117
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Identifying scale and person response validity of a new assessment of driving ability

, , &
Pages 70-77 | Published online: 12 Jul 2009

References

  • Lundqvist A, Ro¨ nnberg J. Driving problems and adap- tive driving behaviour after brain injury: A qualitative assessment. Neuropsychol Rehab 2001; 11: 171 -85.
  • Fox GK, Bashford GM, Caust ST. Identifying the safe versus the unsafe drivers following brain impairment: The Coorabel Programme. Disabil Rehabil 1992; 14: 140 -5.
  • Korner-Bitensky N, Sofer S, Gelinas I, Mazer B. Evaluating driving potential in persons with stroke: a survey of occupational therapy practices. Am J Occup Ther 1998; 54: 916 -9.
  • Galski T, Ehle H, McDonald M, Mackevich J. Evaluat- ing fitness to drive after cerebral injury: basic issues and recommendations for medical and legal communities. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2000; 15: 895 -908.
  • Fisher A. Uniting practice and theory in an occupa- tional framework. J Occup Ther 1998; 52: 509 -20.
  • Trombly CA. Occupation: purposefulness and mean- ingfulness as therapeutic mechanisms. Am J Occup Ther 1995; 49: 960 -72.
  • Van Zomeren A, Brouwer W, Rothengatter J, Snoek J. Fitness to drive a car after severe head injury. Arch Phys Med 1988; 69: 90 -6.
  • Lundqvist A, Alinder J, Alm H, Gerdle B, Levander S, Ro¨ nnberg J. Neuropsychological aspects of driving after brain lesion: simulator study and on-road driving. Appl Neuropsychol Rehab 1997; 4: 220 -30.
  • Lundqvist A, Gerdle B, Ro¨ nnberg J. Neuropsychological aspects of driving after stroke: in the simulator and on the road. Appl Cogn Psychol 2000; 14: 135 -50.
  • Van Zomeren, Brouwer W. Assessment of attention. A handbook of neuropsychological assessment. Hove: Erlbaum, 1992.
  • Wilson T, Smith T. Driving after stroke. Int Rehab Med 1983; 5: 170 -7.
  • Christie N. Assessing driving fitness following brain injury or illness: a research review. TRL report 208. Crowthorne: Transport and Road Research Laboratory, 1996.
  • Lundberg C, Caneman G, Samuelsson S-M, Hakamies- Blomqvist L, Almqvist O. The assessment of fitness to drive after stroke: the Nordic Stroke Driver Screening Assessment. Scand J Psychol 2003; 44: 23 -30.
  • Mazer B, Korner-Bitensky N, Sofer S. Predicting ability to drive after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 743 -50.
  • Akiwuntan A, Feys H, DeWeerdt W, Pauwels J, Baten G, Strypstein E. Determinants of driving after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 334 -41.
  • Akiwuntan A, DeWeerdt W, Feys H, Baten G, Arno P, Kiekens C. Reliability of a road test after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 8: 1792–6.
  • Caneman G, Wahlgren NG, A° kerblom L. Development of the Argus driving simulator-an assessment tool of driving ability among stroke patients. Unpublished manuscript.
  • Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch model. Funda- mental measurement in the human sciences. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum, 2001.
  • Fisher A. The assessment of IADL motor skills: an application of many facets Rasch analysis. Am J Occup Ther 1993; 47: 319 -29.
  • Fisher A, Bryze K, Granger C, Haley S, Hamilton B, Heinemann A, Puderbaugh J, Linacre JM, Ludlow L, McCabe M, Wright B. Applications of conjoint mea- surement to the development of functional assessment. Int Res 1994; 21: 579 -93.
  • Michon JA. A critical review of driver behaviour models. What do we know, what should we do? In: Evans L,Schwing R, editors. Human behaviour and traffic safety. New York: Plenum Press, 1985.
  • Crepeau E. Analysing occupation and activity: a way of thinking about occupational performance. In: Crepeau E, Cohn E, Schell B. Willard and Spackman’s Occupa- tional Therapy. Tenth ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2003; 189 -98.
  • Linacre J. FACETS: Many facet Rasch measurement computer program. Chicago: MESA, 1994.
  • Wright BD, Stone MH. Best test design. Chicago: MESA Press, 1979.
  • Fisher A. Development of a functional assessment that adjusts ability measurement for task simplicity and rater leniency. In Wilson M, editor. Objective measurement: theory into practice, Vol. 2. Norwood: Ablex, 1994; 145 -75.
  • Linacre JM, Heinemann A, Wright B, Granger C, Hamilton B. The structure and stability of the functional independence measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 127 -32.
  • Tham K, Bernspra°ng B, Fisher A. Development of the assessment of awareness of ability. Scand J Occup Ther 1999; 6: 184 -90.
  • Kottorp A, Bernspa°ng B, Fisher AG. Validity of a performance assessment of activities of daily living for people with developmental disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res 2003; 47: 597 -605.
  • Kottorp A. Occupation-based evaluation and interven- tion. Validity of the assessment of motor and process skills when used with persons with mental retardation. Umea° University Medical Dissertation, Umea°, 2003.
  • Wright B, Tennant A. Sample size again. Rasch Measurement Transactions 1996; 9: 468.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.