Measurement properties of performance-based instruments to assess mental function during activity and participation in traumatic brain injury: A systematic review

References

• Peeters W, van den Brande R, Polinder S, et al. Epidemiology of traumatic brain injury in Europe. Acta Neurochir. 2015;157:1683–1696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyder AA, Wunderlich CA, Puvanachandra P, et al. The impact of traumatic brain injuries: a global perspective. NeuroRehabilitation. 2007;22:341–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sashika H, Takada K, Kikuchi N. Rehabilitation needs and participation restriction in patients with cognitive disorder in the chronic phase of traumatic brain injury. Medicine. 2017;96:e5968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicerone KD, Dahlberg C, Malec JF, et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 1998 through 2002. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1681–1692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. ICF International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy JD, Carroll LJ, Peloso PM, et al. Incidence, risk factors and prevention of mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J Rehabil Med. 2004;36:28–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park HY, Maitra K, Martinez KM. The effect of occupation-based cognitive rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Occup Ther Int. 2015;22:104–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himanen L, Portin R, Isoniemi H, et al. Longitudinal cognitive changes in traumatic brain injury: a 30-year follow-up study. Neurology 2006;66:187–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung CS, Pollock A, Campbell T, et al. Cognitive rehabilitation for executive dysfunction in adults with stroke or other adult non-progressive acquired brain damage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;30:CD008391.
   Google Scholar
• Werff KR. The application of the international classification of functioning, disability and health to functional auditory consequences of mild traumatic brain injury. Semin Hear. 2016;37:216–232.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tate RL, Godbee K, Sigmundsdottir L. A systematic review of assessment tools for adults used in traumatic brain injury research and their relationship to the ICF. NeuroRehabilitation 2013;32:729–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed Alotaibi N, Reed K, Shaban Nadar M. Assessments used in occupational therapy practice: an exploratory study. Occup Ther Health Care. 2009;23:302–318.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, et al. The montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:695–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson B, Cockburn J, Halligan P. Development of a behavioral test of visuospatial neglect. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987;68:98–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson CS, Shechtman O, Jackson Foss J, et al. Occupational therapy: current practice and training issues in the treatment of cognitive dysfunction. NeuroRehabilitation 1997;8:31–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulin V, Korner-Bitensky N, Dawson DR. Stroke-specific executive function assessment: a literature review of performance-based tools. Aust Occup Ther J. 2013;60:3–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sansonetti D, Hoffmann T. Cognitive assessment across the continuum of care: the importance of occupational performance-based assessment for individuals post-stroke and traumatic brain injury. Aust Occup Ther J. 2013;60:334–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickenbach J, Cieza A, Rauch A, Stucki G, editors. ICF core sets: manual for clinical practice. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre JM, Heinemann JW, Wright BD, et al. The structure and stability of the functional independence measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:127–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapparo C. Perceive, recall, plan and perform (PRPP): occupation‐centred task analysis and intervention system. In: Rodger S, editor. Occupation‐centred practice with children. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Bayley MT, Tate R, Douglas JM, Turkstra LS, et al. INCOG guidelines for cognitive rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury: methods and overview. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2014;29:290–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laxe S, Tschiesner U, Zasler N, et al. What domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health are covered by the most commonly used measurement instruments in traumatic brain injury research? Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012;114:645–650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols [PRISMA-P] 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;349:g7647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muren MA, Kristensen LQ, Petersen AK, et al. Measurement properties of instruments to assess mental function during activity and participation in individuals surviving traumatic brain injury: a systematic review protocol. Scand J Occup Ther. 2019;1–5. [E-pub ahead of print]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Jansma EP, Riphagen II, et al. Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments. Qual Life Res. 2009;18:1115–1123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AOTA. Role of Occupational therapy in Assessing Functional Cognition [internet]. [cited 2019 June 6]. Available from: https://www.aota.org/Advocacy-Policy/Federal-Reg-Affairs/Medicare/Guidance/role-OT-assessing-functional-cognition.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:737–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, et al. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:651–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furlan AD, Malmivaara A, Chou R, et al. Updated method guideline for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back and Neck Group. Spine 2015;40:1660–1673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson DR, Anderson ND, Burgess P, et al. Further development of the multiple errands test: standardized scoring, reliability, and ecological validity for the Baycrest version. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:S41–S51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeon A, Terhorst L, Skidmore E, et al. A novel tool for naturalistic assessment of behavioural dysregulation after traumatic brain injury: a pilot study. Brain Inj. 2017;31:1781–1790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malec JF, Hammond FM, Giacino JT, et al. Structured interview to improve the reliability and psychometric integrity of the disability rating scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:1603–1608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rappaport M, Hall KM, Hopkins K, et al. Disability rating scale for severe head trauma: coma to community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1982;63:118–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd TM, Sautter SW. Route-finding: a measure of everyday executive functioning in the head-injured adult. Appl Cognit Psychol. 1993;7:171–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labi MLC, Brentjens M, Shaffer K, et al. Functional cognition index©: a new instrument to assess cognitive disability after traumatic brain injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 1998;12:45–51.
   Google Scholar
• LeBlanc J, de Guise E, Lamoureux J, et al. Criterion validity of a functional cognitive task in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2012;26:1143–1154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretz CR, Kean J, Heinemann AW, et al. A multidimensional rasch analysis of the functional independence measure based on the national institute on disability, independent living, and rehabilitation research traumatic brain injury model systems national database. J Neurotrauma. 2016;33:1358–1362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamdad MJ, Ryan LM, Warden DL. Functional assessment of executive abilities following traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2003;17:1011–1020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kean J, Malec JF, Altman IM, et al. Rasch measurement analysis of the Mayo-Portland adaptability inventory (MPAI-4) in a community-based rehabilitation sample. J Neurotrauma. 2011;28:745–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murrey GJ, Hale FM, Williams JD. Assessment of anosognosia in persons with frontal lobe damage: clinical utility of the Mayo-Portland adaptability inventory [MPAI]. Brain Inj. 2005;19:599–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace JJ, Caroselli JS, Scheibel RS, et al. Predictive validity of the Neurobehavioural Cognitive Status Examination (NCSE) in a post-acute rehabilitation setting. Brain Inj. 2000;14(1):63–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zgaljardic DJ, Yancy S, Temple RO, et al. Ecological validity of the screening module and the daily living tests of the neuropsychological assessment battery using the Mayo-Portland adaptability inventory-4 in postacute brain injury rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol. 2011;56:359–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Neil-Pirozzi TM, Goldstein R, Strangman GE, et al. Test-re-test reliability of the virtual planning test in individuals with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2010;24:509–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Abreu BC, Seale GS, et al. A virtual reality environment for evaluation of a daily living skill in brain injury rehabilitation: reliability and validity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:1118–1124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doninger NA, Bode RK, Heinemann AW, et al. Rating scale analysis of the neurobehavioral cognitive status examination. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2000;15:683–695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doig E, Fleming J, Ownsworth T, et al. An occupation-based, metacognitive approach to assessing error performance and online awareness. Aust Occup Ther J. 2017;64:137–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nott MT, Chapparo C, Heard R. Reliability of the perceive, recall, plan and perform system of task analysis: a criterion-referenced assessment. Aust Occup Ther J. 2009;56:307–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renison B, Ponsford J, Testa R, et al. The ecological and construct validity of a newly developed measure of executive function: the virtual library task. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2012;18:440–450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canty AL, Fleming J, Patterson F, et al. Evaluation of a virtual reality prospective memory task for use with individuals with severe traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2014;24:238–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawley CA, Taylor R, Hellawell DJ, et al. Use of the functional assessment measure [FIM + FAM] in head injury rehabilitation: a psychometric analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999;67:749–754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso CO, Zimmermann N, Parana CB, et al. Brazilian adaptation of the hotel task: a tool for the ecological assessment of executive functions. Dement Neuropsychol. 2015;9:156–164.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Donaghy S, Wass PJ. Interrater reliability of the functional assessment measure in a brain injury rehabilitation program. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:1231–1236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis MW, Babbage DR, Leathem JM. Systematic behavioural observation of executive performance after brain injury. Brain Inj. 2017;31:639–648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Pernia D, Nunez-Huasaf J, Del Blanco A, et al. Using game authoring platforms to develop screen-based simulated functional assessments in persons with executive dysfunction following traumatic brain injury. J Biomed Inform. 2017;74:71–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Baalen B, Odding E, van Woensel MP, et al. Reliability and sensitivity to change of measurement instruments used in a traumatic brain injury population. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20:686–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesio L, Cantagallo A. The functional assessment measure (FAM) in closed traumatic brain injury outpatients: a Rasch-based psychometric study. J Outcome Meas. 1998;2:79–96.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gouvier WD, Blanton PD, LaPorte KK, et al. Reliability and validity of the disability rating scale and the levels of cognitive functioning scale in monitoring recovery from severe head injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987;68:94–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roozenbeek B, Lingsma HF, Maas AI. New considerations in the design of clinical trials for traumatic brain injury. Clin Invest. 2012;2:153–162.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mokkink LB, de Vet HCW, Prinsen CAC, et al. COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27:1171–1179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Keith RA, et al. Advances in functional assessment for medical rehabilitation. Top Geriatr Rehabil. 1986;1:59–74.
   Google Scholar
• Hall KM, Bushnik T, Lakisic-Kazazic B, et al. Assessing traumatic brain injury outcome measures for long-term follow-up of community-based individuals. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 200;82:367–374.
   Google Scholar
• Wales K, Clemson L, Lannin N, et al. Functional assessments used by occupational therapists with older adults at risk of activity and participation limitations: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0147980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenny C, Stolee P. Comparing the functional independence measure and the interRAI/MDS for use in the functional assessment of older adults: a review of the literature. BMC Geriatr. 2009;9:52-2318-9-52.
   Google Scholar
• Hobart JC, Lamping DL, Freeman JA, et al. Evidence-based measurement: which disability scale for neurologic rehabilitation? Neurology 2001;57:639–644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malec JF. Comparability of Mayo-Portland adaptability inventory ratings by staff, significant others and people with acquired brain injury. Brain Inj. 2004;18:563–575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW. Outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;110:105–111.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wesson J, Clemson L, Brodaty H, et al. Estimating functional cognition in older adults using observational assessments of task performance in complex everyday activities: a systematic review and evaluation of measurement properties. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;68:335–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman J. Challenges to measuring outcomes in occupational therapy: a qualitative focus group study. Br J Occup Ther. 2006;69:464–472.
   Google Scholar
• Stapleton T, McBrearty C. Use of standardised assessments and outcome measures among a sample of Irish occupational therapists working with adults with physical disabilities. Br J Occup Ther. 2009;72:55–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar