Content validity and usefulness of Picture My Participation for measuring participation in children with and without intellectual disability in South Africa and Sweden

References

• United Nations General Assembly. Convention on the rights of the child; 1989. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CRC.aspx
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. New York: United Nations; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• WHO (World Health Organization). International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• WHO (World Health Organization). International classification of functioning, disability and health – version for children and youth (ICF-CY). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Imms C, Granlund M, Wilson PH, et al. Participation, both a means and an end: a conceptual analysis of processes and outcomes in childhood disability. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017;59:16–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:737–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Prinsen CA, Chiarotto A, et al. COSMIN methodology for assessing the content validity of PROMs – user manual; 2018. Available from: http://www.cosmin.nl/
   Google Scholar
• Snell M, Luckasson R, Borthwick-Duffy S, et al. Characteristics and needs of people with intellectual disability who have higher IQs. Intellect Dev Disabil. 2009;47:220–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenspan S, Switzky HN, Woods GW. Intelligence involves risk-awareness and intellectual disability involves risk-unawareness: Implications of a theory of common sense. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2011;36:246–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guralnick MJ. Early intervention for children with intellectual disabilities: an update. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2017;30:211–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King M, Shields N, Imms C, et al. Participation of children with intellectual disability compared with typically developing children. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34:1854–1862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dada S, Bastable K, Schlebusch L, et al. (submitted). Participation of children with developmental disabilities and those whom are typically developing in low and middle income countries: a scoping review.
   Google Scholar
• Shields N, King M, Corbett M, et al. Is participation among children with intellectual disabilities in outside school activities similar to their typically developing peers? A systematic review. Dev Neurorehab. 2014;17:64–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lygnegard F, Donohue D, Bornman J, et al. A systematic review of generic and special needs of children with disabilities living in poverty settings in low- and middle-income countries. J Policy Pract. 2013;12:296–315.
   Google Scholar
• Schlebusch L, Huus K, Samuels A, et al. (submitted) The participation of children and young adults with disabilities and/or long term chronic health conditions living in LMIC: a scoping review.
   Google Scholar
• Rainey L, van Nispen R, van der Zee C, et al. Measurement properties of questionnaires assessing participation in children and adolescents with a disability: a systematic review. Qual Life Res. 2014;23:2793–2808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granlund M, Arvidsson P, Niia A, et al. Differentiating activity and participation of children and youth with disability in Sweden – a third qualifier in ICF-CY. Am J Phys Med Rehab, 2012;91:84–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coster W, Khetani M. Measuring participation of children with disabilities: issues and challenges. Disabil Rehab. 2008;30:639–648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adair B, Ullenhag A, Rosenbaum P, et al. Measures used to quantify participation in childhood disability and their alignment with the family of participation‐related constructs: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018;60:1101–1116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley S, MacLean W. A review of the reliability and validity of Likert-type scales for people with intellectual disability. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2006;50:813–827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batorowicz B, King G, Vane F, et al. Exploring validation of a graphic symbol questionnaire to measure participation experiences of youth in activity settings. Augment Altern Commun. 2017;33:97–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Räty L, Kontu EK, Pirttimaa R. Teaching children with intellectual disabilities: analysis of research-based recommendations. JEL. 2016;5:318–336.
   Google Scholar
• King GA, Law M, King S, et al. Children's Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment and Preferences for Activities of Kids. San Antonio (TX): PsychCor; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Khetani M, Marley J, Baker M, et al. Validity of the Participation and Environment Measure for Children and Youth (PEM-CY) for Health Impact Assessment (HIA) in sustainable development projects. Disabil Health J. 2014;7:226–235.
   Google Scholar
• Mandich AD, Polatajko HJ, Miller L, et al. Paediatric Activity Card Sort. Ottawa, (Canada): Canadian Association of Occupational Therapy; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• APA (American Psychiatric Association). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Brislin RW. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. J Cross Cult Psychol. 1970;1:185–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durkin MS, Wang W, Shrout PE, et al. Evaluation of the ten questions screen for childhood disability: reliability and internal structure in different cultures. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48:657–666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller DR, Lloyd LL. Symbol selection. In Lloyd LL, Fuller DR, Arvidson HH, editors. Augmentative and alternative communication. A handbook of principles and practices. Boston: Allyn & Bacon Inc; 1997. p. 214–225.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer-Johnson. BoardMaker is part of the PCS is a product of DynaVox Mayer-Johnson, Sweden; 2015. Available from: https://www.tobiidynavox.com/
   Google Scholar
• Cameron L, Murphy J. Enabling young people with a learning disability to make choices at a time of transition. Br J Learning Disab. 2002;30:105–112.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson L, Welander J, Granlund M. Participation in everyday school activities for children with and without disabilities. J Dev Phys Disabil. 2007;19:485–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvidsson P, Granlund M, Thyberg I, et al. Important aspects of participation and participation restrictions in people with a mild intellectual disability. Disabil Rehab. 2014;36:1264–1272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar