Clinical utility of the Danish version of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure

References

• Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, et al. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. 5th ed. Toronto, ON: CAOT Publications ACE; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Carswell A, McColl MA, Law M, et al. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: a research and clinical literature review. Can J Occup Ther. 2004;71:210–222.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harris JE, Eng JJ. Goal priorities identified through client-centred measurement in individuals with chronic stroke. Physiother Can. 2004;56:171–176.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parker DM, Sykes CH. A systematic review of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: a clinical practice perspective. Br J Occup Ther. 2006;69:150–160.
   Google Scholar
• Colquhoun H, Letts L, Law M, et al. Routine administration of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: effect on functional outcome. Aust Occup Ther J [Internet]. 2010;57:111–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjeken I, Slatkowsky-Christensen B, Kvien TK, et al. Norwegian version of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in patients with hand osteoarthritis: validity, responsiveness, and feasibility. Arthritis Care Res. 2004;51:709–715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cup EHC, op Reimer W, Thijssen MCE, et al. Reliability and validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in stroke patients. Clin Rehabil. 2003;17:402–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wressle E, Samuelsson K, Henriksson C. Responsiveness of the Swedish version of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Scand J Occup Ther. 1999;6:84–89.
   Google Scholar
• Smart A. A multi-dimensional model of clinical utility. Int J Qual Health Care. 2006;18:377–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson L, Mitchell G, Fleming J, et al. Clinical utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in spinal cord injury rehabilitation. Br J Occup Ther. 2012;75:337–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuntland HK, Aaslund MK, Langeland E, et al. Psychometric properties of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in home-dwelling older adults. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016;9:411–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enemark Larsen A, Carlsson G. Utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure as an admission and outcome measure in interdisciplinary community-based geriatric rehabilitation. Scand J Occup Ther. 2012;19:204–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wressle E, Marcusson J, Henriksson C. Clinical utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure - Swedish version. Can J Occup Ther. 2002;69:40–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Enemark Larsen A, Rasmussen B, Christensen JR. Enhancing a client-centred practice with the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Occup Ther Int. 2018;2018:13–15.
   Google Scholar
• Richard LF, Knis-Matthews L. Are we really client-centered? Using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure to see how the client’s goals connect with the goals of the occupational therapist. Occup Ther Ment Heal. 2010;26:51–66.
   Google Scholar
• Levack WMM, Dean SG, Siegert RJ, et al. Navigating patient-centered goal setting in inpatient stroke rehabilitation: how clinicians control the process to meet perceived professional responsibilities. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;85:206–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosewilliam S, Roskell CA, Pandyan AD. A systematic review and synthesis of the quantitative and qualitative evidence behind patient-centred goal setting in stroke rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 2011;25:501–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maitra KK, Erway F. Perception of client-centered practice in occupational therapists and their clients. Am J Occup Ther. 2006;60:298–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G. Conceptual foundations of occupational therapy practice. 4th ed.Kielhofner G, editor. Philadelphia (PA): F.A.Davies; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Drolet MJ, Désormeaux-Moreau M. The values of occupational therapy: perceptions of occupational therapists in Quebec. Scand J Occup Ther. 2016;23:272–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjørkedal STB, Torsting AMB, Møller T. Rewarding yet demanding: client perspectives on enabling occupations during early stages of recovery from schizophrenia. Scand J Occup Ther. 2016;23:97–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oestergaard LG, Maribo T, Bünger CE, et al. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure’s semistructured interview: its applicability to lumbar spinal fusion patients. A prospective randomized clinical study. Eur Spine J. 2012;21:115–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enemark Larsen A, Morville AL, Hansen T. Translating the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure to Danish, addressing face and content validity. Scand J Occup Ther. 2018;119:543–551.
   Google Scholar
• Regnault A, Herdman M. Using quantitative methods within the Universalist model framework to explore the cross-cultural equivalence of patient-reported outcome instruments. Qual Life Res. 2015;24:115–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossuyt PMM, Reitsma JB, Linnet K, et al. Beyond diagnostic accuracy: the clinical utility of diagnostic tests. Clin Chem. 2012;58:1636–1643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, et al. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (Danish). Dansk Vers. Ergoterapeutforeningen. Copenhagen, DK; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24:105–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo S, Kääriäinen M, Kanste O, et al. Qualitative content analysis. SAGE Open. 2014;4:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, et al. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant. 2018;52:1893–1907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, et al. Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015;42:533–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agee J. Developing qualitative research questions: a reflective process. Int J Qual Stud Educ. 2009;22:431–447.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277–1288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Am Med Assoc. 2013;310:2191–2194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly C, O’Neill C, Bauer M, et al. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) in primary care: a profile of practice. Am J Occup Ther. 2017;71:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller K. The effectiveness of occupational performance outcome measures within mental health practice. Br J Occup Ther. 2011;74:399–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Ven-Stevens LAW, Graff MJL, Peters MAM, et al. Construct validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in participants with tendon injury and Dupuytren disease. Phys Ther. 2015;95:750–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumsion T, Law M. A review of evidence on the conceptual elements informing client-centred practice. Can J Occup Ther. 2006;73:153–162.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kirsh B, Cockburn L. The Canadian Performance Measure: a tool for recovery-based practice. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2009;32:171–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft M, Blomberg K, Hedman A. The health care professionals’ perspectives of collaboration in rehabilitation - An interview study. Int J Older People Nurs. 2014;9:209–216.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bright FAS, Kayes NM, Worrall L, et al. A conceptual review of engagement in healthcare and rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37:643–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins T, Larson E, Schnall R. Unraveling the meaning of patient engagement: a concept analysis. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100:30–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend E, Polatajko HJ. Enabling occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being and justice through occupation. 2th ed.Townsend E, Polatajko HJ, editors. Ontario, Canada: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Drolet MJ. The axiological ontology of occupational therapy: a philosophical analysis. Scand J Occup Ther. 2014;21:2–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindahl-Jacobsen L, Hansen DG, Waehrens EE, et al. Performance of activities of daily living among hospitalized cancer patients. Scand J Occup Ther. 2015;22:137–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts AEK, James A, Drew J, et al. Measuring occupational performance and client priorities in the community: the COPM. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2008;15:22–29.
   Google Scholar
• Rochman DL, Ray SA, Kulich RJ, et al. Validity and utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure as an outcome measure in a craniofacial pain center. OTJR Occup Particip Heal. 2008;28:4–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uddannelses- og Forskningsministeriet [Ministry of Education and Research]. Bekendtgørelse om uddannelsen til professionsbachelor i Ergoterapi [Bachelor᾽s Degree Programme of Occupational Therapy. København, Danmark: Styrelsen for Videregående Uddannelser [Department of Higher Education]; 2016. p. 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• AbuSabha R. Interviewing clients and patients: improving the skill of asking open-ended questions. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013;113:624–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graneheim UH, Lindgren BM, Lundman B. Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: a discussion paper. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;56:29–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luborsky MR.Lysack C. Design considerations in qualitative research. In:Taylor RR, editor. Kielhofner’s research in occupational therapy. Philiadelphia (PA): F.A. Davies Company; 2017. p. 180–195.
   Google Scholar