupational Therapy 1989–1996. Br J Occup Ther 1997; 60: 430–435.
- Ottenbacher K, Short M. Publication trends in occupational therapy. Occup Ther J Res 1982; 2: 80–88.
- Fleming M, Piedmont R. The relationship of academic degree and years in practice to occupational therapists’ perception of the status of the profession and educational preparation. Occup Ther J Res 1989; 9: 101–113.
- Vogel K. Perception of practitioners, educators, and students concerning the role of the occupational therapy practitioner. Am J Occup Ther 1991; 45: 130–136.
- Lobovitz S. The assignment of numbers to rank order categories. Am Sociolog Rev 1970; 35: 515–524.