Occupational therapy interventions for multiple sclerosis: A scoping review

References

• Harirchian MH, Fatehi F, Sarraf P, et al. Worldwide prevalence of familial multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018;20:43–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• College of Occupational Therapists. The College of Occupational Therapists' vocational rehabilitation strategy. London: The College; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists, Townsend E. Enabling occupation: an occupational therapy perspective. Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Steultjens EEMJ, Dekker JJ, Bouter LM, et al. Occupational therapy for multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(3):CD003608. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD003608
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Law MC, MacDermid J. editors. Evidence-based rehabilitation: a guide to practice. New Jersey, USA: Slack Incorporated; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs LE. Evidence-based practice for the helping professions: a practical guide with integrated multimedia. Pacific Grove (CA): Brooks/Cole-Thomson Learning; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Borah R, Brown AW, Capers PL, et al. Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry. BMJ Open. 2017;7(2):e012545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levac D, Colquhoun H, O'Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5(1):69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, et al. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):210.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dang D, Dearholt SL. Johns Hopkins nursing evidence-based practice: model and guidelines. Indianapolis, USA: Sigma Theta Tau; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Letts L, Wilkins S, Law M, et al. Critical review form–qualitative studies (version 2.0). Canada: McMaster University; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Law M, Stewart D, Pollock N, et al. Guidelines for critical review form-Quantitative studies, 1998. Canada: McMaster University Occupational Therapy Evidence-based Practice Research Group; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Hong QN, Pluye P, Fàbregues S, et al. Mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT), version 2018. IC Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Industry Canada. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• ResearchGate [Internet]. Alexa. [cited 2019 Jun 7]. Available from: www.researchgate.net.
   Google Scholar
• OpenGrey. [Internet]. London. University of London. [cited 2019 Jun 6]. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.london.ac.uk/resources/databases/opengrey.
   Google Scholar
• Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers [Internet]. New Jersey. [cited 2019 Jun 10]. Available from: https://www.mscare.org/.
   Google Scholar
• European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis [Internet]. Switzerland. [cited 2019 Jun 6]. Available from: https://www.ectrims.eu/.
   Google Scholar
• Yu CH, Mathiowetz V. Systematic review of occupational therapy-related interventions for people with multiple sclerosis: part 1. Activity and participation. Am J Occup Ther. 2014;68(1):27–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu CH, Mathiowetz V. Systematic review of occupational therapy-related interventions for people with multiple sclerosis: part 2. Impairment. Am J Occup Ther. 2014;68(1):33–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlayson M, Petrin J, Akbar N, et al. Utility and outcomes of a digitally delivered, self-guided fatigue management tool for people with multiple sclerosis. Am J Occup Ther. 2016;70(4_Supplement_1):7011520289p1.
   Google Scholar
• Akbar N, Turpin K, Petrin J, et al. A pilot mixed-methods evaluation of MS INFoRm: a self-directed fatigue management resource for individuals with multiple sclerosis. Int J Rehabil Res. 2018;41(2):114–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrin J, Akbar N, Turpin K, et al. The experience of persons with multiple sclerosis using MS INFoRm: an interactive fatigue management resource. Qual Health Res. 2018;28(5):778–788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlayson M. Pilot study of an energy conservation education program delivered by telephone conference call to people with multiple sclerosis. NeuroRehabilitation. 2005;20(4):267–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlayson M, Holberg C. Evaluation of a teleconference-delivered energy conservation education program for people with multiple sclerosis. Can J Occup Ther. 2007;74(4):337–347.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Packer TL, Brink N, Sauriol A. Managing fatigue: a six-week course for energy conservation. Tucson (AZ): Therapy Skill Builders; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Finlayson M, Preissner K, Cho C, et al. Randomized trial of a teleconference-delivered fatigue management program for people with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2011;17(9):1130–1140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathiowetz V, Matuska KM, Murphy ME. Efficacy of an energy conservation course for persons with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(4):449–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathiowetz VG, Finlayson ML, Matuska KM, et al. Randomized controlled trial of an energy conservation course for persons with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2005;11(5):592–601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathiowetz V, Busch ML. Participant evaluation of energy conservation course for people with multiple sclerosis. Int J MS Care. 2006;8(3):98–106.
   Google Scholar
• Mathiowetz VG, Matuska KM, Finlayson ML, et al. One-year follow-up to a randomized controlled trial of an energy conservation course for persons with multiple sclerosis. Int J Rehabil Res. 2007;30(4):305–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb AL, Finlayson M, Mathiowetz V, et al. The outcomes of using self-study modules in energy conservation education for people with multiple sclerosis. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19(5):475–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanage SM, Gilbertson KK, Mathiowetz V. Effects of an energy conservation course on fatigue impact for persons with progressive multiple sclerosis. Am J Occup Ther. 2003;57(3):315–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scaffa ME, Gualtieri CL, Cordoba M, et al. Fatigue management: occupational therapy intervention in multiple sclerosis for Argentinean population. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2017;23:971–971.
   Google Scholar
• Blikman LJ, van Meeteren J, Twisk JW, et al. Effectiveness of energy conservation management on fatigue and participation in multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. Mult Scler. 2017;23(11):1527–1541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersche R, Weise A, Michel G, et al. Development and preliminary evaluation of a 3-week Inpatient Energy Management Education (IEME) program for people with multiple sclerosis–related fatigue. Int J MS Care. 2019;21(6):265–274.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hersche R, Weise A, Barbero M, et al. Inpatient Energy Management Education (IEME) for persons with MS–related fatigue. A feasibility study. Age;39:57.
   Google Scholar
• Twomey F, Robinson K. Pilot study of participating in a fatigue management programme for clients with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(10):791–800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kos D, Duportail M, Meirte J, et al. The effectiveness of a self-management occupational therapy intervention on activity performance in individuals with multiple sclerosis-related fatigue: a randomized-controlled trial. Int J Rehabil Res. 2016;39(3):255–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rietberg MB, Van Wegen EE, Kwakkel G. Measuring fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis: reproducibility, responsiveness and concurrent validity of three Dutch self-report questionnaires. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(22):1870–1876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pluye P, Hong QN. Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:29–45.
   Google Scholar
• Hawes F, Billups C, Forwell S. Interventions for upper-limb intention tremor in multiple sclerosis: a feasibility study. Int J MS Care. 2010;12(3):122–132.
   Google Scholar
• Kalron A, Greenberg-Abrahami M, Gelav S, et al. Effects of a new sensory re-education training tool on hand sensibility and manual dexterity in people with multiple sclerosis. NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;32(4):943-948.
   Google Scholar
• Kamm CP, Mattle HP, Müri RM, et al. Home-based training to improve manual dexterity in patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. Mult Scler. 2015;21(12):1546–1556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waliño-Paniagua CN, Gómez-Calero C, Jiménez-Trujillo MI, et al. Effects of a game-based virtual reality video capture training program plus occupational therapy on manual dexterity in patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. J Healthc Eng. 2019;2019:9780587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mark VW, Taub E, Uswatte G, et al. Phase II randomized controlled trial of constraint-induced movement therapy in multiple sclerosis. Part 1: effects on real-world function. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2018;32(3):223–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentry T. PDAs as cognitive aids for people with multiple sclerosis. Am J Occup Ther. 2008;62(1):18–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goverover Y, Chiaravalloti N, DeLuca J. Self-generation to improve learning and memory of functional activities in persons with multiple sclerosis: meal preparation and managing finances. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(8):1514–1521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly S, Hynes SM. A cognitive occupation-based programme for people with multiple sclerosis: a study to test feasibility and clinical outcomes. Occup Ther Int. 2018;2018:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlayson M, Peterson EW, Cho C. Pilot study of a fall risk management program for middle aged and older adults with MS. NRE. 2009;25(2):107–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalina JT, Hinojosa J, Strober L, et al. Randomized controlled trial to improve self-efficacy in people with multiple sclerosis: the Community Reintegration for Socially Isolated Patients (CRISP) program. Am J Occup Ther. 2018;72(5):7205205030p1–7205205030p8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jellie B, Sweetland J, Riazi A, et al. Staying at work and living with MS: a qualitative study of the impact of a vocational rehabilitation intervention. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(19):1594–1599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyssen IC, Steultjens MP, De Groot V, et al. A cluster randomised controlled trial on the efficacy of client-centred occupational therapy in multiple sclerosis: good process, poor outcome. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(19):1636–1646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyssen IC, Dekker J, de Groot V, et al. Client-centred therapy in multiple sclerosis: more intensive diagnostic evaluation and less intensive treatment. J Rehabil Med. 2014;46(6):527–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson CM. Managing fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis. Nursing2019. 2012;42(6):26–29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tompkins SA, Roeder JA, Thomas JJ, et al. Effectiveness of a relationship enrichment program for couples living with multiple sclerosis. Int J MS Care. 2013;15(1):27–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ehde DM, Elzea JL, Verrall AM, et al. Efficacy of a telephone-delivered self-management intervention for persons with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial with a one-year follow-up. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(11):1945–1958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motl RW, Dlugonski D, Wójcicki TR, et al. Internet intervention for increasing physical activity in persons with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2011;17(1):116–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss-Morris R, McCrone P, Yardley L, et al. A pilot randomised controlled trial of an Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy self-management programme (MS Invigor8) for multiple sclerosis fatigue. Behav Res Ther. 2012;50(6):415–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amatya B, Galea MP, Kesselring J, et al. Effectiveness of telerehabilitation interventions in persons with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2015;4(4):358–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamers I, Cattaneo D, Chen CC, et al. Associations of upper limb disability measures on different levels of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in people with multiple sclerosis. Phys Ther. 2015;95(1):65–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vikman T, Fielding P, Lindmark B, et al. Effects of inpatient rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis patients with moderate disability. Adv Physiother. 2008;10(2):58–65.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson P, Freeman C, Coote S, et al. Using functional electrical stimulation mediated by iterative learning control and robotics to improve arm movement for people with multiple sclerosis. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2016;24(2):235–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergaro E, Squeri V, Brichetto G, et al. Adaptive robot training for the treatment of incoordination in Multiple Sclerosis. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2010;7(1):37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalron A, Greenberg-Abrahami M, Gelav S, et al. Effects of a new sensory re-education training tool on hand sensibility and manual dexterity in people with multiple sclerosis. NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;32(4):943–948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keser I, Meric A, Kirdi N, et al. Comparing routine neurorehabilitation programme with callisthenic exercises in multiple sclerosis. NeuroRehabilitation. 2011;29(1):91–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamers I, Maris A, Severijns D, et al. Upper limb rehabilitation in people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016;30(8):773–793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• das Nair R, Martin KJ, Lincoln NB. Memory rehabilitation for people with multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(3):CD008754. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD008754.pub3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein OA, Drummond A, Mhizha-Murira JR, et al. Effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation for people with multiple sclerosis: a meta-synthesis of patient perspectives. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2019;29(4):491–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goverover Y, Chiaravalloti ND, O'Brien AR, et al. Evidenced-based cognitive rehabilitation for persons with multiple sclerosis: an updated review of the literature from 2007 to 2016. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(2):390–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan F, Amatya B. Rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(2):353–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Close J, Ellis M, Hooper R, et al. Prevention of falls in the elderly trial (PROFET): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 1999;353(9147):93–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott S, Leland NE. Occupational therapy fall prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review. Am J Occup Ther. 2018;72(4):7204190040p1–7204190040p1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riazi A, Thompson AJ, Hobart JC. Self-efficacy predicts self-reported health status in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2004;10(1):61–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar