Construct and ecological validity of the Occupational Therapy Adult Perceptual Screening Test (OT-APST)

References

• Bouska MJ, Kauffman NA, Marcus SE. Disorders of the visual perceptual system. Neurological rehabilitation2nd ed, DA Umphred. CV Mosby, St Louis, MO 1990; 552–85
   Google Scholar
• Lezak MD. Neuropsychological assessment3rd ed. Oxford Press, New York 1995
   Google Scholar
• Cermak SA, Lin K-C. Assessment of perceptual dysfunction in the adult. Assessment in occupational therapy and physical therapy, J Van Deusen, D Brunt. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia 1997; 302–33
   Google Scholar
• Gutman SA. Traumatic brain injury. Occupational therapy practice skills for physical dysfunction5th ed, LW Pedretti, MB Early. Mosby, St Louis, MO 2001; 671–701
   Google Scholar
• Zoltan B. Visual, visual-perceptual, and perceptual-motor deficits in brain-injured adults. Traumatic Brain Injury 1992; 3: 337–54
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly S. The Rivermead Perceptual Assessment Battery: Can it predict functional performance?. Aust Occup Ther J 2002; 49: 71–81
   Google Scholar
• Sabari JS. Occupational therapy after stroke: Are we providing the right services at the right time?. Am J Occup Ther 1998; 52: 299–302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercier L, Audet T, Hebert R, Rochette A, Dubois MF. Impact of motor, cognitive, and perceptual disorders on ability to perform activities of daily living after stroke. Stroke 2001; 32: 2602–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheatley CJ. Evaluation and treatment of perceptual and perceptual motor deficits. Occupational therapy practice skills for physical dysfunction5th ed, LW Pedretti, MB Early. Mosby, St Louis, MO 2001; 444–55
   Google Scholar
• Bernspang B, Asplund KJ, Eriksson S, Fugl-Meyer A. Motor and perceptual impairments in acute stroke patients: Effects on self-care ability. Stroke 1987; 18: 1081–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintana LA. Assessing abilities and capacities: Vision, visual perception and praxis. Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction5th ed, CA Trombly, MV Radomski. Lippincott Willams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 2002; 177–95
   Google Scholar
• Gutman SA, Schonfeld AB. Screening adult neurologic populations. AOTA Press, Bethesda, MD 2003
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln NB, Drummond AER, Berman P. Perceptual impairment and its impact on rehabilitation outcome. Disabil Rehabil 1997; 19: 231–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okkema K. Cognition and perception in the stroke patient. A guide to functional outcomes in occupational therapy. Aspen Publications, Silver Spring, MD 1993
   Google Scholar
• Trombly C. Anticipating the future: Assessment of occupational function. Am J Occup Ther 1993; 47: 253–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golisz KM, Toglia JP. Perception and cognition. Willard and Spackman's occupational therapy10th ed, EB Crepeau, ES Cohn, BA Boyt Schell. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 2003; 395–411
   Google Scholar
• Bechinger D, Tallis R. Perceptual disorders neurological disease part 1. Occup Ther 1986: 282–4.
   Google Scholar
• Benton A, Tranel D. Visuoperceptual, visuospatial, and visuoconstructive disorders. Clinical neuropsychology3rd ed, KM Heilman, E Valenstein. Oxford University Press, New York 1993; 165–213
   Google Scholar
• Chaikin LE. Disorders of vision and visual perceptual dysfunction. Neurological rehabilitation4th ed, DA Umphred. Mosby, St Louis, MO 2001; 821–52
   Google Scholar
• Grieve J. Neuropsychology for occupational therapists2nd ed. Blackwell Science, Oxford 2000
   Google Scholar
• Heilman KM, Watson RT, Valenstein E. Neglect and related disorders. Clinical neuropsychology4th ed, KM Heilman, E Valenstein. Oxford University Press, Oxford 2003; 296–346
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth C. Cognitive and perceptual dysfunction. F.A. Davis, Philadelphia 1999
   Google Scholar
• Zoltan B. Vision, perception and cognition: A manual for the evaluation and treatment of the neurologically impaired adult3rd ed. Slack, Thorofare, NJ 1996
   Google Scholar
• Arnadottir G. The brain and behavior: Assessing cortical dysfunction through activities of daily living (ADL). C.V. Mosby, St Louis, MO 1990
   Google Scholar
• Rubio KB. Treatment of neurobehavioral deficits: A function-based approach. Stroke rehabilitation: A function-based approach, G Gillen, A Burkardt. Mosby Year Book, St Louis, MO 1998; 334–52
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson TL, Kennard C. Disorders of higher visual function and hemi-spatial neglect. Curr Opin Neurol 2000; 13: 7–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilman KM, Rothi LJG. Apraxia. Clinical neuropsychology4th ed, KM Heilman, E Valenstein. Oxford University Press, Oxford 2003; 215–35
   Google Scholar
• Heilman KM. Neglect and related disorders. Clinical neuropsychology, KM Heilman, E Valenstein. Oxford University Press, New York 1979; 268–307
   Google Scholar
• Neistadt ME. Occupational therapy treatment for constructional deficits. Am J Occup Ther 1992; 46: 141–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardarsdottir S, Kaplan S. Validity of the Arnadottir OT-ADL neurobehavioral evaluation (A-ONE): Performance in activities of daily living and neurobehavioral impairments of persons with left and right hemisphere damage. Am J Occup Ther 2002; 56: 499–508
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays RD, Anderson RT, Revicki D. Assessing reliability and validity of measurement in clinical trials. Quality of life assessment in clinical trials: Methods and practice, MJ Staquet, RD Hays, PM Fayers. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1998; 169–82
   Google Scholar
• Kline P. Handbook of test construction: Introduction to psychometric design. Methuen, London 1986
   Google Scholar
• Payton OD. Research: The validation of clinical practice2nd ed. F.A. Davis, Philadelphia 1988
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association. Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC 1999
   Google Scholar
• Fayers PM, Machin D. Factor analysis. Quality of life assessment in clinical trials: Methods and practice, MJ Staquet, RD Hays, PM Fayer. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1998; 191–223
   Google Scholar
• Murphy KR, Davidshofer CO. Psychological testing: Principles and applications4th ed. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1998
   Google Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice2nd ed. Prentice Hall Health, Upper Saddle River, NJ 2000
   Google Scholar
• Sbordone RJ. Ecological validity: Some critical issues for the neuropsychologist. Ecological validity of neuropsychological testing, RJ Sbordone, CJ Long. St Lucie Press, Boca Raton, FL 1998; 15–41
   Google Scholar
• Johnston MV, Findley TW, DeLuca J, Katz RT. Research in physical medicine and rehabilitation XII. Measurement tools and application to brain injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1991; 70: S114–30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmuckler MA. What is ecological validity? A dimensional analysis. Infancy 2001; 2: 419–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George K, Batterham A, Sullivan I. Validity in clinical research: A review of basic concepts and definitions. Phys Ther Sport 2000; 1: 19–27
   Google Scholar
• Patrick L, Perugini M, Leclerc C. Neuropsychological assessment and competency for independent living among geriatric patients. Top Geriatr Rehabil 2002; 17: 65–77
   Google Scholar
• Bailey IL, Lovie JE. The design and use of a new near-vision chart. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1980; 57: 378–87
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh RR. ‘Mini–mental state’: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients from the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke D. M., McKenna K, Fleming J. Development of a standardized occupational therapy screening tool for visual perception in adults. Scand J Occup Ther 2005; 12: 59–71
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cooke DM. Establishing the psychometric properties of the Occupational Therapy Adult Perceptual Screening Test (OT-APST). PhD thesis. Brisbane: University of Queensland; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42: 703–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna K, Tooth L, Strong J, Ottenbacher K, Connell J, Cleary M. Predicting discharge outcomes for stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation in an Australian hospital. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 81: 47–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itzkovich M, Elazar B, Averbuch S, Katz N. The Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Assessment (LOTCA) Manual. Maddak, Pequannock, NJ 1990
   Google Scholar
• Itzkovich M, Elazar B, Averbuch S, Katz N. LOTCA Manual2nd ed. Maddak, Pequannock, NJ 2000
   Google Scholar
• Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1995
   Google Scholar
• Maher LM, Ochipa C. Managment and treatment of limb apraxia. Apraxia: The neuropsychology of action, LJG Rothi, KM Heilman. Erlbaum/Psychology Press, Hillsdale, NJ 1997; 75–91
   Google Scholar
• York CD, Cermak SA. Visual perception and praxis in adults after stroke. Am J Occup Ther 1995; 49: 543–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. WAIS-R Manual. Psychological Corporation, New York 1981
   Google Scholar
• Raven JC. Guide to the Standard Progressive Matrices. H.K. Lewis, London 1960
   Google Scholar
• Hooper HE. The Hooper Visual Organization Test. Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles 1983
   Google Scholar
• Hutt ML. The Hutt adaptation of the Bender-Gestalt test3rd ed. Grune & Stratton, New York 1977
   Google Scholar