311
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

From shaky grounds to solid foundations: A salutogenic perspective on return to work after cancer

ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 524-535 | Received 27 Nov 2018, Accepted 01 Sep 2019, Published online: 26 Sep 2019

References

  • Cancer Registry of Norway. Cancer in Norway 2015 - Cancer incidence, mortality, survival and prevalence in Norway. Oslo (Norway): Cancer Registry of Norway; 2016.
  • Danckert B, Ferlay J, Engholm G, et al. Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Prevalence and Survival in the Nordic Countries. NORDCAN (Version 8.2) [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2019 May 2]. Available from: http://www.ancr.nu
  • Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(2):87–108.
  • Mehnert A. Employment and work-related issues in cancer survivors. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2011;77(2):109–130.
  • Van Egmond MP, Duijts SFA, Loyen A, et al. Barriers and facilitators for return to work in cancer survivors with job loss experience: a focus group study. Eur J Cancer Care. 2017;26(5):e12420.
  • Mehnert A, De Boer A, Feuerstein M. Employment challenges for cancer survivors. Cancer. 2013;119(S11):2151–2159.
  • Grunfeld EA, Low E, Cooper AF. Cancer survivors' and employers' perceptions of working following cancer treatment. Occup Med (Lond). 2010;60(8):611–617.
  • Knott V, Zrim S, Shanahan EM, et al. Returning to work following curative chemotherapy: a qualitative study of return to work barriers and preferences for intervention. Support Care Cancer. 2014;22(12):3263–3273.
  • De Boer A, Verbeek J, Spelten ER, et al. Work ability and return-to-work in cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2008;98(8):1342–1347.
  • Torp S, Nielsen RA, Gudbergsson SB, et al. Worksite adjustments and work ability among employed cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20(9):2149–2156.
  • Little M, Paul K, Jordens CFC, et al. Survivorship and discourses of identity. Psychooncology. 2002;11(2):170–178.
  • Dorland HF, Abma FI, Roelen CAM, et al. Factors influencing work functioning after cancer diagnosis: a focus group study with cancer survivors and occupational health professionals. Support Care Cancer. 2016;24(1):261–266.
  • Brusletto B, Torp S, Ihlebæk CM, et.al. A five-phase process model describing the return to work of persons who survived cancer: A qualitative study. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2018;34:21–27.
  • Falkdal AH, Edlund C, Dahlgren L. Experiences within the process of sick leave. Scand J Occup Ther. 2006;13(3):170–182.
  • Antonovsky A. Health, stress and coping. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1979.
  • Antonovsky A. The salutogenic model as a theory to guide health promotion. Health Promot Int. 1996;11(1):11–18.
  • Lindström B, Eriksson M. The hitchhiker’s guide to salutogenesis: salutogenic pathways to health promotion. Helsinki (Finland): Folkhälsan Research Centre; 2010.
  • Antonovsky A. Health promoting factors at work: the sense of coherence In: Kalimo R, El-Batawi MA, Cooper CL, editors. Psychosocial factors at work and their relation to health. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 1987. p. 153–167.
  • Antonovsky A. Unraveling the mystery of health. how people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass Inc.; 1987.
  • Idan O, Eriksson M, Al-Yagon M, et al. The salutogenic model: the role of generalized resistance resources In: Mittelmark MB, Sagy S, Eriksson M, editors. The handbook of salutogenesis. Cham (Switzerland): Springer International Publishing; 2017. p. 57–69.
  • Jenny GJ, Bauer GF, Vinje HF, et al. The application of salutogenesis to work In: Mittelmark MB, Sagy S, Eriksson M, et al. editors. The handbook of salutogenesis. Cham (Switzerland): Springer International Publishing; 2017. p. 197–210.
  • Nilsson P, Andersson IH, Ejlertsson G, et al. Workplace health resources based on sense of coherence theory. Intl J of Workplace Health Mgt. 2012;5(3):156–167.
  • Hansen A, Edlund C, Bränholm I. Significant resources needed for return to work after sick leave. Work. 2005;25(3):231–240.
  • Opsahl J, Eriksen HR, Tveito TH. Do expectancies of return to work and job satisfaction predict actual return to work in workers with long lasting LBP?. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17(1):481.
  • Seligman M. Flourish: a visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York (NY): Free Press; 2011.
  • Smith JA, Flowers P, Larkin M. Interpretative phenomenological analysis: theory, method and research. London (UK): Sage Publications; 2009.
  • Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357.
  • Kvale S, Brinkmann S. Interviews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Los Angeles (CA): Sage Publications; 2009.
  • Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–1760.
  • QSR International. NVIVO 11. 2016 [cited 2016 Feb 17]. Available from: http://www.qsrinternational.com/product/NVivo11-for-Windows
  • Miller WL, Crabtree BF. Clinical research: a multimethod typology and qualitative roadmap In: Crabtree BF, Miller WL, editors. Doing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 1999. p. 3–30.
  • Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105–112.
  • Shilling V, Starkings R, Jenkins V, et al. The pervasive nature of uncertainty—a qualitative study of patients with advanced cancer and their informal caregivers. J Cancer Surviv. 2017;11(5):590–603.
  • Gragnano A, Negrini A, Miglioretti M, et al. Common psychosocial factors predicting return to work after common mental disorders, cardiovascular diseases, and cancers: a review of reviews supporting a cross-disease approach. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(2):215–231.
  • Magrin ME, Bruno C, Gheno S, et al. The power of stress: a salutogenic model of intervention In: Delle Fave A, editor. Dimensions of well-being: research and intervention. Milano (Italy): Franco Angeli; 2006. p. 470–488.
  • Mayan MJ, Morse JM, Eldershaw LP. Developing the concept of self-reformulation. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2006;1(1):20–26.
  • Hefferon K, Grealy M, Mutrie N. Post-traumatic growth and life threatening physical illness: a systematic review of the qualitative literature. Br J Health Psychol. 2009;14(2):343–378.
  • Brinkmann S. Stand firm: resisting the self-improvement craze. Cambridge (UK): Polity Press; 2017.
  • Held BS. Positive psychology’s a priori problem. Humanist Psychol. 2018;58(3):313–342.
  • Coyne JC, Tennen H. Positive psychology in cancer care: bad science, exaggerated claims, and unproven medicine. Ann Behav Med. 2010;39(1):16–26.
  • Paltrinieri S, Fugazzaro S, Bertozzi L, et al. Return to work in European cancer survivors: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2018;26(9):2983–2994.
  • Jakobsen K, Magnus E, Lundgren S, et al. Everyday life in breast cancer survivors experiencing challenges: a qualitative study. Scand J Occup Ther. 2018;25(4):298–307.
  • Van der Noordt M, IJzelenberg H, Droomers M, et al. Health effects of employment: a systematic review of prospective studies. Occup Environ Med. 2014;71(10):730–736.
  • Waddell G, Burton K, Aylward M. Work and common health problems. J Insur Med. 2007;39(2):109–120.
  • Kennedy F, Haslam C, Munir F, et al. Returning to work following cancer: a qualitative exploratory study into the experience of returning to work following cancer. Eur J Cancer Care. 2007;16(1):17–25.
  • Vanderpool RC, Nichols H, Hoffler EF, et al. Cancer and employment issues: perspectives from cancer patient navigators. J Cancer Educ. 2017;32(3):460–466.
  • Stergiou-Kita M, Pritlove C, Holness DL, et al. Am I ready to return to work? Assisting cancer survivors to determine work readiness. J Cancer Surviv. 2016;10(4):699–710.
  • Komatsu H, Yagasaki K. The power of nursing: guiding patients through a journey of uncertainty. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2014;18(4):419–424.
  • Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet. 2001;358(9280):483–488.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.