Impact factor, eigenfactor, article influence, scopus SNIP, and SCImage journal rank of occupational therapy journals

References

• Hopkins HL. An historical perspective on occupational therapy. In: Hopkins HL, Smith HD, editors. Willard and Spackman’s Occupational Therapy. New York (NY): Lippincott; 1983. p. 3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Brown T. Characteristics of occupational therapy journals of WFOT member countries: a descriptive survey. Occup Ther Int. 1997;4:116–137.
   Google Scholar
• Brown T, Rodger S, Brown AJ. Publication practices of English language occupational therapy journals. Br J Occup Ther. 2005;68:85–92.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder J. An overlap analysis of occupational therapy electronic journals available in full-text databases and subscription services. J Elect Resources in Med Lib. 2008;5:346–361.
   Google Scholar
• Brown T, Brown AJ. Characteristics of the occupational therapy journal of research: the first twenty years. Occup Ther Health Care. 2005;19:73–92.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cusick A. Australian occupational therapy research: a review of publications 1987-91. Aust Occup Ther J. 1995;42:67–75.
   Google Scholar
• Madill H, Brintnell S, Stewin L. Professional literature: one view of a national perspective. Aust Occup Ther J. 1989;36:110–119.
   Google Scholar
• Mountain G. A review of the literature in the British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1989-1996. Br J Occup Ther. 1997;60:430–435.
   Google Scholar
• Pearl AW, Brennan AR, Journey TI, et al. Content analysis of five occupational therapy journals, 2006–2010: further review of characteristics of the quantitative literature. Am J Occup Ther. 2014;68:e115–e123.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Potter J. Mapping the literature of occupational therapy: an update. J Med Libr Assoc. 2010;98:235–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed KL. Mapping the literature of occupational therapy. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1999;87:298–304.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roberts D. The journal literature of occupational therapy: a comparison of coverage by four bibliographic information services. Br J Occup Ther. 1992;55:143–147.
   Google Scholar
• Brown T. Journal quality metrics: Options to consider other than impact factors. Am J Occup Ther. 2011;65:346–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown T. How does the CJOT measure up? Taking journal quality metrics into account. Can J Occup Ther. 2012;79:195–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodger S, McKenna K, Brown T. Quality and impact of occupational therapy journals: authors’ perspectives. Aust Occ Ther J. 2007;54:174–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meho LI, Yang K. Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 2007;58:2105–2125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson Reuters. Using bibliometrics: a guide to evaluating research performance with citation data. Philadelphia (PA): Author; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Franchignoni F, Lasa SM. Bibliometric indicators and core journals in physical and rehabilitation medicine. J Rehabil Med. 2011;43:471–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moed HF, Colledge L, Reedijk J, et al. Citation-based metrics are appropriate tools in journal assessment provided that they are accurate and used in an informed way. Scientometrics. 2012;92:367–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismail S, Nason E, Marjanoic S, et al. Bibliometrics as a tool for supporting prospective R&D decision making in the health sciences. Strengths, weaknesses and options for future development. Cambridge (UK): RAND; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Bellis N. Bibliometrics and citation analysis: from the science citation index to cybermetrics. Lanham (MD): Scarecrow Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Bornmann L, Leydesdorff L. Scientometrics in a changing research landscape: bibliometrics has become an integral part of research quality evaluation and has been changing the practice of research. EMBO Reports. 2014;15:1228–1232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaway E. Beat it, impact factor! Publishing elite turns against controversial metric: senior staff at leading journals want to end inappropriate use of the measure. Nature. 2016;535:210–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krell FT. The Journal Impact Factor as a performance indicator. Eur Sci Editing. 2012;38:3–6.
   Google Scholar
• Elsaie ML, Kammer J. Impactitis: the impact factor myth syndrome. Indian J Dermatol. 2009;54:83–85.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garfield E. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA. 2006;295:90–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arendt J. Are article influence scores comparable across scientific fields? Issues Sci Technol Librarianship. 2010;60:n.p. Available from: http://www.istl.org/10-winter/refereed2.html
   Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff L, Opthof T. Scopus's source normalized impact per paper (SNIP) versus a journal impact factor based on fractional counting of citations. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 2010;61:2365–2369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramin S, Sarraf Shirazi A. Comparison between Impact factor, SCImago journal rank indicator and Eigenfactor score of nuclear medicine journals. Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur. 2012;15:132–136.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teixeira da Silva JA, Memon AR. CiteScore: a cite for sore eyes, or a valuable, transparent metric?. Scientometrics. 2017;111:553–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstrom CT, West JD. Assessing citations with the Eigenfactor metrics. Neurology. 2008;71:1850–1851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Pereira B, Guerrero-Bote VP, Moya-Anegón F. A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: the SJR indicator. J Informetrics. 2010;4:379–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacsó P. Comparison of journal impact rankings in the SCImago Journal & Country Rank and the Journal Citation Reports databases. Online Infor Rev. 2010;34:642–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Groote SL, Raszewski R. Coverage of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: a case study of the h-index in nursing. Nurs Outlook. 2012;60:391–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kianifar N, Sadeghi R, Zarifmahmoudi L. Comparison between impact factor, Eigenfactor Metrics, and SCimago journal rank indicator of pediatric neurology journals. Acta Inform Med. 2014;22:103–106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson KS, Leising DJ. The literature of occupational therapy: a citation analysis study. Am J Occup Ther. 1986;40:390–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar