Voices on disability issues in Namibia: Evidence for entrenching occupational justice in disability policy formulation

References

• Christiansen CH, Townsend EA. Introduction to occupation: the art and science of living. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzo T, Duncan M, Buchanan H, et al. Practice and service learning in occupational therapy enhancing potential in context. West Sussex: Whurr; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteford G, Townsend E. Participatory occupational justice framework (POJF 2010): enabling occupational participation and inclusion. In: Kronenberg F, Pollard N, Sakellariou D, editors. Occupational therapy without borders: towards an ecology of education based practices. New York (NY): Elsevier; 2011. p. 65–84.
   Google Scholar
• Government of the Republic of Namibia. National policy on disability. Windhoek: Ministry of Lands Resettlement and Rehabilitation; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcock AA, Townsend EA. Occupational justice. In: Crepeau EB, Cohn ES, Boyt-Schell BA, editors. Willard Spackman’s occupational therapy. 11th ed. Baltimore (MD): Lippincott Williams Wilkins; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hocking C. Occupational justice as social justice: the moral claim for inclusion. J Occup Sci. 2017;24:29–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond R, McColl MA. A review of disability policy in Canada. 2nd ed. Kingstone: Canadian Disability Policy Alliance; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteford G, Townsend E, Bryanton O, et al. The participatory justice framework: salience across contexts. In: Dikaios S, Pollard N, editors. Occupational therapies without borders: integrating justice with practice. London: Elsevier; 2017. p. 163–174.
   Google Scholar
• Marston G, Watts R. Tampering with the evidence: a critical appraisal of evidence based policymaking. The Drawing Board. 2003;3:143–163.
   Google Scholar
• Hopwood G. Guide to Namibian politics. Windhoek: Konrad Adenauer Foundation; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Government of the Republic of Namibia. National population and housing census. Windhoek: National Planning Commission; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Government of the Republic of Namibia. National population and housing census. Windhoek: National Planning Commission; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Government of the Republic of Namibia. National population and Housing census. Windhoek: National Planning Commission; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• NRSC [National Road Safety Council]. Road accidents in Namibia: statistical report 2009. Windhoek: National Road Safety Council; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Eide AH, Loeb ME, Van Rooy G, et al. Living conditions among people with disabilities in Namibia. Pilot study. SINTEF report STF78A014502. Oslo: SINTEF Unimed NIS Health, Rehabilitation; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Namibia Statistics Agency. Namibia labour force survey 2016 report. Windhoek: Namibia Statistics Agency; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health and Social Services. Health and social services review. Windhoek: Ministry of Health and Social Services; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health and Social Services. Health and social services March 2015 newsletter. Windhoek: Ministry of Health and Social Services; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Held D. Introduction to critical theory: Horkheimer to Habermas. California USA: University of California Press; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Michalko R. The difference that disability makes. Philadelphia (PA): Temple University Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Charlton J. Nothing about us without us. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Devlin R, Pothier D. Critical disability theory: essays in philosophy, politics, policy, and law. Vancouver: University of York; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hosking DL. Critical disability theory. Proceedings of the 4th biennial disability studies conference; 2008 Sept 2–4; Lancaster, UK. Lancaster University [cited 2017 Jan 2]. p. 1–17. Available from: http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/events/disabilityconference_archive/2008/papers/hosking2008.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• WFOT [World Federation of Occupational Therapists]. WFOT position statement of human rights [Interenet]. World federation of occupational therapists; 2006 [cited 2016 Nov 19] Available from: http://appsserver09/User$/tongai.chichaya/Downloads/Human%20Rights%20Position%20Statement%20Final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf L, Ripat J, Davis E, et al. Applying an occupational justice framework. Occup Ther Now. 2002;12:15–18.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend E, Marval R. Can professionals actually enable occupational justice? Cad Ter Ocup. 2013;21:215–228.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen E. Successful qualitative health research. Berkshire England: Open University Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:349–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durocher E, Gibson BE, Rappolt S. Occupational justice: a conceptual review. J Occup Sci. 2014;21:418–430.
   Google Scholar
• Hamza Alshenqeeti H. Interviewing as a data collection method: a critical review. ELR. 2014;3:39–45.
   Google Scholar
• Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods. 2006;18:59–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennink MM, Kaiser BN, Marconi VC. Code saturation versus meaning saturation: how many interviews are enough? Qual Health Res. 2017;27:591–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart DW, Shamdasani PN, Rook DW. Focus groups: theory and practice. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Gasson S. Rigor in grounded theory research: an interpretive perspective on generating theory from qualitative field studies. In: Whitman ME, Woszczynski AB, editors. The handbook of information systems research. Hershey (PA): Idea Group; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Wickham M, Woods MR. On the strategic use of CAQDAS to manage and report on the qualitative research process. The Qual Rep. 2005;10:687–702.
   Google Scholar
• Corden A, Sainsbury R. The impact of verbatim quotations on research users: qualitative exploration. York: Social Policy Research Unit; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Corden A, Sainsbury R. Using verbatim quotations in reporting qualitative social research: researchers’ views. York: Social Policy Research Unit; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Government of the Republic of Namibia. 2015/2016 budget statement for the 2015/2016 financial year. Windhoek: Ministry of Finance; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• WHO [World Health Organization]. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend E, Polatajko H. Enabling occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being, justice through occupations. 2nd ed. Ottawa: CAOT Publications ACE; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• WHO [World Health Organization]. World report on disability. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta J. Mapping the evolving ideas of occupational justice a critical analysis. OTJR Occup Part Hea. 2016;36:179–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN [United Nations]. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. New York: United Nations; 2006.
   Google Scholar